Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of land use on macrobenthic communities in nearshore estuarine habitats

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Macrobenthic community indices were examined for their ability to characterize the influence of shoreline alteration and watershed land use in nearshore estuarine environments of the Chesapeake Bay, U.S.A. Twenty-three watersheds were surveyed in 2002 and 2003 for nearshore macrobenthic assemblages, environmental parameters (i.e., dissolved oxygen, pH, total suspended solids, salinity, and sediment composition), shoreline condition, and land use. Two indices of macrobenthic biological integrity, benthic index of biological integrity in the nearshore (B-IBIN) and abundance biomass comparison (W-value), were evaluated for associations with environmental and shoreline condition, and riparian and watershed land use. Comparisons between nearshore measures of the B-IBI with offshore values (>2 m; Chesapeake Bay benthic index of biological integrity [B-IBICB]) were conducted to assess the ability of the index to reflect land use patterns at near and far proximities to shore. Nearshore macrobenthic communities were represented by a total of 94 species (mean number of species =9.2 ± 0.4 sample−1), and were dominated by the phyla Arthropoda, Annelida, and Mollusca. Temporal variability in environmental conditions and macrobenthic abundance and biomass may be attributable to the notable increase in precipitation in 2003 that led to nutrient influxes and algal blooms. For the biotic indices applied in the nearshore, the highest scores were associated with forested watersheds (W-value, B-IBIN). Ecological thresholds were identified with nonparametric change-point analysis, which indicated a significant reduction in B-IBIN and W-value scores when the amount of developed shoreline exceeded 10% and developed watershed exceeded 12%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alden, III,R. W., D. M. Dauer, J. A. Ranasinghe, L. C. Scott, andR. J. Llanso. 2002. Statistical verification of the Chesapeake Bay Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity.Environmetrics 13:473–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen, B. D. Snyder, and J. B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, 2nd edition. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, EPA 841-B-99-002. Washington, D.C.

  • Beauchamp, D. A., E. R. Byron, andW. A. Wurtsbaugh. 1994. Summer habitat use by littoral-zone fishes in Lake Tahoe and the effects of shoreline structures.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 14:385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilkovic, D. M., C. H. Hershner, M. R. Berman, K. J. Havens, andD. M. Stanhope. 2005. Evaluating estuarine indicators of ecosystem health in the nearshore of Chesapeake Bay, p. 365–379.In S. A. Bortone (ed.), Estuarine Indicators. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. P., D. H. Wardrop, K. W. Thornton, D. Whigham, C. Hershner, M. M. Brinson, andJ. S. Shortle. 2006. Integration of ecological and socioeconomic indicators for estuaries and watersheds of the Atlantic Slope. Final Report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency STAR Program, Agreement R-82868401, Atlantic Slope Consortium, University Park, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, P. M. 1996. Presentation and interpretation of sediment quality triad data.Ecotoxicology 5:327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. 1990. Comparisons of dominance curves.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 138:143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. andR. M. Warwick. 2001. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd edition. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comeleo, R. L., J. F. Paul, P. V.August, J. Copeland, C. Baker, S. S. Hale, andR. L. Latimer. 1996. Relationships between watershed stressors and sediment contamination in Chesapeake Bay estuaries.Landscape Ecology 11:307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, D. L., T. E. Jordan, andD. E. Weller. 1992. Nutrient flux in a landscape: Effects of coastal land use and terrestrial community mosaic on nutrient transport to coastal waters.Estuaries 15:431–442.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dauer, D. M. 1993. Biological criteria, environmental health and estuarine macrobenthic community structure.Marine Pollution Bulletin 26:249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauer, D. M., M. W. Luckenbach, andA. J. Rodi, Jr. 1993. Abundance biomass comparison (ABC method): Effects of an estuarine gradient, hypoxic/hypoxic events and contaminated sediments.Marine Biology 116:507–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauer, D. M., S. B. Weisberg, andJ. A. Ranasinghe. 2000. Relationships between benthic community condition, water quality, sediment quality, nutrient loads, and land use patterns in Chesapeake Bay.Estuaries 23:80–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, L. A., J. T. Finn, S. G.Ayvazian, C. A. Ryder-Kieffer, andJ. Buonaccorsi. 1997. Development and validation of an estuarine biotic integrity index.Estuaries 20:601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deluca, W. V., C. E. Studds, L. L. Rockwood, andP. P. Marra. 2004. Influence of land use on the integrity of marsh bird communities of the Chesapeake Bay, USA.Wetlands 24:837–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennison, W. C., R. J. Orth, K. A. Moore, J. C. Stevenson, V. Carter, S. Kollar, P. W. Bergstrom, andR. A. Batiuk. 1993. Assessing water quality with submersed aquatic vegetation. Habitat requirements as barometers of Chesapeake Bay health.Bioscience 43:86–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, R. J., G. R. Cutter Jr, andD. M. Dauer. 2003. A comparison of two methods for estimating the status of benthic habitat quality in the Virginia Chesapeake Bay.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 285–286:371–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, V. D. andJ. K. Summers, 1999. Refinement, validation, and application of a benthic condition index for northern Gulf of Mexico estuaries.Estuaries 22:624–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folk, R. L. 1980. Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks, 2nd edition. Hemphill Publishing Company, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, S. S., J. F. Paul, andJ. F. Heltshe. 2004. Watershed landscape indicators of estuarine benthic condition.Estuaries 27:283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. F., D. M. Sanger, C. P. Gawle, S. B. Lerberg, M. S. Santiago, G. H. M. Riekerk, L. E. Zimmerman, andG. I. Scott. 2004. Linkages between tidal creek ecosystems and the landscape and demographic attributes of their watersheds.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 298:151–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. E., J. C. Kurtz, andW. S. Fisher (eds.). 2000, Evaluation Guidelines for Ecological Indicators. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Je, J. G., T. Belan, C. Levings, andB. J. Koo. 2003. Changes in benthic communities along a presumed pollution gradient in Vancouver Harbour.Marine Environmental Research 57:121–135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. J., M. A. Bozek, G. R. Hatzenbeler, E. E. Emmons, andM. D. Staggs. 1999. Cumulative effects of incremental shoreline habitat modification on fish assemblages in north temperate lakes.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, S. J. andP. A. Vaas. 2000. An index of ecosystem integrity for northern Chesapeake Bay.Environmental Science and Policy 3: S59-S88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities.Fisheries 6:21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. andE. W. Chu. 1999. Restoring Life in Running Waters: Better Biological Monitoring, 1st edition, Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerans, B. L. andJ. R. Karr. 1994. A benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for rivers of the Tennessee Valley.Ecological Applications 4:768–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiddon, J. A., J. F. Paul, H. W. Buffum, C. S. Strobel, S. S. Hale, D. Cobb, andB. S. Brown. 2003. Ecological condition of US mid-Atlantic estuaries, 1997–1998.Marine Pollution Bulletin 46: 1224–1244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King, R. S., A. H. Hinse, F. D. Craige, andS. Grap. 2005. Regional, watershed and local correlates of blue crab and bivalve abundances in subestuaries of Chesapeake Bay, USA.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 319:101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, R. S. andC. J. Richardson. 2003. Integrating bioassessment and ecological risk assessment: An approach to developing numerical water-quality criteria.Environmental Management 31: 795–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerberg, S. B., A. F. Holland, andD. M. Sanger. 2000. Responses of tidal creek macrobenthic communities to the effects of watershed development.Estuaries 23:838–853.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Limburg, K. E. andR. E. Schmidt. 1990. Patterns of fish spawning in Hudson River tributaries: Response to an urban gradient?Ecology 71:1238–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llanso, R., D. Dauer, J. Voelstad, andL. Scott. 2003. Application of the benthic index of biotic integrity to environmental monitoring in Chesapeake Bay.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 81:163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llanso, R. J., L. C. Scott, D. M. Dauer, J. L. Hyland, andD. E. Russell. 2002a. An estuarine index of biotic integrity for the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. I. Classification of assemblages and habitat definition.Estuaries 25:1219–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llanso, R. J., L. C. Scott, J. L. Hyland, D. M. Dauer, D. E. Russell andF. W. Kutz. 2002b. An estuarine index of biotic integrity for the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. II. Index development.Estuaries 25:1231–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meire, P. M. andJ. Dereu. 1990. Use of the abundance/biomass comparison method for detecting environmental stress: Some considerations based on intertidal macrozoobenthos and bird communities.Journal of Applied Ecology 27:210–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrisey, D. J., S. J. Turner, G. N. Mills, R. B. Williamson, andB. E. Wise. 2003. Factors affecting the distribution of benthic macrofauna in estuaries contaminated by urban runoff.Marine Environmental Research 55:113–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, L. L. andD. A. Kovacic. 1993. Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water-quality restoration and stream management.Freshwater Biology 29:243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, J. F., R. L. Comeleo, andJ. Copeland. 2002. Landscape and watershed processes: Landscape metrics and estuarine sediment contamination in the mid-Atlantic and southern New England regions.Journal of Environmental Quality 31:836–845.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, M. J. andJ. L. Meyer. 2001. Streams in the urban landscape.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32:333–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, J. F., K. J. Scott, D. E. Campbell, J. H. Gentile, C. S. Strobel, R. M. Valente, S. B. Weisberg, A. F. Holland, andJ. A. Ranasinghe. 2001. Developing and applying a benthic index of estuarine condition for the Virginian Province.Ecological Indicators 1:83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, T. H. andR. Rosenberg. 1978. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment.Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 16:229–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, S. S., R. S. King, andC. J. Richardson. 2003. Two statistical methods for the detection of environmental thresholds.Ecological Modelling 166:87–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regier, H. A. 1993. The notion of natural and cultural integrity, p. 3–18.In S. Woodley, J. Kay, and G. Francis (eds.), Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems, Volume 1. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2003. Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen, Water Clarity and Chlorophylla for the Chesapeake Bay and its Tidal Tributaries. EPA 903-R-03-002. Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, Maryland. <|http://www.epa.gov/chesapeake/baycriteria.htm.|>

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dolah, R. F., J. L. Hyland, A. F. Holland, J. S. Rosen, andT. R. Snoots. 1999. A benthic index of biological integrity for assessing habitat quality in estuaries of the southeastern USA.Marine Environmental Research 48:269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., J. Lyons, andP. Kanehl. 1997. Influences of watershed land use on habitat quality and biotic integrity in Wisconsin streams.Fisheries 22:6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, R. M. 1986. A new method for detecting pollution effects on marine macrobenthic communities.Marine Biology 92:557–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, R. M., T. H. Pearson, andRuswahyuni. 1987. Detection of pollution effects on marine macrobenthos: Further evaluation of the species abundance/biomass method.Marine Biology 95:193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, S. B., J. Ranasinghe, D. M. Dauer, L. C. Schaffner, R. J. Diaz, andJ. B. Frithsen. 1997. An estuarine benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for Chesapeake Bay.Estuaries 20:149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, A. K. 1996. Fishes and the environmental status of South African estuaries.Fisheries Management and Ecology 3:54–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Post Office Box 1346, 23062, Gloucester Point, Virginia

    D. M. Bilkovic, M. Roggero, C. H. Hershner & K. H. Havens

Authors
  1. D. M. Bilkovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Roggero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. H. Hershner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. H. Havens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. M. Bilkovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bilkovic, D.M., Roggero, M., Hershner, C.H. et al. Influence of land use on macrobenthic communities in nearshore estuarine habitats. Estuaries and Coasts: J ERF 29, 1185–1195 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02781819

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02781819

Keywords

Search

Navigation