Abstract
Feeling socially well embedded in the classroom’s peer network is a predictor of many positive developmental outcomes, such as engagement at school. But what does feeling embedded depend on? We investigated the impact of both peers and the teacher. Peer status, measured by sociometric sympathy-based peer nominations, and peer victimization, measured by students’ self-report, were examined as potential predictors of students’ self-reported feelings of embeddedness. We further measured student-perceived teacher support and the accuracy with which the teacher can describe individual student’s peer relations in class (teacher awareness) as potential predictors of subjective embeddedness. We expected that victimized students in particular profit in their feelings of embeddedness from a teacher with a highly accurate awareness of their peer relations. In two independent samples (Study 1: 318 students and their 20 teachers; Study 2: 821 students and their 39 teachers), we found that the mean accuracy of teachers’ awareness of individual students’ peer relations was not very high. Students’ feelings of embeddedness decreased with peer victimization experiences and increased with subjective teacher support, whereas, unexpectedly, sociometric peer status did not matter. Victimized students felt stronger embeddedness the more accurately their teacher could describe their peer relations in class. Peer victimization, teacher support, and, for victimized students, teacher awareness predicted school engagement, mediated via subjective embeddedness. Implications for teaching and teacher education are discussed: how can teachers strengthen feelings of embeddedness, thus fostering students’ engagement at school and protecting them from feeling socially excluded.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The same sample was also used in a study investigating teachers’ knowledge of the class peer network (Harks and Hannover 2019). This study did not examine how teacher knowledge relates to student outcomes, which is the focus of the present paper.
The same sample was also used in a study investigating how teacher knowledge about the class peer network corresponds with respective teacher beliefs and attitudes (Harks and Hannover 2017). This study did not examine how teacher knowledge relates to student outcomes, which is the focus of the present paper.
References
Ahn, H., Garandeau, C. F., & Rodkin, P. C. (2010). Effects of classroom embeddedness and density on the social status of aggressive and victimized children. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(1), 76–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609350922.
Ahn, H., Rodkin, P. C., & Gest, S. (2013). Teacher-student agreement on “bullies and kids they pick on” in elementary school classrooms: gender and grade differences. Theory Into Practice, 52(4), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2013.829728.
Altermatt, E. R., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2003). The development of competence-related and motivational beliefs: an investigation of similarity and influence among friends. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.111.
Anttila, H., Pyhältö, K., Piertarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2018). Socially embedded academic emotions in school. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(3), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n3p87.
Audley-Piotrowski, S., Singer, A., & Patterson, M. (2015). The role of the teacher in children’s peer relations: making the invisible hand intentional. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1(2), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000038.
Baumeister, R. F., Brewer, L. E., Tice, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (2007). The need to belong: understanding the interpersonal and inner effects of social exclusion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 506–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00020.x.
Beachboard, M. R., Beachboard, J. C., Li, W., & Adkison, S. R. (2011). Cohorts and relatedness: self-determination theory as an explanation of how learning communities affect educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 52(8), 853–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9221-8.
Blackhart, G. C., Nelson, B. C., Knowles, M. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: a meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 269–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309346065.
van den Berg, Y. H. M., Segers, E., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2012). Changing peer perceptions and victimization through classroom arrangements: a field experiment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40(3), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9567-6.
van den Berg, Y. H. M., & Stoltz, S. (2018). Enhancing social inclusion of children with externalizing problems through classroom seating arrangements: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 26(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426617740561.
Buhs, E. S., Ladd, G. W., & Herald, S. L. (2006). Peer exclusion and victimization: processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children’s classroom engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.1.
Cheng, J. T., Weidman, A. C., & Tracy, J. L. (2014). The assessment of social status: a review of measures and experimental manipulations. In J. T. Cheng, J. L. Tracy, & C. Anderson (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 347–362). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0867-7_16.
Clark, M. S., & Lemay Jr., E. P. (2010). Close relationships. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, 5th ed (Vol. 2, pp. 898–940). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc..
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K., & Cappotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: a cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557.
Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1092–1122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021212.
Davidson, A. J., Gest, S. D., & Welsh, J. A. (2010). Relatedness with teachers and peers during early adolescence: an integrated variable-oriented and person-oriented approach. Journal of School Psychology, 48(6), 483–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2010.08.002.
De Laet, S., Colpin, H., Vervoort, E., Doumen, S., Van Leeuwen, K., Goossens, L., & Verschueren, K. (2015). Developmental trajectories of children’s behavioral engagement in late elementary school: both teachers and peers matter. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1292–1306. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039478.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
Farmer, T. W., Dawes, M., Hamm, J. V., Lee, D., Mehtaji, M., Hoffman, A. S., & Brooks, D. S. (2018). Classroom social dynamics management: why the invisible hand of the teacher matters for special education. Remedial and Special Education, 39(3), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517718359.
Farmer, T. W., McAuliffe Lines, M., & Hamm, J. V. (2011). Revealing the invisible hand: the role of teachers in children’s peer experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.04.006.
Gartstein, M. A., Bridgett, D. J., & Low, C. M. (2012). Asking questions about temperament: self- and other-report measures across the lifespan. In M. Zentner & R. L. Shiner (Eds.), Handbook of temperament (pp. 183–208). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Gest, S. D., Madill, R. A., Zadzora, K., Miller, A., & Rodkin, P. C. (2014). Teacher management of classroom social network dynamics: associations with trajectories of student adjustment. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426613512677.
Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Rohrbeck, C. A., & Fantuzzo, J. W. (2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.732.
Gomez, B. D., & Lucia, C. A. M. (2018). A self-determination theory approach to health and well-being in the workplace: results from the sixth European working conditions survey in Spain. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(5), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12511.
Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., Dadisman, K., Gravelle, M., & Murray, R. A. (2011). Teachers’ attunement to students’ peer group affiliations as a source of improved student experiences of the school social-affective context following the middle school transition. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.06.003.
Harks, M. & Hannover, B. (2017). Sympathiebeziehungen unter Peers im Klassenzimmer: Wie gut wissen Lehrpersonen Bescheid? Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 20, 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-017-0769-8.
Harks, M. & Hannover, B. (2019). Wie gut kennen Lehrkräfte die Peerbeziehungen der Schülerinnen und Schüler? Eine Untersuchung von Lehramtsstudierenden im Praxissemester und erfahrenen Lehrkräften [How well do teachers know their students’ peer relationships? An investigation of student teachers and of experienced teachers]. Unterrichtswissenschaft. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-019-00060-9.
Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 40(2), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8.
Hendrickx, M. M., Mainhard, M., Boor-Klip, H. J., Cillessen, A. H., & Brekelmans, M. (2016). Social dynamics in the classroom: teacher support and conflict and the peer ecology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.10.004.
Hilts, A., Part, R., & Bernacki, M. L. (2018). The roles of social influences on student competence, relatedness, achievement, and retention in STEM. Science Education, 102(4), 744–770. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21449.
Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (1999). Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 677–685. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.677.
Hoffman, A. S., Hamm, J. V., & Farmer, T. W. (2015). Teacher attunement: supporting early elementary students’ social integration and status. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 39, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2015.04.007.
Kindermann, T. A. (2011). Commentary: the invisible hand of the teacher. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 304–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.04.005.
Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Pelletier, M. E. (2008). Teachers’ views and beliefs about bullying: influences on classroom management strategies and students’ coping with peer victimization. Journal of School Psychology, 46(4), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.07.005.
Kreutzmann, M., Zander, L., & Webster, G. D. (2018). Dancing is belonging! How social networks mediate the effect of a dance intervention on students’ sense of belonging to their classroom. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2319.
Kunter, M. (2005). Multiple Ziele im Mathematikunterricht [multiple goals in math class]. Muenster, Germany: Waxmann.
Kuperminc, G. P., Blatt, S. J., Shahar, G., Henrich, C., & Leadbeater, B. (2004). Cultural equivalence and cultural variance in longitudinal associations of young adolescent self-definition and interpersonal relatedness to psychological and school adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027378129042.
Ladd, G. W., Herald-Brown, S. L., & Reiser, M. (2008). Does chronic classroom peer rejection predict the development of children's classroom participation during the grade school years? Child Development, 79(4), 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01172.x.
Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: the sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.518.
Lohmeier, J. H., & Lee, S. W. (2011). A school connectedness scale for use with adolescents. Educational Research and Evaluation, 17(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2011.597108.
Lubbers, M. J., van der Werf, M. P. C., Snijders, T. A. B., Creemers, B. P. M., & Kuyper, H. (2006). The impact of peer relations on academic progress in junior high. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.07.005.
Luckner, A. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2011). Teacher-student interactions in fifth grade classrooms: relations with children’s peer behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.02.010.
Lynn Mulvey, K., Boswell, C., & Zheng, J. (2017). Causes and consequences of social exclusion and peer rejection among children and adolescents. Report On Emotional & Behavioral Disorders In Youth, 17(3), 71–75.
Madill, R. A., Gest, S. D., & Rodkin, P. C. (2014). Students’ perceptions of relatedness in the classroom: the roles of emotionally supportive teacher-child interactions, children’s aggressive-disruptive behaviors, and peer social preference. School Psychology Review, 43(1), 86–105.
von Marées, N., & Petermann, F. (2010). Bullying- und Viktimisierungsfragebogen (BVF) [bullying and victimization questionnaire]. Goettingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: a hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088904.
Müller, C. M., Hofmann, V., Begert, T., & Cillessen, A. H. (2018). Peer influence on disruptive classroom behavior depends on teachers’ instructional practice. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 56, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.04.001.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (Eighth ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Nezlek, J. B., Schröder-Abé, M., & Schütz, A. (2006). Mehrebenenanalysen in der psychologischen Forschung. Vorteile und Möglichkeiten der Mehrebenenmodellierung mit Zufallskoeffizienten [Multilevel analyses in psychological research. Advantages and potential of multilevel random coefficient modeling]. Psychologische Rundschau, 57(4), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042.57.4.213.
Norwalk, K. E., Hamm, J. V., Farmer, T. W., & Barnes, K. L. (2016). Improving the school context of early adolescence through teacher attunement to victimization. Journal of Early Adolescence, 36(7), 989–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431615590230.
Pearl, R., Leung, M., van Acker, R., Farmer, T. W., & Rodkin, P. C. (2007). Fourth and fifth grade teachers’ awareness of their classrooms’ social networks. The Elementary School Journal, 108(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1086/522384.
Piwowar, V., Thiel, F., & Ophardt, D. (2013). Training inservice teachers’ competencies in classroom management – a quasi-experimental study with teachers of secondary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.09.007.
Rauer, W., & Schuck, K. D. (2003). FEESS 3–4: Fragebogen zur Erfassung emotionaler und sozialer Schulerfahrungen von Grundschulkindern dritter und vierter Klassen. Manual [questionnaire for emotional and social school experiences of elementary school students]. Goettingen, Germany: Beltz Test. https://doi.org/10.1024/1422-4917/a000363.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: implications for interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22(4), 453–459. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1999.0239.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.
Schachner, M., Schwarzenthal, M., van de Vijver, F., & Noack, P. (2019). How all students can belong and achieve: effects of the cultural diversity climate amongst students of immigrant and nonimmigrant background in Germany. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(4), 703–716. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000303.
Slavin, R. E. (2014). Making cooperative learning powerful. Educational Leadership, 72(2), 22–26.
Thomas, S. L. (2000). Ties that bind: a social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 591–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2000.11778854.
Urberg, K. A., Degirmencioglu, S. M., Tolson, J. M., & Halliday-Scher, K. (2000). Adolescent social crowds: measurement and relationship to friendships. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15(4), 417–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558400154001.
Uslu, F., & Gizir, S. (2017). School belonging of adolescents: the role of teacher-student relationships, peer relationships and family involvement. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 17(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.1.0104.
Walton, G., & Wilson, T. (2018). Wise interventions: psychological remedies for social and personal problems. Psychological Review, 125(5), 617–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000115.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2007). Social network analysis. Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wentzel, K. R. (2009). Peers and academic functioning at school. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships and groups (pp. 531–547). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
Wentzel, K. R., McNamara-Barry, C., & Caldwell, K. A. (2004). Friendships in middle school: influences on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.195.
Wentzel, K. R., Russell, S., & Baker, S. (2014). Peer relationships and positive adjustment at school. In M. Furlong, R. Gilman, E. Huebner, & E. Scott (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp. 260–277). New York, NY: Routledge.
Wentzel, K. R., Russell, S., & Baker, S. (2016). Emotional support and expectations from parents, teachers, and peers predict adolescent competence at school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000049.
Weyns, T., Colpin, H., De Laet, S., Engels, M., & Verschueren, K. (2018). Teacher support, peer acceptance, and engagement in the classroom: a three-wave longitudinal study in late childhood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(6), 1139–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0774-5.
Whipp, P. R., & Salin, K. (2018). Physical education teachers in Australia: why do they stay? Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 21(4), 897–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9443-0.
Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: effects of being excluded and ignored. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 279–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1.
Wormington, S. V., Anderson, K. G., Schneider, A., Tomlinson, K. L., & Brown, S. A. (2016). Peer victimization and adolescent adjustment: does school belonging matter? Journal of School Violence, 15(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.922472.
Youniss, J. (1980). Parents and peers in social development. A Sullivan-Piaget perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zander, L., Kreutzmann, M. & Hannover, B. (2017). Peerbeziehungen im Klassenzimmer [Peer relations in the classroom]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 20, 349–352.
Funding
This work was supported by the project K2teach which is part of the “Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung,” a joint initiative of the German Federal Government and the Länder. The program is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. The authors are responsible for the content of this publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dr. Marvin Harks. Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin. Email: m.harks@fu-berlin.de
Current themes of research:
Teacher awareness of peer relationships in school class; peer networks in school class.
Most relevant publications (peer-review) in the field of psychology of education:
Harks, M. & Hannover, B. (2019). Wie gut kennen Lehrkräfte die Peerbeziehungen der Schülerinnen und Schüler? Eine Untersuchung von Lehramtsstudierenden im Praxissemester und erfahrenen Lehrkräften [How well do teachers know their students’ peer relationships? An investigation of student teachers and of experienced teachers]. Unterrichtswissenschaft. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-019-00060-9.
Harks, M. & Hannover, B. (2017). Sympathiebeziehungen unter Peers im Klassenzimmer: Wie gut wissen Lehrpersonen Bescheid? [Sympathy-based peer interactions in the classroom: How well do teachers know them?]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 20, 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-017-0769-8.
Prof. Dr. Bettina Hannover. Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin
Current themes of research :
Impact of the self on students’ social and academic development; gender stereotypes; peer networks in school class; integration of refugee children and students with special educational needs into the school class; teacher awareness of peer relationships in school class; effects of stereotype-threat on immigrant students’ learning.
Selection of recent relevant publications (peer review) in the field of psychology of education:
Hannover, B. & Zander, L. (in press). How personal and social selves influence the development of children and adolescents at school. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie.
Ehrtmann, L., Wolter, I. & Hannover, B. (2019). The interrelatedness of gender-stereotypical interest profiles and students’ gender-role orientation, gender, and reasoning abilities. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01402
Zander, L., Chen, I.-C., & Hannover, B. (2019). Who asks whom for help in mathematics? A sociometric analysis of adolescents’ help-seeking within and beyond clique boundaries. Learning and Individual Differences, 72, 49-58.
Hannover, B., Gubernath, J., Schultze, M. & Zander, L. (2018). Religiosity, religious fundamentalism, and ambivalent sexism toward girls and women among adolescents and young adults living in Germany. Frontiers in Psychology, 9:2399
Sander, A., Ohle, A., Mc Elvany, N., Zander, L. & Hannover, B. (2018). Stereotypenbedrohung als Ursache für geringeren Wortschatzzuwachs bei Grundschulkindern mit Migrationshintergrund [Stereotype threat as a cause for lower gains in vocabulary learning in elementary school children with an immigrant background]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 21, 177–197.
Zander, L., Brouwer, J., Jansen, E., Crayen, C. & Hannover, B. (2018). Academic self-efficacy, growth mindsets, and university students’ integration in academic and social support networks. Learning and Individual Differences, 62, 98–107.
Zander, L., Kreutzmann, M. & Hannover, B. (2017). Peerbeziehungen im Klassenzimmer [Peer relations in the classroom]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 20, 349–352.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harks, M., Hannover, B. Feeling socially embedded and engaging at school: the impact of peer status, victimization experiences, and teacher awareness of peer relations in class. Eur J Psychol Educ 35, 795–818 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00455-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00455-3