Akins, K. (1996). Of sensory systems and the ‘aboutness’ of mental states. Journal of Philosophy, 93(7), 337–372.
Google Scholar
Alexander, S. (1920). Space, time, and deity (2 vols). London: Macmillan.
Ashby, W. R. (1952). Design for a brain. London: Chapman and Hall.
Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2006). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar
Bateson, G. (1970). Form, substance, and difference. General Semantic Bulletin, 37, 5–13. The nineteenth annual Alfred Korzybski memorial lecture, delivered at New York, January 9, 1970; reprinted in Steps to an ecology of mind, Part V: Epistemology and ecology (pp. 454–471).
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
Google Scholar
Bergstrom, C. T., & Rosvall, M. (2011). The transmission sense of information. Biology and Philosophy, 26, 159–176.
Google Scholar
Bickhard, M. (2008). Issues in process metaphysics. Ecological Psychology, 20(3), 252–256.
Google Scholar
Bickhard, M. (2009). The interactivist model. Synthese, 166, 547–591.
Google Scholar
Bickhard, M. (2011). Some consequences (and enablings) of process metaphysics. Axiomathes, 21(1), 3–32.
Google Scholar
Bishop, R. C. (2012). Excluding the causal exclusion argument against non-reductive physicalism. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 19(5/6), 57–74.
Google Scholar
Bitbol, M. (2012). Downward causation without foundations. Synthese, 185(2), 233–255.
Google Scholar
Brier, S., & Joslyn, C. (2013). Information in biosemiotics: Introduction to the special issue. Biosemiotics, 6, 1–7.
Google Scholar
Campbell, R. (2009). A process-based model for an interactive ontology. Synthese, 166(3), 453–477.
Google Scholar
Cao, R. (2012). A teleosemantic approach to information in the brain. Biology and Philosophy, 27, 49–71.
Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219.
Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. (2011). A computational foundation for the study of cognition. Journal of Cognitive Science, 12, 323–357.
Google Scholar
Cohen, J., & Nichols, S. (2010). Colours, colour relationalism and the deliverances of introspection. Analysis, 70(2), 218–228.
Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1998). Brainchildren. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Di Paolo, E. A., Rohde, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2010). Horizons for the enactive mind. In J. Steward, O. Gapenne, A. Ezequiel, & Di Paolo (Eds.) Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 33–88). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Dretske, F. (1981). Knowledge and the flow of information. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Dupré, J. A. (2014). A process ontology for biology. The Philosophers’ Magazine, 67, 81–88.
Google Scholar
Dupré, J. A., & Nicholson, D. (2018). A manifesto for a processual philosophy of biology. In D. Nicholson & J. Dupré (Eds.), Everything flows: Towards a processual philosophy of biology (pp. 3–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Emmeche, C. (1999). The Sarkar challenge to biosemiotics: Is there any information in a cell? Semiotica, 127(1), 273–293.
Google Scholar
Emmet, D. (1992). The passage of nature. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1996). Deconstructing Dennett’s Darwin. Mind and Language, 11(3), 246–262.
Google Scholar
Francis, R. (2003). Why men won’t ask for directions: The seductions of sociobiology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Fresco, N., Ginsburg, S., & Jablonka, E. (2018). Functional information: A graded taxonomy of difference makers. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 11, 547–567.
Google Scholar
Fuchs, C. (2010). QBism, the perimeter of quantum Bayesianism. arXiv: Quantum Physics.
Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2007). Information in biology. In D. Hull & M. Ruse (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to the philosophy of biology (pp. 103–119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. & Sterelny, K. (2008). Biological information. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/information-biological/. Accessed 28 April 2020.
Griffiths, P. E. (2001). Genetic information: A metaphor in search of a theory. Philosophy of Science, 68, 394–412.
Google Scholar
Günter, G. (1963). Das Bewusstsein der Maschinen: Eine Metaphysik der Kybernetik [the consciousness of machines: A metaphysics of cybernetics]. Krefeld: Agis-Verlag.
Google Scholar
Hoffmeyer, J. (2002). The central dogma: A joke that became real. Semiotica, 138(1), 1–13.
Google Scholar
Hulswit, M. (2001). Peirce on causality and causation. In M. Bergman & J. Queiroz (Eds.), The commens encyclopedia: The digital encyclopedia of Peirce studies. New edition. http://www.commens.org/encyclopedia/article/hulswit-menno-peirce-causality-and-causation. Accessed 28 April 2020.
Hume, D. (1748). Philosophical essays concerning human understanding. London: A. Miller.
Google Scholar
Ingthorsson, R. D. (2002). Causal production as interaction. Metaphysica, 3(1), 87–119.
Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (1990). An anthropologist looks at biology. Man, New Series, 25(2), 208–229.
Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (2001). From the transmission of representations to the education of attention. In H. Whitehouse (Ed.), The debated mind: Evolutionary psychology versus ethnography (pp. 113–153). Oxford: Berg.
Google Scholar
Jablonka, E. (2002). Information: Its interpretation, its inheritance, and its sharing. Philosophy of Science, 69, 578–605.
Google Scholar
Johansson, L. G. (2009). Causation: A synthesis of three approaches. In S. Alice, J. Stuart, & G. D. Crnkovic (Eds.), Computation, information, cognition: The nexus and the liminal (pp. 75–86). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Google Scholar
Jordan, J. S. & Day, B. (2015). Wild systems theory as a 21st century coherence framework for cognitive science. In T. Metzinger & J. M. Windt (Eds.). Open MIND: 21(T). Frankfurt am Main: MIND group.
Jordan, J. S., & Vinson, D. (2012). After nature: On bodies, consciousness, and causality. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 19(5/6), 229–250.
Google Scholar
Josephson, B. (2017). Incorporating meaning into fundamental physics. Lecture given at the Frontiers of fundamental physics 15, Miguel Hernández University, Spain. https://sms.cam.ac.uk/media/2657924. Accessed 28 April 2020.
Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action. Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Kim, J. (1999). Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies, 95, 3–36.
Google Scholar
Kim, J. (2006a). Emergence: Core ideas and issues. Synthese, 151, 547–559.
Google Scholar
Kim, J. (2006b). Being realistic about emergence. In P. Clayton & P. Davies (Eds.), The re-emergence of emergence (pp. 189–202). New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Korn, R. W. (2005). The emergence principle in biological hierarchies. Biology and Philosophy, 20, 137–151.
Google Scholar
Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., Hoppitt, W., & Uller, T. (2013). More on how and why: Cause and effect in biology revisited. Biology and Philosophy, 28, 719–745.
Google Scholar
Levy, A. (2011). Information in biology: A fictionalist account. Noûs, 45(4), 640–657.
Google Scholar
Longo, G., Miquel, P. A., Sonnenschein, C., & Soto, A. M. (2012). Is information a proper observable for biological organization? Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 109(3), 108–114.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lycan, W. G. (1996). Consciousness and experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Macdonald, C., & Macdonald, G. (2010). Emergence and downward causation. In C. Macdonald & G. MacDonald (Eds.), Emergence in mind (pp. 139–168). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Google Scholar
McCulloch, W., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 7, 115–133.
Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception. C. Smith (trans.). New York: Routledge.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). The structure of behavior. A. L. Fisher (trans.). Boston: Beacon press.
O’Connor, T., & Wong, H. Y. (2005). The metaphysics of emergence. Noûs, 39, 658–678.
Google Scholar
O’Connor, T., & Wong, H. Y. (2020). Emergent properties. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/properties-emergent/. Accessed 28 April 2020.
Okasha, S. (2011). Emergence, hierarchy and top-down causation in evolutionary biology. Interface Focus, 2, 49–54.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Peters, J. D. (1988). Information: Notes toward a critical history. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 12(9), 9–23.
Google Scholar
Pharoah, M. C. (2018). Qualitative attribution, phenomenal experience and being. Biosemiotics, 11, 427–446.
Google Scholar
Piccinini, G., & Scarantino, A. (2010). Computation vs. information processing: Why their difference matters to cognitive science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Science, 41, 237–246.
Google Scholar
Prakash, C., Fields, C., Hoffman, D. D., Prentner, R., & Singh, M. (2020). Fact, fiction, and fitness. Entropy, 22, 514.
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Rescher, N. (1982). A coherence theory of truth. Lanham: University Press of America.
