Skip to main content
Log in

The Association between Tea Consumption and the Risk of Fracture: A Dose—Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies

  • Original Research
  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Objectives

Inconsistent results exist on the role of tea consumption on subsequent risk of fracture. A dose-response metaanalysis was therefore conducted to assess the association of tea consumption with the risk of fracture based on prospective cohort studies.

Methods

The electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched to identify prospective cohort studies from inception until September 2020. The categories of high versus low and dose-response meta-analyses for tea consumption on the risk of fracture were calculated using the random-effects model. Eight prospective cohort studies recruited 774,134 individuals selected for the final meta-analysis.

Results

An increment of 1 cup in tea consumption was not associated with the risk of fracture [relative risk (RR), 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.96-1.00; P = 0.102]. Moreover, the highest tea consumption category was associated with a reduced risk of fracture (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98; P = 0.005). Furthermore, heavy (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.98; P = 0.008) and mild (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.00; P = 0.046) tea consumption were associated with lower risk of fracture. However, moderate tea consumption was not associated with the risk of fracture (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94-1.02; P = 0.281).

Conclusion

This study found that increased tea consumption may provide a protective role in the risk of fracture. The benefits of tea consumption should be further explored according to the characteristics of the individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cummings SR, Melton LJ Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet. 2002;359:1761–1767. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08657-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sambrook P, Cooper C Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2006;367:2010–2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68891-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Orsini LS, Rousculp MD, Long SR, Wang S Health care utilization and expenditures in the united states: A study of osteoporosis-related fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:359–371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1694-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnell O, Kanis JA An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:1726–1733. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Si L, Winzenberg TM, Jiang Q, Chen M, Palmer AJ Projection of osteoporosis-related fractures and costs in china: 2010–2050. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26:1929–1937. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3093-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guan JZ, Wu M, Xiao YZ, Zhou JS, Wang ZD Mthfr c677t polymorphism and osteoporotic fracture in postmenopausal women: A meta-analysis. Genet Mol Res. 2014;13:7356–7364. doi:https://doi.org/10.4238/2014.September.12.1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun Y, Liu C, Bo Y, You J, Zhu Y, Duan D, Cui H, Lu Q Dietary vitamin c intake and the risk of hip fracture: A dose-response meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29:79–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4284-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang X, Yu Z, Yu M, Qu X Alcohol consumption and hip fracture risk. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26:531–542. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2879-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shen GS, Li Y, Zhao G, Zhou HB, Xie ZG, Xu W, Chen HN, Dong QR, Xu YJ Cigarette smoking and risk of hip fracture in women: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Injury. 2015;46:1333–1340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hartley L, Flowers N, Holmes J, Clarke A, Stranges S, Hooper L, Rees K Green and black tea for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013:Cd009934. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009934.pub2

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Qi H, Li S Dose-response meta-analysis on coffee, tea and caffeine consumption with risk of parkinson’s disease. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2014;14:430–439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gianfredi V, Nucci D, Abalsamo A, Acito M, Villarini M, Moretti M, Realdon S Green tea consumption and risk of breast cancer and recurrence-a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutrients. 2018;10. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10121886

  13. Xiang W, Gu K, Wang W, Jiang X Tea consumption and risk of fractures: An updated meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30:1941–1951. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-019-05095-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Guo M, Qu H, Xu L, Shi DZ Tea consumption may decrease the risk of osteoporosis: An updated meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutr Res. 2017;42:1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2017.02.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen B, Shi HF, Wu SC Tea consumption didn’t modify the risk of fracture: A dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies. Diagn Pathol. 2014;9:44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-9-44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sheng J, Qu X, Zhang X, Zhai Z, Li H, Liu X, Li H, Liu G, Zhu Z, Hao Y, Qin A, Dai K Coffee, tea, and the risk of hip fracture: A meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25:141–150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2563-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The prisma statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wells G SB, O Connell D (2009) The newcastle-ottawa scale (nos) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa (ON): Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  19. DerSimonian R, Laird N Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ades AE, Lu G, Higgins JP The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models. Med Decis Making. 2005;25:646–654. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x05282643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Orsini N, Bellocco R, Greenland S Generalized least squares for trend estimation of summarized dose-response data. The Stata Journal. 2006;6:40–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0600600103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Deeks JJ, Higgins J, Altman DG (2008) Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins J, Green S (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Oxford, UK, pp 243–296

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj. 2003;327:557–560. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tobias A Assessing the influence of a single study in the meta-analysis estimate. Stata Technical Bulletin. 1999;8:7526–7529

    Google Scholar 

  25. Altman DG, Bland JM Interaction revisited: The difference between two estimates. Bmj. 2003;326:219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7382.219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Bmj. 1997;315:629–634. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Begg CB, Mazumdar M Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–1101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hernandez-Avila M, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Willett WC Caffeine, moderate alcohol intake, and risk of fractures of the hip and forearm in middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;54:157–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/54.1.157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hansen SA, Folsom AR, Kushi LH, Sellers TA Association of fractures with caffeine and alcohol in postmenopausal women: The iowa women’s health study. Public Health Nutr. 2000;3:253–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s136898000000029x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen Z, Pettinger MB, Ritenbaugh C, LaCroix AZ, Robbins J, Caan BJ, Barad DH, Hakim IA Habitual tea consumption and risk of osteoporosis: A prospective study in the women’s health initiative observational cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:772–781. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwg214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hallström H, Wolk A, Glynn A, Michaëlsson K Coffee, tea and caffeine consumption in relation to osteoporotic fracture risk in a cohort of swedish women. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:1055–1064. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0109-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tomata Y, Kakizaki M, Nakaya N, Tsuboya T, Sone T, Kuriyama S, Hozawa A, Tsuji I Green tea consumption and the risk of incident functional disability in elderly japanese: The ohsaki cohort 2006 study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95:732–739. doi:https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.023200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Myers G, Prince RL, Kerr DA, Devine A, Woodman RJ, Lewis JR, Hodgson JM Tea and flavonoid intake predict osteoporotic fracture risk in elderly australian women: A prospective study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102:958–965. doi:https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.109892

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dai Z, Jin A, Soh AZ, Ang LW, Yuan JM, Koh WP Coffee and tea drinking in relation to risk of hip fracture in the singapore chinese health study. Bone. 2018;112:51–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2018.04.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Shen Q, Yu C, Guo Y, Bian Z, Zhu N, Yang L, Chen Y, Luo G, Li J, Qin Y, Chen J, Chen Z, Lv J, Li L Habitual tea consumption and risk of fracture in 0.5 million chinese adults: A prospective cohort study. Nutrients. 2018;10. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10111633

  36. Yun JH, Kim CS, Cho KS, Chai JK, Kim CK, Choi SH (-)-epigallocatechin gallate induces apoptosis, via caspase activation, in osteoclasts differentiated from raw 264.7 cells. J Periodontal Res. 2007;42:212–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2006.00935.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Oka Y, Iwai S, Amano H, Irie Y, Yatomi K, Ryu K, Yamada S, Inagaki K, Oguchi K Tea polyphenols inhibit rat osteoclast formation and differentiation. J Pharmacol Sci. 2012;118:55–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1254/jphs.11082FP

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Shen CL, Chyu MC, Wang JS Tea and bone health: Steps forward in translational nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98:1694s–1699s. doi:https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.058255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by The Training Planned Fund of Academic Leaders, Shanghai Pudong New Area Health System (PWR 12018-09); The Featured Clinical Discipline Project of Shanghai Pudong (PWY ts2018-2); and Key Subject Construction Project of Shanghai Health System (ZK2019B05).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Gao.

Additional information

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, SL., Ma, ZY., Wang, B. et al. The Association between Tea Consumption and the Risk of Fracture: A Dose—Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. J Nutr Health Aging 25, 1046–1052 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-021-1677-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-021-1677-4

Key words

Navigation