Advertisement

Taking a Risk Perception Approach to Improving Beach Swimming Safety

  • J. McCoolEmail author
  • S. Ameratunga
  • K. Moran
  • E. Robinson
Article

Abstract

Background

Beach swimming is generally associated with a healthy lifestyle, yet the risk of drowning is universally significant.

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to investigate the factors associated with safe swimming behavior using protection motivation theory as a guiding theoretical framework.

Method

This cross-sectional study surveyed a sample of beachgoers (N = 3371) aged ≥16 years who completed an anonymous, self-report questionnaire to assess the associations between perceptions of the risk of drowning and safe swimming behavior.

Results

Compared with males, females perceived greater severity, vulnerability, response efficacy, and concern regarding their risk of drowning. Males, Maori, and 16 to 29 year olds reported higher self-efficacy scores compared to females, other ethnic groups, and older participants, respectively. After controlling for confounding variables, people perceiving a greater threat (severity) of experiencing difficulty while swimming as well as those reporting higher response efficacy (beliefs about the effectiveness of drowning prevention measures) were more likely to report safe swimming behavior.

Conclusion

The effectiveness of water safety education programs could be strengthened by enhancing risk appraisal and coping skills and counter-acting the tendency of males and younger adults to overestimate their swimming ability and underestimate their risk with regard to drowning.

Keywords

Recreational swimming Drowning prevention Risk perception Water safety 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), the advice of the drowning prevention experts who commented on the draft questionnaire, and the participants who contributed their valuable leisure time completing the questionnaire.

References

  1. 1.
    Water Safety New Zealand. Water safety—profile. Wellington: Water Safety New Zealand; 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sport and Recreation Council [SPARC]. (2002). How do we participate in sport and active leisure? Retrieved 21 January 2003 from http://www.pushplay.org.nz
  3. 3.
    Langley JD, Warner M, Smith G, Wright C. Drowning-related deaths in New Zealand, 1980–1994. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25(5):451–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cummings P, Quan L. Trends in unintentional drowning: the role of alcohol and medical care. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;281(23):2198–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mackie IJ. Patterns of drowning in Australia, 1992–1997. Med J Aust. 1999;171:587–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Surf Life Saving New Zealand. The lifesaving report. Wellington: Surf Life Saving New Zealand; 2007.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moran K. New Zealand Youth Water Safety Survey 2003. Wellington: Water Safety New Zealand; 2003.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gulliver P, Begg D. Usual water-related behavior and ‘near-drowning’ incidents in young adults. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005;29(3):238–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Langley JD, Smeijers J. Injury mortality among children and teenagers in New Zealand compared with the United States. Inj Prev. 1997;3:195–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moran K. Re-thinking drowning risk: the role of water safety knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours in the aquatic recreation of New Zealand youth. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Palmerston North: Massey University; 2006.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bell NS, Amoroso PJ, Yore MM, Senier L, Williams JO, Smith GS, et al. Alcohol and other risk factors among male active duty U.S. Army soldiers. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2001;72:1086–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith GS, Keyl P, Hadley JA, Bartley CL, Foss RD, Tolbert WG, et al. Drinking and recreational boating fatalities: a population-based case control study. J Am Med Assoc. 2001;286(23):2974–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Driscoll TR, Harrison JA, Steenkamp M. Review of the role of alcohol in drowning associated with recreational aquatic activity. Inj Prev. 2004;10(2):107–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Quan L, Cummings P. Characteristics of drowning by different age groups. Inj Prev. 2003;9(2):163–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith GS, Brenner R. The changing risks of drowning for adolescents in the U.S. and effective control strategies. Adolescent Medicine: The State of the Art Reviews. 1995;6(2):153–69.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Howland J, Hingson R, Mangione TW, Bell N, Bak S. Why are most drowning victims men? Sex differences in aquatic skills and behaviors. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:93–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baker SP, O'Neil B, Ginsburg MJ, Li G. The injury fact book. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schuman SH, Rowe JR, Glazer HM, Redding JS. Risk of drowning: an iceberg phenomenon. JACEP. 1977;6:139–43.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McCool J, Moran K, Robinson E, Ameratunga S. New Zealand beachgoers' swimming behaviors, abilities and perception of drowning risk. International Journal of Aquatic Education and Research. 2008;2(1):7–15.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Millstein SG. Halpern-Felsher BL Perceptions of risk and vulnerability. J Adolesc Health. 2002;31S:10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rogers R. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear-based attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. In: Caccioppo J, Petty R, editors. Social psychophysiology: a source-book. New York: Guilford; 1983. p. 153–76.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Floyd DL, Prentice-Dunn S, Rogers RW. A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2000;30(2):407–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McClendon BT, Prentice-Dunn S. Reducing skin cancer: an intervention based on protection motivation theory. J Health Psychol. 2001;6(3):321–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cameron LD. Illness risk representations and motivations to engage in protective behavior: the case of skin cancer risk. Psychology and Health. 2008;23:91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Robertson LS. The validity of self-reported behavioral risk factors. J Trauma. 1992;32:58–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Azjen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. McCool
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Ameratunga
    • 2
  • K. Moran
    • 3
  • E. Robinson
    • 2
  1. 1.Section of Social and Community Health, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health ScienceUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population HealthUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.Health and Physical Education, Faculty of EducationUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations