Abstract
For the Cournot-like oligopoly games of n firms, where the Cournot adjustment fails to converge, we propose adjustment processes originating from the family of the Moving Averages. In markets of linear demand, where firms have private and linear on quantities cost functions, these adaptive rules turn the games into discrete-time linear systems with delays. With an out of the box proof, we determine the least number of delays (m) that ensures the game of n players converges to its equilibrium. The Simple Moving Average rule (fixed number of delays) and the Cumulative Moving Average rule (constantly increasing number of delays), which is also known as “fictitious play”, are the main rules considered. Along with a hybrid rule, result of their combination, they are all studied for their convergent properties and compared in a bench-marking framework to indicate the different trajectories and identify their suitability in applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
System’s stability refers to global, uniform, asymptotic stability of the equilibrium point \({\mathbf {x}}^{*}\), i.e. for any \(\varepsilon >0\) there exists a \(\delta (\varepsilon )>0\) such that \(\| {\mathbf {x}}_{t_{0}}-{\mathbf {x}}^{*}\| <\delta\) implies \(\left\| {\mathbf {x}}_{t}-{\mathbf {x}}^{*}\right\| <\varepsilon ,\,\forall t\ge t_{0}\) and \(\lim\nolimits_{{t \to \infty }} {\mathbf{x}}_{t} = {\mathbf{x}}^{*}\), independently of \(t_{0}\) and \({\mathbf {x}}_{t_{0}}\) (Khalil 2002).
Since matrix \({\mathbf {A}}\) is a scaled instance of \(\mathbf {A_G}\), one of its eigenvalues is dominant and all the other are strictly smaller than that, in absolute value (Sect. 2). With marginal stability, we mean the case where the system is neither asymptotically stable nor unstable, i.e. the case where the greatest magnitude of any of the eigenvalues is one and the multiplicity of this critical eigenvalue is one.
Firms’ output can take non-negative values and this has been imposed in simulations; The nonlinearities that may occur (Cánovas et al. 2008) in the case of bounded action sets, given the existence of a Nash Equilibrium are out of the scope of this paper.
References
Ahmed E, Agiza H (1998) Dynamics of a cournot game with n-competitors. Chaos Solitons Fractals 9(9):1513–1517
Askar SS (2018) Duopolistic stackelberg game: investigation of complex dynamics and chaos control. Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0379-0
al Nowaihi A, Levine P (1985) The stability of the cournot oligopoly model: a reassessment. J Econ Theory 35(2):307–321
Bernhard P, Deschamps M (2017) On dynamic games with randomly arriving players. Dyn Games Appl 7(3):360–385
Cánovas JS, Puu T, Ruíz M (2008) The cournot-theocharis problem reconsidered. Chaos Solitons Fractals 37(4):1025–1039
Chrysanthopoulos N, Papavassilopoulos GP (2016) Learning optimal strategies in a stochastic game with partial information applied to electricity markets. In: Mediterranean conference on power generation, transmission, distribution and energy conversion (MedPower 2016), IET, pp 1–6
Chrysanthopoulos N, Papavassilopoulos GP (2016) A step closer to competition: a different concept of cournot duopoly under incomplete information. In: 10th international conference on game theory and management, SPbSU-ISDG, St. Petersburg, Russia
Daughety AF (2005) Cournot oligopoly: characterization and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Deschamps R (1975) An algorithm of game theory applied to the duopoly problem. Eur Econ Rev 6(2):187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(75)90030-6
Doukas H (2013) Linguistic multicriteria decision making for energy systems: building the “re2s“ framework. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Energy Environ 2(5):571–585. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.65
Doukas H, Patlitzianas KD, Kagiannas AG, Psarras J (2008) Energy policy making: an old concept or a modern challenge? Energy Sources Part B Econ Plan Policy 3(4):362–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240701232378