Google Scholar
Riedl, R. (1997). From four forces back to four causes. Evolution and Cognition, 3(2), 148–158.
Google Scholar
Rothschild, L. J. (2006). The role of emergence in biology. In P. Clayton & P. Davies (Eds.), The re-emergence of emergence (pp. 189–202). New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Rosen, R. (1991). Life itself: A comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin and fabrication of life. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar
Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10(1), 18–24.
Google Scholar
Roth, R. J. (1985). Did Peirce answer Hume on necessary connection? Review of Metaphysics, 38(4), 867–880.
Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1912). The problems of philosophy. London: Williams & Norgate.
Google Scholar
Salthe, S. (1993). Development and evolution: Complexity and change in biology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Santaella-Braga, L. (1999). A new causality for the understanding of the living. Semiotica, 127(1/4), 497–519.
Google Scholar
Sarkar, S. (1996). Biological information: A skeptical look at some central dogmas of molecular biology. In S. Sarkar (Ed.), The philosophy and history of molecular biology (pp. 187–231). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Google Scholar
Savan, D. (1988). An introduction to C.S. Peirce's full system of semeiotic. Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle.
Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417–424.
Google Scholar
Searle, J. (2013). Can information theory explain consciousness? New York review of books, January 10. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/01/10/can-information-theory-explain-consciousness/. Accessed 28 April 2020.
Seibt, J. (2018). Process philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/process-philosophy/. Accessed 28 April 2020.
Sharov, A. A. (2010). Functional information: Towards synthesis of biosemiotics and cybernetics. Entropy, 12(5), 1050–1070.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1978). On the forms of mental representation. In C. W. Savage (Ed.), Perception and cognition: Issues in the foundations of psychology (pp. 3–18). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar
Stegmann, U. E. (2005). Genetic information as instructional content. Philosophy of Science, 72, 425–443.
Google Scholar
Steward, H. (1997). The ontology of mind: Events, processes, and states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Steward, H. (2012). Actions and processes. Philosophical Perspectives, 26, 373–388.
Google Scholar
Stoffregen, T. (2000). Affordances and events. Ecological Psychology, 12, 1–28.
Google Scholar
Stonier, T. (1990). Information and the internal structure of the universe: An exploration into information physics. London: Springer.
Google Scholar
Stonier, T. (1991). Towards a new theory of information. Journal of Information Science, 17, 257–263.
Google Scholar
Stonier, T. (1996). Information as a basic property of the universe. Biosystems, 38(2/3), 135–140.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sukhoverkhov, A. (2010). Memory, sign systems, and self-reproductive processes. Biological Theory, 5(2), 161–166.
Google Scholar
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Torrance, S., & Froese, T. (2011). An inter-enactive approach to agency: Participatory sense-making, dynamics, and sociality. Humanamente, 15, 21–53.
Google Scholar
Tye, M. (1995). Ten problems of consciousness: A representational theory of the phenomenal mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Ulanowicz, R. E. (1997). Ecology, the ascendent perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar
van Cleve, J. (1990). Mind-dust or magic? Panpsychism versus emergence. Philosophical Perspectives, 4, 215–226.
Google Scholar
Vehkavaara, T. (1998). Extended concept of knowledge for evolutionary epistemology and for biosemiotics: Hierarchies of storage and subject of knowledge. In G. L. Farré & T. Oksala (Eds.), Emergence, complexity, hierarchy, organization (pp. 207–216). Espoo: Finnish Academy of Technology.
Google Scholar
von Foerster, H. (1981). Observing systems. Seaside: Intersystems Publications.
Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. (1945). First draft of a report on the EDVAC. Moore School of Electrical Engineering, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania. https://www.wiley.com/legacy/wileychi/wang_archi/supp/appendix_a.pdf. Accessed 28 April 2020.
Warburton, N., & Dennett, D.C. (2013). Daniel Dennett on the Chinese room. Philosophy Bites. http://philosophybites.com/2013/06/daniel-dennett-on-the-chinese-room.html. Accessed 28 April 2020.
Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Zoglauer, T. (1996). Can information be naturalized? In K. Kornwachs & K. Jacoby (Eds.), Information: New questions to a multidisciplinary concept (pp. 187–207). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Google Scholar