Abstract
The rapid development of Auckland City in New Zealand from an initial rural settlement to a global urban hub produced a characteristic footprint on the Auckland Volcanic Field (AVF). This process was facilitated by increased anthropogenic activity that has resulted in the deterioration and destruction of many volcanic landforms and caused severe archaeological, cultural, geological and educational losses in an alarmingly short timescale. The AVF has 53 volcanic centres, and of these, 17% are classified as intact, 28% are partially intact, 30% are partially destroyed, and 25% are destroyed (including 13% that have no trace left). Based on surface area, approximately 40% of volcanic deposits in the AVF have been lost. The most common causes for impacts are public land use, quarrying and urban development. Regardless, there is significant potential to be found in the balance between the losses and gains of anthropogenic impacts on volcanic landforms. In the AVF and worldwide, geological studies have often been assisted by the presence of outcrops created by quarrying, mining, transport infrastructure and other modifications of volcanic landforms. Areas of significant volcanic geoheritage worldwide are often linked with these impacted volcanoes, and the information gained from these geoheritage areas assists in the management of geodiversity and geoeducation. Several volcanic centres are currently at risk of further destruction in the near future (Crater Hill, Waitomokia, Maugataketake, Kohuroa, Three Kings, St Heliers and McLaughlins Mt) and should be prioritised for any possible research before it is too late. We propose that a geological assessment should be a requirement before and, if possible, during any land development on or near a volcanic landform. Allowing access to scientists through the course of development in areas with volcanic landforms would, in turn, aid public and governing bodies in decision-making for the future of the city and its volcanoes in terms of increased knowledge of volcanic mechanisms of the AVF and awareness of the potential associated hazards.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
There have been at least 1300 terrestrial volcanoes erupted in the last 10,000 years (which is likely an underestimation due to the nature of small eruptions and stratigraphic complexity in volcanic-rich areas), mostly (94%) concentrated along tectonic plate boundaries (Sigurdsson 2015; Global Volcanism Program 2023). At least 80% of nations in the world host at least one volcano that has been active in the Holocene (Brown et al. 2015; Sigurdsson 2015; Global Volcanism Program 2023). When considering the dispersal of volcanic material and associated hazards associated with volcanic eruptions, the number of nations worldwide that have been affected by volcanoes in the Holocene is much greater. More than 14% of the world’s population live within 100 km of a Holocene volcano (Sigurdsson 2015; Freire et al. 2019). Volcanoes and their resources have been utilised by humans for millennia. They have provided natural fortification, fertile soils, ore deposits, construction materials and tourism and recreational value (Kelman and Mather 2008; Erfurt-Cooper and Cooper 2010; Sigurdsson 2015). Volcanoes also played and continue to play an important role in many cultural and religious traditions worldwide (Lowe et al. 2002; Nunn 2014; Fepuleai et al. 2017; Mackintosh 2019). Volcanic materials have been utilised since prehistoric times for various uses including cutting tools, building materials, weapons and defence during conflict (Sigurdsson 2015). In modern times, volcanic materials are mined for construction materials including aggregate, to be used in building, concrete and transport infrastructure such as roads and railways. Our long-term reliance on volcanic materials has resulted in varied impacts on the landforms of volcanic fields worldwide.
Some global examples of volcanic fields that have been impacted by human activity are provided in Table 1. A wide variety of impacts are caused by anthropogenic activity; however, the major impacts on volcanic landforms have been through quarrying (e.g. extraction of raw materials mostly for construction and housing development), land use (e.g. development for farming), urban development (e.g. section development for housing and large scale construction sites associated with community needs) and transport infrastructure (e.g. road and rail network development) (Table 1). In recent decades, geoparks, national parks and co-managed areas have been established to protect volcanic landforms from the impacts of urban development and destruction (Erfurt-Cooper 2011; Németh et al. 2017; Pijet-Migoń and Migoń, 2022).
The Auckland Volcanic Field (AVF) is a good example of an active volcanic field that exhibits anthropogenic impacts on volcanic landforms (Table 1). The unique, geologically diverse nature of this field, its overlap with the city of Auckland (with a third of New Zealand’s population living there), its active status and the presence of a university (Auckland University- ranked 1st out of New Zealand (NZ) universities) within the field has prompted many detailed studies of the volcanic centres (e.g. Shane and Smith 2000; Lindsay et al. 2011; Augustinus et al. 2012; Hopkins et al. 2020). Anthropogenic activity in the AVF has resulted in the deterioration and destruction of many of the centres. Geoconservation bids to protect the volcanic centres in Auckland for their volcanic knowledge and cultural and societal values have had mixed success (Golson and Fowlds 1957; Hayward and Crossley 2014; Gravis and Németh 2016; Gravis et al. 2017, 2020; Németh et al. 2021b). In several cases, complete destruction has resulted in the loss of volcanic knowledge of key landforms and centres of the field (Hayward 2008; Hayward et al. 2011; Hopkins et al. 2017).
This paper examines the Auckland Volcanic Field as it was before the introduction of anthropogenic impacts and as it is today. The aims of this study are to (1) conduct a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative study of the anthropogenic impact on volcanic landforms and causes of impact in the AVF and (2) highlight the importance of preserving these landforms and the wealth of information that can be gained from each of them, even when partially destroyed. This study combined structured literature reviews, site visits (recording and photographing the current state of the volcanic centres) and GIS-based volume estimations of eruptive products for comparison with historical data sets. We summarise the landforms of all 53 volcanic centres in the AVF and discuss the history of quarrying in Auckland and the impact it has had on the volcanic field. Furthermore, we summarise the impacts to, and current preservation state of, each of the centres and highlight where there are future needs in terms of geoconservation and geological understanding of the field. To the best of our knowledge, a summary and overview of the current state of a volcanic field, as well as a quantitative and qualitative assessment of deposits affected or destroyed, has not been academically published.
The Auckland Volcanic Field
The Auckland Volcanic Field (AVF) is an active Quaternary monogenetic volcanic field located on the North Island of New Zealand (Fig. 1a,b). In 1864, early European explorer and geologist Ferdinand von Hochstetter described Auckland as ‘one of the most remarkable volcanic districts of the Earth’ and ‘a truly classical soil for the study of volcanic formations’ (Hochstetter 1864). The field has been active for around 200,000 years (Leonard et al. 2017; Hopkins et al. 2020) with eruptions at 53 volcanic centres during that time (Fig. 1c). The monogenetic volcanic landforms range from tuff rings and maars to lava flow fields (Lindsay et al. 2011; Hopkins et al. 2020), with the exception of the youngest centre, Rangitoto (Needham et al. 2011; Linnell et al. 2016). Rangitoto was formed by two separate eruptions – Rangitoto 1 produced an underlying maar with a tuff ring and a northern scoria cone 553 ± 7 cal. years BP, and Rangitoto 2 produced a large shield volcano and central and southern scoria cones 504 ± 5 cal. years BP (Needham et al. 2011; Shane et al. 2013; Linnell et al. 2016; Hayward et al. 2022). The 53 volcanic centres have produced a complex volcanic stratigraphy throughout Auckland, with many older deposits and potentially entire volcanic centres obscured by younger ones (Affleck et al. 2001). Due to the abundance of water (groundwater and surface) in the Auckland area, the majority (83%) of volcanoes began with phreatomagmatic activity and commonly (60%) transitioned to Hawaiian, Strombolian or effusive activity (Kereszturi et al. 2014).
(a) The Auckland Volcanic Field (AVF) in New Zealand. (b) Location of the AVF and related preceding intraplate volcanic fields in the North Island (Briggs et al. 1994). (c) Deposits of volcanic centres in the AVF (Edbrooke 2001; Cassidy and Locke 2010; Hopkins et al. 2017). (d) Depiction of Queen Street and the Auckland Harbour from the year Auckland City was founded (Ashworth 1843). (e) Auckland City satellite imagery from 1984 (Landsat and Copernicus 1984), with comparison to (f) satellite imagery from 2020 (Landsat and Copernicus 2020)
The city of Auckland is New Zealand’s most populated city with 1.7 million people (Auckland City Council 2021). It is the largest in New Zealand and covers the same area as the AVF, around 360 km2. New Zealand was the last substantial landmass to be colonised by humans (Anderson 1991; Newnham et al. 1998; Brooking 2004), and humans have lived in what is now the Auckland area for around 750 years (Newnham et al. 1998; Lowe et al. 2000; Smith 2012). The first human modification of volcanic centres in Auckland was due to the formation of pās (Māori fortifications) and associated terraces and pits (Barr and Graham 1920; Golson and Fowlds 1957; Hayward 1983). Urban development of Auckland City began in 1840 (Fig. 1d) when it was declared New Zealand’s capital city (Hochstetter 1864; Brooking 2004; Arbury 2019) (shifting to Wellington in 1865), with rapid population and industrial growth in the area thereafter (Fig. 1e,f) (Chalmers and Hall 1989; Edbrooke et al. 2003; Brooking 2004).
The 53 volcanic centres in the AVF are listed in Table 2, with a summary of the original landforms of each centre, including tuff rings and maars, scoria cones (and small scoria mounds) and lava flows. Where possible, the maximum lava flow deposit length was estimated, including instances where lava did not breach a crater. A count of each landform type has also been recorded, as well as the layout of landforms, such as whether the volcano has a single landform, landforms centred on a single vent, landforms clustered together, or landforms that appear to have any alignments in a particular direction (e.g. Von Veh and Németh 2009). All landform data are based on the closest estimates of original landforms from literature review and historical images. Underlined volcanic centres were originally the site of a Māori pā (Taylor 1961; Hayward 1983, 2019b; Mathews 2015).
Volcanic Remnants
Importance and Significance of the Volcanic Centres in the Auckland Volcanic Field
For the Māori people, the volcanoes of New Zealand are sacred (Lowe et al. 2002; Bernbaum 2006). They hold significant importance and are directly tied to their culture, traditions, history and how they interpret the world and its creation (Lowe et al. 2002; Sigurdsson 2015; Hayward 2019b; Mackintosh 2019). The volcanoes in Auckland were key to the very existence of their ancestors and continue to remain a significant part of their identity and traditions today (Mackintosh 2019; Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority 2019). Volcanic cones, craters and castle and moat structures are naturally defendable places where human habitations worldwide have commonly been initiated in the past (Ort et al. 2008; Davidson 2011; MacInnes et al. 2014; Benfer and Ocás, 2017). Before European colonisation, volcanic cones in Auckland were used as fortified pās for the Māori tribes, with terraces for defence and storage pits dug around the slopes of the cones (Hochstetter 1864; Golson and Fowlds 1957) (Table 2). Pās were also seen as symbols of community and identity, and they were key hubs for housing food stores and seeds, provided prime soils for agriculture, and were a physical representation of hierarchy with the chief living at the summit (Hayward 1983; Lowe et al. 2002; Allen 2015). Dwellings for the rest of the tribe and kumara fields typically stretched out around the cones (Hochstetter 1864). The soil and vegetation cover of the volcanic cones resulted in an ease of landscaping, planting food and digging foundations for dwellings (Bulmer 1994; Davidson 2011). There were an estimated 198 pās in the Auckland area (Fig. 2) (Hayward 1983). Once Auckland had been colonised by Europeans, ownership of these cones commonly passed out of Māori hands (Morad and Jay 2003), and therefore, the decisions of what happened to the landforms were made by people other than the traditional land owners.
For the people living in Auckland City today, the visual presence of the volcanic centres in the area is key to their sense of belonging (Allen et al. 2021), local identity and nostalgia for the landscape (Mackintosh 2019). The volcanic centres help to provide green open spaces that are key to the character of the city (Auckland Council 2016; Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority 2019) and vital for recreational uses (Hayward 2019b; Mackintosh 2019). The views provided by the volcanic cones are ‘of great value to Auckland’s identity and the quality of the environment and should be protected’ (Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority 2019). As the management authority of 15 of the volcanic centres in the AVF (on behalf of the original Māori owners of the land), it is the intention of the Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority (2019) that ‘the visual and physical integrity and the historic, archaeological and cultural values of Auckland’s volcanic features that are of local, regional, national and/or international significance are protected and, where practicable, enhanced’.
The connections that remain between the volcanic landscape of the AVF and the Māori people continue to provide them with their unique identity and relationship to the land around them (Mackintosh 2019; Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority 2019). Even after a volcanic centre has been quarried and destroyed, a cultural connection to the site plays an important role in present-day Māori traditions and is still considered to be sacred land (Mackintosh 2019).
Volcanic landscapes provide not only an archaeological record of the area but also the histories and experiences of the people who lived there (e.g. Gravis et al. 2017; Hayward 2019b; Auckland War Memorial Museum 2023). Volcanic regions are also significant places for geotourism and education worldwide (Sigurdsson 2015; Németh et al. 2017, 2021a; Quesada-Valverde and Quesada-Román, 2023). Geologically, the significance of the volcanic centres in the AVF lies in their relatively young age, ease of access and striking examples of simple to complex monogenetic volcanism on coastal and water-saturated plains in a field that is still active (e.g. Golson and Fowlds 1957; Houghton et al. 1996; Németh et al. 2012; Agustín-Flores et al. 2014).
History of Quarrying and Conservation Attempts in the Auckland Volcanic Field
The European settlement of Auckland ensured that the volcanic cones in the area became foundational to the creation and expansion of the city (Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority 2019). Soon after Auckland was declared the capital of New Zealand in 1840 (Brooking 2004), all the ‘volcanic hills’ in Auckland were reserved as public parks (initially protected for their aesthetic value), with the exception of Three Kings (Government 1886). Most volcanic centres saved any destruction at the onset of the development of the city due to the abundance of timber in the area which was readily used for building (Mathews 2015) instead of relying on the volcanic landforms to provide building materials. However, within twenty years of Auckland’s development, early wooden houses were starting to be replaced with stone buildings made with basalt from nearby cones; a common source of which was lava flows from Mount Eden (Hochstetter 1864; Hayward et al. 2011). St Andrew’s Presbyterian Church, for example, is the oldest stone church in New Zealand and was built in 1847 with basalt from Mt Hobson (Ōhinerau) lava flows (Hayward 2019b). By this point, there were two main roads within Auckland that served as major routes for transportation: the Great North Road and the Great South Road; materials for both were sourced from quarries along their paths, including Mount Eden (Maungawhau), One Tree Hill (Maungakiekie) and Mount Wellington (Maungarei) (Fig. 3c,f,g) (Hochstetter 1864; Hayward et al. 2011). Volcanic centres along the path of newly established railway trunk lines suffered the same fate, as ballast and rail track underlays required for their construction and expansion were sourced from Wiri Mt (Matukutūruru), Mount Smart (Rarotonga) and Mount Albert (Te Ahi-kā-a-Rakataura) (Fig. 3a,b) (Mathews 2015; Németh et al. 2021b). Several other key roads in Auckland began as pathways for the Māori people and were later converted by settlers using volcanic material, including Manukau Road, Symonds Street and Remuera Road (Mackintosh 2019).
Quarrying throughout Auckland City over the last 100 years. (a) Wiri Quarry (Matukutūruru) supplying railway ballast (Collections 1922); (b) Mount Smart Quarry (Rarotonga) with railway wagons in the foreground (New Zealand Herald 1935); (c) Mount Eden Quarry (Maungawhau), digger at work (Auckland City Council, circa 1952); (d) Māngere Sewage Treatment Plant oxidation ponds construction at the site of Māngere Lagoon, with Puketūtū Island (Te Motu-a-Hiaroa) causeway in background (Auckland Metropolitan Drainage Board 1959); (e) Smales Mt (Ōtara Hill) with bulldozer working the quarry (La Roche 1980); (f) Winstone Quarry on the north side of Mount Wellington (Maungarei), active for 65 years (Page 1989b); (g) Quarry danger sign, Mount Wellington (Maungarei) (Page 1989a); (h) Entrance to Ihumātao Quarries Scoria Pit Ltd site (Alford 2003); (i) Three Kings Quarry (Te Tātua a Riukiuta) looking North (Elliot 2016)
The Scenery Preservation Board was founded in 1906 (Roche 2017) in order to establish scenic reserves in Auckland that protect important contributors to the ‘aesthetic vision’ of the area, including volcanic cones. In 1914, the Mayor of Auckland petitioned parliament to protect the volcanic cones in the area from further destruction by quarrying and suggested they all be reserved as public domains (Pishief and Adam 2015). The most obvious and largest cones in Auckland (e.g. Mt Roskill (Puketāpapa), Mt St John (Te Kōpuke)) were the ones most likely to be preserved and protected, with smaller cones and less imposing landforms far more likely to be quarried (Mathews 2015; Mackintosh 2019). These prominent cones were further protected in the 1970s by council measures, deeming them to be of ‘regional significance’ (Mathews 2015). The Department of Conservation (DOC) was established in 1987 in order to protect ‘the intrinsic and cultural values of the country’s natural and historic resources’ (Booth 1993). Since its foundation, the DOC has played an important role in the development and protection of regional recreational parks and landforms (e.g. Rangitoto Island, Maungauika/North Head Historic Reserve, Tiritiri Matangi Island) (Department of Conservation 2023).
The development of Auckland City was rapid from its onset, and one of the main reasons it has been able to foster such a strong growth and development rate has been its proximity to key resources, the foremost of these being from volcanoes (Golson and Fowlds 1957). Many of the major Auckland roads and railways that are still used today were built using these resources (Hochstetter 1864; Mathews 2015; Németh et al. 2021b). The ability to develop such a strong transport system early on in the life of the city has enabled Auckland to grow and expand quickly (Chalmers and Hall 1989; Brooking 2004). Greater transport distances to provide ballast and roading materials would have resulted in an increased cost and time to produce infrastructure and could have significantly altered the development of the city. Throughout the development of Auckland, from its establishment as a city to present day, decisions by government and local councils have affected which volcanic centres have been utilised for a range of impacts related to the city’s development, including quarrying, water storage, waste storage and management, residential and industrial expansion and recreation (Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority 2019; Németh et al. 2021b). As noted by Mathews (2015), ‘The volcanoes were re-worked into new entities whose boundaries are not geological but defined by lawyer’s pen and encroaching houses’. Today, the destruction of the volcanic centres continues due to a sustained demand for easily acquirable rock (Németh et al. 2021b). Quarries at several centres are still operating, and the remains of several more are used as rubbish storage for the city, including Puketūtū (Te Motu-a-Hiaroa) and Green Mt (Matanginui) (Németh et al. 2021b).
Approach and classifications
Kereszturi et al. (2014) published data on the reconstructed original total area of volcanic deposits from each centre in the AVF (see the ‘original area’ column in Table 3). These were calculated from field measurements, geological maps, orthophotos and LiDAR digital terrain models (DTM). We use this published data to compare with our own measurements from the latest available LiDAR data (LINZ 2018a; b) (Table 3). These data were sourced from Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) and were captured for the Auckland Council by Aerial Surveys in 2016–2018. The data used were the 1 m LiDAR digital elevation model (DEM) of Auckland, with a reported vertical accuracy of ± 0.2 m and horizontal accuracy of ± 0.6 m. Satellite imagery was sourced from Sentinel Hub (2023). LiDAR DEM data, satellite imagery and geological maps (Edbrooke 2001) were used to measure the total deposit surface area remaining for each volcanic centre (see ‘current area’ column in Table 3). Using the estimated original areas published by Kereszturi et al. (2014), a percentage decrease was calculated for each centre. This value was used to assign a basic category of status for each centre to provide an overview of the field.
As there were no appropriate comparative examples of categorisation available in the literature, categories were created that best fit the situation. Categories were not evenly distributed on a percentage scale in order to appropriately reflect the visual, social and cultural aspects of impacts on a landform. Centres were categorised using the following: intact: 0–20% loss in the area; partially intact: 20–50% loss; partially destroyed: 50–80% loss; and destroyed: 80–100% loss. The current state of each centre has been summarised in Table 3 below, with the main causes of impacts listed.
Discussion
The Current State of Centres in the Auckland Volcanic Field
Of the 53 volcanic centres in the AVF (Fig. 4), 17% are classified as intact, 28% are partially intact, 30% are partially destroyed, and 25% are destroyed (including 13% that have no trace left). The measurements in Table 3 present a total estimated original deposit area of 147.65 km2 and a total measured area (using 2016–2018 data as outlined above) of 88.58 km2, with the difference between these measurements totalling a 59.07 km2 loss, or 40%. To summarise, we have approximately 60% of the deposit area remaining in the AVF. Unsurprisingly, the most common causes for impacts to the volcanic centres throughout the AVF are land use and quarrying (Table 3). Urban development has also been a common impact. The AVF was built over almost 200,000 years of volcanism (Leonard et al. 2017; Hopkins et al. 2020), and in just 180 years, anthropogenic activity has destroyed or covered 40% of its surface expression to date.
Current status of each volcanic centre in the AVF. Classification of the state of each centre is represented by triangle symbols shown in the key. Satellite imagery from Airbus (2023)
Historical and Geological Losses Caused by Anthropogenic Activity
Volcanic centres provide important insights into both human history and the natural histories of the area (such as remnants of forests long removed to make way for quarrying and urban development (Mackintosh 2019)). Quarrying in the AVF has destroyed numerous archaeological sites (e.g. Ihumātao Peninsula, Otuataua Stonefields, Three Kings (Fox 1977; Mackintosh 2019)) and remnants of local Māori culture and history (Stone 2001). The geological and educational losses caused by anthropogenic modifications to this field have also been severe (Fig. 5).
Examples of some of the affected volcanic centres in Auckland. (a) Tuff deposits along the Ihumātao Peninsula, on the outer edge of Maungataketake (Elletts Mt), with buried fossil forest remnants visible in coastal exposures. (b) Mount Wellington (Maungarei) showcasing Māori terracing on its flanks and scars from quarrying operations covered in trees on one side. (c) The remnants of Three Kings (Te Tātua a Riukiuta) with the protected ‘Big King’ cone visible in the background. (d) View of Auckland City from Mount Eden (Maungawhau), with Rangitoto, North Head (Maungauika) and Mt Victoria (Takarunga) visible on the left (all intact; see Table 3), Orakei Basin visible ahead (partially destroyed) and Mt Hobson (Ōhinerau) and Mt Wellington (Maungarei) visible to the right (both partially intact)
For example, Maungataketake (Elletts Mt), located on the culturally and historically significant Ihumatao Peninsula, has been heavily quarried since at least 2005 (Fig. 3h), with few deposits remaining. It is privately owned with limited access to its scientific study. Németh et al. (2021b) drew attention to outer exposures of the deposits of Maungataketake along the Ihumātao peninsula (Fig. 5a), which provide a truly unique geoheritage opportunity to study both the inner and outer proximal to distal volcanic successions in tandem to provide high-resolution data (Gravis and Németh 2016; Gravis et al. 2017). Unfortunately, due to a lack of access by volcanologists to the centre, this is unlikely to happen, and it remains classified as a future urban zone in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Auckland Council 2016).
Ōtāhuhu (Mt Richmond) was one of the most complex centres in the AVF (Table 2) and the original site of a Māori pā (Fig. 2). It originally consisted of a tuff ring with at least nine scoria cones within the crater, as recorded by Hochstetter (1864). There were also at least two smaller craters that formed within the tuff ring (Hayward 2019b). Ōtāhuhu has produced the fifth-largest eruptive volume of materials attributed to scoria cones in the AVF (Kereszturi et al. 2013). Due to its complexity and high eruptive volume, it is one of the more significant volcanic centres in the field. Unfortunately, Ōtāhuhu had already been ‘badly defaced by quarrying operations’ by 1961 (Searle 1961) and has since been over half quarried away (Hayward 2019b) (Table 3).
The smallest tuff ring in the AVF, Ash Hill (Fig. 1), was completely removed by 2019. Minimal observations of the centre were made by Hochstetter (1864); however, a full volcanological study was never made. If any deposits remain, they are now buried underneath a well-developed heavy industrial zone (Hayward 2008; Auckland Council 2016) and are unlikely ever to be seen again. Despite the size of this centre and the likelihood that it was the shortest eruption in the AVF (Németh et al. 2021b), its loss is substantial as it would have been an important end-member indicator for future eruptions.
Several campaigns have been formed to protect and preserve the volcanic landscapes in Auckland. The Save Our Unique Landscape (SOUL) campaign was created to protect the Ihumatao Peninsula from further damage and planned urban development. The area is undeniably significant in terms of Māori history and culture, as well as geological and archaeological heritage (Gravis and Németh 2016; Gravis et al. 2017; Malva 2018; Mackintosh 2019). Community interest and support have meant this area remains free of development for the time being, with an uncertain future (McCreanor et al. 2018; Gravis et al. 2020). Other geoconservation bids have been made by geologists and concerned citizens over areas such as Three Kings (Te Tātua a Riukiuta) (Fig. 5c), Crater Hill and Wiri (Matukutūruru) with limited success (Hayward and Crossley 2014; Hayward 2017, 2019a).
The Benefits and Balance of Anthropogenic Modification of Volcanic Landforms
It has been recognised worldwide that there is significant potential to be found in the balance between the losses and gains of quarrying, mining and other anthropogenic impacts on volcanic landforms (Prosser 2016; Gravis et al. 2020; Quesada-Valverde and Quesada-Román, 2023). As determined by Németh et al. (2021b), ‘a balance must be defined between excavation and preservation’. Quarries and mines create opportunities for geologists to study volcanoes in greater detail beneath the surface (López-García et al. 2011) and often aid in the creation of geoheritage sites, geoparks and tourism sites after a quarry has ceased operations (Prosser 2016; Pijet-Migoń and Migoń, 2022) (Fig. 6). Abandoned quarries and mines can also help promote education regarding volcanic landforms and their history and help to showcase the materials they have provided for the area (such as stone walls and buildings) (Hayward 2019b; Németh et al. 2021b; Pijet-Migoń and Migoń, 2022).
Examples of spectacular outcrops exposed worldwide by anthropogenic impacts: (a) Stratigraphy of what was once a 90-m high scoria cone exposed by quarrying, Wiri Mountain (Matukutūruru), Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand (Foote et al. 2022); (b) Al Malsa scoria cone complex damaged by quarrying and road construction, Northern Harrat Rahat, Saudi Arabia, in the proposed Harrat Al Madinah Geopark (Downs et al. 2019); (c) an abandoned basalt quarry that showcases the rock types of the region and now hosts the main visitor centre of Bakony-Balaton UNESCO Global Geopark, Plio-Pleistocene Bakony-Balaton Highland Volcanic Field, Hungary (Pál and Albert 2021); (d) quarry face at Mount Elephant, Newer Volcanics Province, Australia (Boyce 2013); (e) Late Pleistocene Um Nathilah scoria cone chain, Al Madinah City, Saudi Arabia, damaged by motorway construction on the northern side (Downs et al. 2019); (f) active quarrying of scoria at the Ohakune Volcanic Complex, southern Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand (Froggatt and Lowe 1990; Kósik et al. 2016)
Due to the frequency of quarrying in the AVF, many geological studies in the area have been assisted by the presence of the outcrops created. Having a cross-cut view of volcanic deposits allows for a 3D representation of key indicators including deposit direction, thickness, eruption mechanisms, complex eruption style transitions (Houghton et al. 1996; Foote et al. 2023), feeder dyke characterisation and even buried landforms (Foote et al. 2022). If every volcanic landform in the AVF had been untouched by quarrying and transport infrastructure (such as motorways), our understanding of volcanic processes and evolution in this field would have been greatly reduced.
This gain of geological knowledge because of human impacts on volcanic landforms is a common occurrence worldwide (Fig. 6). During quarrying operations at Hornsby in New South Wales, Australia, a cross-section was exposed (at 100 m depth) of a previously unidentified Jurassic diatreme (Semeniuk 2022). Key inner structures of volcanoes in the Sudetes, Poland, were exposed by quarrying (Migoń and Pijet-Migoń, 2016), and due to the scarce surface exposures of landforms in the area, this was the only way volcanism could have been studied in detail. Xitle Volcano in the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, Mexico City, has been exposed by quarrying and has been a key site for studying monogenetic volcanism for many years (Walker 1993; Guilbaud et al. 2021).
Areas of significant volcanic geoheritage worldwide are often linked with anthropogenically impacted volcanic landforms, which aid in geodiversity, geoeducation and geoheritage management. This has been the case in the Canary Islands (Dóniz-Páez et al. 2020), in geoparks throughout China (Fuming et al. 2016), with the volcanic landforms through Andagua in Peru (Gałaś et al. 2018), the volcanic islands of Sardinia in Italy (Gioncada et al. 2019), the spectacular oasis-volcanic landscape of Bahariya in Egypt (Khalaf et al. 2019) and throughout harrats of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Moufti et al. 2015), to name a few.
Future Impacts on Volcanic Centres of the Auckland Volcanic Field
As is made apparent when looking at the history of Auckland’s volcanic landforms and the numerous attempts at conserving them from the time the city was founded, the future preservation of each volcanic centre is never set in stone, and centres that may have assurances of protection today will undoubtedly be reassessed as the demands of this vital city’s continued development continue (Figs. 4 and 5) (Németh et al. 2021b). The Auckland Unitary Plan, a plan for the use of ‘Auckland’s natural and physical resources’, was developed by the Auckland Council and introduces objectives to protect ‘outstanding natural features and landscapes’ (Auckland Council 2016). The plan also acknowledges the importance of the AVF volcanoes to the history of the Māori people, as well as Auckland City’s identity. There are several other formal policies and acts that outline the importance of preserving and protecting the volcanic features in the AVF (Department of Conservation 1977; Ministry for the Environment 1991; Tataki Auckland Unlimited 2023). The continued destruction of volcanic landforms in Auckland is likely due to a lack of education and communication of their significance, a lack of cohesive legislation specific to these landforms, and a priority balance for each landform that weighs heavily towards urban development (Gravis et al. 2020; Németh et al. 2021a). Crater Hill (Fig. 4) is one such example and is identified as being at risk of further destruction. It was a complex centre with a tuff ring with a small crater on its rim, two scoria cones, a lava shield and two significant lava caves (McGee et al. 2013; Hayward 2019b) and is a typical example of the upper range of complexity that can be expected from future eruptions at a single centre in the AVF. Crater Hill was originally the site of a Māori pā, with housing developed on the tuff ring rim (Hayward 2019b). One of the most striking features of this centre is intercalated deposits from simultaneous ‘wet’ phreatomagmatic and ‘dry’ magmatic eruptions from multiple vents (Houghton et al. 1996). This process has only been noted in several other centres in the AVF (Agustin-Flores et al. 2015; Foote et al. 2023). Crater Hill has been severely modified by quarrying in the past, with both the scoria cones and the scoria-rich tuff ring affected (Houghton et al. 1996; Hayward 2019a). The site was partially restored after quarrying ceased; however, the deposits at this important site are damaged regardless of the aesthetic outlook (Németh et al. 2021b). There are currently legal bids by the private owners of the land to develop it into a residential zone, which have so far been met with resistance in favour of retaining the land as a protected area to preserve the volcanic landscape of the AVF (Hayward 2019a). However, when taking into account the continued demands of the growth of Auckland City, and the potential gain for the private owners, this already damaged volcanic centre is unlikely to exist much longer (Mathews 2015; Mackintosh 2019; Németh et al. 2021b), and recent city plans have already classed all but the middle part as a rural production zone (Auckland Council 2016).
Other centres that will be impacted due to city plans (Auckland Council 2016) are Waitomokia (Moerangi) (Figs. 1 and 4), with all but one corner is classed as a light industry zone; Maungataketake (Elletts Mt) (Figs. 3h, 5a), classed as a future urban zone; the northern section of Kohuora (Figs. 1, 4), classed as a single housing zone; and Three Kings (Te Tātua a Riukiuta) (Figs. 1, 4, 5c), classed as an apartment zone with the exception of a section of the original landform that covers one of the three scoria cones, Te Tātua o Riu-ki-uta ‘Big King’, which was successfully made into a reserve in 1949 (Pishief and Adam 2015).
Future Opportunities for the Auckland Volcanic Field
Any geoconservational opportunities for the volcanic landforms of the AVF lie in communication, policy and education. As with any increase in geological knowledge, a better understanding of the current landform status of the field (Table 3, Fig. 4) will aid the public and governing bodies in making decisions regarding land management and urban development for the future of the city (Németh and Németh 2023). An increase in geological understanding of the current landforms of the field is not enough, however, to ensure these landforms are protected. This information and therefore the decisions impacting the future of this field must be made open to the public, who may be unaware they are living on top of and surrounded by the remnants of culturally significant volcanic landscapes. Increased awareness and education must be a priority going forward, as geoheritage is made stronger by public involvement (Németh et al. 2017). Geoheritage and geoeducation have proven to be successful in Auckland (e.g. Māngere Mountain Education Centre (Gravis et al. 2020)), and funded development of geoheritage and geoeducation should be made a priority if any positive change is to be made for the future in terms of volcanic landform conservation (Németh and Németh 2023).
Regarding future geological studies within the AVF, increased communication and education could prevent the loss of field research before it is too late (e.g. Green Mt (Matanginui), Albert Park, Ash Hill; Table 3), by assisting with prioritisation and communication with landholders and governing bodies.
In terms of the volcanic centres that will soon be impacted by city plans (mentioned above: Crater Hill, Maungataketake, Kohuora and Three Kings), field research should be arranged where possible. For example, Wiri Mt and Waitomokia are now classed as (heavy and light, respectively) industry zones, but sampling, measurements and studies were completed before their spectacular outcrops were further destroyed and access issues prevented further study. There are also other volcanic centres whose existence and outcrop access are soon likely to further deteriorate as urban development and pressures increase over time. These include St Heliers (Whakamuhu) (Jones 1967; Spörli et al. 2015) and McLaughlins Mt (Matukutūreia) (Searle 1961) and should be prioritised if at all possible for any research before it is too late.
