Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Benefits of a Highly Entitative Class for Adolescents’ Psychological Well-Being in School

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
School Mental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies of the protective factors for adolescents’ psychological well-being in school have focused on the emotional relationships under the classroom climate. In contrast, the present study focused on the structural relationships among students. To investigate this issue, we examined the effects of class entitativity, that is, the extent that a class is a coherent group rather than a number of students, on students’ attitudes about themselves, their peers, and the whole class. A total of 408 adolescents completed measures of perceived class entitativity (i.e., homogeneity and interaction among students), self-efficacy, peer trust, and identification with the class. The results of a structural equation model analysis indicated that class entitativity was positively correlated with students’ self-efficacy and their identification with the class, which were in turn correlated with students’ trust of their peers. Further analysis revealed that homogeneity was positively associated with students’ self-efficacy, while higher level of interaction was associated with stronger identification with the class. These findings highlight the essential role of structural relationships between students in their psychological well-being and have implications for student-oriented practices in schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arroyo, C. G., & Zigler, E. (1995). Racial identity, academic achievement, and the psychological well-being of economically disadvantaged adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,69(5), 903–914.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy,1(4), 139–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin,117(3), 497–529.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,107(2), 238–246.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin,88(3), 588–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, A. L., Caudill, L. E., & Walker, L. S. (2018). Developing an entitativity measure and distinguishing it from antecedents and outcomes within online and face-to-face groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217743577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B., Hong, Y. Y., & Li, Q. (2004). Dynamic entitativity: Perceiving groups as actors. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception (pp. 25–38). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B., & Roccas, S. (2001). Individual values, social identity, and optimal distinctiveness. In C. Sedikides & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 219–237). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsma, D. L. (2006). School uniform policies in public schools. Principal,85, 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, S. P., & Ledgerwood, A. (2016). On the psychological function of flags and logos: Group identity symbols increase perceived entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,110(4), 528–550.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Sciences,3, 14–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carron, A. V., & Brawley, L. R. (2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research,31(1), 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213–226). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., Paladino, M. P., & Sacchi, S. (2002). I belong, therefore, I exist: Ingroup identification, ingroup entitativity, and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,28(2), 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S. K., & Sun, S. Y. (1999). Assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: Further validation of the Chinese version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychological Reports,85(3), 1221–1224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clift, S. M., Hancox, G., Morrison, I., Hess, B., Kreutz, G., & Stewart, D. (2010). Choral singing and psychological wellbeing: Quantitative and qualitative findings from English choirs in a cross-national survey. Journal of Applied Arts and Health,1, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., McCabe, L., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record,111(1), 180–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collisson, B., & Howell, J. L. (2014). The liking-similarity effect: Perceptions of similarity as a function of liking. The Journal of Social Psychology,154(5), 384–400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crump, S. A., Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., Lickel, B., & Thakkar, V. (2010). Group entitativity and similarity: Their differing patterns in perceptions of groups. European Journal of Social Psychology,40(7), 1212–1230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dang, J., Liu, L., Zhang, Q., & Li, C. (2019). Leaving an attacked group: Authoritative criticism decreases ingroup favoritism. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology,13, e7.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D. (2001). Perceptions of group homogeneity as a function of social comparison: The mediating role of group identity. Current Psychology,20(2), 138–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaria, C. H., Peroni, C., & Sarracino, F. (2017). Happiness matters: Productivity gains from subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00074-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotterer, A. M., & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,40(12), 1649–1660.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorization, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology,29(2–3), 371–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I. M., Harvey, S. T., Buckley, L., & Yan, E. (2009). Differentiating classroom climate concepts: Academic, management, and emotional environments. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences,4(2), 131–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fessler, D. M. T., & Holbrook, C. (2016). Synchronized behavior increases assessments of the formidability and cohesion of coalitions. Evolution & Human Behavior,37(6), 502–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, L., Iuzzini, J., Witt, M. G., & Oriã, A. M. M. (2006). Us without them: Evidence for an intragroup origin of positive in-group regard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,90(3), 426–439.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, L., & Schopler, J. (1998). Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. European Journal of Social Psychology,28(6), 963–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramzow, R. H., & Gaertner, L. (2005). Self-esteem and favoritism toward novel in-groups: The self as an evaluative base. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,88(5), 801–815.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grob, A., Wearing, A. J., Little, T. D., & Wanner, B. (1996). Adolescents’ well-being and perceived control across 14 sociocultural contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71(4), 785–795.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. E., & Cameron, J. E. (2005). Multiple dimensions of organizational identification and commitment as predictors of turnover intentions and psychological well-being. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science,37, 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., & Huang, H. (2011). Well-being and trust in the workplace. Journal of Happiness Studies,12(5), 747–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershberger, S. L. (2003). The growth of structural equation modeling: 1994–2001. Structural Equation Modeling,10(1), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., Sherman, D. K., Dierselhuis, J., Maitner, A. T., & Moffitt, G. (2007). Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,43, 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,26(2), 242–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L-t, & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling,6(1), 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ip, G. W., Chiu, C., & Wan, C. (2006). Birds of a feather and birds flocking together: Physical versus behavioral cues may lead to trait versus goal-based group perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,90, 368–381.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, K., Mulder, L., & Simpson, B. (2014). The detrimental effects of sanctions on intragroup trust. Social Psychology Quarterly,77(3), 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworska, N., & MacQueen, G. (2015). Adolescence as a unique developmental period. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience,40(5), 291–293.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Carvallo, M., & Mirenberg, M. C. (2004). How do I love thee? Let me count the Js: Implicit egotism and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,87, 665–683.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M. (1991). Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. Research in Organizational Behavior,13, 191–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakens, D., & Stel, M. (2011). If they move in sync, they must feel in sync: Movement synchrony leads to attributions of rapport and entitativity. Social Cognition,29(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Launay, J., Dean, R. T., & Bailes, F. (2013). Synchronization can influence trust following virtual interaction. Experimental Psychology,60(1), 53–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Layous, K., Nelson, S. K., Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2012). Kindness counts: Prompting prosocial behavior in preadolescents boosts peer acceptance and well-being. PLoS ONE,7(12), e51380.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., Fan, W., Cheung, F., & Wang, Q. (2018). Could meaning in life contribute to adolescents’ vocational commitment and identity? A longitudinal analysis in different Chinese cultures. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology,12, e36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, T., Cunningham, W., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling,9(2), 151–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods,12(1), 23–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, C., & Falci, C. (2004). School connectedness and the transition into and out of health-risk behavior among adolescents: A comparison of social belonging and teacher support. Journal of School Health,74(7), 284–292.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2016). Observing joint action: Coordination creates commitment. Cognition,157, 106–113.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M. (1998). Attachment working models and the sense of trust: An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,74(74), 1209–1224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,25, 889–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Tabulation of the 2010 population census of the People’s Republic of China. Retrieved from http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/pcsj/rkpc/6rp/indexch.htm.

  • Newman, B. M., Lohman, B. J., & Newman, P. R. (2007). Peer group membership and a sense of belonging: Their relationship to adolescent behavior problems. Adolescence,42(166), 241–263.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies,12(2), 303–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Östberg, V. (2003). Children in classrooms: Peer status, status distribution and mental well-being. Social Science and Medicine,56(1), 17–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2013). Happiness experienced: The science of subjective well-being. In I. Boniwell, S. A. David, & A. C. Ayers (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 134–151). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raja, S. N., McGee, R., & Stanton, W. R. (1992). Perceived attachments to parents and peers and psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,21(4), 471–485.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rempel, J. K., & Holmes, J. G. (1986). How do I trust thee? Psychology Today,20(2), 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rempel, J., Holmes, J., & Zanna, M. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,49(1), 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1993). Dimensions of interpersonal relation among Australian children and implications for psychological well-being. The Journal of Social Psychology,133(1), 33–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality,35(4), 651–665.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutchick, A. M., Hamilton, D. L., & Sack, J. D. (2008). Antecedents of entitativity in categorically and dynamically construed groups. European Journal of Social Psychology,38(6), 905–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacchi, S., & Castano, E. (2002). Entitative is beautiful: The importance of perceiving the ingroup as a real entity. In Paper presented at the general meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, San Sebastian, Spain.

