Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Aboveground Biomass Patterns of Dominant Spartina Species and Their Relationship with Selected Abiotic Variables in Argentinean SW Atlantic Marshes

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Salt marsh zonation patterns generate different abiotic and biotic conditions that can accentuate species inherent differences in primary production and biomass. In South West Atlantic marshes, there are two Spartina species: Spartina alterniflora in the low intertidal and Spartina densiflora in the high intertidal. These two species are generally found in all marshes but with different dominance: In some marshes, the S. densiflora zone occupies higher extents, and in others, the S. alterniflora zone is the one that prevails. We found through field sampling that, in six studied marshes, there is greater S. densiflora live and total (i.e., dead+live) aboveground biomass (g m−2) in the marshes dominated by S. densiflora than in the ones dominated by S. alterniflora. Spartina alterniflora had similar aboveground biomass in the six marshes, regardless of the dominance of each species. When comparing the two Spartina species within each marsh, S. densiflora had greater live and total biomass in the marshes it dominates. In the marshes dominated by S. alterniflora, both species had similar live and total biomass. In all marshes, there was greater dead S. densiflora biomass. A multivariate analysis using selected abiotic factors (i.e., salinity, latitude, and tidal amplitude) showed that S. alterniflora aboveground biomass patterns are mainly correlated with salinity, while S. densiflora live biomass is mainly correlated with salinity and latitude, dead biomass with salinity and tidal amplitude, and total biomass with salinity alone. We conclude that in S. densiflora dominated marshes, the main processes of that species zone (i.e., nutrient accumulation) will be accentuated because of its higher biomass. We also conclude that climatic conditions, in combination with specific Spartina biotic and ambient abiotic parameters, can affect marsh ecological functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, P. 1990. Saltmarsh ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, D.A. 1963. Factors influencing vascular plant zonation in North Carolina saltmarshes. Ecology 44: 445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti, J., J. Cebrian, A. Méndez Casariego, A.D. Canepuccia, M. Escapa, and O. Iribarne. 2011. Effects of nutrient enrichment and crab herbivory on a SW Atlantic saltmarsh productivity. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 405: 99–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti, J., M. Escapa, P. Daleo, O.O. Iribarne, B. Silliman, and M. Bertness. 2007. Local and geographic variation in grazing intensity by herbivorous crabs in SW Atlantic salt marshes. Marine Ecology Progress Series 349: 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antón, A., J. Cebrian, K. Heck Jr., C. Duarte, K. Sheehan, M. Miller, and C. Foster. 2011. Decoupled effects (positive to negative) of nutrient enrichment on ecosystem services. Ecological Applications 21: 991–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertness, M.D. 1985. Fiddler crab regulation of Spartina alterniflora production on a New England salt marsh. Ecology 66: 1042–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortolus, A., and O.O. Iribarne. 1999. The effect of the southwestern Atlantic burrowing crab Chasmagnathus grannulata on a Spartina salt-marsh. Marine Ecology Progress Series 178: 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, V., and J.C. Lefeuvre. 2000. Primary production and macro-detritus dynamics in a European salt marsh: carbon and nitrogen budgets. Aquatic Botany 67: 23–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A.L., and A. Willink. 1973. Biogeografía de América Latina. Serie de biología, monográfica no, 13. Programa regional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico. Washington: Departamento de Asuntos Científicos, Organización de Estados Americanos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canepuccia, A.D., D.I. Montemayor, J. Pascual, J.L. Farina, and O.O. Iribarne. 2011. A stem-boring moth drives detritus production in SW Atlantic marshes. Marine Ecology Progress Series 442: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, J.M., L. Fernandez-Baco, E.M. Castellanos, C.J. Luque, M.E. Figueroa, and A.J. Davy. 2000. Lower limits of Spartina densiflora and S. maritima in a Mediterranean salt marsh determined by different ecophysiological tolerances. Journal of Ecology 88: 801–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, J.M., A.E. Rubio-Casal, S. Redondo, A.A. Alvarez-Lopez, T. Luque, C. Luque, F.J. Nieva, E.M. Castellanos, and M.E. Figueroa. 2005. Short-term responses to salinity of an invasive cordgrass. Biological Invasions 7: 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K.R., and R.M. Warwick. 2001. Changes in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd ed. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daleo, P., and O.O. Iribarne. 2009. Beyond competition: the stress-gradient hypothesis tested in plant–herbivore interactions. Ecology 90: 2368–2374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLaune, R.D., R.J. Buresh, and W.H. Patrick Jr. 1979. Relationship of soil properties to standing crop biomass of Spartina alterniflora in a Louisiana marsh. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 8: 477–487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Leeuw, J., H. Olff, and J.P. Bakker. 1990. Year-to-year variation in peak above ground biomass of six salt-marsh angiosperm communities as related to rainfall deficit and inundation frequency. Aquatic Botany 36: 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, N.C., P.J. Ewanchuk, and M.D. Bertness. 2001. Competition and salt-marsh plant zonation: stress tolerators may be dominant competitors. Ecology 82: 2471–2485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González Trilla, G., P. Kandus, V. Negrin, and J. Marcovecchio. 2009. Tiller dynamic and production on a SW Atlantic Spartina alterniflora marsh. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 85: 126–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González Trilla, G., S. De Marco, J. Marcovecchio, R. Vicari, and P. Kandus. 2010. Net primary productivity of Spartina densiflora Brong in a SW Atlantic coastal salt marsh. Estuaries and Coasts 33: 953–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, B.L., and E.L. Dunn. 1976. Growth and resource allocation responses of Spartina alterniflora Loisel. to three levels of NH4N, Fe, and NaCl in solution culture. Botanical Gazette 137: 224–230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemminga, M.A., and G.J.C. Buth. 1991. Decomposition in salt marsh ecosystems of the S.W. Netherlands: the effects of biotic and abiotic factors. Vegetatio 92: 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkinson, C.H., J.G. Gosselink, and R.T. Parrondo. 1978. Aboveground production of seven marsh plant species in coastal Louisiana. Ecology 59: 760–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, B.L., J.W.H. Dacey, and D.D. Goehringer. 1986. Factors controlling the growth form of Spartina alterniflora: feedbacks between above ground production, sediment oxidation, nitrogen and salinity. Journal of Ecology 74: 881–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isacch, J.P., L. Rodríguez, D. Conde, C. Costa, M. Escapa, D. Gagliardini, and O. Iribarne. 2006. Distribution of salt marsh plant communities associated with environmental factors along a latitudinal gradient on SW Atlantic coast. Journal of Biogeography 33: 888–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, M.L., G.R. Guntenspergen, and J.T. Morris. 2009. Latitudinal trends in Spartina alterniflora productivity and the response of coastal marshes to global change. Global Change Biology 15: 1982–1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittelson, P.M., and M.J. Boyd. 1997. Mechanisms of expansion for an introduced species of Cordgrass, Spartina densiflora, in Humboldt Bay, California. Estuaries 20: 770–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, R., F. Shi, and K. Fukuda. 2010. Interactive effects of various salt and alkali stresses on growth, organic solutes, and cation accumulation in a halophyte Spartina alterniflora (Poaceae). Environmental and Experimental Botany 68: 66–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, K.L., and E.D. Seneca. 1982. The influence of morphology in determining the decomposition of two salt marsh macrophytes. Estuaries 5: 302–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelssohn, I.A., and J.T. Morris. 2000. Eco-physiological controls on the productivity of Spartina alterniflora Loisel. In Concepts and controversies in tidal marsh ecology, ed. M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger, 59–80. Dordretch: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menendez, M., and N. Sanmartí. 2007. Geratology and decomposition of Spartina versicolor in a brackish Mediterranean marsh. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 74: 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montemayor, D.I. 2012. Importancia ecosistémica de las plantas de marisma género Spartina en áreas costeras del Atlántico Sudoccidental. Doctoral thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata.

  • Montemayor, D.I., M. Addino, E. Fanjul, M. Escapa, M.F. Alvarez, F. Botto, and O. Iribarne. 2011. Effect of dominant Spartina species on salt marsh detritus production in SW Atlantic estuaries. Journal of Sea Research 66: 104–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffet, K.B., D.A. Robinson, and S.M. Gorelick. 2010. Relationship of salt marsh vegetation zonation to spatial patterns in soil moisture, salinity, and topography. Ecosystems 13: 1287–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffett, K.B., S.M. Gorelick, R.G. McLaren, and E.A. Sudicky. 2012. Salt marsh ecohydrological zonation due to heterogeneous vegetation–groundwater–surface water interactions. Water Resources Research 48, W02516. doi:10.1029/2011WR010874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieva, F.J.J., E.M. Castellanos, J.M. Castillo, and M.E. Figueroa. 2005. Clonal growth and tiller demography of the invader cordgrass Spartina densiflora Brong. at two contrasting habitats in SW European salt marshes. Wetlands 25: 122–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieva, F.J.J., A. Diaz-Espejo, E.M. Castellanos, and M.E. Figueroa. 2001. Field variability of invading populations of Spartina densiflora Brong. in different habitats of the Odiel marshes (SW Spain). Estuarine. Coastal and Shelf Science 52: 515–527.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, S.W., and C.A. Oviatt. 1973. Analysis of local variation in the standing crop of Spartina alterniflora. Botanica Marina 16: 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E.P. 2000. Tidal marshes as outwelling/pulsing systems. In Concepts and controversies in tidal marsh ecology, ed. M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger, 3–7. Dordretch: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, S.C., L.E. Stanton, and J.S. Brewer. 2002. Nutrient effects on the composition of salt marsh plant communities along the Southern Atlantic and Gulf Coasts of the United States. Estuaries 25: 1164–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubauer, J.P., and C.S. Hopkinson. 1984. Above- and belowground emergent macrophyte production and turnover in a coastal marsh ecosystem, Georgia. Limnology and Oceanography 29: 1052–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silliman, B.R., and M.D. Bertness. 2002. A trophic cascade regulates salt marsh primary production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 10500–10505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spalding, M.D., H. Fox, G.R. Allen, N. Davidson, Z.A. Ferdaña, M. Finlayson, B.S. Halpern, M.A. Jorge, A. Lombana, S.A. Lourie, K.D. Martin, E. McManus, J. Molnar, C.A. Recchia, and J. Robertson. 2007. Marine ecoregions of the world: A bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. Bioscience 57: 573–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steever, E.Z., R.S. Warren, and W.A. Niering. 1976. Tidal energy subsidy and standing crop production of Spartina alterniflora. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 4: 473–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D.I., and B.R. Allanson. 1995. Organic carbon fluxes between a high marsh and estuary, and the inapplicability of the outwelling hypothesis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 120: 263–270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R.E. 1976. Geographic variations in salt marsh macrophyte production: a review. Contributions in Marine Science 20: 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.G., and F.S. Chapin. 2005. Causes and consequences of spatial heterogeneity in ecosystem function. In In Ecosystem function in heterogeneous landscapes, ed. G.M. Lovett, C.G. Jones, M.G. Turner, and K.C. Weathers, 9–30. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, A.J. 1997. Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Y., J.B. Tang, and S.Q. An. 2011. Responses of growth and sexual reproduction of Phragmites australis and Spartina alterniflora to salinity stress. Chinese Journal of Ecology 30: 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J.B. 1983. Freshwater impacts in normally hipersaline marshes. Estuaries 6: 346–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ann Borsinger for assistance with language edition and two anonymous reviewers for valuable suggestions on the manuscript. We also thank Juan Pablo Isacch for providing us the satellite images of Fig. 1. This project was supported by Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, ANPCyT, and CONICET (all granted to O.I.). D.M. and J.P. were supported by a doctoral scholarship from CONICET. This paper is part of the Doctoral thesis of D.M.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC), UNMDP, CONICET, Mar del Plata, Argentina

    Diana I. Montemayor, Alejandro D. Canepuccia, Jesus Pascual & Oscar O. Iribarne

  2. Laboratorio de Ecología, IIMyC, CC 573 Correo Central, B7600WAG, Mar del Plata, Argentina

    Diana I. Montemayor

Authors
  1. Diana I. Montemayor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alejandro D. Canepuccia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jesus Pascual
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Oscar O. Iribarne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana I. Montemayor.

Additional information

Communicated by Bob Christian

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montemayor, D.I., Canepuccia, A.D., Pascual, J. et al. Aboveground Biomass Patterns of Dominant Spartina Species and Their Relationship with Selected Abiotic Variables in Argentinean SW Atlantic Marshes. Estuaries and Coasts 37, 411–420 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9688-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9688-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation