Instructional guidance in microblogging-supported learning: insights from a multiple case study
- 368 Downloads
Microblogging tools such as Twitter show potential to enrich classroom experience and benefit student learning. Research shows that instructional guidance is particularly necessary in computer-assisted learning environments, but no research has been done to study the effects of instructional guidance in microblogging-based learning. Using a multiple-case study design, the researcher examined student learning in terms of the amount of participation, ability to focus on task, and depth of thinking in guided, semi-guided, and unguided modes. The findings suggest that in guided environments, students achieved higher levels of learning, especially with respect to focusing on task and depth of thinking. Variations in depth of learning existed between the semi-guided and the guided mode. Students’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of using microblogging across three cases were also analyzed. The study has implications for future research on using microblogging tools for educational purposes and pedagogical practice.
KeywordsMicroblogging Twitter Computer-mediated communication Social media Interactive learning environments Instructional guidance
- Agherdien, N. (2011). Twitter and Edulink: Balancing passive consumption with knowledge creation. In Proceedings of the international conference on e-learning, pp. 489–492.Google Scholar
- An, Y.-J. (2010). Scaffolding wiki-based, ill-structured problem solving in an online environment. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no4/an_1210.htm.
- Baddeley, A. D. (1999). Essentials of human memory. UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Clark, R. E., Kirschner, P. A., & Sweller, J. (2012). Putting students on the path to learning: the case for fully guided instruction. American Educator, 36(1), 6–11.Google Scholar
- Cohen, A., & Duchan, G. (2012). The usage characteristics of Twitter in the learning process. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 8(1), 149–163. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/44767.
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Costa, C., Beham, G., Reinhardt, W., & Sillaots, M. (2008). Microblogging in technology enhanced learning: A use-case inspection of PPE summer school 2008. In Paper presented at the workshop on social information retrieval for technology enhanced learning.Google Scholar
- Davis III, C. H. F., Deil-Amen, R., Rios-Aguilar, C., & González Canché, M. S. (2013). Social media and higher education: A literature review and research directions. Report printed by the University of Arizona and Claremont Graduate University. Retrieved Feb 27, 2013 from http://works.bepress.com/hfdavis/2/.
- Divaharan, S., & Lim, C. P. (2010). Secondary school socio-cultural context influencing ICT integration: A case study approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 741–763. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/divaharan-2.html.
- Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). Tweeting the night away: Using twitter to enhance social presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 129–155.Google Scholar
- Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
- Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (p. c1997). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Brookline Books.Google Scholar
- Holotescu, C., & Grosseck, G. (2009). Using microblogging in education. Case study: Cirip.ro. Paper presented at the 6th conference on e-learning applications, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
- Ito, M., Bittanti, M., Horst, A., Horst, H., Pascoe, C. J., Robinson, L., et al. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, c2010.Google Scholar
- Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage andcommunities. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis, San Jose, California. Google Scholar
- Kop, R., Fournier, H. & Mak, J. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 74–93. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1041/2025.
- Luo, T., & Gao, F. (2012). Enhancing classroom learning experience by providing structures to microblogging-based activities. Journal of Information Technology Education, 11, 199–211.Google Scholar
- Mcglathery, G. (1978). Analyzing the questioning behaviors of science teachers. In M. B. Rowe (Ed.), What research says to the science teacher (Vol. 1, pp. 13–30). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.Google Scholar
- Mcwilliams, J., Hickey, D. T., Hines, M. B., Conner, J. M., & Bishop, S. C. (2010). Voices from the field: using collaborative writing tools for literary analysis: Twitter, fan fiction and the crucible in the secondary English classroom. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 3(3), 238–245.Google Scholar
- Naaman, M., Boase, J., & Lai, C. (2010). Is it really about me?: Message content in social awareness streams. In Proceedings ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, Savannah, Georgia, USA. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1718918.1718953.
- Novak, J., & Canas, A. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Pensacola, FL. Retrieved from http://cmap.ihmc.us/publications/researchpapers/theorycmaps/theoryunderlyingconceptmaps.htm.
- Paloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2001). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom—The realities of online teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Salmon, G. (2004). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar