Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 41, Supplement 1, pp 159–179 | Cite as

Shoreline Hardening Affects Nekton Biomass, Size Structure, and Taxonomic Diversity in Nearshore Waters, with Responses Mediated by Functional Species Groups

  • Matthew S. Kornis
  • Donna M. Bilkovic
  • Lori A. Davias
  • Steve Giordano
  • Denise L. Breitburg


Coastal shoreline hardening is intensifying due to human population growth and sea level rise. Prior studies have emphasized shoreline-hardening effects on faunal abundance and diversity; few have examined effects on faunal biomass and size structure or described effects specific to different functional groups. We evaluated the biomass and size structure of mobile fish and crustacean assemblages within two nearshore zones (waters extending 3 and 16 m from shore) adjacent to natural (native wetland; beach) and hardened (bulkhead; riprap) shorelines. Within 3 m from shore, the total fish/crustacean biomass was greatest at hardened shorelines, driven by greater water depth that facilitated access to planktivore (e.g., bay anchovy) and benthivore-piscivore (e.g., white perch) species. Small-bodied littoral-demersal species (e.g., Fundulus spp.) had greatest biomass at wetlands. By contrast, total biomass was comparable among shoreline types within 16 m from shore, suggesting the effect of shoreline hardening on fish biomass is largely within extreme nearshore areas immediately at the land/water interface. Shoreline type utilization was mediated by body size across all functional groups: small individuals (≤60 mm) were most abundant at wetlands and beaches, while large individuals (>100 mm) were most abundant at hardened shorelines. Taxonomic diversity analysis indicated natural shoreline types had more diverse assemblages, especially within 3 m from shore, although relationships with shoreline type were weak and sensitive to the inclusion/exclusion of crustaceans. Our study illustrates how shoreline hardening effects on fish/crustacean assemblages are mediated by functional group, body size, and distance from shore, with important applications for management.


Shoreline modification Shoreline armoring Habitat degradation Fish Crustaceans Chesapeake Bay 



We thank H. Soulen, K. Heggie, K. Evans, C. Hause, C. Kliewer, M. Odabaş-Geldiay, D. Shikashio, J. Wilhelm, and many others for help with field collections. We also thank the NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office (Annapolis, MD) for leveraged, in-kind support for field collections, specifically the use of a specially designed skiff and associated equipment, supplies, and personnel. Scientific collection permits were obtained from the Maryland and Virginia Departments of Natural Resources prior to sampling, and animal handling conformed to the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center’s animal care protocols. Mention of specific product or trade names does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. This is publication #17-012 of the NOAA/CSCOR Mid-Atlantic Shorelines project, grant number NA09NOS4780214.

Supplementary material

12237_2017_214_MOESM1_ESM.docx (32 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 31 kb)
12237_2017_214_MOESM2_ESM.mpg (82.1 mb)
ESM 2 (MPG 84024 kb)


  1. Abadie, A. 2002. Bootstrap tests for distributional treatment effects in instrumental variable models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 97: 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Able, K.W., D.M. Nemerson, R. Bush, and P. Light. 2001. Spatial variation in Delaware Bay (USA) marsh creek fish assemblages. Estuaries 24: 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Able, K.W., T.M. Grothues, J. Turnure, D.M. Byrne, and P. Clerkin. 2012. Distribution, movements, and habitat use of small Striped Bass (Morone saxatilis) across multiple spatial scales. Fishery Bulletin 110: 176–192.Google Scholar
  4. Akin, S., K.O. Winemiller, and F.P. Gelwick. 2003. Seasonal and spatial variations in fish and macrocrustacean assemblage structure in Mad Island Marsh estuary, Texas. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 57: 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angermeier, P.L., and M.R. Winston. 1999. Characterizing fish community diversity across Virginia landscapes: prerequisite for conservation. Ecological Applications 9: 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arkema, K.K., G. Gaunnel, G. Verutes, S.A. Wood, A. Guerry, M. Ruckelshaus, P. Kareiva, M. Lacayo, and J.M. Silver. 2013. Coastal habitats shield people and property from sea-level rise and storms. Nature Climate Change 3: 913–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balouskus, R.G., and T.E. Targett. 2012. Egg deposition by Atlantic silverside, Menidia menidia: Substrate utilization and comparison of natural and altered shoreline type. Estuaries and Coasts 35: 1100–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Balouskus, R.G., and T.E. Targett. 2016. Fish and blue crab density along a riprap-sill hardened shoreline: comparisons with Spartina marsh and riprap. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 145: 776–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barbier, E.B., S.D. Hacker, C. Kennedy, E.W. Koch, A.C. Stier, and B.R. Silliman. 2011. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs 81: 169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beck, M.W., K.L. Heck Jr., K.W. Able, D.L. Childers, D.B. Eggleston, B.M. Gillanders, B. Halpern, C.G. Hays, K. Hoshino, T.J. Minello, R.J. Orth, P.F. Sheridan, and M.P. Weinstein. 2001. The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. Bioscience 51: 633–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Becker, A., and I.M. Suthers. 2014. Predator driven diel variation in abundance and behaviour of fish in deep and shallow habitats of an estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 144: 82–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bilkovic, D.M., and M.M. Mitchell. 2013. Ecological tradeoffs of stabilized salt marshes as a shoreline protection strategy: effects of artificial structures on macrobenthic assemblages. Ecological Engineering 61: 469–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bilkovic, D.M., and M.M. Roggero. 2008. Effects of coastal development on nearshore estuarine nekton communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series 358: 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bilkovic, D.M., M. Roggero, C.H. Hershner, and K.H. Havens. 2006. Influence of land use on macrobenthic communities in nearshore estuarine habitats. Estuaries and Coasts 29: 1185–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bilkovic, D.M., M.M. Mitchell, P. Mason, and K. Durhing. 2016. The role of living shorelines as estuarine habitat conservation strategies. Coastal Management 44: 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Borcard, D., P. Legendre, and P. Drapeau. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brody, S.D., S.E. Davis III, W.E. Highfield, and S. Bernhardt. 2008. A spatio-temporal analysis of Section 404 wetland permitting in Texas and Florida: thirteen years of impact along the coast. Wetlands 28: 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bulleri, F., and M.G. Chapman. 2010. The introduction of coastal infrastructure as a driver of change in marine environments. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Childers, D.L., J.W. Day Jr., and H.N. Mckellar Jr. 2000. Twenty more years of marsh and estuarine flux studies: revisiting Nixon (1980). In Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology, ed. M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger, 391–424. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  20. Clark, K.R., and R.M. Warwick. 1998. A taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 523–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark, K.R., and R.M. Warwick. 1999. The taxonomic distinctness measure of biodiversity: weighting of step lengths between hierarchical level. Marine Ecology Progress Series 184: 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clark, K.R., and R.M. Warwick. 2001. A further biodiversity index applicable to species lists: variation in taxonomic distinctness. Marine Ecology Progress Series 216: 265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crossett, K., T. Culliton, P. Wiley, and T. Goodspeed. 2004. Population trends along the coastal United States, 1980–2008. Silver Spring: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.Google Scholar
  24. Currin, C. A., W. S. Chappell, and A. Deaton. 2010. Developing alternative shoreline armoring strategies: the living shoreline approach in North Carolina. In Puget sound shorelines and the impacts of armoring, ed. H. Shipman, M. N. Dethier, G. Gelfenbaum, K. L. Fresh, and R. S. Dinicola, 91–102. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5254.Google Scholar
  25. Davias, L.A., M.S. Kornis, and D.L. Breitburg. 2014. Environmental factors influencing δ13C and δ15N in three fishes from Chesapeake Bay. ICES Journal of Marine Science 71: 689–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. David, V., J. Selleslagh, A. Nowaczyk, S. Dubois, G. Bachelet, H. Blanchet, B. Gouillieux, N. Lavesque, M. Leconte, N. Savoye, B. Sautour, and J. Lobry. 2016. Estuarine habitats structure zooplankton communities: implications for the pelagic trophic pathways. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2016.01.022.Google Scholar
  27. Davis, J. L. D., R. L. Takacs, and R. Schnabel. 2008. Evaluating ecological impacts of living shorelines and shoreline habitat elements: an example from the upper western Chesapeake Bay. In Management, policy, science, and engineering of nonstructural erosion control in the Chesapeake Bay: proceedings of the 2006 living shoreline summit, ed. S. Y. Erdle, J. L. D. Davis, and K. G. Sellner, 55–61. Chesapeake Research Consortium, Publication 08–164, Gloucester Point.Google Scholar
  28. Dethier, M.N., W.W. Raymond, A.N. McBride, J.D. Toft, J.R. Cordell, A.S. Ogston, S.M. Heerhartz, and H.D. Berry. 2016. Multiscale impacts of armoring on Salish Sea shorelines: Evidence for cumulative and threshold effects. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 175: 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dugan, J.E., L. Airoldi, M.G. Chapman, S.J. Walker, and T. Schlacher. 2011. Estuarine and coastal structures: environmental effects, a focus on shore and nearshore structures. In Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science, ed. E. Wolanski and D.S. Mclusky, vol. Vol. 8, 17–41. Waltham: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ellingsen, K.E., K.R. Clarke, P.J. Somerfield, and R.M. Warwick. 2005. Taxonomic distinctness as a measure of diversity applied over a large scale: the benthos of the Norwegian continental shelf. Journal of Animal Ecology 74: 1069–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gedan, K.B., B.R. Silliman, and M.D. Bertness. 2009. Centuries of human-driven change in salt marsh ecosystems. Annual Review of Marine Science 1: 117–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gittman, R.K., F.J. Fodrie, A.M. Popowich, D.A. Keller, J.F. Bruno, C.A. Currin, C.H. Peterson, and M.F. Piehler. 2015. Engineering away our natural defenses: an analysis of shoreline hardening in the US. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 13: 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gittman, R.K., S.B. Scyphers, C.S. Smith, I.P. Neylan, and J.H. Grabowski. 2016a. Ecological consequences of shoreline hardening: a meta-analysis. Bioscience 66: 763–773.Google Scholar
  34. Gittman, R.K., C.H. Peterson, C.A. Currin, F.J. Fodrie, M.F. Piehler, and J.F. Bruno. 2016b. Living shorelines can enhance the nursery role of threatened estuarine habitats. Ecological Applications 26: 249–263.Google Scholar
  35. Glasby, T.M., S.D. Connell, M.G. Holloway, and C.L. Hewitt. 2006. Nonindigenous biota on artificial structures: could habitat creation facilitate biological invasions? Marine Biology 151: 887–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Halpern, B.S., S. Walbridge, K.A. Selkoe, C.V. Kappel, F. Micheli, C. D’Agrosa, J.F. Bruno, K.S. Casey, C. Ebert, H.E. Fox, R. Fujita, D. Heinemann, H.S. Lenihan, E.M.P. Madin, M.T. Perry, E.R. Selig, M. Spalding, R. Steneck, and R. Watson. 2008. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319: 948–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hartman, K.J., and S.B. Brandt. 1995. Trophic resource partitioning, diets, and growth of sympatric estuarine predators. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 124: 520–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heerhartz, S.M., and J.D. Toft. 2015. Movement patterns and feeding behavior of juvenile salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) along armored and unarmored estuarine shorelines. Environmental Biology of Fishes 98: 1501–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heerhartz, S.M., J.D. Toft, J.R. Cordell, M.N. Dethier, and A.S. Ogston. 2015. Shoreline armoring in an estuary constrains wrack-associated invertebrate communities. Estuaries and Coasts 39: 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hines, A.H., and G.M. Ruiz. 1995. Temporal variation in juvenile blue crab mortality: nearshore shallows and cannibalism in Chesapeake Bay. Bulletin of Marine Science 57: 884–901.Google Scholar
  41. Hodson, R.G., J.O. Hackman, and C.R. Bennett. 1981. Food habits of young spots in nursery areas of the Cape Fear River Estuary, North Carolina. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 110: 495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kettenring, K.M., D.F. Whigham, E.L.G. Hazelton, S.K. Gallagher, and H.M. Baron. 2015. Biotic resistance, disturbance, and mode of colonization impact the invasion of a widespread, introduced, wetland grass. Ecological Applications 25: 466–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. King, R.S., A.H. Hines, F.D. Craige, and S. Grap. 2005. Regional, watershed and local correlates of blue crab and bivalve abundances in subestuaries of Chesapeake Bay, USA. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 319: 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kneib, R.T. 1997. The role of tidal marshes in the ecology of estuarine nekton. Oceanography and Marine Biology 35: 163–220.Google Scholar
  45. Kornis, M.S., D. Breitburg, R. Balouskus, D.M. Bilkovic, L.A. Davias, S. Giordano, K. Heggie, A.H. Hines, J.M. Jacobs, T.E. Jordan, R.S. King, C.J. Patrick, R.D. Seitz, H. Soulen, T.E. Targett, D. E. Weller, D.F. Whigham, and J. Uphoff Jr. 2017. Linking the abundance of estuarine fish and crustaceans in nearshore waters to shoreline hardening and landcover. Estuaries and Coasts. doi:10.1007/s12237-017-0213-6Google Scholar
  46. Lawless, A.S., and R.D. Seitz. 2014. Effects of shoreline stabilization and environmental variables on benthic infaunal communities in the Lynnhaven River System of Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 457: 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leonard, D.R.P., K.R. Clarke, P.J. Somerfield, and R.M. Warwick. 2006. The application of an indicator based on taxonomic distinctness for UK marine biodiversity assessments. Journal of Environmental Management 78: 52–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Litvin, S.Y., and M.P. Weinstein. 2003. Life history strategies of estuarine nekton: the role of marsh macrophytes, benthic microalgae, and phytoplankton in the trophic spectrum. Estuaries 26: 552–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lotze, H.K., et al. 2006. Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 312: 1806–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lowe, M.R., and M.S. Peterson. 2014. Effects of coastal urbanization on salt-marsh faunal assemblages in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science 6: 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lowe, M.R., and M.S. Peterson. 2015. Body condition and foraging patterns of nekton from salt marsh habitats arrayed along a gradient of urbanization. Estuaries and Coasts 38: 800–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McCormick, M.K., K.M. Kettenring, H.M. Baron, and D.F. Whigham. 2010. Spread of invasive Phragmites australis in estuaries with differing degrees of development: genetic patterns, Allee effects and interpretation. Journal of Ecology 98: 1369–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Minello, T.J., K.W. Able, M.P. Weinstein, and C.G. Hays. 2003. Salt marshes as nurseries for nekton: testing hypotheses on density, growth and survival through meta-analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 246: 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Munsch, S.H., J.R. Cordell, and J.D. Toft. 2015. Effects of shoreline engineering on shallow subtidal fish and crab communities in an urban estuary: A comparison of armored shorelines and nourished beaches. Ecological Engineering 81: 312–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Munsch, S.H., J.R. Cordell, and J.D. Toft. 2016. Fine-scale habitat use and behaviour of a nearshore fish community: nursery functions, predation avoidance, and spatiotemporal habitat partitioning. Marine Ecology Progress Series 557: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Murdy, E.O., R. S. Birdsong, and J. A. Musick. 1997. Fishes of Chesapeake Bay, 324. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  57. Nemerson, D.M., and K.W. Able. 2003. Spatial and temporal patterns in the distribution and feeding habits of Morone saxatilis in marsh creeks of Delaware Bay, USA. Fisheries Management and Ecology 10: 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nemerson, D.M., and K.W. Able. 2004. Spatial patterns in diet and distribution of juveniles of four fish species in Delaware Bay marsh creeks: factors influencing fish abundance. Marine Ecology Progress Series 276: 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ng, C.L., K.W. Able, and T.M. Grothues. 2007. Habitat use, site fidelity, and movement of adult striped bass in a southern New Jersey estuary based on mobile acoustic telemetry. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136: 1344–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Partyka, M.L., and M.S. Peterson. 2008. Habitat quality and salt-marsh species assemblages along an anthropogenic estuarine landscape. Journal of Coastal Research 24: 1570–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Patrick, C.J., D.E. Weller, X. Li, and M. Ryder. 2014. Effects of shoreline alteration and other stressors on submerged aquatic vegetation in subestuaries of Chesapeake Bay and the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Bays. Estuaries and Coasts 37: 1516–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Patrick, C.J., D.E. Weller, and M. Ryder. 2016. The relationship between shoreline armoring and adjacent submerged aquatic vegetation in Chesapeake Bay and nearby Atlantic Coastal Bays. Estuaries and Coasts 39: 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Patterson, A.W., and A.K. Whitfield. 2000. Do shallow-water habitats function as refugia for juvenile fishes? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 51: 359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Peters, J.R., L.A. Yeager, and C.A. Layman. 2015. Comparison of fish assemblages in restored and natural mangrove habitats along an urban shoreline. Bulletin of Marine Science 91: 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Peterson, M.S., and M.R. Lowe. 2009. Implications of cumulative impacts to estuarine and marine habitat quality for fish and invertebrate resources. Reviews in Fisheries Science 17: 505–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peterson, M.S., B.H. Comyns, J.R. Hendon, P.J. Bond, and G.A. Duff. 2000. Habitat use by early life-history stages of fishes and crustaceans along a changing estuarine landscape: Differences between natural and altered shoreline sites. Wetlands Ecology and Management 8: 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rahmstorf, S. 2007. A semi-empirical approach to projecting future sea-level rise. Science 315: 368–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ross, S.W. 2003. The relative value of different estuarine nursery areas in North Carolina for transient juvenile marine fishes. Fishery Bulletin 101: 384–404.Google Scholar
  69. Rozas, L.P., T.J. Minello, R.J. Zimmerman, and P. Caldwell. 2007. Nekton populations, long term wetland loss, and the effect of recent habitat restoration in Galveston Bay, Texas, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 344: 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ruiz, G.M., A.H. Hines, and M.H. Posey. 1993. Shallow water as a refuge habitat for fish and crustaceans in non-vegetated estuaries: an example from Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 99: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sciance, M.B., C.J. Patrick, D.E. Weller, M.N. Williams, M.K. McCormick, and E.L. Hazelton. 2016. Local and regional disturbances associated with the invasion of Chesapeake Bay marshes by the common reed Phragmites australis. Biological Invasions. doi: 10.1007/s10530-016-1136-z.Google Scholar
  72. Seitz, R.D., R.N. Lipcius, N.H. Olmstead, M.S. Seebo, and D.M. Lambert. 2006. Influence of shallow-water habitats and shoreline development on abundance, biomass, and diversity of benthic prey and predators in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 326: 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sekhon, J.S. 2011. Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization. Journal of Statistical Software 42: 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sharma, S., P. Legendre, M. De Cáceres, and D. Boisclair. 2011. The role of environmental and spatial processes in structuring native and non-native fish communities across thousands of lakes. Ecography 34: 762–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sheaves, M., R. Baker, I. Nagelkerken, and R.M. Connolly. 2015. True value of estuarine and coastal nurseries for fish: Incorporating complexity and dynamics. Estuaries and Coasts 38: 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sobocinski, K.L., J.R. Cordell, and C.A. Simenstad. 2010. Effects of shoreline modifications on supratidal macroinvertebrate fauna on Puget Sound, Washington beaches. Estuaries and Coasts 33: 699–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Strayer, D.L., S.E.G. Findlay, D. Miller, H.M. Malcom, D.R. Fischer, and T. Coote. 2012. Biodiversity in Hudson River shore zones: influence of shoreline type and physical structure. Aquatic Sciences 74: 597–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tan, E.L.-Y., M. Mayer-Pinto, E.L. Johnston, and K.A. Dafforn. 2015. Differences in intertidal microbial assemblages on urban structures and natural rocky reef. Frontiers in Microbiology 6: 1276. doi: 10.3389/fmicob.2015.01276.Google Scholar
  79. Teal, J.M. 1962. Energy flow in the salt marsh ecosystem of Georgia. Ecology 43: 614–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Toft, J.D., J.R. Cordell, C.A. Simenstad, and L.A. Stamatiou. 2007. Fish distribution, abundance, and behavior along city shoreline types in Puget Sound. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 27: 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tuckey, T.D., and M.C. Fabrizio. 2013. Influence of survey design on fish assemblages: implications from a study in Chesapeake Bay tributaries. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142: 957–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Vaselli, S., F. Bulleri, and L. Benedetti-Cecchi. 2008. Hard coastal-defence structures as habitats for native and exotic rock-bottom species. Marine Environmental Research 66: 395–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Weinstein, M.P., S.Y. Litvin, and V.G. Guida. 2005. Considerations of habitat linkages, estuarine landscapes, and the trophic spectrum in wetland restoration design. Journal of Coastal Research SI40: 51–63.Google Scholar
  84. Weinstein, M.P., S.Y. Litvin, and V.G. Guida. 2010. Stable isotope and biochemical composition of white perch in a Phragmites dominated salt marsh and adjacent waters. Wetlands 30: 1181–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Weinstein, M.P., S.Y. Litvin, and J.M. Krebs. 2014. Restoration ecology: Ecological fidelity, restoration metrics, and a systems perspective. Ecological Engineering 65: 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Weinsten, M.P., and S.Y. Litvin. 2016. Macro-Restoration of tidal wetlands: a whole estuary approach. Ecological Restoration 34: 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yang, M. L., W. S. Jiang, W. Y. Wang, X. F. Pan, D. P. Kong, F. H. Han, X. Y. Chen, and J. X. Yang. 2016. Fish assemblages and diversity in three tributaries of the Irrawaddy River in China: changes, threats and conservation perspectives. Knowledge & Management of Aquatic Ecosystems 417. doi:  10.1051/kmae/2015042.

Copyright information

© 2017 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew S. Kornis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Donna M. Bilkovic
    • 3
  • Lori A. Davias
    • 1
  • Steve Giordano
    • 4
  • Denise L. Breitburg
    • 1
  1. 1.Smithsonian Environmental Research CenterEdgewaterUSA
  2. 2.Green Bay Fish and Wildlife Conservation OfficeUS Fish and Wildlife ServiceNew FrankenUSA
  3. 3.Virginia Institute of Marine ScienceCollege of William & MaryGloucester PointUSA
  4. 4.Department of CommerceNOAA National Marine Fisheries ServiceSt. PetersburgUSA

Personalised recommendations