Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating Geomorphosites and the Geomorphological Hazards that Impact them: Case Study—Cozia Massif (Southern Carpathians, Romania)

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper intends to evaluate the most important geomorphosites in the Cozia Massif (Southern Carpathians) area and the geomorphological hazards that can affect and damage them. The methodology used for the evaluation stage is based on a method elaborated by Reynard et al. in Geoheritage 8:43–60, 2016, and additionally on other approaches built by researches from Lausanne, Modena and Reggio Emilia, Cantabria, Valladolid, Minho or Bucharest universities. The evaluation methodology measures quantitatively the scientific central value as well as the level of protection and promotion of specific geomorphosites. The most crucial geomorphological hazard in the area is disintegration. In order to evaluate its impact, the authors used geomechanical analysis methods; the evaluation included analysing features such as lithology, geomorphology (altitude, exposure and declivity), fissures (density, width, orientation and continuity), size and density of the base blocks, all according to the 1980 Shelby method. The Cozia Massif was considered to be an appropriate study area given their great variety in geomorphosites. Thirteen geomorphosites were included in this study, and all of them achieved scores between 0.38 (Traian’s Table) and 0.82 (Cozia Gorges). These geomorphosites are in different stages of degradation with values varying from 40 (Stone Gate Archway) to 82 (Gardului Waterfall). The study ended with identifying not only the most important geomorphosites for scientific research (e.g. Cozia Gorges) and for tourism value (e.g. Gardului Waterfall) but also the most vulnerable ones that require immediate action in terms of protection and conservation (e.g. Stone Gate Archway). The values registered are in general lower than the values achieved in other massifs of the Southern Carpathians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badea L (1983) Defileul Coziei si valea subcarpatică a Oltului. Studii și cercetări de Geologie – Geofizică – Geografie, Geografie XXX:30–34, București

  • Brandolini P, Pelfini M (2010) Mapping geomorphological hazards in relation to geotourism and hiking trails. In: Regolini-Bissig G, Reynard E (eds) Mapping geoheritage. Institute of Geography, Lausanne (Géovisions 35), pp 31–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Brilha J (2005) Património geológico e geoconservação: a conservação da natureza na sua vertente geológica. Palimage Editores, Viseu, p 190

    Google Scholar 

  • Brilha J et al (2005) Definition of the Portuguese frameworks with international relevance as an input for the European geological heritage characterisation. Episodes 28(3):177–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruschi VM, Cendrero A (2005) Geosite evaluation: can we measure intangible values? Il Quaternario 18(1):293–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruschi VM, Cendrero A (2009) Direct and parametric methods for the assessment of geosites and geomorphosites. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Pfeil, Munchen, pp 73–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussard J (2014) Protection et valorisation du patrimoine géomorphologique du Parc naturel régional Gruyère Pays-d’Enhaut. Etat des lieux et perspectives. Master’s thesis, University of Lausanne. http://mesoscaphe.unil.ch/igul/memoires/bd/

  • Carcavilla Urquí L, López Martinez J, Durán Valsero JJ (2007) Patrimonio Geológico y Geodiversidad: investigación, conservación, gestión y relación con los espacios naturales protegidos. Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Madrid, p 360

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocean G (2011) Munţii Trascău. Relief, Geomorfosituri, Turism. Edit. Presa Universitară Clujeană, Cluj-Napoca (in Romanian), p. 269

  • Cocean G, Surdeanu V (2011) The assessment of geomorphosites of tourist interest in the Trascău Mountains. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai, Geographia 2:67–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Comănescu L, Dobre R (2009) Inventorying, evaluating and tourism valuating the geomorphosites from the central sector of the Ceahlău National Park. GeoJ Tour Geosites 1(3):86–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Comănescu L, Nedelea A (2010) Analysis of some representative geomorphosites in the Bucegi Mountains: between scientific evaluation and tourist perception. Area 4:406–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comănescu L, Nedelea A (2012) The assessment of geodiversity – a premise for declaring the geopark Buzăului County (Romania). J Earth Syst Sci 121(6):1493–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comănescu L, Nedelea A (2015) Public perception of the hazards affecting geomorphological heritage—case study: the central area of Bucegi Mts. (Southern Carpathians, Romania). Environ Earth Sci 73(12):8487–8497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comănescu L, Nedelea A (2017) Geomorphosites assessments of the glacial and periglacial landforms from Southern Carpathians, Landform Dynamics and Evolution in Romania, Chapter 10, Springer Geography, p 215–246

  • Comănescu L, Nedelea A, Dobre R (2009) Inventoring and evaluation of geomorphosites in the Bucegi Mountains. Geogr Forum Geogr Stud Environ Prot Res 8:38–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Comănescu L, Dobre R, Nedelea A (2011) The identification of geomorphosites in different cartographic materials. The study case—Bucegi Mts (Romania). Egypt J Environ Chang 3(1):25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Comănescu L, Nedelea R, Dobre R (2012) The evaluation of geomorphosites from the Ponoare Protected Area. Geogr Forum Geogr Stud Environ Prot Res 11(1):54–61

  • Comănescu L, Nedelea A, Dobre R, Bandoc G (2014) Inventoring the principal geomorphosites for determining geomorphodiversity. Case study—the central sector of the Bucegi Mountains (the Carpathians, Romania). J Environ Prot Ecol 15(4):1849–1857

    Google Scholar 

  • Coratza P, Giusti C (2005) Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il Quaternario 18(1):307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Droz Y, Miéville-Ott V (eds) (2005) La polyphonie du paysage. Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, Lausanne, p 236

    Google Scholar 

  • Durán Valsero JJ, Urquí L, López-Martínez J (2005) Patrimonio geológico: una panorámica de los últimos 30 años en España. Bol Real Soc Esp Hist Nat (Sec Geol) 100(1–4):277–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilă I, Anghel T (2013) Geomorphosites inventory in the Măcin Mountains (South-Eastern Romania). GeoJ Tour Geosites 11(1):42–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghika St.–Budesti (1958) Depresiunea intramontană Lovistea și creasta horstului Cozia, Studii si cercetări de geologie, p. 61–78, Bucuresti

  • Grandgirard V (1999) L’évaluation des géotopes. Geol Insubr 4(1):59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Grangier L (2013) Quelle place pour le géotourisme dans l’offre touristique du Val d’Hérens et du Vallon de Réchy? Etat du patrimoine géo(morpho)logique et propositions de valorisation. Master’s thesis, University of Lausanne. http://mesoscaphe.unil.ch/igul/memoires/bd/

  • Hann HP (1990) Cozia Gneiss (South Carpathians): Petrography, Structure, Genesis. D S Inst Geol Geofiz 74/5:41–59 Bucuresti

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilieș D (2014) Tourism planning and management for natural heritage. Edit. Bernardinum, Poland, p 134

  • Ilieş D, Josan N (2007) Preliminary contribution to the investigation of the geosites from Apuseni Mountains (Romania). Revista de geomorfologie 9:53–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilieș D, Josan N (2009) Geosituri și geopeisaje. Edit. Universității din Oradea (in Romanian), p 246

  • Ilieş D, Ilieş A, Herman G, Baias Ş, Morar C (2011) Geotourist map of Baile Felix-Băile 1 Mai-Betfia (Bihor County, Romania). GeoJ Tour Geosites IV(8):219–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilinca V, Comănescu L (2011) Aspects concerning some of the geomorphosites with tourist value from Vâlcea county (Romania). GeoJ Tour Geosites, Year IV 7(1):22–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Irimia D, Toma B (2012) The identification of the geomorphosites in Buzău Subcarpathians. Tourism capitalization options. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai—Geographia LVII 2:161–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Irimuş IA, Petrea D, Vescan I, Toma B, Vieru I (2011) Vulnerability of touristic geomorphosites in Transylvanian saliferous areas (Romania). GeoJ Tour Geosites 2(8):212–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubalíková L (2013) Geomorphosite assessment for geotourism purposes. Czech J Tour 2(2):80–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima FF, Brilha JB, Salamuni E (2010) Inventorying geological heritage in large territories: a methodological proposal applied to Brazil. Geoheritage 2(3–4):91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins B, Pereira A (2018) Residents’ perception and assessment of geomorphosites of the Alvão—Chaves region. Geosciences 8:381. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8100381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massé MO, Morissette A, Hétu B, Tita G, Vigneault B (2011) Inventaire du patrimoine géomorphologique de l’archipel des Iles-de-la- Madeleine et identification des stratégies de valorisation géotouristique. Centre de recherche sur les milieux insulaires et maritimes (CERMIM), Iles-de-la-Madeleine (Québec)

  • O’Halloran D, Green C, Harley M, Stanley M, Knill J (eds) (1994) Geological and landscape conservation. The Geological Society, London, p 530

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano L (2008) Inventaire des géotopes géomorphologiques du Val Bavona et du Val Rovana. Sélection, évaluation et perspectives. Master’s thesis, University of Lausanne. http://mesoscaphe.unil.ch/igul/memoires/bd/

  • Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and example of geomorphological survey. Chin Sci Bull 46(suppl Bd):4–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M (2018) Outstanding intrinsic and extrinsic values of the geological heritage of the dolomites (Italy). Geoheritage 10:607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0259-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panizza M, Piacente S (2003) Geomorfologia culturale, Pitagora, Bologna, p 350

