Abstract
Precise Point Positioning (PPP) algorithms have been widely used in the Global Positioning System (GPS)-based applications. A PPP technique with a single receiver provides effective solutions where accurate absolute positioning is required. This paper provides the performance assessment of GPS PPP for detecting the displacements caused by an earthquake. For this purpose, the earthquake that occurred on 21 July 2017 at Kos-Bodrum with the impact of Mw 6.6 was investigated by analyzing the data of the permanent GPS stations located around the related region with the PPP technique. The location distances of these GPS stations range from 10 to 89 km to the epicenter of this earthquake. GPS data provided from seven permanent stations from the Continuously Operating Reference Stations-Turkey (CORS-TR) and local Bodrum CORS networks were processed to determine the co-seismic displacements during the earthquake. The data of these stations for days of year (DOYs) 200, 201, 202, and 203 were analyzed with post-process static PPP and kinematic PPP methods. GIPSY-OASIS II v6.4 was used for processing the data and all of the solutions were performed in the ITRF2008 reference frame. Two strategies were followed on the post-process static solutions. In the first strategy, 4-day data with 24-h observations were separately analyzed day by day. In the second strategy, the 24-h data were divided into 3-h duration, which is the minimum duration for optimum PPP solutions, and then the analyses were performed. When the displacements between DOYs 200 and 203 are considered in the 24-h data analysis, significant displacements have been observed through northwest direction in the northern stations whereas MUG1 is excluded. Moreover, there is significant displacement through the southeast direction in the station DATC located in the south of the epicenter. When the 3-h solutions are examined, displacements, especially on n and e directions, are observed starting from the solutions, which include Mw 6.6 earthquake. According to the kinematic PPP solutions, the effects of the Mw 6.6 earthquake can be seen clearly in the stations DATC, ORTA, TRKB, and YALI. Considering all outcomes, the PPP technique with both static and kinematic solutions provides effective results for detecting the displacements during the earthquake.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aktug B, Lenk O (2010) Yeni Gelişmeler Işığında Ağ Hiyerarşisi. Ölçü Süreleri ve Duyarlık Ölçütlerinin İncelenmesi Harita Dergisi 135:40–50
Altiner Y, Söhne W, Güney C, Perlt J, Wang R, Muzli M (2013) A geodetic study of the 23 October 2011 Van, Turkey earthquake. Tectonophysics 588:118–134
Avallone A, Marzario M, Cirella A, Piatanesi A, Rovelli A, Di Alessandro C, D’Anastasio E, D’Agostino N, Giuliani R, Mattone M (2011) Very high rate (10 Hz) GPS seismology for moderate-magnitude earthquakes: the case of the Mw 6.3 L’Aquila (central Italy) event J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 116
Calais E, Han J, DeMets C, Nocquet J (2006) Deformation of the North American plate interior from a decade of continuous GPS measurements. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 111
Cubuk-Sabuncu Y, Taymaz T, Fichtner A (2017) 3-D crustal velocity structure of western Turkey: constraints from full-waveform tomography. Phys Earth Planet Inter 270:90–112
Demir D, Dogan U (2014) Determination of crustal deformations based on GPS observing-session duration in Marmara region, Turkey. Adv Space Res 53:452–462
Ebner R (2008) Validation and application of free-online and commercial post-processing PPP packages. Master of Science, Graz University of Technology
Ergintav S, Dogan U, Gerstenecker C, Cakmak R, Belgen A, Demirel H, Aydin C, Reilinger R (2007) A snapshot (2003–2005) of the 3D postseismic deformation for the 1999, M w= 7.4 İzmit earthquake in the Marmara Region, Turkey, by first results of joint gravity and GPS monitoring. J Geodyn 44:1–18
Gao Y, Shen X (2001) Improving convergence speed of carrier phase based Precise Point Positioning. Salt Lack City,
Hammond WC, Thatcher W (2005) Northwest basin and range tectonic deformation observed with the Global Positioning System, 1999–2003. J Geophysic Res: Solid Earth 110
Hoffman-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger H, Wasle E (2008) GNSS—global navigation satellite systems GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and more Wien: Springer-Verlag
Kahveci M (2010) GPS/GNSS Gözlemlerini Değerlendirme Yöntemlerinde Son Gelişmeler HKM Jeodezi. Jeoinformasyon ve Arazi Yönetimi Dergisi 1:3–10
Karasözen E, Nissen E, Buyukpınar P, Cambaz MD, Kahraman M, Kalkan Ertan E, Abgarmi B, Bergman E, Ghods A, Ozacar AA (2018) The 2017 July 20 M w 6.6 Bodrum–Kos earthquake illuminates active faulting in the Gulf of Gökova, SW Turkey. Geophys J Int 214:185–199
Kedar S, Hajj G.A, Wilson B.D, Heflin M.B (2003) The effect of the second order GPS ionospheric correction on receiver positions, Geophys Res Lett, 30
Kouba J (2003) Measuring seismic waves induced by large earthquakes with GPS. Stud Geophys Geod 47:741–755
Kouba J, Héroux P (2001) Precise point positioning using IGS orbit and clock products. GPS Solutions 5:12–28
Kreemer C, Blewitt G, Klein EC (2014) A geodetic plate motion and global strain rate model. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 15:3849–3889
Larson KM (2009) GPS seismology. J Geod 83:227–233
Larson KM, Miyazaki S (2008) Resolving static offsets from high-rate GPS data: the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake. Earth Planets and Space 60:801–808
Li T, Wang J, Laurichesse D (2014) Modeling and quality control for reliable precise point positioning integer ambiguity resolution with GNSS modernization. GPS Solutions 18:429–442
Martín A, Anquela A, Dimas-Pagés A, Cos-Gayón F (2015) Validation of performance of real-time kinematic PPP. A possible tool for deformation monitoring. Measurement 69:95–108
Ohta Y, Meilano I, Sagiya T, Kimata F, Hirahara K (2006) Large surface wave of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake captured by the very long baseline kinematic analysis of 1-Hz GPS data. Earth Planets and Space 58:153–157
Ohta Y, Ohzono M., Miura S, Iinuma T, Tachibana K, Takatsuka K, Miyao K, Sato T, Umino N (2008) Coseismic fault model of the 2008 Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku earthquake deduced by a dense GPS network Earth, planets and space 60:1197–1201
Reilinger R, McClusky S, Paradissis D, Ergintav S, Vernant P (2010) Geodetic constraints on the tectonic evolution of the Aegean region and strain accumulation along the Hellenic subduction zone. Tectonophysics 488:22–30
Rizos C, Janssen V, Roberts C, Grinter T (2012) Precise Point Positioning: is the era of differential GNSS positioning drawing to an end?
Saltogianni V, Gianniou M, Taymaz T, Yolsal-Çevikbilen S, Stiros S (2015) Fault slip source models for the 2014 Mw 6.9 Samothraki-Gökçeada earthquake (North Aegean trough) combining geodetic and seismological observations. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120:8610–8622
Savage J, Gan W, Prescott W, Svarc J (2004) Strain accumulation across the coast ranges at the latitude of San Francisco, 1994–2000 J Geophysic Res: Solid Earth 109
Shi C, Lou Y, Zhang H, Zhao Q, Geng J, Wang R, Fang R, Liu J (2010) Seismic deformation of the M w 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake from high-rate GPS observations. Adv Space Res 46:228–235
Tiryakioglu I (2015) Geodetic aspects of the 19 May 2011 Simav earthquake in Turkey. Geomatics Nat Hazards and Risk 6:76–89
Tiryakioglu I, Floyd M, Erdogan S, Gulal E, Ergintav S, McClusky S, Reilinger R (2013) GPS constraints on active deformation in the Isparta Angle region of SW Turkey. Geophys J Int 195:1455–1463
Tiryakioglu I, Yigit CO, Yavasoglu H, Saka MH, Alkan RM (2017) The determination of interseismic, coseismic and postseismic deformations caused by the Gökçeada-Samothraki earthquake (2014, Mw: 6.9) based on GNSS data. J Afr Earth Sci 133:86–94
Tiryakioglu I, Akug B, Yigit CO, Yavasoglu HH, Sozbilir H, Ozkaymak C, Poyraz F, Taneli E, Bulut F, Dogru A, Ozener H (2018) Slip distribution and source parameters of the 20 July 2017 Bodrum-Kos earthquake (Mw6. 6) from GPS observations. Geodin Acta 30:1–14
Weissel P, Smith W (1995) New version of the generic mapping tools released. EOS Trans Am Geophys Un 76:329
Xu P, Shi C, Fang R, Liu J, Niu X, Zhang Q, Yanagidani T (2013) High-rate precise point positioning (PPP) to measure seismic wave motions: an experimental comparison of GPS PPP with inertial measurement units. J Geod 87:361–372
Yavasoğlu H, Tarı E, Tuysuz O, Cakir Z, Ergintav S (2011) Determining and modeling tectonic movements along the central part of the North Anatolian Fault (Turkey) using geodetic measurements. J Geodyn 51:339–343
Yigit CO (2016) Experimental assessment of post-processed kinematic Precise Point Positioning method for structural health monitoring. Geomatics Nat Hazards and Risk 7:360–383
Yolsal-Cevikbilen S, Taymaz T, Helvacı C (2014) Earthquake mechanisms in the gulfs of Gökova, Sığacık, Kuşadası, and the Simav Region (western Turkey): neotectonics, seismotectonics and geodynamic implications. Tectonophysics 635:100–124
Zumberge J, Heflin M, Jefferson D, Watkins M, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 102:5005–5017
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Republic of Turkey General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre (TKGM), GEOTEKNIK-Geodesy and Electronic Instruments Ltd., Co., and The Association of Bodrum Geomatic Engineers for providing the GNSS/CORS data used in this study. We thank NASA JPL for the GIPSY-OASIS II software and precise GPS orbit products and IGS for TEC maps. The maps in this paper were produced using the public domain Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) software (Weissel and Smith 1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dogan, A.H., Tunalioglu, N., Erdogan, B. et al. Evaluation of the GPS Precise Point Positioning technique during the 21 July 2017 Kos-Bodrum (East Aegean Sea) Mw 6.6 earthquake. Arab J Geosci 11, 775 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-4140-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-4140-z