Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid Screening of Sugarcane Plantlets for In Vitro Mannitol-Induced Stress

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Six cultivars with a range of known field responses to drought were tested in vitro. Firstly, the two on each end of the drought tolerance scale (NCo376, most susceptible and N41, most tolerant) were screened on 204–1493 mM mannitol for  % re-rooting after 10 days, following plantlet root trimming. From the results, the LD50 and LD90 of re-rooting were calculated as 332 and 606 mM mannitol for NCo376 and 851 and 1493 mM mannitol for N41, respectively. These mannitol concentrations were then used as benchmarks for testing four other cultivars. At 606 mM mannitol, % re-rooting in vitro was: N41 (80 ± 10.7), N26 (80 ± 10.7), N36 (60 ± 13.1), N12 (60 ± 13.1), N19 (20 ± 10.7) and NCo376 (13.3 ± 9.1) (p < 0.05). The consequent ‘ranking’ in terms of mannitol tolerance in vitro matched well with those of field observations for drought tolerance, with N41 being the most drought tolerant and NCo376 the most susceptible. Other parameters assessed as possible drought indices such as leaf chlorophyll content (by soil plant analysis development measurements) and histochemical staining were difficult to perform on the small in vitro leaves, and relative electrolyte leakage did not distinguish drought tolerant from susceptible cultivars. Therefore, the re-rooting assessment provides a rapid (3 weeks) ranking measure and has potential application when screening mutagenic and genetically modified lines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Cha-um, S., S. Wangmoon, C. Mongkolsiriwatana, M. Ashraf, and C. Kirdmanee. 2012. Evaluating sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) cultivars for water deficit tolerance using some key physiological markers. Plant Biotechnology 29: 431–439.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eksteen, A., A. Singels, and S. Ngxaliwe. 2014. Water relations of two contrasting sugarcane genotypes. Field Crops Research 168: 86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Errabii, T., C.B. Gandonou, H. Essalmani, J. Abrini, M. Idaomar, and N.S. Senhaji. 2007. Effects of NaCl and mannitol induced stress on sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) callus cultures. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 29: 95–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gandonou, C.B., T. Errabii, J. Abrini, M. Idaomar, and N.S. Senhaji. 2006. Selection of callus cultures of sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) tolerant to NaCl and their response to salt stress. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 87: 9–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inman-Bamber, N.G. 1982. Drought tolerance of commercial sugarcane varieties in South Africa. Proceedings of the South African Sugar Technologists Association 56: 112–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, D., M.A. Yusuf, P. Singh, M. Sardar, and N.B. Sarin. 2013. Modulation of antioxidant machinery in α-tocopherol-enriched transgenic Brassica juncea plants tolerant to abiotic stress conditions. Protoplasma 250: 1079–1089.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahlanza, T., S.J. Snyman, R.S. Rutherford, and M.P. Watt. 2013. In vitro generation of somaclonal variant plants of sugarcane for tolerance to Fusarium sacchari. Plant Cell Reports 32: 249–262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munns, R., R.A. James, X.R.R. Sirault, R.T. Furbank, and H.G. Jones. 2010. New phenotyping methods for screening wheat and barley. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 3499–3507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T., and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patade, V.Y., S. Bhargsva, and P. Suprasanna. 2012. Effects of NaCl and iso-osmotic PEG stress on growth, osmolytes accumulation and antioxidant defence in cultured sugarcane callus. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 108: 279–286.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rai, M.K., R.K. Kalia, R. Singh, M. Gangola, and A.L. Dhawan. 2011. Developing stress tolerant plants through in vitro selection—An overview of the recent progress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 71: 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, S., and F.T.Z. Jabeen. 2013. In vitro selection and characterisation of polyethylene glycol (PEG) tolerant callus lines and regeneration of plantlets from the selected callus lines in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 19: 261–268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ramgareeb, S., S.J. Snyman, T. van Antwerpen, and R.S. Rutherford. 2010. Elimination of virus and rapid propagation of disease-free sugarcane (Saccharum spp. cultivar NCo376) using apical meristem culture. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 100: 175–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • www.sasa.org.za/Libraries/Variety_Information. Accessed 24 June 2015.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the SASRI, University of KwaZulu-Natal, and National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grants 85573 and 85414) for support.

Author Contribution Statement

P. Mhlanga carried out the experimental work as part of her M.Sc. degree. S. J. Snyman and M. P. Watt wrote the article. All authors read and approved the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. J. Snyman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Snyman, S.J., Mhlanga, P. & Watt, M.P. Rapid Screening of Sugarcane Plantlets for In Vitro Mannitol-Induced Stress. Sugar Tech 18, 437–440 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-015-0411-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-015-0411-0

Keywords

Navigation