Abstract
The majority of data envelopment analysis (DEA) models can be linearized via the classical Charnes–Cooper transformation. Nevertheless, this transformation does not apply to sum-of-fractional DEA efficiencies models, such as the secondary goal I (SG-I) cross efficiency model and the arithmetic mean two-stage network DEA model. To solve a sum-of-fractional DEA efficiencies model, we convert it into bilinear programming. Then, the obtained bilinear programming is relaxed to mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) by using a multiparametric disaggregation technique. We reveal the hidden mathematical structures of sum-of-fractional DEA efficiencies models, and propose corresponding discretization strategies to make the models more easily to be solved. Discretization of the multipliers of inputs or the DEA efficiencies in the objective function depends on the number of multipliers and decision-making units. The obtained MILP provides an upper bound for the solution and can be tightened as desired by adding binary variables. Finally, an algorithm based on MILP is developed to search for the global optimal solution. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by using it to solve the SG-I cross efficiency model and the arithmetic mean two-stage network DEA model. Results of the numerical applications show that the proposed approach can solve the SG-I cross efficiency model with 100 decision-making units, 3 inputs, and 3 outputs in 329.6 s. Moreover, the proposed approach obtains more accurate solutions in less time than the heuristic search procedure when solving the arithmetic mean two-stage network DEA model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amirkhan, M., Didehkhani, H., Khalili-Damghani, K., & Hafezalkotob, A. (2018). Measuring performance of a three-stage network structure using data envelopment analysis and nash bargaining game: A supply chain application. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 17(05), 1429–1467.
Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264.
Ang, S., & Chen, C.-M. (2016). Pitfalls of decomposition weights in the additive multi-stage DEA model. Omega, 58, 139–153.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
Beasley, J. (2003). Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), 198–216.
Brook, A., Kendrick, D., & Meeraus, A. (1988). GAMS, a user's guide: ACM.
Castro, P. M. (2016). Normalized multiparametric disaggregation: An efficient relaxation for mixed-integer bilinear problems. Journal of Global Optimization, 64(4), 765–784.
Castro, P. M. (2017). Spatial branch-and-bound algorithm for MIQCPs featuring multiparametric disaggregation. Optimization Methods and Software, 32(4), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/10556788.2016.1264397
Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9(3–4), 181–186.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
Chen, K., & Zhu, J. (2017). Second order cone programming approach to two-stage network data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(1), 231–238.
Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2014). DEA Cobb–Douglas frontier and cross-efficiency. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(2), 265–268.
Cooper, W. W., Park, K. S., & Yu, G. (1999). IDEA and AR-IDEA: Models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Management Science, 45(4), 597–607.
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2011). Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Springer.
Despotis, D. K., & Smirlis, Y. G. (2002). Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data. European Journal of Operational Research, 140(1), 24–36.
Doyle, J., & Green, R. (1994). Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(5), 567–578.
Drud, A. S. (1994). CONOPT—A large-scale GRG code. ORSA Journal on Computing, 6(2), 207–216.
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290.
Guo, C., Wei, F., & Chen, Y. (2017). A note on second order cone programming approach to two-stage network data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 263(2), 733–735.
ILOG, I. (2012). CPLEX 12.4. In.
Kao, C., & Hwang, S.-N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 418–429.
Kolodziej, S., Castro, P. M., & Grossmann, I. E. (2013). Global optimization of bilinear programs with a multiparametric disaggregation technique. Journal of Global Optimization, 57(4), 1039–1063.
Li, Y., Chen, Y., Liang, L., & Xie, J. (2012). DEA models for extended two-stage network structures. Omega, 40(5), 611–618.
Li, Y., Xie, J., Wang, M., & Liang, L. (2016). Super efficiency evaluation using a common platform on a cooperative game. European Journal of Operational Research, 255(3), 884–892.
Liang, L., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008a). DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 55(7), 643–653.
Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008b). The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium. Operations Research, 56(5), 1278–1288.
Liang, L., Yang, F., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2006). DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Annals of Operations Research, 145(1), 35–49.
Lim, S., & Zhu, J. (2016). A note on two-stage network DEA model: Frontier projection and duality. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(1), 342–346.
Liu, H., Song, Y., & Yang, G. (2018). Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis based on prospect theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 273(1), 364–375.
Mahdiloo, M., Toloo, M., Duong, T.-T., Farzipoor Saen, R., & Tatham, P. (2018). Integrated data envelopment analysis: Linear vs. nonlinear model. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(1), 255–267.
McCormick, G. P. (1976). Computability of global solutions to factorable nonconvex programs: Part I—Convex underestimating problems. Mathematical Programming, 10(1), 147–175.
Murtagh, B. A., & Saunders, M. A. (1983). MINOS 50 user’s guide. Stanford Univ CA Systems Optimization Lab.
Sahinidis, N. V. (1996). BARON: A general purpose global optimization software package. Journal of Global Optimization, 8(2), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00138693
Teles, J. P., Castro, P. M., & Matos, H. A. (2012). Global optimization of water networks design using multiparametric disaggregation. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 40, 132–147.
Teles, J. P., Castro, P. M., & Matos, H. A. (2013b). Univariate parameterization for global optimization of mixed-integer polynomial problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(3), 613–625.
Teles, J. P., Castro, P. M., & Matos, H. A. (2013a). Multi-parametric disaggregation technique for global optimization of polynomial programming problems. Journal of Global Optimization, 55(2), 227–251.
Wu, J., Liang, L., & Chen, Y. (2009). DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings. Omega, 37(4), 909–918.
Zhang, L., & Chen, Y. (2018). Equivalent solutions to additive two-stage network data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(3), 1189–1191.
Zhu, W., Yu, Y., & Sun, P. (2018). Data envelopment analysis cross-like efficiency model for non-homogeneous decision-making units: The case of United States companies’ low-carbon investment to attain corporate sustainability. European Journal of Operational Research, 269(1), 99–110.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos: 71701220, 72071192, 71671172, and 71631006), the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (NO. 9202002), the GreatWall Scholar Training Program of Beijing Municipality (CIT&TCD20180305) and the Social Science Foundation of Beijing (16JDGLC005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, J., Xie, Q., Li, Y. et al. Solving data envelopment analysis models with sum-of-fractional objectives: a global optimal approach based on the multiparametric disaggregation technique. Ann Oper Res 304, 453–480 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04026-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04026-y