Skip to main content
Log in

A Framework for the Development of Design and Control Spaces

  • Case Study
  • Published:
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a framework for the development of design and control spaces that simultaneously considers the raw material property space (Z), the critical to quality process variable space (X), and the critical quality attribute space (Y). The importance of jointly defining all of these spaces and simultaneously considering the eventual process feedforward–feedback control system is illustrated. It is shown that changes in any one of these spaces or in the control system will greatly affect the other spaces. Justification is provided for the use of multivariate principal component analysis and projection to latent structures methods to define more meaningful raw material design spaces and the use of statistical process control concepts to redefine control spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. USDA (2006), Guidance for industry: Q8 pharmaceutical development, Office of Training and Communication, Division of Drug Information, HFD-240, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, USA.

  2. Eriksson L, Johansson E, Kettaneh-Wold N, Wold S. Multi- and megavariate data analysis principles and applications. Sweden: Umetrics AB; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marlin TE. Process control: Designing processes and control systems for dynamic performance, 2nd ed. Boston, USA: McGraw Hill; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maciejowski JM. Predictive control with constraints. New York: Prentice Hall; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yabuki Y, Nagasawa T, MacGregor JF. An industrial experience with product quality control in semi-batch processes. Comput Chem Eng. 2000;24:585–590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Flores-Cerillo J, MacGregor JF. Within-batch and batch-to-batch inferential adaptive control of semi-batch reactors: A partial least squares approach. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2003;42:3334–3345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Box GE, Hunter JS, Hunter WG. Statistics for experimenters: Design, innovation and discovery, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Montgomery DC. Introduction to statistical quality control, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Montgomery DC, Runger GC. Applied statistics and probability for engineers, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duchesne C, MacGregor JF. Establishing multivariate specification regions for incoming materials. J Qual Technol. 2004;36(1):78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P. Principal component analysis. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 1987;2:37–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nasr M. The FDA’s initiative on pharmaceutical quality for the 21-st century: emphasizing quality by design. Baltimore: IFPAC 2007; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John F. MacGregor.

Additional information

This article provides a conceptual framework for the development and implementation of design and control spaces in support of the quality-by-design initiative.

Appendix

Appendix

This appendix provides details of the simulation model necessary for the reader to reproduce the results presented in this article. The true simulation model takes the form:

$$y = \beta _0 + \beta _1 x_1^2 + \beta _2 x_1 x_2 + \beta _3 x_2^2 + \beta _4 x_1 + \beta _5 x_2 + \beta _6 x_2 z_1 + \beta _7 x_2 z_2 + \beta _8 z_1 + \beta _9 z_2 $$
(1)

The specific parameter values in Eq. 1 are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Specific parameter values for Eq. 1

Furthermore, the specific principal property values for the raw materials (z 1, z 2) that were used in the case study are listed in Table 2.

Table 2 Specific principal property (z 1, z 2) combinations for the raw materials that were used in the simulated case study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacGregor, J.F., Bruwer, MJ. A Framework for the Development of Design and Control Spaces. J Pharm Innov 3, 15–22 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-008-9023-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-008-9023-5

Keywords

Navigation