Ideally, a geological assessment should be included in the planning policy requirements for any land development that coincides with a volcanic landform, along with archaeological and geotechnical assessments. This could be for a certain period of time before works commenced and at certain points throughout the development process (The benefits and balance of anthropogenic modification of volcanic landforms). Access would allow scientists to collect data and samples and make effective 3D observations of the structure to create virtual reconstructions.
Conclusions
Due to the rapid development of Auckland City over the last 180 years, anthropogenic activity has caused severe archaeological, cultural, geological, and educational losses. Of the 53 volcanic centres in the AVF, 17% are classified as intact, 28% are partially intact, 30% are partially destroyed, and 25% are destroyed (including 13% that have no trace left). Based on surface area, approximately 60% of deposits remain in the AVF, and the most common causes for impacts are public land use, quarrying and urban development. Within around 180 years of human activity since European colonisation, we estimate that 40% of the original surface extent has been lost. Compiling a full account of all volcanic landforms in a volcanic field allows for the understanding of the field as a whole to ensure that preparations for future eruptions are not only based on centres with ease of access or exposure. We conclude that several volcanic centres are currently at risk of further destruction in the near future: Crater Hill, Waitomokia, Maugataketake, Kohuroa, Three Kings, St Heliers and McLaughlins Mt, and should be prioritised for any possible research before it is too late.
Funded geoheritage and geoeducation development must be a priority going forward to assist the education of the public, who should be aware of the decisions affecting the future of this field and the extent of its cultural and historical significance. We propose that a geological assessment should be a requirement before and, if possible, during any land development on or near a volcanic landform. Many geological studies globally have been assisted by the presence of outcrops created by quarrying, mining, transport infrastructure and other modifications of volcanic landforms. If access was granted in every situation where these landforms were to be impacted, it would result in a significant increase in geological knowledge and improve the geoheritage value and management of geoeducation in Auckland. The history of this young monogenetic volcanic field can help us to understand what to expect in the future, both in terms of volcanic activity and management of volcanic landforms. Allowing access (where safe and practicable) to scientists through the course of development in these areas would, in turn, aid the public and governing bodies in decision-making for the future of the city and its volcanic landforms in terms of increased knowledge of volcanic mechanisms of the AVF and awareness of the potential associated hazards.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [AF], upon reasonable request.
References
Affleck DK, Cassidy J, Locke CA (2001) Te Pouhawaiki Volcano and pre-volcanic topography in central Auckland: volcanological and hydrogeological implications. NZ J Geol Geophys 44:313–321
Agustín-Flores J, Németh K, Cronin S, Lindsay JM, Kereszturi G, Brand BD, Smith IEM (2014) Phreatomagmatic eruptions through unconsolidated coastal plain sequences, Maungataketake, Auckland Volcanic Field (New Zealand). J Volcanol Geoth Res 276:46–63
Agustin-Flores J, Németh K, Cronin S, Lindsay J, Kereszturi G (2015) Shallow-seated explosions in the construction of the Motukorea tuff ring (Auckland, New Zealand): evidence from lithic and sedimentary characteristics. J Volcanol Geoth Res 304:272–286
2023 Airbus (2023) Maxar Technologies & Airbus, C. 2023. Auckland, New Zealand. Data SIO, NOAA, U.S. Navy, NGA, GEBCO,. Google Earth
Alessio G, De Lucia M (2017) Promotion and development of protected volcanic areas through field-based environmental communication activities: the ‘Gran Cono’ tour in the Vesuvius National Park (Italy). Geoheritage 9:435–442
Alford H (2003) Quarry entrance, Māngere. In: COLLECTIONS, A. L. H. (ed.) Footprints Collection. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland Libraries
Allen SR, Bryner VF, Smith IEM, Ballance PF (1996) Facies analysis of pyroclastic deposits within basaltic tuff-rings of the Auckland volcanic field, New Zealand. NZ J Geol Geophys 39:309–327
Allen MW (2015) Food, fighting, and fortifications in pre-European New Zealand: beyond the ecological model of Maori Warfare. In: VANDERWARKER, A. M. & WILSON, G. D. (eds.) The Archaeology of Food and Warfare. Calfornia, USA: Springer
Allen SR, Smith IEM (1994) Eruption styles and volcanic hazard in the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. Geosci Rep Shizuoka Univ. 5 - 14
Allen K-A, Kern ML, Rozek CS, McInerney DM, Slavich GM (2021) Belonging: a review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research. Aust J Psychol 73
Anderson A (1991) The chronology of colonization in New Zealand. Antiquity 65:767–795
Arbury J (2019) From urban sprawl to compact city – an analysis of urban growth management in Auckland University of Auckland.
Ashworth E (1843) Queen Street, Auckland, 1843. Accession No. 65/20 ed. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland War Memorial Museum Tāmaki Paenga Hira
Auckland City Council (2021) Auckland’s Population [Online]. Auckland: Auckland Council, New Zealand Government. Available: https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/plans-projects-policies-reports-bylaws/our-plans-strategies/auckland-plan/about-the-auckland-plan/Pages/aucklands-population.aspx [Accessed 24/05/2023 2023]
Auckland City Council circa (1952) Digger in the Mount Eden Quarry. In: COLLECTION, A. L. H. (ed.) Accession 580. Central City Library, Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland Libraries
Auckland Council (2016) Auckland Unitary Plan. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland Council
Auckland Metropolitan Drainage Board 1959. Māngere Sewage Treatment Plant. In: COLLECTION, A. L. H. (ed.) Auckland Metropolitan Drainage Board. Central City Library, Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland Libraries
Auckland War Memorial Museum (2023) Auckland War Memorial Museum [Online]. Parnell, Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland Council. Available: https://www.aucklandmuseum.com/ [Accessed 18/04/2023 2023]
Augustinus P, Cochran U, Kattel G, D’Costa D, Shane P (2012) Late Quaternary paleolimnology of Onepoto maar, Auckland, New Zealand: implications for the drivers of regional paleoclimate. Quatern Int 253:18–31
Avellán DR, Macías JL, Pardo N, Scolamacchia T, Rodriguez D (2012) Stratigraphy, geomorphology, geochemistry and hazard implications of the Nejapa Volcanic Field, western Managua, Nicaragua. J Volcanol Geoth Res 213:51–71
Barr J, Graham G (1920) The City of Auckland, New Zealand, 1840–1920, Auckland, Whitcombe & Tombs
Benfer RA, Ocás A (2017) A prehistoric pyramid in the shape of a volcanic cinder cone, Nepeña Valley. Peru Antiquity 91:e7
Bernbaum E (2006) Sacred mountains: themes and teachings. Mt Res Dev 26:304–309
Bitschene PR (2015) Edutainment with basalt and volcanoes – the Rockeskyller Kopf example in the Westeifel Volcanic Field/Vulkaneifel European Geopark, Germany. Zeitschrift Der Deutschen Gesellschaft Fur Geowissenschaften 166:187–193
Booth KL (1993) Recreation on public lands in New Zealand — past, present and future. GeoJournal 29:299–305
Boyce J (2013) The Newer Volcanics Province of southeastern Australia: a new classification scheme and distribution map for eruption centres. Aust J Earth Sci 60:449–462
Briggs RM, Okada T, Itaya T, Shibuya H, Smith IEM (1994) K-Ar ages, paleomagnetism, and geochemistry of the South Auckland volcanic field, North Island, New Zealand. New Z J Geol Geophys 143–153
Brilha J (2018) Geoheritage: inventories and evaluation. Geoheritage 69–85
Brooking T (2004) The History of New Zealand. Greenwood Publishing Group, America
Brown SK, Auker MR, Sparks RSJ (2015) Populations around Holocene volcanoes and development of a Population Exposure Index. In: LOUGHLIN, S. C., SPARKS, S., BROWN, S. K., JENKINS, S. F. & VYE-BROWN, C. (eds.) Global Volcanic Hazards and Risk. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press
Bulmer S (1994) Sources for the archaeology of the Maaori settlement of the Taamaki volcanic district In: CONSERVATION, D. O. (ed.) Science and Research Series, no. 63. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Conservation
Cas RAF, Van Otterloo J, Blaikie TN, Van Den Hove J (2017) The dynamics of a very large intra-plate continental basaltic volcanic province, the Newer Volcanics Province, SE Australia, and implications for other provinces. Geol Soc Spec Pub 446:123–172
Cassidy J, Locke CA (2010) The Auckland volcanic field, New Zealand: geophysical evidence for structural and spatio-temporal relationships. J Volcanol Geoth Res 195:127–137
Cassidy J, Locke CA, Miller CA, Rout DJ (1999) The Auckland volcanic field, New Zealand: geophysical evidence for its eruption history. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 161:1–10
Cassidy J, France SJ, Locke CA (2007) Gravity and magnetic investigation of maar volcanoes, Auckland volcanic field, New Zealand. J Volcanol Geoth Res 153–163
Chalmers L, Hall B (1989) City Profile: Auckland. Cities 6:82–90
Collections SGGS circa (1922) Ballast for the railways: a volcanic hill at Wiri, south of Auckland, from whence a supply is obtained. Supplement to the Auckland Weekly News 30 March 1922 p041 Auckland: Auckland Libraries
Cruz-Pérez MA, García-Sánchez L, Miros J, Canet C, Muñoz-Salazar JI (2022) Multidesignated areas: case study from Comarca Minera UNESCO Global Geopark, Mexico. In: KUBALÍKOVÁ, L., CORATZA, P., PÁL, M., ZWOLIŃSKI, Z., IRAPTA, P. N. & VAN WYK DE VRIES, B. (eds.) Visages of Geodiversity and Geoheritage. London: Geological Society, Special Publications
Davidson J (2011) Archaeological investigations at Maungarei: a large Mäori settlement on a volcanic cone in Auckland, New Zealand. Tuhinga 22:19–100
De Natale G, Troise C, Somma R (2020) Invited perspectives: the volcanoes of Naples: how can the highest volcanic risk in the world be effectively mitigated? Nat Hazard 20:2037–2053
Department of Conservation (1977) Reserves Act 1977. In: CONSERVATION, D. O. (ed.) Public Act 1977 no 66. New Zealand: Parliamentary Counsel Office
Department of Conservation (1990) Report of the protection of the Wiri lava cave. In: CONSERVATION, D. O. (ed.). Wellington, New Zealand: Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment
Department of Conservation (2023) Department of Conservation Te Papa Atawhai [Online]. New Zealand: New Zealand Government. [Accessed 01/05/2023 2023]
Dóniz-Páez JF, Beltrán-Yanes E, Becerra-Ramírez R, Pérez NM, Hernández PA, Hernández W (2020) Diversity of Volcanic Geoheritage in the Canary Islands. Geosciences, Spain, p 10
Downs DT, Robinson JE, Stelten ME, Champion DE, Dietterich HR, Sisson TW, Zahran H, Hassan K, Shawali J (2019) Geologic Map of the Northern Harrat Rahat Volcanic Field, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. U.S. Geological Survey.
Edbrooke SW (2001) Geology of the Auckland Area: scale 1:250 000. New Zealand: Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences
Edbrooke SW, Mazengarb C, Stephenson W (2003) Geology and geological hazards of the Auckland urban area, New Zealand. Quatern Int 103:3–21
Elliot M (2016) Three Kings Quarry. In: COLLECTION, A. L. H. (ed.) Matt Elliott Collection. Auckland, New Zealand: Aickland Libraries
Erfurt-Cooper P (2011) Geotourism in volcanic and geothermal environments: playing with fire? Geoheritage 3:187–193
Erfurt-Cooper P, Cooper M (2010) Volcano and geothermal tourism. United Kingdom, Earthscan, London, p 378
Fepuleai A, Weber E, Németh K, Muliaina T, Iese V (2017) Eruption styles of Samoan volcanoes represented in tattooing, language and cultural activities of the indigenous people. Geoheritage 9:395–411
Ferrer N, Vegas J, Galindo I, Lozano G (2022) A geoheritage valuation to prevent environmental degradation of a new volcanic landscape in the Canary Islands. Land Degrad Dev 1–14
Firth CW (1930) The geology of the north-west portion of Manukau County, Auckland. New Z Sci Congr 85–137
Foote A, Németh K, Handley H (2022) The interplay between environmental and magmatic conditions in eruption style transitions within a fissure-aligned monogenetic volcanic system of Auckland, New Zealand. J Volcanol Geoth Res 431:107652
Foote A, Németh K, Handley H (2017) Unpublished: Māngere tuff deposits. Personal observations, measurements and sampling. Māngere Mt, Auckland, New Zealand: Macquarie University, NSW, Australia
Foote A, Handley H, Németh K (2023) The role of phreatomagmatism in the formation of complex monogenetic volcanic systems in a low-lying coastal plain. J Volcanol Geoth Re in review
Fox E (1977) Pa of the Auckland Isthmus: an archaeological analysis. Records of the Auckland Institute and Museum. Auckland Institute and Museum, Auckland, New Zealand
Freire S, Florczyk AJ, Pesaresi M, Sliuzas R (2019) An improved global analysis of population distribution in proximity to active volcanoes, 1975–2015. Int J Geo-Inf 8:341
Froggatt PC, Lowe DJ (1990) A review of late Quaternary silicic and some other tephra formations from New Zealand: their stratigraphy, nomenclature, distribution, volume, and age. NZ J Geol Geophys 33:89–109
Fuming L, Fang W, Heigang X, Zhaoguo W, Baofu L (2016) A study on classification and zoning of Chinese geoheritage resources in national geoparks. Geoheritage 8:247–261
Gałaś A, Paulo A, Gaidzik K, Zavala B, Kalicki T, Churata D, Gałaś S, Mariño J (2018) Geosites and geotouristic attractions proposed for the project geopark Colca and volcanoes of Andagua, Peru. Geoheritage 10:707–729
Gioncada A, Pitzalis E, Cioni R, Fulignati P, Lezzerini M, Mundula F, Funedda A (2019) The Volcanic and mining geoheritage of San Pietro Island (Sulcis, Sardinia, Italy): the potential for geosite valorization. Geoheritage 11:1567–1581
Global Volcanism Program (2023) Holocene Volcano List. 17/08/2023 ed. Smithsonian Institution: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History.
Gluhak TM, Hofmeister W (2009) Roman lava quarries in the Eifel region (Germany): geochemical data for millstone provenance studies. J Archaeol Sci 36:1774–1782
Golson J, Fowlds GM (1957) Auckland’s volcanic cones: a report on their condition and a plea for their preservation. New Zealand, Unity Press, Auckland
Government NZ (1886) New Zealand parliamentary debates: third session of the ninth parliament. In: REPRESENTATIVES, L. C. A. H. O. (ed.). Wellington: G. Didsbury, Government Printer
Gravis I, Németh K, Procter JN (2017) The role of cultural and indigenous values in geosite evaluations on a quaternary monogenetic volcanic landscape at Ihumātao, Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. Geoheritage 9:373–393
Gravis I, Németh K, Twemlow C, Németh B (2020) The case for community-led geoheritage and geoconservation ventures in Māngere, South Auckland, and Central Otago, New Zealand. Geoheritage 12:1–24
Gravis I, Németh K (2016) From regional geopark to a UNESCO Global Geopark: community initiative with strong scientific support to evaluate the geoheritage and cultural values at Ihumātao, South Auckland, New Zealand. The 6th International Maar Conference. Changchun, China
Guilbaud MN, Ortega-Larrocea MDP, Cram S, van Wyk de Vries B (2021) Xitle volcano geoheritage, Mexico City: raising awareness of natural hazards and environmental sustainability in active volcanic areas. Geoheritage 13:1–27
Hayward BW (1983) Prehistoric pa sites of metropolitan Auckland. Tane 29:3–14
Hayward BW (2008) Ash Hill Volcano. Geoscience Society NZ, Wiri. Geocene, pp 8–9
Hayward BW (2018) An explanation for the origin of the triangular tuff ring remnants at Puketutu volcano. Geocene 19:16–18
Hayward BW (2019) Volcanoes of Auckland, a field guide. Auckland University Press, Auckland
Hayward BW, Crossley PC (2014) Why Wiri lava cave is so special. Geosci Soc New Z Newsl 13:18–24
Hayward BW, Grenfell H, Sandiford A, Shane P, Morley MS, Alloway B (2002) Foraminiferal and molluscan evidence for the Holocene marine history of two breached maar lakes, Auckland, New Zealand. NZ J Geol Geophys 45:467–479
Hayward BW, Murdoch G, Maitland G, Jamieson A (2011) Volcanoes of Auckland: the essential guide. Auckland University Press, Auckland, p 234
Hayward BW, Kenny JA, Grenfell H (2012) Puhinui Craters. Geoscience Society of New Zealand, Geocene, pp 14–18
Hayward BW (2013) Volcanoes recognised by Hochstetter on the Mangere Lowlands. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258374010_Volcanoes_recognised_by_Hochstetter_on_the_Mangere_Lowlands. Accessed 09/03/2022
Hayward BW (2015) Small satellite explosion craters in the Auckland Volcanic Field [Online]. Available: https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:iBjBvV0zpYwJ:scholar.google.com/+hayward+2015+small+satellite+&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&inst=9337400240212475524 [Accessed 15/11/2021]
Hayward BW (2017) Assessment of geological heritage values and extent of “volcanic remnants” within the Three Kings Precinct Plan. Auckland, New Zealand: geomarine research
Hayward BW (2019a) The campaign to save crater hill continues. Geoscience Society of New Zealand Newsletter [Online], July 2019. [Accessed 20/04/2023]
Hayward BW, Hopkins JL, Morley MS, Kenny JA (2022) Microfossil evidence for a possible maar crater and tuff ring beneath Rangitoto Volcano, Auckland, New Zealand. New Z J Geol Geophys 1–17
Hochstetter FV (1864) Geologie von Neu-Seeland. Beitrage zur Geologie der Provinzen Auckland und Nelson. Novara-Expedition, Geologie Thiel 1:274
Hopkins JL, Wilson CJN, Milled M, Leonard GS, Timm C, McGee LE, Smith IEM, Smith EGC (2017) Multi-criteria correlation of tephra deposits to source centres applied in the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. Bull Volcanol 0 - 35
Hopkins JL, Smid ER, Eccles JD, Hayes JL, Hayward BW, McGee LE, van Wijk K, Wilson TM, Cronin SJ, Leonard GS, Lindsay JM, Németh, Smith IE M (2020) Auckland volcanic field magmatism, volcanism, and hazard: a review. New Z J Geol Geophys 1–22.
Houghton BF, Wilson CJN, Rosenburg MD, Smith IEM, Parker RJ (1996) Mixed deposits of complex magmatic and phreatomagmatic volcanism: an example from Crater Hill, Auckland, New Zealand. Bull Volcanol 58:59–66
Houghton BF, Wilson CJN, Smith IEM (1999) Shallow-seated controls on styles of explosive basaltic volcanism: a case study from New Zealand. J Volcanol Geoth Res 97 - 120
Jones BG (1967) An outline of the geology of the St Heliers Bay-Glendowie area, Auckland, New Zealand. Tane 13:119–142
Kazancı N, Kuzucuoğlu C (2019) Threats and conservation of landscapes in Turkey. In: KUZUCUOĞLU, C., ÇINER, A. & KAZANCı, N. (eds.) Landscapes and landforms of Turkey. World Geomorphological Landscapes. Switzerland: Springer, Cham
Kelman I, Mather TA (2008) Living with volcanoes: the sustainable livelihoods approach for volcano-related opportunities. J Volcanol Geoth Res 172:189–198
Kereszturi G, Németh K, Cronin S, Procter J, Agustín-Flores J (2014) Influences on the variability of eruption sequences and style transitions in the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. J Volcanol Geoth Res 286:101–115
Kereszturi G, Németh K, Cronin SJ, Agustín-Flores J, Smith IEM, Lindsay J (2013) A model for calculating eruptive volumes for monogenetic volcanoes – implication for the Quaternary Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. J Volcanol Geoth Res 16–33
Khalaf EEDAH, Wahed MA, Maged A, Mokhtar H (2019) Volcanic geosites and their geoheritage values preserved in monogenetic neogene volcanic field, Bahariya Depression, Western Desert, Egypt: implication for climatic change-controlling volcanic eruption. Geoheritage 11:855–873
Kósik S, Németh K, Kereszturi G, Procter JN, Zellmer GF, Geshi N (2016) Phreatomagmatic and water-influenced Strombolian eruptions of a small-volume parasitic cone complex on the southern ringplain of Mt. Ruapehu, New Zealand: facies architecture and eruption mechanisms of the Ohakune Volcanic Complex controlled by an unstable fissure eruption. J Volcanol Geoth Res 327:99–115
Kshirsagar P, Sheth H, Shaikh B (2010) Mafic alkalic magmatism in central Kachchh, India: a monogenetic volcanic field in the northwestern Deccan Traps. Bull Volcanol 73:595–612
La Roche A (1980) Quarry, East Tamaki. In: COLLECTION, A. L. H. (ed.) Footprints Collection. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland Libraries, New Zealand
Landsat & Copernicus (1984) Auckland City 1984. Historical satellite imagery. Google Earth
Landsat & Copernicus (2020) Auckland City 2020. Historical satellite imagery. Google Earth
Leonard GS, Calvert AT, Hopkins JL, Wilson CJN, Smid ER, Lindsay J, Champion DE (2017) High-precision 40Ar/39Ar dating of Quaternary basalts from Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand, with implications for eruption rates and paleomagnetic correlations. J Volcanol Geoth Res 343:60–74
Lindsay JM, Leonard GS, Smid ER, Hayward BW (2011) Age of the Auckland Volcanic Field: a review of existing data. New Z J Geol Geophys 379–401
Linnell T, Shane P, Smith I, Augustinus P, Cronin S, Lindsay J, Maas R (2016) Long-lived shield volcanism within a monogenetic basaltic field: the conundrum of Rangitoto volcano, New Zealand. Geol Soc Am Bull 1160–1172
LINZ (2016–2018a) Auckland North LiDAR 1m DEM. In: SURVEYS, A. (ed.) LINZ Data Service. Auckland, New Zealand: land information New Zealand
LINZ (2016–2018b) Auckland South LiDAR 1m DEM. In: SURVEYS, A. (ed.) LINZ Data Service. Auckland, New Zealand: land information New Zealand
López-García JA, Oyarzun R, López Andrés S, Manteca Martínez JI (2011) Scientific, educational, and environmental considerations regarding mine sites and geoheritage: a perspective from SE Spain. Geoheritage 3:267–275
Lowe DJ, Newnham RM, McFagden BG, Higham TFG (2000) Tephras and New Zealand Archaeology. J Archaeol Sci 27:859–870
Lowe DJ, Newnham RM, McCraw JD (2002) Volcanism and early Maori society in New Zealand. In: TORRENCE, R. & GRATTAN, J. (eds.) Natural disasters and cultural change. London: Routledge
MacInnes B, Fitzhugh B, Holman D (2014) Controlling for landform age when determining the settlement history of the Kuril Islands. Geoarchaeology 29:185–201
Mackintosh L (2019) Shifting grounds: history, memory and materiality in Auckland landscapes c.1350–2018. Doctor of Philosophy in History, University of Auckland
Magill C, Blong R (2005) Volcanic risk ranking for Auckland, New Zealand. I: methodology and hazard investigation. Bull Volcanol 67:331–339
Malva S (2018) A struggle with SOUL: politics of land, housing, and metaphysics in Ihumātao. Master of Arts in Sociology, The University of Auckland, Tāmaki Makaurau
Martí J, Planagumà L (2016) La Garrotxa volcanic field of Northeast Spain: case study of sustainable volcanic landscape management. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland
Mathews N (2015) Molten territories: 21st century articulations of Auckland’s volcanoes. University of Auckland, PhD
McCreanor T, Hancock F, Short N (2018) The mounting crisis at Ihumaatao: a high cost special housing area or a cultural heritage landscape for future generations. Counterfutures 6:139–148
McGee LE, Millet M, Smith IEM, Németh K, Lindsay JM (2012) The inception and progression of melting in a monogenetic eruption: Motukorea Volcano, the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. Lithos 155:360–374
McGee LE, Smith IEM, Millet M, Handley H, Lindsay JM (2013) Asthenospheric control of melting processes in a monogenetic basaltic system: a case study of the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. J Petrol 54:2125–2153
Migoń P, Pijet-Migoń E (2016) Overlooked geomorphological component of volcanic geoheritage—diversity and perspectives for tourism industry, Pogórze Kaczawskie Region, SW Poland. Geoheritage 8:333–350
Ministry for the Environment (1991) Resource management act 1991. In: ENVIRONMENT, M. F. T. (ed.) Public Act 1991 No 69. New Zealand: Parliamentary Counsel Office
Morad M, Jay M (2003) Freedom’s ramparts on the sea: the postcolonial New Zealand landcape and the quest for sustainability. Br Rev N Z Stud 14:119–130
Moufti MRH, Németh K, El-Masry NN, Qaddah A (2015) Volcanic geotopes and their geosites preserved in an arid climate related to landscape and climate changes since the Neogene in Northern Saudi Arabia: Harrat Hutaymah (Hai’il Region). Geoheritage 7:103–118
Needham AJ, Lindsay JM, Smith IEM, Augustinus P, Shane PA (2011) Sequential eruption of alkaline and sub-alkaline magmas from a small monogenetic volcano in the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. J Volcanol Geoth Res 126 - 142
Németh B, Németh K (2023) Spatial decision-making support for geoheritage conservation in the urban and indigenous environment of the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. Geol Soc Publ 530:235–256
Németh K, Casadevall T, Moufti MRH, Martí J (2017) Volcanic geoheritage. Geoheritage 9:251–254
Németh K, Gravis I, Németh B (2021) Dilemma of geoconservation of monogenetic volcanic sites under fast urbanization and infrastructure developments with special relevance to the Auckland Volcanic Field. New Z Sustain 13:6549
Németh K, Cronin SJ, Smith IEM, Agustín-Flores J (2012) Amplified hazard of small-volume monogenetic eruptions due to environmental controls, Orakei Basin, Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. Bull Volcanol 2121 - 2137
Németh B, Németh K, Procter J (2021a) Visitation rate analysis of geoheritage features from earth science education perspective using automated landform classification and crowdsourcing: a geoeducation capacity map of the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. Geosciences 11
New Zealand Herald circa (1935) Mount Smart quarry and ralway, 1930s. In: COLLECTION, A. L. H. (ed.) Onehunga Public Library Collection. Central City Library, Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland Libraries
Newnham RM, Lowe DJ, McGlone MS, Wilmshurst JM, Higham TFG (1998) The Kaharoa Tephra as a critical datum for earliest human impact in Northern New Zealand. J Archaeol Sci 25:533–544
Nunn PD (2014) Lashed by sharks, pelted by demons, drowned for apostasy: the value of myths that explain geohazards in the Asia-Pacific region. Asian Geogr 31:59–82
Nurmawati A, Konstantinou KI (2018) Hazard assessment of volcanic ballistic impacts at Mt Chihshin, Tatun Volcano Group, northern Taiwan. Natual Hazards 92:77–92
Ort MH, Elson MD, Anderson KC, Duffield WA, Hooten JA, Champion DE, Waring G (2008) Effects of scoria-cone eruptions upon nearby human communities. GSA Bull 120:476–486
Page S (1989a) Quarry zone danger sign, Winstone Quarry, Mount Wellington. In: COLLECTIONS, A. L. H. (ed.) 1990 Project, AucklandLibraries. Auckland, New Zealand: Central City Library, Auckland Libraries
Page S (1989b) Winstone Quarry, Mount Wellington. In: COLLECTIONS, A. L. H. (ed.) 1900 Project, Auckland Libraries. Auckland, New Zealand: Central City Library, Auckland Libraries
Pál M, Albert G (2021) Geodiversity mapping of the Bakony–Balaton UNESCO Global Geopark, Hungary. Proceedings of the International Cartographic Association. Copernicus Publications, 1–6
Peti L, Augustinus PC (2019) Stratigraphy and sedimentology of the Orakei maar lake sediment sequence (Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand). Scientific Drilling 25:47–56
Pijet-Migoń E, Migoń P (2022) Geoheritage and cultural heritage—a review of recurrent and interlinked themes. Geosciences 12
Pishief DE, Adam J (2015) Te Tātua a Riukiuta Three Kings heritage study. Hastings: Puketāpapa Local Board, Auckland Council
Planagumà L, Martí J (2018) Geotourism at the natural park of La Garrotxa volcanic zone (Catalonia, Spain): impact, viability, and sustainability. Geosciences 8
Prosser CD (2016) Geoconservation, quarrying and mining: opportunities and challenges illustrated through working in partnership with the mineral extraction industry in England. Geoheritage 10:259–270
Quesada-Valverde ME, Quesada-Román A (2023) Worldwide Trends in methods and resources promoting geoconservation, geotourism, and geoheritage. Geosciences 13
Ricketts BD (1977) The coastal geology of the Ihumatao area, Auckland. Tane 23:119–124
Roche M (2017) Seeing scenic New Zealand: W. W. Smith’s eye and the scenery preservation commission, 1904–06. Int Rev Environ Hist 3:175–195
Sadono R, Hartono H, Machfoedz MM, Setiaji S (2017) Monitoring land cover changes in the disaster-prone area: a case study of Cangkringan Sub-District, the flanks of Mount Merapi, Indonesia. Forum Geografi 31:209–219
Searle EJ (1959) The volcanoes of Ihumato and Mangere, Auckland. New Z J Geol Geophys 870 - 888
Searle EJ (1961) Volcanoes of the Otahuhu-Manurewa district, Auckland. NZ J Geol Geophys 4:239–255
Searle EJ (1962) The volcanoes of Auckland City. NZ J Geol Geophys 5:193–227
Semeniuk TA (2022) The Hornsby Quarry Geosite, NSW, Australia— A Geoheritage Treasure. Land 11
Sentinel Hub (2023) Modified Copernicus Sentinel data. In: 2, C. S. (ed.). Slovenia: Sinergise Laboratory of geographical information systems Ltd
Shane P, Gehrels M, Zawalna-Geer A, Augustinus P, Lindsay J, Chaillou I (2013) Longevity of a small shield volcano revealed by cryto-tephra studies (Rangitoto volcano, New Zealand): change in eruptive behavior of a basaltic field. J Volcanol Geoth Res 174–183
Shane P, Smith I (2000) Geochemical fingerprinting of basaltic tephra deposits in the Auckland Volcanic Field. NZ J Geol Geophys 43:569–577
Sigurdsson H (2015) The encyclopedia of volcanoes. Elsevier, USA
Smith PM (2012) A concise history of New Zealand. USA, Cambridge University Press, New York, p 368
Spörli KB, Black PM, Lindsay JM (2015) Excavation of buried Dun Mountain-Maitai terrane ophiolite by volcanoes of the Auckland Volcanic field, New Zealand. NZ J Geol Geophys 58:229–243
Stone RCJ (2001) From Tamaki-Makau-Rau to Auckland: A History of Auckland. New Zealand, Auckland University Press, Auckland
Szakács A, Chiriță V (2017) Protected natural values of geoheritage interest in the Călimani National Park, Eastern Carpathians, Romania. Geoheritage 9:421–434
Szepesi J, Harangi S, Ésik Z, Novák TJ, Lukács R, Soós I (2017) Volcanic geoheritage and geotourism perspectives in Hungary: a case of an UNESCO World Heritage Site, Tokaj Wine Region Historic Cultural Landscape, Hungary. Geoheritage 9:329–349
Tataki Auckland Unlimited (2023) Destination AKL 2025. In: AUCKLAND TOURISM, E. A. E. D. (ed.). Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland Council
Taylor A (1961) Five Manukau Pa sites. New Zealand Archaeological Association
Todde A, Cioni R, Pistolesi M, Geshi N, Bonadonna C (2017) The 1914 Taisho eruption of Sakurajima volcano: stratigraphy and dynamics of the largest explosive event in Japan during the twentieth century. Bull Volcanol 79
Tūpuna Maunga o Tāmaki Makaurau Authority (2019) Tūpuna Maunga Strategies. Auckland, New Zealand: Tūpuna Maunga Authority
Umaya R, Hardjanto, Soekmadi R, Sunito S (2020) Direct economic benefits and human dependence toward Gunung Merapi National Park, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 21:982–993
Vafadari K, Cooper MJ (2020) Community engagement in Japanese geoparks. In: SADRY, B. N. (ed.) The Geotourism Industry in the 21st Century. 1st Edition ed. New York: Apple Academic Press
Von Veh MW, Németh K (2009) An assessment of the alignments of vents based on geostatistical analysis in the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. Géo Morphologie 15:175–186
Walker GPL (1993) Basaltic-volcano systems. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 76:3–38
Zangmo GT, Kagou AD, Nkouathio DG, Gountié MD, Kamgang P (2017) The volcanic geoheritage of the Mount Bamenda Calderas (Cameroon Line): assessment for geotouristic and geoeducational purposes. Geoheritage 9:255–278
Acknowledgements
We thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments that have improved the manuscript. We thank Kevin Page for editorial handling of this manuscript. This study was supported by a Macquarie University Research Training Program Scholarship awarded to AF and an Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP150100328) awarded to HH. LiDAR data was sourced from Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) and was captured for the Auckland Council by Aerial Surveys in 2016–2018. The data used was 1m LiDAR digital elevation model (DEM) data of Auckland, with a reported vertical accuracy of ±0.2 m and horizontal accuracy of ±0.6 m. Satellite imagery was sourced from Sentinel Hub (2023).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions Australian Research Council, DP150100328, Heather Handley. Macquarie University, 2017626, April Foote.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The concept for the paper was developed by April Foote. Material preparation, data analysis and interpretations were completed by April Foote under the supervision of Heather Handley and Károly Németh. The manuscript was written by April Foote with supervision and edits provided by Heather Handley and Károly Németh. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
There are no conflicts of interest relating to this study.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Foote, A., Handley, H. & Németh, K. Remnants of a Young Monogenetic Volcanic Field and the Fragile Balance of Anthropogenic Interaction. Geoheritage 15, 131 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00897-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00897-8