Skip to main content
Log in

On technical considerations of velodrome track design

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel approach to velodrome track design is presented. The mathematical model uses differential geometry to form a three-dimensional ruled surface. The surface accounts for the safety zone, blue band, and track region, the latter of which is comprised of three segments: straight lines, the arcs of circles, and connecting transition curves. Following a first-principles approach, the general expressions are derived from the Frenet–Serret relations, as a function of the banking and curvature profiles, lengths of curve segments, and turn radius of the bends. Particular solutions to the design problem are obtained using a least-squares minimization of an objective function, within the framework of numerical optimization. Symmetric and asymmetric designs are presented to demonstrate the versatility of the approach. The resulting formulation may be used to design velodrome tracks of any UCI Category and track geometry specification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. We detail the pertinent regulations that restrict the velodrome surface design; the complete list of technical specifications are listed in [17, Chapter VI].

  2. For readers intersted in model-based optimization strategies, we recommend the textbooks of [26,27,28].

  3. For instance, although we do not consider such features in this article, the banking profile could be designed to have portions with constant inclination angle.

References

  1. Olds T, Norton KI, Lowe ELA, Olive S, Reay F, Ly S (1995) Modelling road-cycling performance. J Appl Physiol 78(4):1596–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin JC, Milliken DL, Cobb JE, McFadden KL, Coggan AR (1998) Validation of a mathematical model for road cycling power. J Appl Biomech 14(3):276–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin JC, Gardner AS, Barras M, Martin DT (2006) Modelling sprint cycling using field-derived parameters and forward integration. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38(3):592–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lukes R, Carré M, Haake S (2006) Track cycling: an analytical model. Eng Sport 6:115–120

    Google Scholar 

  5. Underwood L, Jermy M (2010) Mathematical model of track cycling: the individual pursuit. Procedia Eng 2(2):3217–3222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Underwood L, Jermy M (2014) Determining optimal pacing strategy for the track cycling individual pursuit event with a fixed energy mathematical model. Sports Eng 17:183–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Caddy O, Fitton W, Symons D, Purnell A, Gordon D (2017) The effects of forward rotation of posture on computer-simulated 4-km track cycling: Implications of Union Cycliste Internationale rule 1.3.013. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part P J Sports Eng Technol 231(1):3–13

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng J, Du X, Shi J, Zhang Y, Li F (2011) Optimization of superelevation runoff model for cycling tracks. J Central South Univ 18:587–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Woźniak M, Anioł P (2011) Inventorying the shape of a velodrome track by scanning. Rep Geodesy z.1/90:525–530

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fitton B, Symons D (2018) A mathematical model for simulated cycling: applied to track cycling. Sports Eng 21:409–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Benham GP, Cohen C, Brunet E, Clanet C (2020) Brachistochrone on a velodrome. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 476:20200153

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lukes R, Hart J, Haake S (2012) An analytical model for track cycling. Proce Inst Mech Eng Part P J Sports Eng Technol 226(2):143–151

    Google Scholar 

  13. Solarczyk MT (2020) Geometry of cycling track. Budownictwo i Architektura 19(2):111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fitzgerald S, Kelso R, Grimshaw P, Warr A (2021) Impact of transition design on the accuracy of velodrome models. Sports Eng 24(23)

  15. Bos L, Slawinski MA, Slawinski R, Stanoev T (2022) Modelling of cyclist’s power for timetrials on a velodrome. arXiv arXiv:2201.06788 [physics.class-ph]

  16. Frigg R, Hartmann S (2020) Models in science. In: Zalta EN (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Spring 2020 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, USA. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/

  17. UCI (2021) Union Cycliste Internationale Regulations. Part III: track races. www.uci.org/inside-uci/constitutions-regulations/regulations. Accessed 2021

  18. Gray A, Abbena E, Salamon S (2006) Modern differential geometry of curves and surfaces with mathematica. Textbooks in mathematics, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kreyszig E (1991) Differential geometry, reprint. Originally published: Toronto: Univeristy of Toronto Press, 1959 (Mathematical expositions; no. 11) edn. Dover Books on Mathematics. Dover Publications, Inc., New York

  20. Spivak, M. (1979) A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry. A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry. 2nd edn. vol 2. Publish or Perish, Inc., Lombard

  21. Magnus W (1954) On the exponential solution of differential equations for a linear operator. Commun Pure Appl Math 7(4):649–673

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Powell MJD (1981) Approximation theory and methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Bloss AE (1936) Der Übergangsbogen mit geschwungener Überhöhungsrampe. Organ für die Fortschritte des Eisenbahnwesens 73(15):319–320

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kufver, B (1997) Mathematical description of railway alignments and some preliminary comparative studies. VTI rapport, vol 420, part 1. Swedish National Road and Transportation Research Institute

  25. Watorek K (1907) Übergangsbogen. Organ für die Fortschritte des Eisenbahnwesens 62(9 & 10):186–189205208

    Google Scholar 

  26. Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Nocedal J, Wright SJ (2006) Numerical optimization, 2nd edn. Springer series in operations research and financial engineering. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cavazzuti M (2013) Optimization methods: from theory to design scientific and technological aspects in mechanics. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Conn AR, Scheinberg K, Vincente LN (2009) Introduction to derivative-free optimization. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics/Mathematical Programming Society, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7(4):308–313

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Douglas L (2010) Olympics watch: the velodrome. Eng Technol 5(2):20–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fitzgerald S, Kelso R, Grimshaw P, Warr A (2019) Measurement of the air velocity and turbulence in a simulated track cycling team pursuit race. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 190:322–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fitzgerald S, Kelso R, Grimshaw P, Warr A (2022) Measurements of roll, steering, and the far-field wake in track cycling. Sci Rep 12 (article number 11356)

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to acknowledge the following professors, without whom this article would not be possible: Michael A. Slawinski, for his unwavering mentorship and for fostering an enthusiasm for mathematical modelling; Len Bos, for sharing his mathematical rigour, to which I strive continually to emulate; and Ivan Booth, for sparking an interest in differential geometry and its infinite applications. In addition, I would be remiss not to acknowledge the reviewers of this article, whose insightful comments enhanced greatly the practicality of the formulation.

Funding

No funding was received for the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodore Stanoev.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The sole author consents to publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12283_2023_425_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Supplementary file 1 Online supplementary material accompanies this article: Online Resource A quantifies the curvature along curves of constant ruling; Online Resource B demonstrates that parameterizing the inclination along a curve of constant ruling leads to inconsistent angles (pdf 203 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stanoev, T. On technical considerations of velodrome track design. Sports Eng 26, 36 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-023-00425-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-023-00425-5

Keywords

Navigation