Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting suitable timing for artificial reproductive technology treatment in aged infertile women

  • Minireview
  • Published:
Reproductive Medicine and Biology

Abstract

It has been widely accepted that the age of women plays a fundamental role in fecundity, and age-related fertility decline has one of the most significant and detrimental effects on the success rate of infertility treatment. Therefore, treatment cycles of non-in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment for infertile women of advanced aged have been limited due to their lack of efficacy, and they are often optimized, compared to IVF/ICSI treatment. Recent trends in infertility treatment apparently indicate that IVF/ICSI treatment, including egg donation, is frequently offered to aged women for first-line management, despite its heavy burden, but hasty IVF/ICSI treatment should be avoided, considering its socioeconomic problems. It is important to distinguish women who could conceive by non-IVF/ICSI treatment, although the optimization of non-IVF/ICSI treatment protocols remains poorly understood. This review focuses on extracting aged patients who have higher chance of conceiving with non-IVF/ICSI treatment and providing necessary and sufficient infertility treatment. After initial evaluation for fertility, including tubal factor, male factor, the presence of endometriosis and/or adenomyosis, and ovarian reserve, the outcomes of fertility treatment can be predicted to some extent in aged infertile women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AFC:

Antral follicle count

AMH:

Anti-Müllerian hormone

ART:

Assisted reproductive technology

ASRM:

American society for reproductive medicine

BMI:

Body mass index

CC:

Clomiphene citrate

CPR:

Cumulative pregnancy rate

GS:

Gestational sac

hMG:

Human menopausal gonadotropin

ICSI:

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection

IUI:

Intrauterine insemination

IVF:

In vitro fertilization

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

rFSH:

Recombinant FSH

PR:

Pregnancy rates

References

  1. ACOG Committee Opinion. Age-related fertility decline. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:409–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dew JE, Don RA, Hughes GJ, Johnson TC, Steigrad SJ. The influence of advanced age on the outcome of assisted reproduction. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15:210–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ziebe S, Devroey P. Assisted reproductive technologies are an integrated part of national strategies addressing demographic and reproductive challenges. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:583–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barton M, Walker K, Wiesner BP. Artificial insemination. Br Med J. 1945;1:40–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Frederick JL, Denker MS, Rojas A, Horta I, Stone SC, Asch RH, Balmaceda JP. Is there a role for ovarian stimulation and intra-uterine insemination after age 40? Hum Reprod. 1994;9:2284–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lass A, Croucher C, Duffy S, Dawson K, Margara R, Winston RM. One thousand initiated cycles of in vitro fertilization in women > or = 40 years of age. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:1030–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsafrir A, Simon A, Revel A, Reubinoff B, Lewin A, Laufer N. Retrospective analysis of 1217 IVF cycles in women aged 40 years and older. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:348–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marinakis G, Nikolaou D. National survey of the current management of infertility in women aged 40 and over in the UK. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;32:375–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Corsan G, Trias A, Trout S, Kemmann E. Ovulation induction combined with intrauterine insemination in women 40 years of age and older: is it worthwhile? Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1109–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Japan.Society.of.Reproductive Medicine, http://plaza.umin.ac.jp/~jsog-art/, Accessed 3 7 2016.

  11. Brandes M, van der Steen JO, Bokdam SB, Hamilton CJ, de Bruin JP, Nelen WL, Kremer JA. When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population, Hum Reprod. 2009;24:3127–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Speyer BE, Abramov B, Saab W, Doshi A, Sarna U, Harper JC, Serhal P. Factors influencing the outcome of intrauterine insemination (IUI): age, clinical variables and significant thresholds. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33:697–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Westerlaken LA, Naaktgeboren N, Helmerhorst FM. Evaluation of pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination according to indication, age, and sperm parameters. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15:359–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tomas C, Bloigu R, Tuomivaara L, Martikainen H. Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility: an analysis of factors affecting outcome. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:698–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Isono W, Wada-Hiraike O, Shirane A, Fujimoto A, Osuga Y, Yano T, Taketani Y. Alternative strategies to in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment for aged infertile women. Reprod Med Biol. 2011;11:69–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dickey RP, Taylor SN, Lu PY, Sartor BM, Rye PH, Pyrzak R. Effect of diagnosis, age, sperm quality, and number of preovulatory follicles on the outcome of multiple cycles of clomiphene citrate-intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:1088–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. World Health Organization, WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction Cambridge University Press, 2010.

  18. American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Endometriosis, A Guide for Patients https://www.asrm.org/BOOKLET_Endometriosis Accessed 3 7 2016.

  19. Marcoux S, Maheux R, Berube S. Laparoscopic surgery in infertile women with minimal or mild endometriosis. Canadian Collaborative Group on Endometriosis, N Engl J Med. 1997;337:217–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ozkan S, Murk W, Arici A. Endometriosis and infertility: epidemiology and evidence-based treatments. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2008;1127:92–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Buyalos RP, Agarwal SK. Endometriosis-associated infertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2000;12:377–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu HM, Tzeng CR, Chen CH, Chen PH. Pelvic endometriosis with peritoneal fluid reduces pregnancy rates in women undergoing intrauterine insemination. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;52:512–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eskenazi B, Warner ML. Epidemiology of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1997;24:235–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moradi M, Parker M, Sneddon A, Lopez V, Ellwood D. Impact of endometriosis on women’s lives: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis, mapping, and measurement of uterine myomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:409–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang JQ, Lathi RB, Lemyre M, Rodriguez HE, Nezhat CH, Nezhat C. Coexistence of endometriosis in women with symptomatic leiomyomas. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:720–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hemmings R, Rivard M, Olive DL, Poliquin-Fleury J, Gagne D, Hugo P, Gosselin D. Evaluation of risk factors associated with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1513–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Isono W, Wada-Hiraike O, Osuga Y, Yano T, Taketani Y. Diameter of dominant leiomyoma is a possible determinant to predict coexistent endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;162:87–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. La Marca A, Sighinolfi G, Radi D, Argento C, Baraldi E, Artenisio AC, Stabile G, Volpe A. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:113–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li HWR, Yeung WSB, Lau EYL, Ho PC, Ng EHY. Evaluating the performance of serum antimullerian hormone concentration in predicting the live birth rate of controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:2177–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. La Marca A, Volpe A. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) in female reproduction: is measurement of circulating AMH a useful tool? Clin Endocrinol. 2006;64:603–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Plosker SM, Jacobson W, Amato P. Predicting and optimizing success in an intra-uterine insemination programme. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:2014–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dovey S, Sneeringer RM, Penzias AS. Clomiphene citrate and intrauterine insemination: analysis of more than 4100 cycles. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2281–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Haebe J, Martin J, Tekepety F, Tummon I, Shepherd K. Success of intrauterine insemination in women aged 40–42 years. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:29–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wyatt PR, Owolabi T, Meier C, Huang T. Age-specific risk of fetal loss observed in a second trimester serum screening population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:240–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tsafrir A, Simon A, Margalioth EJ, Laufer N. What should be the first-line treatment for unexplained infertility in women over 40 years of age—ovulation induction and IUI, or IVF? Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19(Suppl 4):4334.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Veltman-Verhulst SM, Cohlen BJ, Hughes E, Heineman MJ. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:CD001838.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ferrara I, Balet R, Grudzinskas JG. Intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm. Pregnancy outcome in relation to age and ovarian stimulation regime, Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2320–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Belloc S, Cohen-Bacrie P, Benkhalifa M, Cohen-Bacrie M, De Mouzon J, Hazout A, Menezo Y. Effect of maternal and paternal age on pregnancy and miscarriage rates after intrauterine insemination. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:392–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. W.s. National Collaborating Centre for, H. Children’s, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Guidance, Fertility: Assessment and Treatment for People with Fertility Problems, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health, London, 2013.

  41. Practice M. Committee of the American Society for Reproductive. Use of clomiphene citrate in infertile women: a committee opinion, Fertil Steril. 2013;100:341–8.

    Google Scholar 

  42. UpToDate, http://www.uptodate.com/contents/unexplained-infertility, Accessed 3 7 2016.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This report was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, The Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research, and The Nakatomi Foundation. This report was also supported by the Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. The authors would like to thank American Journal Experts (http://www.aje.com) for the English language review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osamu Wada-Hiraike.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

These authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human rights statements and informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human subjects performed by any of the authors.

Animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akino, N., Isono, W. & Wada-Hiraike, O. Predicting suitable timing for artificial reproductive technology treatment in aged infertile women. Reprod Med Biol 15, 253–259 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12522-016-0241-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12522-016-0241-0

Keywords

Navigation