Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of user perceptions of SAP ERP system on user learning and skills

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the effects of playfulness and anxiety as perceived by users in relation to SAP enterprise resource planning (ERP) system on users’ learning of business processes and users’ skills to use the system. Data was collected from a survey of college students who took a course on business process integration with ERP system where students used SAP ERP system to complete course works on business processes. System playfulness is found to have a small positive effect on user learning and skills without any control but the positive effect disappears after controlling for gender and prior experiences. System anxiety is found to have a large negative effect on both user learning and skills. These results suggest that enhancing the playfulness of SAP ERP system can help improve the user’s learning of business processes and the user's skills to use the system, but that reducing the anxiety of the system is far more important in improving the user’s learning of business processes and the user’s skills to use the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 0.02 for small effect size, 0.15 for medium effect size and 0.35 for large effect size (Cohen 1988).

References

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. Management Information Systems Quarterly,9(2), 89–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkhani, N., Soltani, S., & Ahmad, M. N. (2014). The effects of transformational leadership and ERP system self-efficacy on ERP system usage. Journal of Enterprise Information Management,27(6), 759–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ERPsim. (2019). ERPsim, the business simulation for SAP. Retrieved from https://erpsim.hec.ca/en/erpsim. Accessed on 2 March 2019.

  • Ganzel, R. (1998). Feeling squeezed by technology? Training,35(4), 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattiker, T. F., & Goodhue, D. L. (2005). What happens after ERP implementation: Understanding the impact of interdependence on plant-level outcomes. MIS Quarterly,29(3), 559–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackbarth, G., Grover, V., & Yi, M. Y. (2003). Computer playfulness and anxiety: Positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use. Information & Management,40, 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzig, P., Strahringer, S., & Ameling, M. (2012). Gamification of ERP systems—Exploring gamification effects on user acceptance constructs. In Proceedings of the MKWI 2012 (pp. 793–804).

  • Hsu, C., Chang, K., & Chen, M. (2012). The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and purchase intention: Perceived playfulness and perceived flow as mediators. Information Systems and e-Business Management,10(4), 549–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, S. Y., & Liang, T. P. (2001). Effect of computer self-efficacy on the use of executive support systems. Industrial Management & Data Systems,101(5), 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jashapara, A., & Tai, W. (2011). Knowledge mobilization through e-learning systems: Understanding the mediating roles of self-efficacy and anxiety on perceptions of ease of use. Information Systems Management,28(1), 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, J., Park, J., Ji, H., Yang, Y., & Lim, H. (2016). A study on factor analysis to support knowledge based decisions for a smart class. Information Technology and Management,17(1), 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laosethakul, K., & Leingpibul, T. (2010). Why females do not choose computing? A lesson learned from China. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal,4(3), 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauchlan, S. (2017). How SAP became the world’s third largest independent software supplier. Retrieved from http://www.computerweekly.com/feature/How-SAP-became-the-worlds-third-largest-independent-software-supplier. Accessed on 10 Oct 2018.

  • Magal, S. M. & Word, J. (2017). Business Process Integration with SAP ERP. Frisco, Texas: Epistemy Press LLC.

  • Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research information. Information Systems Research,9(2), 126–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouakket, S. (2010). Extending the technology acceptance model to investigate the utilization of ERP systems. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems,6(4), 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. H., Suh, H. J., & Yang, H. D. (2007). Perceived absorptive capacity of individual users in performance of enterprise resource planning (ERP) usage: The case for Korean firms. Information & Management,44(3), 300–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saadé, R. G., & Kira, D. (2009). Computer anxiety in e-learning: The effect of computer self-efficacy. Journal of Information Technology Education,8, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAP University Alliances. (2018). SAP University alliances: Building talent for the digital future. Retrieved from http://www.sap.com/training-certification/university-alliances.html. Accessed on 10 Oct 2018.

  • Simonson, M. R., Maurer, M., Montag-Torardi, M., & Whitaker, M. (1987). Development of a standardized test of computer literacy and a computer anxiety index. Journal of Educational Computing Research,3(2), 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzis, V., Moridis, C. N., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Continuance acceptance of computer based assessment through the integration of user’s expectations and perceptions. Computers & Education,62, 50–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, Y., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science,46(2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. (1989). Playfulness and computers at work. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, New York University.

  • Webster, J., & Martocchio, J. J. (1992). Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quarterly,16(2), 201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildstrom, S. H. (1998). They’re mad as hell out there. Business Week,3600, 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support for travel expenses pertaining to this study was provided by the Institute for International Business of the Stillman School of Business at Seton Hall University for Sung J. Shim. We highly appreciate the reviewers’ insightful and helpful comments on our earlier manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung J. Shim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shim, S.J., Shim, M.K. Effects of user perceptions of SAP ERP system on user learning and skills. J Comput High Educ 32, 41–56 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09218-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09218-x

Keywords

Navigation