Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Geotechnical investigations and shear wave velocity estimation in Makkah Al-Mukarramah metropolitan area, Saudi Arabia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The geotechnical parameters of the near-surface geological units are gathered, tested, correlated, appraised, and then mapped at 199 drill locations. The soil materials vary from soft to very dense based on the measured N-value, which extends from 4 to > 50. The computed rock quality designation (RQD) ranges from very low to good, where RQD values extend from 0 to 80%. The measured N-value has been corrected into N60. Then, the average shear wave velocity (Vs) is computed as a function of energy-corrected SPT blow count (N60). According to NEHRP-IBC standards, the average Vs30 parameter was employed for the site soil zonation map of Makkah. The estimated Vs30 values range from 235 to 1073 m/s. The soils of Makkah’s inhabited wadis fall into the NEHRP-IBC “B,” “C,” and “D” site classes, according to this map. The sites measured in the Al Utaibiyyah District revealed that the district is underlain by thick, weak soil that extends to depths of more than 30 m. Based on the drill profiles, a depth-to-basement map has been created for the city. This map would be quite useful in Makkah’s geotechnical, geological, and hydrological investigations. The Makkah Al-Mukarramah municipality’s civil engineers and urban designers will benefit greatly from these findings. The results of this study are of utmost importance for seismic hazard assessment and risk mitigation of the Makkah area. Moreover, it will improve the Saudi Building Code in terms of shear wave velocity to 30-m depth

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelrahman K, Al-Amri A, Al-Otaibi N, Fnais M, Abdelmonem E (2019) Ground motion acceleration and response spectra of Al-Mashair area, Makkah Al-Mukarramah, Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci 12:346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4526-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdelrahman K, Alamri A, Al-Otaibi N, Fnais M (2020) Geotechnical assessment for the ground conditions in Makah Al-Mukarramah city, Saudi Arabia. J King Saud Univ Sci https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2020.02.011

  • Al-Amri A, Abdelrahman K, Fnais M (2022) Evaluation of seismic vulnerability index in Makkah AL-Mukarramah urban area, Saudi Arabia, using microtremor measurements. ARAB J GEOSCI (under publication)

  • Al- Otaibi, N (2020) Seismic vulnerability assessment for Makkah Al-Mukarramah urban area, Western Saudi Arabia, using microtremor measurements. M.Sc. thesis requirements at Geology and Geophysics Department (Geophysics), College of Science, King Saud University. 138p

  • Al-Saud M (2008) Seismic characteristics and kinematic models of Makkah and central Red Sea regions. Arab J Geosci 1:49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbazhagan P, Sitharam TG, Divya C (2007) Site response analysis based on site-specific soil properties using geotechnical and geophysical tests: correlations between Gmax and N60. 4th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, June 25-28, 1286.

  • Anderson JG, Lee Y, Zeng Y, Days S (1996) Control of strong motion by the upper 30 meters. BSSA 86:1749–1759

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellana N (2009) Shear wave velocity as function of SPT penetration resistance and vertical effective stress at California Bridge sites. A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of California, Los Angeles, 81P

  • Boore DM (2004) Estimating Vs (30) (or NEHRP Site Classes) from shallow velocity models (depths < 30 m). BSSA 94:591–597

    Google Scholar 

  • BSSC (2003) Building Seismic Safety Council National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C. 2004.

  • Cetin M (2015) Using GIS analysis to assess urban green space in terms of accessibility: a case study in Kutahya. Int. J. Sustainable Dev. World Ecol. 22(5):420–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetin M (2019) The effect of urban planning on urban formations determining bioclimatic comfort area’s effect using satellite imagines on air quality: a case study of Bursa city. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019-00742-4

  • Deere DU (1989) Rock Quality Designation (RQD) After 20 Years, U.S. Army Corps Engrs. Contract Report GL-89-1. Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, MS.

  • Dikmen U (2009) Statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for soils. J. Geophys. Eng. 6:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Dakheel ARM, Sadek HS, El-Saeed MM, and Filali EY (1997) Groundwater resources in Misfalah area – Southern Makkah Al Mukarramah. MW-17-50, Fakeeh Center for Research and Development, 201pp (in Arabic)

  • Fumal TE (1978) Correlations between seismic wave velocities and physical properties of near-surface geologic materials in the southern San Francisco Bay region, California. US Geological Survey Open-file Report:78–1067

  • Hasancebi N, Ulusay R (2006) Empirical correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments. Bull Eng Geol Environ 66:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai T (1977) P-and S-wave velocities of the ground in Japan. Proc.9th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering 2:127–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai T and Tonouchi K (1982) Correlation of N-value with S-wave velocity and shear modulus. Proc. 2nd European Symp. Of Penetration Testing (Amsterdam), 57–72

  • Imai T, Yoshimura Y (1975) The relation of mechanical properties of soils to P and S-wave velocities for ground in Japan. Technical Note, OYO Corporation

  • Inazaki T (2006) Relationship between S-wave velocities and geotechnical properties of alluvial sediments. SAGEEP2006: 19th Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems. April 2006. Institution, London, 1199

  • Iyisan R (1996) Correlations between shear wave velocity and in-situ penetration test results. Tech. J. Chamber Civil Eng. Turkey 7:1187–1199

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafari MK, Shafiee A, Ramzkhah A (2002) Dynamic properties of the fine-grained soils in the south of Tehran. J. Seismol. Earthq. Eng. 4:25–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafari MK, Asghari A and Rahmani I (1997) Empirical correlation between shear wave velocity (Vs) and SPT-N value for the south of Tehran soils. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Civil Engineering (Tehran, Iran)

  • Jinan Z (1987) Correlation between seismic wave velocity and the number of blows of SPT and depth. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE:92–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1984) Use of measured shear-wave velocity for predicting geologic site effects on strong ground motion. Proc. 8th World Conf. on Earthq. Eng:777–783

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya E, Agca M, Adiguzel F, Cetin M (2019) Spatial data analysis with R programming for the environment. Human Ecol. Risk Assess. 25(6):1521–1530. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1470896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohta Y, Goto N (1978) Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristics soil indexes. Earthq. Eng. and Structural Dyn. 6:167–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitharam TG, Anbazhagan P, Mahesh GU, Bharathi K, and Nischala RP (2005) Seismic hazard studies using geotechnical borehole data and GIS. Symposium on Seismic Hazard Analysis and Microzonation, Roorkee

  • Skempton AW (1986) Standard penetration test procedures. Geotechnique 36(3):425–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykora DE, Stokoe KH (1983) Correlations of in-situ measurements in sands of shear wave velocity. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 20:125–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykora DW, Koester PJ (1988) Correlations between dynamic shear resistance and standard penetration resistance in soils. Earthq. Eng. Soil Dyn. 2:389–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulugergerli UE, Uyanik O (2007) Statistical correlations between seismic wave velocities and SPT blow counts and the relative density of soils. J. Test. Eval. 35:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project was funded by the National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH), King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Award Number (11-ENV1902-02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geology and Geophysics, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia

    Abdullah M. Al-Amri, Kamal Abdelrahman & Mohammed S. Fnais

Authors
  1. Abdullah M. Al-Amri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kamal Abdelrahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammed S. Fnais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamal Abdelrahman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Biswajeet Pradhan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Amri, A.M., Abdelrahman, K. & Fnais, M.S. Geotechnical investigations and shear wave velocity estimation in Makkah Al-Mukarramah metropolitan area, Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci 15, 1214 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10515-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10515-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation