Skip to main content
Log in

Worry about Performance: Unravelling the Relationship between ‘Doing More’ and ‘Doing Better’

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Objective

Recent studies have described worry about caregiver performance (WaP) as a distinct dimension of caregiver burden. We aimed to explore care recipient and caregiver characteristics between the concordant and discordant WaP groups in a population of caregivers of older adults with cognitive impairment. The secondary objective is to explore if there are differences between high and low WaP subsets in the ‘doing more’ and ‘doing better’ groups.

Design, setting and participants

This is a retrospective study of 936 dyads of community-dwelling older adults with cognitive complaints and their primary family caregiver from a hospital in Singapore.

Measurements

We performed descriptive and inferential statistics of the characteristics of caregivers and patients. We categorized caregiver-patient dyads into four groups, namely concordant (high vs low WaP) and discordant (‘doing more’ vs ‘doing better’) groups. For both concordant and discordant groups, we further defined low and high WaP subgroups using tertile cutoffs.

Results

The concordant low WaP group is predicted by the spousal relationship (p<.001) and care recipients with fewer neuropsychiatric symptoms (p<.001). There is no significant difference between the discordant groups, which were predominantly the adult children. Further analysis of subgroups found that in the ‘doing better’ group, there were more spouses in the high as compared to low WaP subgroups, with the reverse true in the ‘doing more’ group. In the ‘doing more’ group, caregivers with high WaP also had higher total ZBI (p<0.05) with higher factors (Fl, F2 and F3) scores (p<0.05). They also endorsed higher NPI-Q scores (p=0.045) particularly in the domain of depression / dysphoria (p=0.034). These differences are not seen in the ‘doing better’ group.

Conclusion

Our study suggests an association with caregiver characteristics (adult child) and disruptive behavior in the ‘do more’ high WaP discordant group. Delineating into the high and low WaP subgroups can help us identify the ‘do more’ high WaP subgroup that merits further attention and early intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asia Pacific Members of Alzheimer’s Disease International. Dementia in the Asia Pacific Region: The Epidemic is here. Access Economics Pty Limited; 2006. Available at: http://www.alz.co.uk/research/files/apreport.pdf

