Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with acute type B aortic intramural hematoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The clinical course and predictors of adverse aortic events (AAE) in patients with acute Stanford type B intramural hematoma (IMH) remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate whether 18F-FDG PET/CT can predict risk in patients with acute type B IMH.

Methods and Results

This study included 34 patients with acute type B IMH who underwent PET/CT within 14 days from the onset of symptoms. The maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of 18F-FDG uptake was significantly different between patients with or without AAE (4.3 ± 0.6 vs 3.7 ± 1.0, P = 0.020), but not the target to blood ratio (TBR, SUVmax divided by SUV in the superior vena cava) (1.6 ± 0.2 vs 1.5 ± 0.5, P = 0.064). In patients with initial ulcer-like projection (ULP), a blood-filled pouch protruding into the IMH, which was seen in 25 patients(74%), both the SUVmax and TBR were significantly higher in patients who developed AAE, (4.3 ± 0.6 vs 3.3 ± 0.5, P = 0.001; 1.6 ± 0.2 vs 1.4 ± 0.2, P = 0.01); the TBR >1.5, which is determined from receiver-operating-characteristic curve, had a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 80% in predicting AAE.

Conclusion

Patients with ULP and high 18F-FDG uptake were more likely to develop AAE and may require closer surveillance with serial imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AAS:

Acute aortic syndrome

CTA:

Computed tomography angiography

18F-FDG:

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose

IMH:

Intramural hematoma

PAU:

Penetrating aortic ulcer

PET/CT:

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography

SUV:

Standardized uptake value

TBR:

Target to blood ratio

TEVAR:

Thoracic endovascular repair

ULP:

Ulcer-like projection

References

  1. Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Bartolomeo RD, Eggebrecht H, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases of the european society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2873-926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nienaber CA, von Kodolitsch Y, Petersen B, Loose R, Helmchen U, Haverich A, et al. Intramural hemorrhage of the thoracic aorta. Diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Circulation. 1995;92:1465-72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Song JK, Kim HS, Kang DH, Lim TH, Song MG, Park SW, et al. Different clinical features of aortic intramural hematoma versus dissection involving the ascending aorta. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1604-10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaji S, Akasaka T, Katayama M, Yamamuro A, Yamabe K, Tamita K, et al. Long-term prognosis of patients with type B aortic intramural hematoma. Circulation. 2003;108:II307-11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Evangelista A, Mukherjee D, Mehta RH, O’Gara PT, Fattori R, Cooper JV, et al. Acute intramural hematoma of the aorta: A mystery in evolution. Circulation. 2005;111:1063-70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mussa FF, Horton JD, Moridzadeh R, Nicholson J, Trimarchi S, Eagle KA. Acute aortic dissection and intramural hematoma. JAMA. 2016;316:754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. von Kodolitsch Y, Csosz SK, Koschyk DH, Schalwat I, Loose R, Karck M, et al. Intramural hematoma of the aorta: Predictors of progression to dissection and rupture. Circulation. 2003;107:1158-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Evangelista A, Dominguez R, Sebastia C, Salas A, Permanyer-Miralda G, Avegliano G, et al. Prognostic value of clinical and morphologic findings in short-term evolution of aortic intramural haematoma. Therapeutic implications.Eur Heart J. 2004;25:81-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kitai T, Kaji S, Kim K, Ehara N, Tani T, Kinoshita M, et al. Prognostic value of sustained elevated C-reactive protein levels in patients with acute aortic intramural hematoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:326-31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shimizu H, Yoshino H, Udagawa H, Watanuki A, Yano K, Ide H, et al. Prognosis of aortic intramural hemorrhage compared with classic aortic dissection. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:792-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Song JK, Kim HS, Song JM, Kang DH, Ha JW, Rim SJ, et al. Outcomes of medically treated patients with aortic intramural hematoma. Am J Med. 2002;113:181-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moizumi Y, Komatsu T, Motoyoshi N, Tabayashi K. Clinical features and long-term outcome of type A and type B intramural hematoma of the aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:421-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Quint LE, Williams DM, Francis IR, Monaghan HM, Sonnad SS, Patel S, et al. Ulcerlike lesions of the aorta: Imaging features and natural history. Radiology. 2001;218:719-23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jang YM, Seo JB, Lee YK, Chae EJ, Park SH, Kang JW, et al. Newly developed ulcer-like projection (ULP) in aortic intramural haematoma on follow-up CT: Is it different from the ULP seen on the initial CT? Clin Radiol. 2008;63:201-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kitai T, Kaji S, Yamamuro A, Tani T, Kinoshita M, Ehara N, et al. Impact of new development of ulcer-like projection on clinical outcomes in patients with type B aortic dissection with closed and thrombosed false lumen. Circulation. 2010;122:S74-80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eggebrecht H, Plicht B, Kahlert P, Erbel R. Intramural hematoma and penetrating ulcers: Indications to endovascular treatment. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38:659-65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sueyoshi E, Nagayama H, Hashizume K, Eishi K, Sakamoto I, Uetani M. Computed tomography evaluation of aortic remodeling after endovascular treatment for complicated ulcer-like projection in patients with type B aortic intramural hematoma. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:693-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grimm M, Loewe C, Gottardi R, Funovics M, Zimpfer D, Rodler S, et al. Novel insights into the mechanisms and treatment of intramural hematoma affecting the entire thoracic aorta. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:453-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morris JH, Mix D, Cameron SJ. Acute aortic syndromes: Update in current medical management. Curr Treat Options Cardiovas Med. 2017;19:29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Blockmans D, de Ceuninck L, Vanderschueren S, Knockaert D, Mortelmans L, Bobbaers H. Repetitive 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in giant cell arteritis: A prospective study of 35 patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55:131-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Walter MA, Melzer RA, Schindler C, Muller-Brand J, Tyndall A, Nitzsche EU. The value of [18F]FDG-PET in the diagnosis of large-vessel vasculitis and the assessment of activity and extent of disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:674-81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tokuda Y, Oshima H, Araki Y, Narita Y, Mutsuga M, Kato K, et al. Detection of thoracic aortic prosthetic graft infection with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43:1183-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Soussan M, Nicolas P, Schramm C, Katsahian S, Pop G, Fain O, et al. Management of large-vessel vasculitis with FDG-PET. Medicine. 2015;94:e622.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Evangelista A, Dominguez R, Sebastia C, Salas A, Permanyer-Miralda G, Avegliano G, et al. Long-term follow-up of aortic intramural hematoma: Predictors of outcome. Circulation. 2003;108:583-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nienaber CA, Sievers HH. Intramural hematoma in acute aortic syndrome: More than one variant of dissection? Circulation. 2002;106:284-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Winnerkvist A, Lockowandt U, Rasmussen E, Radegran K. A prospective study of medically treated acute type B aortic dissection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;32:349-55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nienaber CA, Kische S, Rousseau H, Eggebrecht H, Rehders TC, Kundt G, et al. Endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection: Long-term results of the randomized investigation of stent grafts in aortic dissection trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:407-16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sueyoshi E, Imada T, Sakamoto I, Matsuoka Y, Hayashi K. Analysis of predictive factors for progression of type B aortic intramural hematoma with computed tomography. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1179-83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kitai T, Kaji S, Yamamuro A, Tani T, Kinoshita M, Ehara N, et al. Detection of intimal defect by 64-row multidetector computed tomography in patients with acute aortic intramural hematoma. Circulation. 2011;124:S174-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gorla R, Erbel R, Kuehl H, Kahlert P, Tsagakis K, Jakob H, et al. Prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT imaging in acute aortic syndromes: Comparison with serological biomarkers of inflammation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;31:1677-85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kato K, Nishio A, Kato N, Usami H, Fujimaki T, Murohara T. Uptake of 18F-FDG in acute aortic dissection: A determinant of unfavorable outcome. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:674-81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kuehl H, Eggebrecht H, Boes T, Antoch G, Rosenbaum S, Ladd S, et al. Detection of inflammation in patients with acute aortic syndrome: Comparison of FDG-PET/CT imaging and serological markers of inflammation. Heart. 2008;94:1472-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Reeps C, Essler M, Pelisek J, Seidl S, Eckstein H, Krause B. Increased 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in abdominal aortic aneurysms in positron emission/computed tomography is associated with inflammation, aortic wall instability, and acute symptoms. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:417-23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Reeps C, Pelisek J, Bundschuh RA, Gurdan M, Zimmermann A, Ockert S, et al. Imaging of acute and chronic aortic dissection by 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:686-91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

No grants, contracts, or any other forms of financial support were involved in this study. There was no relationship between this study and any industry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianfang Luo MD.

Additional information

The authors of this article have provided a PowerPoint file, available for download at SpringerLink, which summarises the contents of the paper and is free for re-use at meetings and presentations. Search for the article DOI on SpringerLink.com.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PPTX 9539 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, F., Luo, J., Hou, Q. et al. Predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with acute type B aortic intramural hematoma. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 26, 633–641 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-1014-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-1014-9

Keywords

Navigation