What do participants think of today’s MOOCs: an updated look at the benefits and challenges of MOOCs designed for working professionals
Literature on MOOCs has shown that understanding learners’ perspectives in taking MOOCs is critical if a MOOC needs to be successful. Now that MOOCs have been in wide use, in this study we took an updated look at learners’ perspective of taking MOOCs designed for working professionals and course aspects that these MOOC participants found beneficial. General interest in the topic, personal growth and enrichment, relevance to job, and career change were the top reasons for working professionals to enroll in MOOCs. First-time MOOC takers were more likely to seek a certificate, while MOOC veterans may complete most assignments but did not seek for a certificate. Quality materials from a reputable provider remains an important reason for working professionals to enroll in a MOOC. Offering meaningful ways for MOOC participants to interact with instructors and with each other calls for innovative designs than the current discussion forums in a learning management system can offer. This remains to be a big challenge for MOOC designers.
KeywordsMOOCs Learners’ perspective Reasons MOOCs for working professionals Course features
We would like to thank Professor Rosental Calmon Alves, Director of Knight Center for Journalism in the Americas at the University of Texas at Austin for his encouragement and support for this research.
This study was not funded.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Alario-Hoyos, C., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Delgado Kloos, C., & Parada, G. H. A. (2016). Who are the top contributors in a MOOC? Relating participants’ performance and contributions. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 32(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bennett, Elizabeth E. (2012). A four-part model of informal learning: Extending Schugurensky’s conceptual model, Presented at Adult Education Research Conference. NY: Saratoga Springs.Google Scholar
- Bezerra, L. N. M., & da Silva, M. T. (2017). A review of literature on the reasons that cause the high dropout rates in the MOOCS. Revista Espacios, 38(5), 11. Retrieved from http://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n05/a17v38n05p11.pdf.
- Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 13–25. Retrieved from http://www.rpajournal.com/dev/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/SF2.pdf.
- Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Khalil, H. & Ebner, M. (2014). MOOCs completion rates and possible methods to improve retention—A literature review. In J. Viteli & M. Leikomaa (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2014—World conference on educational media and technology (pp. 1305–1313). Tampere, Finland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/147656/.
- Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 170–179). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460330.
- Knowles, M. (1975). Self-Directed Learning. Chicago: Follet.Google Scholar
- Knowles, M. (1984). The adult learner: A neglected species (3rd ed.). Houston: Gulf Publishing.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Littlejohn A., & Margaryan A. (2014) Technology-enhanced professional learning. In: S. Billett, C. Harteis, H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_43.
- McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. Charlottetown: University of Prince Edward Island.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/milligan_0613.pdf.
- Nawrot, I., & Doucet, A. (2014). Building engagement for MOOC students: Introducing support for time management on online learning platforms. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on world wide web (pp. 1077–1082). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2580054.
- Schugurensky, D. (2000). The forms of informal learning: Towards a conceptualization of the field. WALL working paper #19-2000. Retrieved from http://www.nall.ca/res/19formsofinformal.htm.
- Shapiro, H. B., Lee, C. H., Wyman Roth, N. E., Li, K., Çetinkaya-Rundel, M., & Canelas, D. A. (2017). Understanding the massive open online course (MOOC) student experience: An examination of attitudes, motivations, and barriers. Computers & Education, 110, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stewart, B. (2013). Massiveness + openness = New literacies of participation? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 228-238. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/stewart_bonnie_0613.pdf.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Richardson, J., & Loizzo, J. (2016). Instructor’s use of social presence, teaching presence, and attitudinal dissonance: A case study of an attitudinal change MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2379.Google Scholar
- Zheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Understanding student motivation, behaviors and perceptions in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 1882–1895). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675217.