  • Sacchi, S., Castano, E., & Brauer, M. (2009). Perceiving one’s nation: Entitativity, agency and security in the international arena. International Journal of Psychology,44(5), 321–332.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. B. (1997). Foreword. In R. Weissberg, T. P. Gullotta, R. L. Hampton, B. A. Ryan, & G. R. Adams (Eds.), Enhancing children’s wellness (Vol. 8, pp. 9–11). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkova, M., Bacikova-Sleskova, M., Madarasova Geckova, A., Katreniakova, Z., van den Heuvel, W., & van Dijk, J. P. (2014). Adolescents’ psychological well-being and self-esteem in the context of relationships at school. Educational Research,56(4), 367–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberg, E. G., Corrigall, K. A., Dys, S. P., & Malti, T. (2015). Group music training and children’s prosocial skills. PLoS ONE,10(10), e0141449.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 25–37). Windsor: NFER-NELSON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Individual self, relational self, and collective self. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & O’Mara, E. M. (2011). Individual self, relational self, collective self: Hierarchical ordering of the tripartite self. Psychological Studies,56(1), 98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, S. J., Hamilton, D. L., & Lewis, A. C. (1999). Perceived entitativity and the social identity value of group memberships. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 80–110). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrout, P. E. (2011). Commentary: Mediation analysis, causal process, and cross-sectional data. Multivariate Behavioral Research,46(5), 852–860.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Statista. (2017). Annual per capita income of households in China 1990–2017. How well-off is China’s middle class? China Power. Available from https://www.statista.com/statistics/278698/annual-per-capita-income-of-households-in-china/.

  • Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research,25(2), 173–180.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, N. A. J., & Lonsdale, A. J. (2016). It’s better together: The psychological benefits of singing in a choir. Psychology of Music,44(6), 1240–1254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel (Ed.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2005). A social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology,35(3), 413–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ryzin, M. J., Gravely, A. A., & Roseth, C. J. (2009). Autonomy, belongingness, and engagement in school as contributors to adolescent psychological well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,38(1), 1–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. K., Hu, Z. F., & Liu, Y. (2001). Evidences for reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the General Self-efficacy Scale. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology,7(1), 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (2001). In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context for trust development. Academy of Management Review,26(3), 377–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, E. S., Cervone, D., Bryant, J., McKinney, C., Liu, R. T., & Nadorff, M. R. (2016). Distinguishing mediational models and analyses in clinical psychology: Atemporal associations do not imply causation. Journal of Clinical Psychology,72(9), 947–955.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., Castano, E., Leyens, J. P., & Paladino, M. P. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 257–295). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & Schwarzer, R. (1995). Measuring optimistic self-beliefs: A Chinese adaptation of the General Sell-efficacy Scale. Psychologia,38, 174–181.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Liwen Bianji, Edanz Editing China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekouwai Street, Beijing, 100875, China

    Jianning Dang & Li Liu

  2. The Seventh Middle School of Qinhuangdao City, Qinhuangdao, Hebei Province, China

    Yue Du

Authors
  1. Jianning Dang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Li Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yue Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dang, J., Liu, L. & Du, Y. Benefits of a Highly Entitative Class for Adolescents’ Psychological Well-Being in School. School Mental Health 11, 766–776 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-019-09319-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-019-09319-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation