Akins, K. (1996). Of sensory systems and the ‘aboutness’ of mental states. Journal of Philosophy, 93(7), 337–372.
Alexander, S. (1920). Space, time, and deity (2 vols). London: Macmillan.
Ashby, W. R. (1952). Design for a brain. London: Chapman and Hall.
Barad, K. (2006). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bateson, G. (1970). Form, substance, and difference. General Semantic Bulletin, 37, 5–13. The nineteenth annual Alfred Korzybski memorial lecture, delivered at New York, January 9, 1970; reprinted in Steps to an ecology of mind, Part V: Epistemology and ecology (pp. 454–471).
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
Bergstrom, C. T., & Rosvall, M. (2011). The transmission sense of information. Biology and Philosophy, 26, 159–176.
Bickhard, M. (2008). Issues in process metaphysics. Ecological Psychology, 20(3), 252–256.
Bickhard, M. (2009). The interactivist model. Synthese, 166, 547–591.
Bickhard, M. (2011). Some consequences (and enablings) of process metaphysics. Axiomathes, 21(1), 3–32.
Bishop, R. C. (2012). Excluding the causal exclusion argument against non-reductive physicalism. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 19(5/6), 57–74.
Bitbol, M. (2012). Downward causation without foundations. Synthese, 185(2), 233–255.
Brier, S., & Joslyn, C. (2013). Information in biosemiotics: Introduction to the special issue. Biosemiotics, 6, 1–7.
Campbell, R. (2009). A process-based model for an interactive ontology. Synthese, 166(3), 453–477.
Cao, R. (2012). A teleosemantic approach to information in the brain. Biology and Philosophy, 27, 49–71.
Chalmers, D. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219.
Chalmers, D. (2011). A computational foundation for the study of cognition. Journal of Cognitive Science, 12, 323–357.
Cohen, J., & Nichols, S. (2010). Colours, colour relationalism and the deliverances of introspection. Analysis, 70(2), 218–228.
Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Dennett, D. C. (1998). Brainchildren. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Di Paolo, E. A., Rohde, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2010). Horizons for the enactive mind. In J. Steward, O. Gapenne, A. Ezequiel, & Di Paolo (Eds.) Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 33–88). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Dretske, F. (1981). Knowledge and the flow of information. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Dupré, J. A. (2014). A process ontology for biology. The Philosophers’ Magazine, 67, 81–88.
Dupré, J. A., & Nicholson, D. (2018). A manifesto for a processual philosophy of biology. In D. Nicholson & J. Dupré (Eds.), Everything flows: Towards a processual philosophy of biology (pp. 3–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Emmeche, C. (1999). The Sarkar challenge to biosemiotics: Is there any information in a cell? Semiotica, 127(1), 273–293.
Emmet, D. (1992). The passage of nature. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Fodor, J. (1996). Deconstructing Dennett’s Darwin. Mind and Language, 11(3), 246–262.
Francis, R. (2003). Why men won’t ask for directions: The seductions of sociobiology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fresco, N., Ginsburg, S., & Jablonka, E. (2018). Functional information: A graded taxonomy of difference makers. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 11, 547–567.
Fuchs, C. (2010). QBism, the perimeter of quantum Bayesianism. arXiv: Quantum Physics.
Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science. New York: Basic Books.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2007). Information in biology. In D. Hull & M. Ruse (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to the philosophy of biology (pp. 103–119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Godfrey-Smith, P. & Sterelny, K. (2008). Biological information. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/information-biological/. Accessed 28 April 2020.
Griffiths, P. E. (2001). Genetic information: A metaphor in search of a theory. Philosophy of Science, 68, 394–412.
Günter, G. (1963). Das Bewusstsein der Maschinen: Eine Metaphysik der Kybernetik [the consciousness of machines: A metaphysics of cybernetics]. Krefeld: Agis-Verlag.
Hoffmeyer, J. (2002). The central dogma: A joke that became real. Semiotica, 138(1), 1–13.
Hulswit, M. (2001). Peirce on causality and causation. In M. Bergman & J. Queiroz (Eds.), The commens encyclopedia: The digital encyclopedia of Peirce studies. New edition. http://www.commens.org/encyclopedia/article/hulswit-menno-peirce-causality-and-causation. Accessed 28 April 2020.
Hume, D. (1748). Philosophical essays concerning human understanding. London: A. Miller.
Ingthorsson, R. D. (2002). Causal production as interaction. Metaphysica, 3(1), 87–119.
Ingold, T. (1990). An anthropologist looks at biology. Man, New Series, 25(2), 208–229.
Ingold, T. (2001). From the transmission of representations to the education of attention. In H. Whitehouse (Ed.), The debated mind: Evolutionary psychology versus ethnography (pp. 113–153). Oxford: Berg.
Jablonka, E. (2002). Information: Its interpretation, its inheritance, and its sharing. Philosophy of Science, 69, 578–605.
Johansson, L. G. (2009). Causation: A synthesis of three approaches. In S. Alice, J. Stuart, & G. D. Crnkovic (Eds.), Computation, information, cognition: The nexus and the liminal (pp. 75–86). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Jordan, J. S. & Day, B. (2015). Wild systems theory as a 21st century coherence framework for cognitive science. In T. Metzinger & J. M. Windt (Eds.). Open MIND: 21(T). Frankfurt am Main: MIND group.
Jordan, J. S., & Vinson, D. (2012). After nature: On bodies, consciousness, and causality. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 19(5/6), 229–250.
Josephson, B. (2017). Incorporating meaning into fundamental physics. Lecture given at the Frontiers of fundamental physics 15, Miguel Hernández University, Spain. https://sms.cam.ac.uk/media/2657924. Accessed 28 April 2020.
Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action. Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kim, J. (1999). Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies, 95, 3–36.
Kim, J. (2006a). Emergence: Core ideas and issues. Synthese, 151, 547–559.
Kim, J. (2006b). Being realistic about emergence. In P. Clayton & P. Davies (Eds.), The re-emergence of emergence (pp. 189–202). New York: Oxford University Press.
Korn, R. W. (2005). The emergence principle in biological hierarchies. Biology and Philosophy, 20, 137–151.
Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., Hoppitt, W., & Uller, T. (2013). More on how and why: Cause and effect in biology revisited. Biology and Philosophy, 28, 719–745.
Levy, A. (2011). Information in biology: A fictionalist account. Noûs, 45(4), 640–657.
Longo, G., Miquel, P. A., Sonnenschein, C., & Soto, A. M. (2012). Is information a proper observable for biological organization? Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 109(3), 108–114.
Lycan, W. G. (1996). Consciousness and experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Macdonald, C., & Macdonald, G. (2010). Emergence and downward causation. In C. Macdonald & G. MacDonald (Eds.), Emergence in mind (pp. 139–168). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
McCulloch, W., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 7, 115–133.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception. C. Smith (trans.). New York: Routledge.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). The structure of behavior. A. L. Fisher (trans.). Boston: Beacon press.
O’Connor, T., & Wong, H. Y. (2005). The metaphysics of emergence. Noûs, 39, 658–678.
O’Connor, T., & Wong, H. Y. (2020). Emergent properties. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/properties-emergent/. Accessed 28 April 2020.
Okasha, S. (2011). Emergence, hierarchy and top-down causation in evolutionary biology. Interface Focus, 2, 49–54.
Peters, J. D. (1988). Information: Notes toward a critical history. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 12(9), 9–23.
Pharoah, M. C. (2018). Qualitative attribution, phenomenal experience and being. Biosemiotics, 11, 427–446.
Piccinini, G., & Scarantino, A. (2010). Computation vs. information processing: Why their difference matters to cognitive science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Science, 41, 237–246.
Prakash, C., Fields, C., Hoffman, D. D., Prentner, R., & Singh, M. (2020). Fact, fiction, and fitness. Entropy, 22, 514.
Rescher, N. (1982). A coherence theory of truth. Lanham: University Press of America.
Riedl, R. (1997). From four forces back to four causes. Evolution and Cognition, 3(2), 148–158.
Rothschild, L. J. (2006). The role of emergence in biology. In P. Clayton & P. Davies (Eds.), The re-emergence of emergence (pp. 189–202). New York: Oxford University Press.
Rosen, R. (1991). Life itself: A comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin and fabrication of life. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10(1), 18–24.
Roth, R. J. (1985). Did Peirce answer Hume on necessary connection? Review of Metaphysics, 38(4), 867–880.
Russell, B. (1912). The problems of philosophy. London: Williams & Norgate.
Salthe, S. (1993). Development and evolution: Complexity and change in biology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Santaella-Braga, L. (1999). A new causality for the understanding of the living. Semiotica, 127(1/4), 497–519.
Sarkar, S. (1996). Biological information: A skeptical look at some central dogmas of molecular biology. In S. Sarkar (Ed.), The philosophy and history of molecular biology (pp. 187–231). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Savan, D. (1988). An introduction to C.S. Peirce's full system of semeiotic. Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle.
Searle, J. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417–424.
Searle, J. (2013). Can information theory explain consciousness? New York review of books, January 10. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/01/10/can-information-theory-explain-consciousness/. Accessed 28 April 2020.
Seibt, J. (2018). Process philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/process-philosophy/. Accessed 28 April 2020.
Sharov, A. A. (2010). Functional information: Towards synthesis of biosemiotics and cybernetics. Entropy, 12(5), 1050–1070.
Simon, H. A. (1978). On the forms of mental representation. In C. W. Savage (Ed.), Perception and cognition: Issues in the foundations of psychology (pp. 3–18). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Stegmann, U. E. (2005). Genetic information as instructional content. Philosophy of Science, 72, 425–443.
Steward, H. (1997). The ontology of mind: Events, processes, and states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Steward, H. (2012). Actions and processes. Philosophical Perspectives, 26, 373–388.
Stoffregen, T. (2000). Affordances and events. Ecological Psychology, 12, 1–28.
Stonier, T. (1990). Information and the internal structure of the universe: An exploration into information physics. London: Springer.
Stonier, T. (1991). Towards a new theory of information. Journal of Information Science, 17, 257–263.
Stonier, T. (1996). Information as a basic property of the universe. Biosystems, 38(2/3), 135–140.
Sukhoverkhov, A. (2010). Memory, sign systems, and self-reproductive processes. Biological Theory, 5(2), 161–166.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Torrance, S., & Froese, T. (2011). An inter-enactive approach to agency: Participatory sense-making, dynamics, and sociality. Humanamente, 15, 21–53.
Tye, M. (1995). Ten problems of consciousness: A representational theory of the phenomenal mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ulanowicz, R. E. (1997). Ecology, the ascendent perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.
van Cleve, J. (1990). Mind-dust or magic? Panpsychism versus emergence. Philosophical Perspectives, 4, 215–226.
Vehkavaara, T. (1998). Extended concept of knowledge for evolutionary epistemology and for biosemiotics: Hierarchies of storage and subject of knowledge. In G. L. Farré & T. Oksala (Eds.), Emergence, complexity, hierarchy, organization (pp. 207–216). Espoo: Finnish Academy of Technology.
von Foerster, H. (1981). Observing systems. Seaside: Intersystems Publications.
von Neumann, J. (1945). First draft of a report on the EDVAC. Moore School of Electrical Engineering, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania. https://www.wiley.com/legacy/wileychi/wang_archi/supp/appendix_a.pdf. Accessed 28 April 2020.
Warburton, N., & Dennett, D.C. (2013). Daniel Dennett on the Chinese room. Philosophy Bites. http://philosophybites.com/2013/06/daniel-dennett-on-the-chinese-room.html. Accessed 28 April 2020.
Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zoglauer, T. (1996). Can information be naturalized? In K. Kornwachs & K. Jacoby (Eds.), Information: New questions to a multidisciplinary concept (pp. 187–207). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.