Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Behavior of cantilever secant pile wall supporting excavation in sandy soil considering pile-pile interaction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents the results of a numerical investigation performed to investigate the behavior of a cantilever secant pile wall (CSPW) used to support excavation in sandy soil. These types of excavations have the potential to cause severe ground movement and possible damage to the adjacent structures. A major concern in supporting excavation is to predict and control ground movement associated with excavation particularly in cohesionless soils, as it could trigger global instability and catastrophic failure. The magnitude and distribution of lateral earth pressure and ground movement depend mainly on soil properties, excavation depth, excavation plan geometry, the stiffness of the supporting wall, and the contact between the secant piles themselves. Three-dimensional finite element model has been developed in this study to capture the excavation and wall geometry. A parametric study has been performed using a wide range of sand density, excavation depth, wall flexural stiffness, and bonding between piles within the wall. The results allowed for the development of an approach to predict both the wall deflection for the case of fully and partially bonded piles. This will help engineers to predict ground movement and select an appropriate supporting system that can maintain the stability of the adjacent structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achmus M, Thieken K, Saathoff J, Terceros M, Albiker J (2019) Un- and reloading stiffness of monopile foundations in sand. Applied Ocean Research. 84:62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Addenbrooke TI (1994) A flexibility number for the displacement controlled design of multi propped retaining walls. Journal of Ground Engineering. 27(7):41–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Altuntas, C., Persaud, D., and Poeppel, A. R. (2009) Secant pile wall design and construction in Manhattan. Proc., Int. Foundation Congress and Equipment Expo (IFCEE2009), ASCE, Reston, VA, 105–112.

  • Bica AVD, Clayton CRI (1989) Limit equilibrium design methods for free embedded cantilever walls in granular materials. Proc. Instn Civ. Engrs Part 1 86. No. 5:879–989

    Google Scholar 

  • Bica A, Clayton C (2004) An experimental study of the behaviour of embedded lengths of cantilever walls. Géotechnique. 48(6):731–745. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1998.48.6.731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton MD (1986) The strength and dilatancy of sands. Géotechnique 36(1):65–78

  • Bolton MD, Powrie W (1987) Collapse of diaphragm walls retaining clay. Géotechnique, 37. No. 3:335–353. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1987.37.3.335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton MD, Powrie W, Symons IF (1989) The design of stiff in-situ walls retaining overconsolidated clay, part I – short term behaviour. Ground Engng 22(8/9):34–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton MD, Powrie W, Symons IF (1990) The design of stiff in-situ walls retaining overconsolidated clay, part II -– long term behaviour. Ground Engng 23. No. 2:22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkgreve R, Engin E, Engin H (2010) Validation of empirical formulas to derive model parameters for sands. In: Brinkgreve R, Engin E, Engin H (eds) 7th International Conference of Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering. Trondheim, Norway. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10551-25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson LS, Medina DG (2010) Finite element analyses of secant pile wall installation. Proc Inst Civ Eng, Geotech Eng 163(4):209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson LS, Zapata-Medina DG (2012) Method for estimating system stiffness for excavation support walls. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 138(9):1104–1115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burland JB, Potts DM, Walsh NM (1981) The overall stability of free and propped embedded cantilever retaining walls. Ground Engineering, 14. No. 5:28–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough GW, O'Rourke T (1990) Construction induced movements of in situ walls. Proceedings of Design and performance of Earth Retaining Structures, ASCE Special Conference, Ithaca, New York, pp 439–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte E, Troncone A, Vena M (2013) Nonlinear three-dimensional analysis of reinforced concrete piles subjected to horizontal loading. Comput. Geotech. 49:123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conte E, Troncone A, Vena M (2015) Behaviour of flexible piles subjected to inclined loads. Comput. Geotech. 69:199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conte E, Troncone A, Vena M (2017) A method for the design of embedded cantilever retaining walls under static and seismic loading. Géotechnique 67(12):1081–1089

    Google Scholar 

  • Day RA (2001) Earth pressure on cantilever walls at design retained heights. Proc. Instn Civ. Engrs Geotech. Engng 149. No. 3:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong YP, Burd HJ, Houlsby GT (2012) 3D FEM modelling of a deep excavation case history considering small-strain stiffness of soil and thermal contraction of concrete. In: Proceedings of the BGA Young Geotechnical Engineers’s Symposium. University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong Y, Burd H, Houlsby G (2014) Advanced finite element analysis of a complex deep excavation case history in Shanghai. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 8:93–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-014-0232-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finno RJ, Bryson S (2002) Response of building adjacent to stiff excavation support system in soft clay. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 16(1):10–20. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2002)16:1(10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finno RJ, Bryson S, Calvello M (2002) Performance of a stiff support system in soft clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128(8):660–671. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:8(660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finno RJ, Tanner BJ, Roboski JF (2006) Three-dimensional effects for supported excavations in clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 133(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:1(30

  • Gannon J (2016) Primary firm secant pile concrete specification. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering 169(2):110–120. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.15.00038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudin C, Garnier J, Thorel L (2004) Physical modelling of a cantilever wall. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics 4(2):13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazetas G, Garini E, Zafeirakos A (2016) Seismic analysis of tall anchored sheet-pile walls. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 91:209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge X (2002) Response of a shield -driven tunnel to deep excavations in soft clay. PhD Thesis, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

  • Hashash Y (1992) Analysis of deep excavations in clay. Ph. D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil Engineering.

  • Hikooei BF (2013) Numerical modeling of pipe-soil interaction under transverse direction. Master’s thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary – Alberta, Canada

  • Hsiung B (2009) A case study on the behaviour of a deep excavation in sand. Computers and Geotechnics. 36(4):665–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiung B, Yang K, Aila W, Hung C (2016) Three-dimensional effects of a deep excavation on wall deflections in loose to medium dense sands. Computers and Geotechnics. 80:138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu ZF, Yue ZQ, Zhou J, Tham LG (2003) Design and construction of a deep excavation in soft soils adjacent to the Shanghai Metro tunnels. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 40(5):933–948. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies M, Been K (2006) Soil liquefaction: a critical state approach. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ji X, Ni P, Zhao W, Yu H (2019) Top-down excavation of an underpass linking two large-scale basements in sandy soil. Arabian Journal for Geosciences 12:314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4493-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny S, Jukes P (2015) Pipeline/soil interaction modeling in support of pipeline engineering design and integrity. In: Oil and Gas Pipelines: Integrity and Safety Handbook, pp 99–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoiri M, Ou C (2013) Evaluation of deformation parameter for deep excavation in sand through case histories. Computers and Geotechnics. 47:57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King GJW (1995) Analysis of cantilever sheet-pile walls in cohesionless soil. J. Geotech. Engng, ASCE 121(9):629–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King G, McLoughlin J (1993) Centrifuge model studies of a cantilever retaining wall in sand. Retaining structures. ICE:711–720

  • Knappett J, Caucis K, Brown M, Jeffrey J, Ball J (2016) CHD pile performance: part II – numerical modelling. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering. 169(5):436–454. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.15.00132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korff, M., Tol, A.F. van & Jong, E. de (2007) Risks related to CFA-pile walls. 14th European Conference on Soils (Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering), Madrid - Spain.

  • Kung GT, Juang C, Hsiao E, Hashash Y (2007) Simplified model for wall deflection and ground-surface settlement caused by braced excavation in clays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 133(6):731–747. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:6(731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li AZ, Lehane BM (2010) Embedded cantilever retaining walls in sand. Géotechnique. 60(11):813–823. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.P.147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao S-M, Li W-L, Fan Y-Y, Sun X, Shi Z-H (2014) Model test on lateral loading performance of secant pile walls. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 28(2):391–401. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu GB, Ng CW, Wang ZW (2005) Observed performance of a deep multistrutted excavation in Shanghai soft clays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 131(8):1004–1013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:8(1004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G, Jiang R, Ng C, Hong Y (2011) Deformation characteristics of a 38 m deep excavation in soft clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 48(12):1817–1828. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu N, Duan N, Yu F (2018) Deformation characteristics of retaining structures and nearby buildings for different propped retaining walls in soft soil. Journal of Testing and Evaluation. 47(3):1829–1847. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20170763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long M (2001) Database for retaining wall and ground movements due to deep excavation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 127(3):203–224. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:3(203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madabhushi G, Chandrasekaran VS (2005) Rotation of cantilever sheet pile walls. J Geotech Geoenviron. Eng 131:202–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madabhushi SPG, Zeng X (2006) Seismic response of flexible cantilever retaining walls with dry backfill. Geomech. Geoengng 1. No. 4:275–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinkus V, Norkus A, Mikolainis M (2017) Numerical simulation of displacement model pile test performed in artificial sand deposit. Procedia Engineering. 172:715–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei GX, Chen QM, Song LH (2009) Model for predicting displacement-dependent lateral earth pressure. Can. Geotech. J. 46(8):969–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan G, St John H, O'Rourke H (2008) Contributions to Géotechnique 1948–2008: Retaining structures. Géotechnique. 58(5):377–383. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2008.58.5.377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamad H, Soga K, Pellew A, Bennett P (2011) Performance monitoring of a secant-piled wall using distributed fiber optic strain sensing. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(12). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000543

  • Moormann C (2004) Analysis of wall and ground movements due to deep excavations in soft soil based on a new worldwide database. Soils And Foundations. 44(1):87–98. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.44.87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng C, Hong Y, Liu G, Liu T (2012) Ground deformations and soil–structure interaction of a multi-propped excavation in Shanghai soft clays. Géotechnique. 62(10):907–921. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.10.P.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Shi J, Mašín D, Sun H, Lei GH (2015) Influence of sand density and retaining wall stiffness on three-dimensional responses of tunnel to basement excavation. Can. Geotech. J. 52(11):1811–1829. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie D (2019) Analysis on the effect of excavation by sections for large foundation pit without horizontal struts. In: International Symposium for Intelligent Transportation and Smart City (ITASC) 2019 Proceedings. ITASC 2019. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 127. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolinakou M, Whittle A, Savidis S, Schran U (2011) Prediction and interpretation of the performance of a deep excavation in berlin sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 137(11):1047–1061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osouli A, Hashash Y (2010) Case studies of prediction of excavation response using learned excavation performance. International Journal of Geoengineering Case Histories. 1(4):340–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Ou CY (2006) Deep excavation: theory and practice. Taylor & Francis, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Ou C, Hsieh P, Chiou D (1993) Characteristics of ground surface settlement during excavation. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 30(5):758–767. https://doi.org/10.1139/t93-068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou C-Y, Hsieh P-G, Chiou D-C (2010) Characteristics of ground surface settlement during excavation. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 30(5):758–767. https://doi.org/10.1139/t93-068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagoulias S, Hosseini S, Brinkgreve R (2018) An innovative design methodology for offshore wind monopile foundations. 26th European Young Geotechnical Engineers Conference, Graz. Austria.

  • PLAXIS 3D FOUNDATION (2006) Version 1.5 PLAXIS finite element code for soil and rock analysis. Delft University of Technology & PLAXIS B. V, Delft.

  • Poulos HG, Davis EH (1980) Pile foundation analysis and design. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramadan MI, Ramadan EH, Khashila MM (2018) Cantilever contiguous pile wall for supporting excavation in clay. Geotechnical and Geological Engineeing Journal. 36:1545–1558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0407-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe P (1952) Anchored sheet pile walls. Proc Inst Civ Eng 1(1):27–70 (PART 1)

  • Rowe PW, Peaker K (1965) Passive earth pressure measurements. Geotechnique 15(1):57–78

  • Sert S, Luo Z, Xiao J, Gong W, Juang C (2016) Probabilistic analysis of responses of cantilever wall-supported excavations in sands considering vertical spatial variability. Computers and Geotechnics. 75:182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan Y, Wei B (2011) Observed behaviors of a long and deep excavation constructed by cut-and-cover technique in Shanghai soft clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 138(1):69–88. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner J, Steele J, Maher W, Zortman M, Carpenter J (2004) Design, construction, and performance of an anchored tangent pile wall for excavation support. GeoSupport 2004, ASCE:322–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong IH, Poh TY, Chuah HL (2002) Performance of excavations for depressed expressway in Singapore. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 123(7). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:7(617

  • Zahmatkesh A, Choobbasti AJ (2015) Evaluation of wall deflections and ground surface settlements in deep excavations. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 8(5):3055–3063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1419-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zdravkovic L, Potts DM, St. John HD (2005) Modelling of a 3D excavation in finite element analysis. Geotechnique 55(7):497–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu W, Yi J (1988) Application of centrifuge modelling to study a failed quay wall. In: Proceedings International Conference Centrifuge 88, Paris: 415–419

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant no. (829-128-D1436). The authors, therefore, gratefully acknowledge the DSR technical and financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering-Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Mohamed I Ramadan

  2. Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt

    Mohamed I Ramadan

  3. Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

    Mohamed Meguid

Authors
  1. Mohamed I Ramadan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohamed Meguid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed I Ramadan.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Zeynal Abiddin Erguler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramadan, M.I., Meguid, M. Behavior of cantilever secant pile wall supporting excavation in sandy soil considering pile-pile interaction. Arab J Geosci 13, 466 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05483-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05483-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation