Abstract
In the present work, the coupled effects of initial structure and processing parameters on microstructure of a two-phase titanium alloy were investigated to predict the microstructural evolution in multiple hot working. It is found that microstructure with different constituent phases can be obtained by regulating the initial structure and hot working conditions. The variation of deformation degree and cooling rate can change the morphology of the constituent phases, but do not alter the phase fraction. The phase transformation during heating and holding determines the phase fraction for a certain initial structure. β–α–β transformation occurs during heating and holding. β to α transformation leads to a significant increase in content and size of lamellar α. The α to β transformation occurs simultaneously in equiaxed α and lamellar α. The thickness of lamellar α increases with temperature, which is caused by the vanishing of fine α lamellae due to phase transformation and coarsening by termination migration. By assuming a quasi-equilibrium phase transformation in heating and holding, a modeling approach is proposed for predicting microstructural evolution. The three stages of phase transformation are modeled separately and combined to predict the variation of phase fraction with temperature. Model predictions agree well with the experimental results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lütjering G, Williams JC. Titanium. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2007. 1.
Banerjee D, Williams JC. Perspectives on titanium science and technology. Acta Mater. 2013;61(3):844.
Guo LG, Zhu S, Yang H, Fan XG, Chen FL. Quantitative analysis of microstructure evolution induced by temperature rise during(α + β) deformation of TA15 titanium alloy. Rare Met. 2016;35(3):223.
Fan XG, Yang H, Gao PF, Zuo R, Lei PH. The role of dynamic and post dynamic recrystallization on microstructure refinement in primary working of a coarse grained two-phase titanium alloy. J Mater Process Technol. 2016;234:290.
Bieler TR, Semiatin SL. The origins of heterogeneous deformation during primary hot working of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Plast. 2002;18(9):1165.
Gao J, Li MQ, Li XD, Zhang D, Xue JR, Jiang XQ, Zhang CY, Liu LY. Quantitative analysis on microstructure evolution of Ti-6Al-2Zr-2Sn-2Mo-1.5Cr-2Nb alloy during isothermal compression. Rare Met. 2015;34(9):625.
Meng M, Yang H, Fan XG, Yan SL, Zhao AM, Zhu S. On the modeling of diffusion-controlled growth of primary α in heat treatment of two-phase Ti-alloys. J Alloy Compd. 2017;691:67.
Jia BH, Song WD, Tang HP, Wang ZH, Mao XN, Ning JG. Hot deformation behavior and constitutive model of TC18 alloy during compression. Rare Met. 2014;33(4):383.
Zhu YC, Zeng WD, Feng F, Sun Y, Han YF, Zhou YG. Characterization of hot deformation behavior of as-cast TC21 titanium alloy using processing map. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013;528(3):1757.
Gao PF, Fan XG, Yang H. Role of processing parameters in the development of tri-modal microstructure during isothermal local loading forming of TA15 titanium alloy. J Mater Process Technol. 2017;239:160.
Wang MP, Zhao YQ, Zeng WD. Phase transformation kinetics of Ti-1300 alloy during continuous heating. Rare Met. 2015;34(4):233.
He D, Zhua JC, Zaefferer S, Raabe D, Liu Y, Lai ZL, Yang XW. Influences of deformation strain, strain rate and cooling rate on the Burgers orientation relationship and variants morphology during β → α phase transformation in a near α titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2012;549:20.
Sha W, Guo ZL. Phase evolution of Ti-6Al-4V during continuous heating. J Alloy Compd. 1999;290(1):L3.
Wang YH, Kou HC, Chang H, Zhu ZZ, Su XF, Li JS, Zhou L. Phase transformation in TC21 alloy during continuous heating. J Alloy Compd. 2009;472(1–2):252.
Zhu S, Yang H, Guo LG, Fan XG. Effect of cooling rate on microstructure evolution during α/β heat treatment of TA15 titanium alloy. Mater Charact. 2012;70:101.
Semiatin SL, Kirby BC, Salishchev GA. Coarsening behavior of an α–β titanium alloy. Metall Mater Trans A. 2004;35(9):2809.
Semiatin SL, Corbett MW, Fagin PN, Salishchev GA, Lee CS. Dynamic-coarsening behavior of an α/β titanium alloy. Metall Mater Trans A. 2006;37(4):1125.
Zong YY, Shan DB, Xu M, Lv Y. Flow softening and microstructural evolution of TC11 titanium alloy during hot deformation. J Mater Process Technol. 2009;209(4):1988.
Ma X, Zeng WD, Tian F, Zhou YG. The kinetics of dynamic globularization during hot working of a two phase titanium alloy with starting lamellar microstructure. Mater Sci Eng A. 2012;548:6.
Wang K, Li MQ. Effects of heat treatment and hot deformation on the secondary α phase evolution of TC8 titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014;613:209.
Semiatin SL, Lehner TM, Miller JD, Doherty RD, Furrer DU. Alpha/beta heat treatment of a titanium alloy with a nonuniform microstructure. Metall Mater Trans A. 2007;38(4):910.
Carslaw HS, Jaeger JC. Conduction of Heat in Solids. London: Oxford University Press; 1959. 28.
Aaron HB, Fainstein D, Kotler GR. Diffusion-limited phase transformations: a comparison and critical evaluation of the mathematical approximations. J Appl Phys. 1970;41(11):4404.
Sha W, Malinov S. Titanium Alloys: Modeling of Microstructure, Properties and Applications. Cambridge: Woodhead; 2009. 117.
Gao XX, Zeng WD, Zhang SF, Wang QJ. A study of epitaxial growth behaviors of equiaxed α phase at different cooling rates in near alpha titanium alloy. Acta Mater. 2017;122:298.
Fan XG, Yang H, Gao PF. Prediction of constitutive behavior and microstructure evolution in hot deformation of TA15 titanium alloy. Mater Des. 2013;51:34.
Elmer JW, Palmer TA, Babu SS, Specht ED. In situ observations of lattice expansion and transformation rates of α and β phases in Ti–6Al–4V. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005;391(1–2):104.
Barriobero-Vila P, Requena G, Buslaps T, Alfeld M, Boesenberg U. Role of element partitioning on the α–β phase transformation kinetics of a bi-modal Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn alloy during continuous heating. J Alloy Compd. 2015;626:330.
Bein S, Bechet J. Comparative approach of phase transformations in titanium alloys Ti-6246, β-Cez and Ti-1023 using dilatometric analysis and electrical resistivity measurements. In: Titanium 95—Science and Technology. Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Titanium. London: Institute of Materials. 1996. 2353.
Sun ZC, Guo SS, Yang H. Nucleation and growth mechanism of α-lamellae of Ti alloy TA15 cooling from an α + β phase field. Acta Mater. 2013;61(6):2057.
Grong Ø, Shercliff HR. Microstructural modelling in metals processing. Prog Mater Sci. 2002;47(2):163.
Pande CS, Rajagopal AK. Uniqueness and self similarity of size distributions in grain growth and coarsening. Acta Mater. 2001;49(10):1805.
Mei MJ, Yang H, Fan XG. Quantitative analysis of the microstructure under multi-pass thermal cycle of TA15 titanium alloy. J Plast Eng. 2014;21(4):79.
Fan XG, Gao PF, Yang H. Microstructure evolution of the transitional region in isothermal local loading of TA15 titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011;528(6):2694.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51575449), the 111 Project (B08040) and the Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China (No. 104-QP-2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fan, XG., Zheng, HJ., Gao, PF. et al. Phase fraction evolution in hot working of a two-phase titanium alloy: experiment and modeling. Rare Met. 36, 769–779 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-017-0950-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-017-0950-5