Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pregnancy Outcomes for Day 5 Versus Day 6 Single Frozen-thawed Blastocyst Transfer with Different Qualities of Embryos: A Large Matched-cohort Study

  • Published:
Current Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to determine whether the day of blastocyst expansion affects pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT) cycles.

Methods

A retrospective match-cohort study was conducted. Patients who underwent blastocyst transfer in frozen-thawed cycles at day 5 or 6 were matched for potential confounding factors. A total of 2207 matched pairs of FBT cycles were included from January 2016 to December 2019 in our Reproductive Medicine Center.

Results

The clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) were significantly increased in day 5 blastocyst transfers when compared to day 6 blastocyst transfers, in terms of the same embryo quality. For FBT cycles with good-quality embryo, the CPR at day 5 and 6 was 61.30% and 57.56%, respectively (P=0.045), and the LBR was 44.79% and 36.16%, respectively (P<0.001). For FBT cycles with poor-quality embryo, the CPR at day 5 and 6 was 48.61% and 40.89%, respectively (P=0.006), and the LBR was 31.71% and 25.74%, respectively (P=0.019). The CPR for FBT cycles with good-quality embryo was statistically higher at day 6 than that at day 5 with poor-quality embryo transferred (57.56% vs. 48.61%, P=0.001). Maternal age, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), endometrial thickness, embryo quality, and the day of blastocyst expansion were independently correlated with the CPR and LBR. The FBT cycles at day 5 had significantly higher CPR (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=1.246, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.097–1.415, P=0.001) and LBR (adjusted OR=1.435, 95% CI: 1.258–1.637, P<0.001) than those at day 6.

Conclusion

The embryo quality is the primary indicator for FBT cycles. Day 5 blastocysts should be preferred when the quality of embryo at day 5 is the same as that at day 6.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glujovsky D, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Alvarez Sedo CR, et al. Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2022,5:CD002118

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ma S, Peng Y, Hu L, et al. Comparisons of benefits and risks of single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2022,20(1):20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Long X, Wang Y, Wu F, et al. Pregnancy Outcomes of Single/Double Blastocysts and Cleavage Embryo Transfers: a Retrospective Cohort Study of 24,422 Frozen-Thawed Cycles. Reprod Sci, 2020,27(12):2271–2278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gardner D, Lane M, Stevens J, et al. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril, 2000,73(6):1155–1158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bourdon M, Pocate-Cheriet K, Finet de Bantel A, et al. Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. Hum Reprod, 2019,34(10):1948–1964

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, et al. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryoendometrium synchrony. Fertil Steril, 2008,89(1):20–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozgur K, Berkkanoglu M, Bulut H, et al. Perinatal outcomes after fresh versus vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: retrospective analysis. Fertil Steril, 2015,104(4):899–907 e893.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozgur K, Berkkanoglu M, Bulut H, et al. Higher clinical pregnancy rates from frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers compared to fresh blastocyst transfers: a retrospective matched-cohort study. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2015,32(10):1483–1490

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Patounakis G, et al. Investigating the impact of the timing of blastulation on implantation: management of embryo-endometrial synchrony improves outcomes. Hum Reprod, 2018,2018(4):hoy022

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haas J, Meriano J, Laskin C, et al. Clinical pregnancy rate following frozen embryo transfer is higher with blastocysts vitrified on day 5 than on day 6. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2016,33(12):1553–1557

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Desai N, Ploskonka S, Goodman L, et al. Delayed blastulation, multinucleation, and expansion grade are independently associated with live-birth rates in frozen blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril, 2016,106(6):1370–1378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferreux L, Bourdon M, Sallem A, et al. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6. Hum Reprod, 2018,33(3):390–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tubbing A, Shaw-Jackson C, Ameye L, et al. Increased live births after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2018,35(3):417–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaye L, Will EA, Bartolucci A, et al. Pregnancy rates for single embryo transfer (SET) of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts after cryopreservation by vitrification and slow freeze. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2017,34(7):913–919

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. El-Toukhy T, Wharf E, Walavalkar R, et al. Delayed blastocyst development does not influence the outcome of frozen-thawed transfer cycles. BJOG, 2011,118(13):1551–1556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 1999,11(3):307–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lédée N, Munaut C, Aubert J, et al. Specific and extensive endometrial deregulation is present before conception in IVF/ICSI repeated implantation failures (IF) or recurrent miscarriages. Int J Exp Pathol, 2011,225(4):554–564

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sunkara S, Siozos A, Bolton V, et al. The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod, 2010,25(8):1906–1915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang H, Yang Q, Dai S, et al. Comparison of differences in development potentials between frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2016,33(7):865–872

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor TH, Patrick JL, Gitlin SA, et al. Comparison of aneuploidy, pregnancy and live birth rates between day 5 and day 6 blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online, 2014,29(3):305–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaing A, Kroener LL, Tassin R, et al. Earlier day of blastocyst development is predictive of embryonic euploidy across all ages: essential data for physician decision-making and counseling patients. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2018,35(1):119–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tong J, Niu Y, Wan A, et al. Comparison of day 5 blastocyst with day 6 blastocyst: Evidence from NGS-based PGT-A results. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2022,39(2):369–377

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Irani M, O’Neill C, Palermo GD, et al. Blastocyst development rate influences implantation and live birth rates of similarly graded euploid blastocysts. Fertil Steril, 2018,110(1):95–102 e101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yan J, Wu K, Tang R, et al. Effect of maternal age on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Sci China Life Sci, 2012,55(8):694–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang Z, Zhu LL, Jiang HS, et al. Predictors of pregnancy outcome for infertile couples attending IVF and ICSI programmes. Andrologia, 2016,48(9):874–881

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Alson S, Bungum L, Giwercman A, et al. Antimüllerian hormone levels are associated with live birth rates in ART, but the predictive ability of anti-müllerian hormone is modest. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2018,225:199–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tal R, Seifer D, Wantman E, et al. Antimüllerian hormone as a predictor of live birth following assisted reproduction: an analysis of 85,062 fresh and thawed cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database for 2012–2013. Fertil Steril, 2018,109(2):258–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bu Z, Yang X, Song L, et al. The impact of endometrial thickness change after progesterone administration on pregnancy outcome in patients transferred with single frozen-thawed blastocyst. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2019,17(1):99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, et al. Endometrial pattern, thickness and growth in predicting pregnancy outcome following 3319 IVF cycle. Reprod Biomed Online, 2014,29(3):291–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang J, Wang Y, Liu H, et al. Effect of in vitro culture period on birth weight after vitrified-warmed transfer cycles: analysis of 4,201 singleton newborns. Fertil Steril, 2019,111(1):97–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang N, Zhao X, Ma M, et al. Effect of Day 3 and Day 5/6 Embryo Quality on the Reproductive Outcomes in the Single Vitrified Embryo Transfer Cycles. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2021, 12:641623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cai J, Liu L, Xu Y, et al. Day 6 blastocyst is associated with increased birth weight in full-term singleton newborns after frozen-thawed transfer. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2018,298(2):397–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang X, Zhen J, Sun Z, et al. Effects of fifth day (D5) or 6th day (D6) frozen-thawed blastocysts on neonatal outcomes. Zygote, 2016,24(5):684–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang J, Wang Z, Cao H, et al. Birthweight After Frozen Embryos Formed on the Fifth Day Versus the 6th Day: A Retrospective Analysis Including 17,127 Singleton Newborns. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2022,13:868335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Oldereid NB, Wennerholm UB, Pinborg A, et al. The effect of paternal factors on perinatal and paediatric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update, 2018,24(3):320–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China

    Qiong Yu, Hui He, Xin-ling Ren & Lei Jin

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China

    Shi-fu Hu

Authors
  1. Qiong Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hui He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xin-ling Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shi-fu Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lei Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shi-fu Hu or Lei Jin.

Additional information

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81701509).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, Q., He, H., Ren, Xl. et al. Pregnancy Outcomes for Day 5 Versus Day 6 Single Frozen-thawed Blastocyst Transfer with Different Qualities of Embryos: A Large Matched-cohort Study. CURR MED SCI 43, 297–303 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-023-2699-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-023-2699-4

Key words

Search

Navigation