Skip to main content
Log in

Is stroke smoothness a reliable indicator of fatigue in ergometer rowing?

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A measure of stroke smoothness (SS) has been presented previously to indicate the degree to which rowers produce an “ideal” handle force profile that of the positive half of a sine wave [2]. This study aimed to determine the influence of fatigue on SS. Ten male rowers completed a maximal intensity trial. Fast Fourier transform methods were used to calculate SS which was given by the amplitude of the fundamental frequency as a percentage of the sum of the first ten peaks. Visual inspection of the data showed indications of a reduction in movement coordination as a function of fatigue. However, SS did not change significantly between the first, middle and last ten strokes (p = 0.205), despite a 21% reduction in mean power between the start and end of the trial. The results suggested that although the shape of the force profile can qualitatively indicate a reduction in movement coordination, the smoothness of the force profiles remains similar with fatigue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Schneider E, Angst F, Brandt JD (1978) Biomechanics in rowing. In: Asmussen E, Jørgensen K (eds) Biomechanics VI-B. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 115–119

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith RM, Spinks WL (1995) Discriminant analysis of biomechanical differences between novice, good and elite rowers. J Sports Sci 13:377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Christov R, Ivanov S, Christov R (1996) Problems with the biomechanical analysis of the rowing technique in real and test conditions. In: Tsarouchas L, Terauds J, Gowitzke BA, Holt LE (eds) Biomechanics in sports V. Hellenic Sports Research Institute, Athens, pp 269–275

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duchesnes CJ, Borres R, Lewill L, Riethmuller M, Olivari D (1996) New approach for boat motion analysis in rowing. In: Tsarouchas L, Terauds J, Gowitzke BA, Holt LE (eds) Biomechanics in sports V. Hellenic Sports Research Institute, Athens, pp 276–280

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mason BR, Shakespear P, Doherty P (1998) The use of biomechanical analysis in rowing to monitor the effect of training. Excel 4:11–47

    Google Scholar 

  6. Struble KR, Erdman AG, Stoner LJ (1981) Computer-aided kinematic analysis of rowing. In: Morecki A, Fidelus K, Kedzior K, Wit A (eds) Biomechanics VII-B. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 425–429

    Google Scholar 

  7. Torres-Moreno R, Tanaka C, Penney KL (2000) Joint excursion, handle velocity, and applied force: a biomechanical analysis of ergonometric rowing. Int J Sports Med 21:41–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holt PJE, Bull AMJ, Cashman PMM, McGregor AH (2003) Kinematics of spinal motion during prolonged rowing. Int J Sports Med 24:597–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wing AM, Woodburn C (1995) The coordination and consistency of rowers in a racing eight. J Sports Sci 13:187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Caplan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caplan, N., Gardner, T.N. Is stroke smoothness a reliable indicator of fatigue in ergometer rowing?. Sports Eng 11, 207–209 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-009-0024-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-009-0024-5

Keywords

Navigation