Fisher FM (1961) The stability of the cournot oligopoly solution: the effects of speeds of adjustment and increasing marginal costs. Rev Econ Stud 28(2):125–135
Friedman J (1983) Oligopoly theory. Cambridge surveys of economic literature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Furth D (1986) Stability and instability in oligopoly. J Econ Theory 40(2):197–228
Gabszewicz JJ, Vial JP (1972) Oligopoly “a la cournot” in a general equilibrium analysis. J Econ Theory 4(3):381–400
Hahn FH (1962) The stability of the cournot oligopoly solution. Rev Econ Stud 29(4):329–331
Hommes CH, Ochea MI, Tuinstra J (2018) Evolutionary competition between adjustment processes in cournot oligopoly: instability and complex dynamics. Dyn Games Appl 8(4):822–843
Huck S, Normann HT, Oechssler J (2002) Stability of the cournot process-experimental evidence. Int J Game Theory 31(1):123–136
Jury EI (1973) Theory and application of the z-transform method. Krieger Pub Co., Malabar
Kakeya S (1912) On the limits of the roots of an algebraic equation with positive coefficients. Tohoku Math J First Ser 2:140–142
Khalil H (2002) Nonlinear systems. Pearson Education, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Kordonis I, Papavassilopoulos GP (2015) Lq nash games with random entrance: an infinite horizon major player and minor players of finite horizons. IEEE Trans Autom Control 60(6):1486–1500
Kordonis I, Charalampidis AC, Papavassilopoulos GP (2018) Pretending in dynamic games, alternative outcomes and application to electricity markets. Dyn Games Appl 8:1–30
MacCluer CR (2000) The many proofs and applications of Perron’s theorem. Siam Rev 42(3):487–498
McManus M, Quandt RE (1961) Comments on the stability of the cournot oligipoly model. Rev Econ Stud 28(2):136–139
Mickens R (1991) Difference equations, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon-on-Thames
Okuguchi K (1970) Adaptive expectations in an oligopoly model. Rev Econ Stud 37(2):233–237
Papavassilopoulos GP (1986) Iterative techniques for the nash solution in quadratic games with unknown parameters. SIAM J Control Optim 24(4):821–834
Papavassilopoulos GP (1988) Adaptive games. In: Albeverio S, Blanchard P, Hazewinkel M, Streit L (eds) Stochastic processes in physics and engineering. Mathematics and its applications, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2893-0_13
Puu T (2008) On the stability of cournot equilibrium when the number of competitors increases. J Econ Behav Org 66(3–4):445–456
Puu T, Sushko I (2002) Oligopoly dynamics: models and tools. Springer, Berlin
Rassenti S, Reynolds SS, Smith VL, Szidarovszky F (2000) Adaptation and convergence of behavior in repeated experimental cournot games. J Econ Behav Org 41(2):117–146
Rumchev V, James D (1990) The role of non-negative matrices in discrete-time mathematical modelling. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol 21(2):169–182
Stamtsis G, Doukas H (2018) Cooperation or localization in european capacity markets? A coalitional game over graph approach. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061473
Szidarovszky F, Okuguchi K (1988) A linear oligopoly model with adaptive expectations: stability reconsidered. J Econ 48(1):79–82
Theocharis RD (1960) On the stability of the cournot solution on the oligopoly problem. Rev Econ Stud 27(2):133–134
Thorlund-Petersen L (1988) Iterative computation of cournot equilibrium. Games Econ Behav 2:61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-8256(90)90014-L
von Mouche P, Quartieri F (2016) Equilibrium theory for Cournot oligopolies and related games. Springer, Berlin
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the participants of the 10th Workshop in Dynamic Games in Management Science (DGMS2018), November 1–2, 2018, Morocco for their comments, which improved this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chrysanthopoulos, N., Papavassilopoulos, G.P. Adaptive rules for discrete-time Cournot games of high competition level markets. Oper Res Int J 21, 2879–2906 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00522-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00522-z