  2. Kamiya M, Sakurai T, Ogama N, Maki Y, Toba K. Factors associated with increased caregivers’ burden in several cognitive stages of A lzheimer’s disease. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2014 Apr;14:45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. The Gerontologist. 1980 Dec 1;20(6):649–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yap P. Validity and reliability of the Zarit Burden Interview in assessing caregiving burden. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2010;39:758–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ankri J, Andrieu S, Beaufils B, Grand A, Henrard JC. Beyond the global score of the Zarit Burden Interview: useful dimensions for clinicians. International journal of geriatric psychiatry. 2005 Mar;20(3):254–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheah WK, Han HC, Chong MS, Anthony PV, Lim WS. Multidimensionality of the Zarit Burden Interview across the severity spectrum of cognitive impairment: an Asian perspective. International psychogeriatrics. 2012 Nov;24(11):1846–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lim WS, Cheah WK, Ali N, Han HC, Anthony PV, Chan M et al. Worry about performance: a unique dimension of caregiver burden. International psychogeriatrics. 2014 Apr;26(4):677–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng ST, Kwok T, Lam LC. Dimensionality of burden in Alzheimer caregivers: confirmatory factor analysis and correlates of the Zarit Burden interview. International psychogeriatrics. 2014 Sep;26(9):1455–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S Lau, JP Lim, N Ali, WS Lim (2018). ZBI multidimensionality: The salience of worry about performance. Int Psychogeriatr. Published online 26 Nov 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610218001217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li R, Chong MS, Chan PC, Tay BG, Ali NB, Lim WS. Worry about caregiving Performance: a confirmatory Factor analysis. Frontiers in medicine. 2018 Mar 22;5:79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Swann Jr WB, Chang-Schneider C, Larsen McClarty K. Do people’s self-views matter? Self-concept and self-esteem in everyday life. American Psychologist. 2007 Feb;62(2):84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lawton MP, Kleban MH, Moss M, Rovine M, Glicksman A. Measuring caregiving appraisal. Journal of Gerontology. 1989 May 1;44(3):P61–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu J, Bern-Klug M. “I should be doing more for my parent:” Chinese adult children’s worry about performance in providing care for their oldest-old parents. International psychogeriatrics. 2016 Feb;28(2):303–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J Li, M Cesari, N Del Campo, S Andrieu, B Dong, WS Lim, B Vellas (2018). Impact of Diabetes on Caregiver Stress in Patients with AD: Data from the ICTUS Study. Int Psychogeriatr. Int Psychogeriatr, 30(8):1109–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. KK Win, MS Chong, N Ali, M Chan, WS Lim (2017). Burden among family caregivers of dementia in the oldest-old: An exploratory study. Front. Med. 4:205. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lavoie JP, Ducharme F, Lévesque L, Hébert R, Vézina J, Gendron C et al. Understanding the outcomes of a psycho-educational group intervention for caregivers of persons with dementia living at home: A process evaluation. Aging & Mental Health. 2005 Jan 1;9(1):25–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim WS, Chin JJ, Lam CK, Lim PP, Sahadevan S. Clinical dementia rating: experience of a multi-racial Asian population. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2005;19:135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. International disability studies. 1988 Jan 1;10(2):61–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The gerontologist. 1969 Oct 1;9(3_Part_1):179–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaufer DI, Cummings JL, Ketchel P, Smith V, MacMillan A, Shelley T et al. Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences. 2000 May;12(2):233–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lau S, Chong MS, Ali N, Chan M, Chua KC, Lim WS. Caregiver burden. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders. 2015 Oct 1;29(4):338–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Conde-Sala JL, Garre-Olmo J, Turró-Garriga O, Vilalta-Franch J, López-Pousa S. Differential features of burden between spouse and adult-child caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease: An exploratory comparative design. International journal of nursing studies. 2010 Oct 1;47(10):1262–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan CL, Chui EW. Association between cultural factors and the caregiving burden for Chinese spousal caregivers of frail elderly in Hong Kong. Aging & Mental Health. 2011 May 1;15(4):500–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu H, Wu L, Chen S, Wu Q, Yang Y, Edwards H. Caregiving burden and gain among adult-child caregivers caring for parents with dementia in China: the partial mediating role of reciprocal filial piety. International psychogeriatrics. 2016 Nov;28(11):1845–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Podgorski C. Research on caregiver stress: time for integration and application. International psychogeriatrics. 2018 Aug;30(8):1085–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan EY, Glass G, Chua KC, Ali N, Lim WS. Relationship Between Mastery and Caregiving Competence in Protecting Against Burden, Anxiety and Depression Among Caregivers of Frail Older Adults. The journal of nutrition, health & aging. 2018:1–8.

  27. Cheng ST, Lam LC, Kwok T, Ng NS, Fung AW. Self-efficacy is associated with less burden and more gains from behavioral problems of Alzheimer’s disease in Hong Kong Chinese caregivers. The Gerontologist. 2012 May 4;53(1):71–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kamiya M, Sakurai T, Ogama N, Maki Y, Toba K. Factors associated with increased caregivers’ burden in several cognitive stages of A lzheimer’s disease. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2014 Apr;14:45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Riffin C, Van Ness PH, Wolff JL, Fried T. Multifactorial Examination of Caregiver Burden in a National Sample of Family and Unpaid Caregivers. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2018 Nov 19.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louise Heyzer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest: None.

Ethical Standards: This study was approved by the Domain-Specific Institutional Review Board of the National Health Group, Singapore (NHG DSRB Ref 2011/01251).

Additional information

Description of authors’ roles: L. Heyzer and W.S. Lim designed the study, conducted the statistical analysis, and wrote the first paper; N. Ali, A.P. Chew and M. Chan helped in patient recruitment and data collection, and contributed to the final paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heyzer, L., Ali, N.B., Chew, A.P. et al. Worry about Performance: Unravelling the Relationship between ‘Doing More’ and ‘Doing Better’. J Nutr Health Aging 23, 843–848 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-019-1225-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-019-1225-7

Key words

Navigation