  • Pereira P, Pereira D, Caetano Alves MI (2007) Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal). Geogr Helv 62(3):159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira P, Pereira D (2010) Methodological guidelines for geomorphosite assessment. Géomorphologie 2:215–222

  • Pérez-Umaña D, Quesada-Román A, De Jesús Rojas JC (2018) Comparative analysis of geomorphosites in volcanoes of Costa Rica, Mexico, and Spain. Geoheritage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0313-0

  • Perret A (2008) Inventaire de géomorphosites du Parc Jurassien vaudois. Essai d’intégration des géotopes spéléologiques et valorisation géomorphologique des réserves naturelles. Master’s thesis, University of Lausanne. http://mesoscaphe.unil.ch/igul/memoires/bd/

  • Popa G, Popa A, Andrășanu A (2017) The SEA and big-S models for managing geosites as resources for local communities in the context of rural geoparks. Geoheritage 9:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popescu NC, Călin D (1987) Munţii Coziei, Colecţia „Munţii noştri”, Ed. Sport-turism, Bucureşti

  • Popescu B, Szasz L, Hann H, Schuster A (1977) Harta geologică a R.S.R., scara 1:50.000, foaia Călimănesti (L-35-97-B) , I.G.G., Bucuresti

  • Pralong JP (2005) A method for assessing tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Géomorphologie 3:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pralong JP (2006) Géotourisme et utilisation de sites naturels d’intérêt pour les sciences de la Terre. Les régions de Crans-Montana-Sierre (Valais, Alpes suisses) et Chamonix-Mont-Blanc (Haute-Savoie, Alpes françaises). Ph.D. thesis, University of Lausanne. https://doc.rero.ch/record/6171/files/These_PralongJP.pdf

  • Reynard E (2005) Géomorphosites et paysages, Géomorphologie 3:181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E (2009) The assessment of geomorphosites. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, Regolini-Bissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Pfeil, Munchen, pp 63–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E (2012) Geoheritage protection and promotion in Switzerland. Eur Geol 34:44–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007) A method for assessing scientific and additional values of geomorphosites. Geogr Helv 62(3):148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard E, Perret A, Bussard J, Grangier L, Martin S (2016) Integrated approach for the inventory and managementof geomorphological heritage at the regional scale. Geoheritage 8:43–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selby MJ (1980) A rock mass strenght classification for geomorphic purposes: with tests from Antarctica and New Zeeland. Z Geomorphol 24:31–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellier D (2010) L’analyse intégrée du relief et la sélection déductive des géomorphosites: application à la Charente-Maritime (France). Géomorphologie 2:199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano E, González Trueba JJ (2005) Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Géomorphologie 3:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharples C (2002) Concepts and principles of geoconservation. Tasmanian Parks & Wildlife Service website. http://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/geoconservation.pdf

  • Vasile M (2014) Procese şi forme de dezagregare fizică a rocilor în areale din Carpaţii Meridionali şi Munţii Măcin, Teză de doctorat, Universitatea din București

  • Wimbledon WAP, Benton MJ, Bevins RE, Black GP, Bridgland DR, Cleal CJ, Cooper RG, May VJ (1995) The development of a methodology for the selection of British geological sites for geoconservation: part 1. Mod Geol 20:159–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbledon WAP, Ishchenko AA, Gerasimenko NP, Karis L. O, Suominen V, Johansson CE, Freden C (2000) Geosites-an iugs initiative: science supported by conservations. In: Barettino D, Wimbledon WAP, Gallego E (eds) Geological heritage: its conservation and management

  • Zouros N (2007) Geomorphosite assessment and management in protected areas of Greece. Case study of the Lesvos Island—coastal geomorphosites. Geogr Helv 62(3):169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Cozia National Park for their support in collecting the data. We wish to thank to Mr. Cruceru Nicolae for providing the Hammer Schmidt tool. All authors have contributed equally to the development of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Geography, Department of Geomorphology-Pedology-Geomatics, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

    Adriana-Bianca Ovreiu, Laura Comănescu, Iulian-Andrei Bărsoianu & Alexandru Nedelea

Authors
  1. Adriana-Bianca Ovreiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura Comănescu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Iulian-Andrei Bărsoianu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexandru Nedelea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iulian-Andrei Bărsoianu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ovreiu, AB., Comănescu, L., Bărsoianu, IA. et al. Evaluating Geomorphosites and the Geomorphological Hazards that Impact them: Case Study—Cozia Massif (Southern Carpathians, Romania). Geoheritage 11, 1067–1087 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00352-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00352-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation