Skip to main content
Log in

Regulatory efficiency decomposition for utilities’ parallel subsystems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural monopolies, such as the utility industry, are usually a regulated sector. Prices and tariffs are generally established by considering a benchmark analysis, such as data envelopment analysis, and are based on utilities observed data. Such analysis, by defining a regulatory efficient frontier that should be pursued by economic regulated companies, benchmarks best practices, and stimulates utilities to operate in an efficient manner, so that, tariff may be reduced by cutting off allowed expenditure of inefficient utilities. In general, regulatory efficient frontier is estimated based on observed costs and services by considering the whole utility as a decision making unit. In practical operations, however, utilities may run numerous parallel individual subunits, known as subsidiaries. Although the regulator generally cannot observe individual subsidiary costs and services, managers might want to know the optimal strategy to deal with efficient costs of each one, i.e., how an eventual expenditure cut off might be fairly allocated among subsidiaries. For such a strategy, this paper proposes a data envelopment based analysis that considers the internal structure of an analyzed utility. Considering that the utility runs homogeneous parallel subsystems, the proposed approach allows the decomposition of utility efficiency score onto its subsidiaries. Indeed, the proposed model is a relaxed approach of another model previously proposed in the literature. It considers the subsidiaries as parallel subsystems, so that managers can fairly allocate the eventual cut off in their subsidiaries. To shed light on the proposed analysis, this paper uses didactic and illustrative examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Operational expenditure in the utility sector generally refers to all expenses necessary to operate the business, i.e., salaries, materials, third-party services, insurances, taxes, and others.

  2. See Jamasb and Pollitt (2000), Ensslin et al. (2015), for discussion.

References

  • Agrell PJ, Bogetoft P (2017) Regulatory benchmarking: models, analyses and applications. Data Envel Anal J 3(12):49–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amirteimoori A, Shahroodi K, Mahmoodkiani FS (2015) Network data envelopment analysis: application to gas companies in Iran. Int J Appl 5(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • An Q, Meng F, Ang S, Chen X (2018) A new approach for fair efficiency decomposition in two-stage structure system. Oper Res 18(1):257–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashrafi A, Kaleibar MM (2016) A slacks-based measure of efficiency for parallel and series production systems. Jordan J Math Stat 9(4):239–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker R, Frsund FR, Zhang D (2017) Use of data envelopment analysis for incentive regulation of electric distribution firms. Data Envel Anal J 3(12):1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley JE (1995) Determining teaching and research efficiencies. J Oper Res Soc 46(4):441–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bian Y, Hu M, Xu H (2015) Measuring efficiencies of parallel systems with shared inputs/outputs using data envelopment analysis. Kybernetes 44(3):336–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bian Y, Yan S, Xu H (2014) Efficiency evaluation for regional urban water use and wastewater decontamination systems in china: a DEA approach. Resour Conserv Recycl 83:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogetoft P, Hougaard JL, Smilgins A (2016) Applied cost allocation: the DEA–Aumann–Shapley approach. Eur J Oper Res 254(2):667–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelli L, Pesenti R, Ukovich W (2004) DEA-like models for the efficiency evaluation of hierarchically structured units. Eur J Oper Res 154(2):465–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelli L, Pesenti R, Ukovich W (2010) A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the decision making units is considered. Ann Oper Res 173(1):207–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Cook WD, Li N, Zhu J (2009) Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage dea. Eur J Oper Res 196(3):1170–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook WD, Zhu J (2014) Data envelopment analysis: a handbook of modeling internal structure and network. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2006) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software, 2nd edn. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Du J, Chen Y, Huo J (2015) Dea for non-homogenous parallel networks. Omega 56:122–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensslin SR, Ensslin L, dos Santos Matos L, Dutra A, Ripoll-Feliu VM (2015) Research opportunities in performance measurement in public utilities regulation. Int J Product Perform Manag 64(7):994–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S (1996) Intertemporal production frontiers: with dynamic DEA. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haney AB, Pollitt MG (2009) Efficiency analysis of energy networks: an international survey of regulators. Energy Policy 37(12):5814–5830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haney AB, Pollitt MG (2013) International benchmarking of electricity transmission by regulators: a contrast between theory and practice? Energy Policy 62:267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamasb T, Pollitt M (2000) Benchmarking and regulation: international electricity experience. Util Policy 9(3):107–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamasb T, Pollitt M (2003) International benchmarking and regulation: an application to european electricity distribution utilities. Energy Policy 31(15):1609–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (2009) Efficiency measurement for parallel production systems. Eur J Oper Res 196(3):1107–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (2012) Efficiency decomposition for parallel production systems. J Oper Res Soc 63(1):64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Hwang S-N (2008) Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in taiwan. Eur J Oper Res 185(1):418–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei X, Li Y, Xie Q, Liang L (2015) Measuring olympics achievements based on a parallel dea approach. Ann Oper Res 226(1):379–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang L, Cook WD, Zhu J (2008) Dea models for two-stage processes: game approach and efficiency decomposition. Nav Res Logist (NRL) 55(7):643–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM, Zhu J (1999) Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks. Manag Sci 45(9):1270–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinuany-Stern Z, Sherman HD (2014) Operations research in the public sector and nonprofit organizations. Ann Oper Res 221(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takada H, Higashimoto Y, Kishi K (2011) Construction of method for comprehensive priority assessment of road maintenance sections using network DEA. In: Proceedings of the Eastern Asia society for transportation studies the 9th international conference of Eastern Asia society for transportation studies, pp 302–302. Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies

  • Thanassoulis E (2000) The use of data envelopment analysis in the regulation of UK water utilities: water distribution. Eur J Oper Res 126(2):436–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CH, Gopal RD, Zionts S (1997) Use of data envelopment analysis in assessing information technology impact on firm performance. Ann Oper Res 73:191–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu M-M, Chen L-H, Hsiao B (2016) A fixed cost allocation based on the two-stage network data envelopment approach. J Bus Res 69(5):1817–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Julio Cesar Gutierres Mosquera and Rodrigo Luiz Mendes Mota thank CAPES for financial support. Rafael C. Leme thanks CNPq (grants 302354/2017-4), FAPEMIG (grant PPM-00520-17) and CAPES (grant 11539/13-5), for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Coradi Leme.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mosquera Gutierres, J.C., Leme, R.C., Mota, R.L.M. et al. Regulatory efficiency decomposition for utilities’ parallel subsystems. Oper Res Int J 21, 331–347 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00454-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00454-8

Keywords

Navigation