Skip to main content
Log in

Empirical correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prediction of the ground shaking response at soil sites requires knowledge of the soil, expressed in terms of shear wave velocity. Although it is preferable to measure this dynamic soil parameter in situ, this is often not economic at all locations. Existing correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance have been assessed in this study and compared with correlations with SPT values obtained based on geotechnical and geoseismic data collected from a first-degree earthquake zone in Turkey. The results obtained support the findings of earlier studies that blow-count is a significant parameter in these correlations while type of soil has no important influence. The regression equations developed in this study compare well with most of the previous equations and exhibit good prediction performance. It is noted that better correlations are obtained when uncorrected blow-counts are used.

Résumé

La prévision de la réponse d’un site à une sollicitation sismique nécessite des connaissances sur le sol, relatives en particulier à la vitesse de propagation des ondes de cisaillement. Il est préférable de mesurer ce paramètre de dynamique des sols in situ. Cependant ceci n’est pas toujours possible en raison de la configuration du site et de contraintes économiques. Des corrélations entre la vitesse de propagation des ondes de cisaillement et des données pénétrométriques ont été évaluées et comparées avec des corrélations entre la vitesse de propagation des ondes de cisaillement et des données SPT, ces dernières obtenues à partir de données géotechniques et sismiques issues d’une zone de forte sismicité en Turquie. Les résultats obtenus confortent de précédentes études montrant que les données SPT apportent un paramètre significatif, tandis que le type de sol ne joue pas un rôle important pour les corrélations établies. Des équations de régression ont été établies et permettent de prévoir la réponse d’un site à une sollicitation sismique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM (1994) Annual book of ASTM standards—soil and rock, building stones. Section 4, Constructions, vol 04.08. ASTM Publications, Philadelphia

  • Borcherdt RD (1994) Estimates of site depending response spectra for design methodology and justifications. Earthquake Spectra 10(4):617–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikmen U, Mirzaoglu M, Sipahi O (2004) Geophysical investigations at Yenisehir (Bursa) settlement area. General Directorate of Disaster Affairs of Turkey, Ankara (in Turkish, unpublished)

  • DLH (2002) Report on investigation and engineering works for Ayazma-Inönü railway route (in Turkish, unpublished)

  • Dobry R, Borcherdt RD, Crouse CB, Idriss IM, Joyner WB, Martin GR, Power MS, Rinne EE, Seed RB (2000) New site coefficient and site classification system used in recent building code provisions. Earthquake Spectra 16(1):41–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyuran V, Kocyigit A, Yazicigil H, Karahanoglu N, Toprak V, Topal T, Suzen ML, Yesilnacar E, Yilmaz KK (2000) Geological and geotechnical investigation at Yenisehir settlement area. Middle East Technical University, Ankara (in Turkish, unpublished)

  • Fujiwara T (1972) Estimation of ground movements in actual destructive earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the fourth European symposium on earthquake engineering, London, pp 125–132

  • Genc S (1992) Geology of the Bursa region. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on the geology of the Black Sea region, Guide Book, Ankara, pp 22–25

  • GDDA (1996) Earthquake zonation map of Turkey. Ankara

  • Hasancebi (Okan) N (2005) Geotechnical evaluation of soil amplification at Yenisehir (Bursa) district. M.Sc. Thesis, Hacettepe University, Geological Engineering Department, Ankara (in Turkish, unpublished)

  • Imai T (1977) P-and S-wave velocities of the ground in Japan. In: Proceedings of the IX international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 2, pp 127–132

  • Imai T, Yoshimura Y (1970) Elastic wave velocity and soil properties in soft soil (in Japanese). Tsuchito-Kiso 18(1):17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai T, Tonouchi K (1982) Correlation of N-value with S-wave velocity and shear modulus. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European symposium of penetration testing, Amsterdam, pp 57–72

  • Iyisan R (1996) Correlations between shear wave velocity and in-situ penetration test results (in Turkish). Chamber of Civil Engineers of Turkey, Teknik Dergi 7(2):1187–1199

  • Jafari MK, Asghari A, Rahmani I (1997) Empirical correlation between shear wave velocity (V s) and SPT-N value for south of Tehran soils. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on civil engineering, Tehran, Iran (in Persian)

  • Jafari MK, Shafiee A, Ramzkhah A (2002) Dynamic properties of the fine grained soils in South of Tehran. JSEE 4(1):25–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Jinan Z (1987) Correlation between seismic wave velocity and the number of blow of SPT and depth. Selected papers from the Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 92–100

  • Kiku H, Yoshida N, Yasuda S, Irisawa T, Nakazawa H, Shimizu Y, Ansal A, Erkan A (2001) In-situ penetration tests and soil profiling in Adapazari, Turkey. In: Proceedings of the ICSMGE/TC4 satellite conference on lessons learned from recent strong earthquakes, pp 259–265

  • Lee SHH (1990) Regression models of shear wave velocities. J Chin Inst Eng 13:519–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohba S, Toriumi I (1970) Dynamic response characteristics of Osaka Plain. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting AIJ (in Japanese)

  • Ohsaki Y, Iwasaki R (1973) On dynamic shear moduli and Poisson’s ratio of soil deposits. Soil Found 13(4):61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta Y, Goto N (1978) Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristics soil indexes. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 6:167–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitilakis K, Raptakis D, Lontzetidis K, Tika-Vassilikou T, Jongmans D (1999) Geotechnical and geophysical description of Euro-Seistests, using field and laboratory tests, and moderate strong ground motions. J Earthquake Eng 3(3):381–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1981) Evaluation of liquefaction potential sand deposits based on observation of performance in previous earthquakes. ASCE National Convention, Missouri, pp 81–544

  • Sisman H (1995) An investigation on relationships between shear wave velocity, and SPT and pressuremeter test results. M.Sc. Thesis, Ankara University, Geophysical Engineering Department, Ankara (in Turkish, unpublished)

  • Sykora DE, Stokoe KHII II (1983) Correlations of in-situ measurements in sands of shear wave velocity. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 20(1-4):125–136

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Project No. 0302602008 of the Research Projects, Division of Hacettepe University. The authors would like to thank the General Directorate of Disaster Affairs and the geophysical team of this organization for their cooperation and the geophysical surveys; the Municipality of Yenisehir for providing the logistic support; the Geophysical Engineering Department of Ankara University for seismic refraction equipment and interpretation of the measured data; and the General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works (DSI) for permission to use the borehole logs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Resat Ulusay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hasancebi, N., Ulusay, R. Empirical correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments . Bull Eng Geol Environ 66, 203–213 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-006-0063-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-006-0063-0

Keywords

Mots clés

Navigation