Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Harvest Date on PI2, Total Protein, TGA Content and Tuber Performance in Potato

  • Published:
American Journal of Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Proteinase inhibitor 2 (PI2), isolated from potatoes is associated with the release of cholecystokinin (CCK), a satiety factor in humans. PI2 is the active ingredient of Slendesta® Potato Extract. The effect of harvest date on the levels of proteinase inhibitor 2 (PI2), total protein content and total glycoalkaloids (TGA) was studied in two potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) clonal lines. In addition, tuber specific gravity, tuber yield, and tuber size distribution were measured in response to harvest date. The two potato clonal lines designated as KI-PSt0018 and KI-PSt0034 were planted in a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Tubers were harvested at four different dates during the growing season; 4 weeks and 2 weeks to vine-kill; at vine-kill; and 2 weeks post vine-kill. Sample tubers from these four harvest dates and from 2 months of storage, post vine-kill stage were analyzed for PI2, total protein and TGA. Harvesting at different dates had a significant influence on most of the traits studied in both clonal lines. The two clonal lines responded differently to different harvest dates for all traits except PI2 and specific gravity. PI2 levels increased with maturity with the highest levels observed at full maturity in both clonal lines. The protein levels did not show any specific trend in either clonal line. TGA levels increased gradually in small increments with maturity in KI-PSt0018 but did not have a clear pattern in KI-PSt0034. Tuber yield and size increased with maturity of the crop in both clonal lines. Higher tuber yields were seen during final vine-kill and 2 weeks post vine-kill compared to the earlier stages of harvest in both clonal lines. Tuber specific gravity declined when tubers were left in the ground for 14 to 21 days after vine-kill in both clonal lines. This study indicated harvest of potato prior to vine-kill is not beneficial for the extraction of PI2 for use as functional food or dietary supplement ingredient.

Resumen

El inhibidor de proteinasa 2 (PI2) aislado de papas se asocia cercanamente con la liberación de colecistocinina (CCK), un factor de saciedad en humanos. PI2 es el ingrediente activo del extracto de papa Slendesta®. Se estudió el efecto de fecha de cosecha en los niveles del inhibidor de proteinasa PI2, así como también el contenido total de proteína y glicoalcaloides totales (TGA) en dos líneas clonales de papa (Solanum tuberosum L.). Además, se midieron la gravedad específica de tubérculo, su rendimiento y la distribución de su tamaño en respuesta a la fecha de cosecha. Se plantaron las dos líneas clonales, designadas como KI-PSt0018 y KI-PSt0034, en un diseño de bloques completos al azar con cuatro repeticiones. Se cosecharon los tubérculos en cuatro diferentes fechas durante el ciclo de cultivo; cuatro y dos semanas antes de la eliminación del follaje; durante la eliminación del follaje; y dos semanas después. Se analizaron para PI2, proteína total y TGA, muestras de tubérculos de estas cuatro fechas de cosecha y de dos meses de almacenamiento después de quema de follaje. Las cosechas en diferentes fechas tuvieron una influencia significativa en la mayoría de las variables estudiadas en ambas líneas clonales. Estas respondieron de manera diferente a las fechas de cosecha para todos los caracteres excepto para PI2 y gravedad específica. Los niveles de PI2 se incrementaron con la madurez, con los niveles más altos observados en completa madurez en ambos clones. Los niveles de proteína no mostraron alguna tendencia específica en cualquiera de los clones. Los niveles de TGA aumentaron gradualmente en pequeños incrementos con la maduración en KI-PSt0018 pero no tuvieron un patrón claro en KI-PSt0034. El rendimiento y tamaño de tubérculo aumentaron con la maduración del cultivo en ambos clones. Los mayores rendimientos de tubérculo se observaron durante el final de la destrucción del follaje y dos semanas después, comparados con los estados más tempranos de cosecha en ambos clones. La gravedad específica de tubérculo declinó cuando se dejaron en el campo de 14 a 21 días después de la destrucción del follaje en los dos clones. Este estudio indicó que la cosecha de la papa antes de eliminar follaje no es benéfica para la extracción de PI2 para usarse como alimento funcional o como ingrediente en suplementos de dietas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, A., A. Rab, and S.A. Hussain. 2003. Yield and nutrient profile of potato tubers at various stages of development. Asian J. of Plant Science. 2: 247–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J., T.R. Green, T. Gurusaddaiah, and C.A. Ryan. 1976. Proteinase inhibitor II from potatoes: Isolation and characterization of its promoter components. Biochemistry 15: 3418–3424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dehdar, B., A. Asadi, Y. Jahani, and K. Ghasemi. 2012. The effect of planting and harvesting dates on yield and vegetative growth of two potato cultivars in Ardabil region. I J. Agron Plant production. 3: 675–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driskill, E.P., L.O. Knowles, and N.R. Knowles. 2007. Temperature induced changes in potato processing quality during storage are modulated by tuber maturity. Amer J Pot Res 84: 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, P. 1984. Glycoalkaloid composition of potatoes: Diversity and biological implications. A. Potato J. 61: 115–122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A.J., S.R. Peikin, C.A. Ryan, and J.E. Blundell. 1990. Oral administration of proteinase inhibitor II from potatoes reduces energy intake in man. Physiology and Behavior 48: 241–246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jewel, S., and R. Stanley. 1989. The influence of defoliation date and harvest interval on the quality of potatoes for French fry production. Potato Res. 32: 431–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, N.R., and L.O. Knowles. 2006. Physiological maturity of Ranger Russet tubers affects storability and processing quality. Potato Progress 6(3): 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuc, J. 1984. Steroid glycoalkaloids and related compounds as potato quality factors. A Potato J 61: 123–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, D., B.P. Singh, and P. Kumar. 2004. An overview of factors affecting sugar content of potato. Annals of Applied Biology 145: 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komarnytsky, S., A. Cook, and I. Raskin. 2011. Potato protease inhibitors inhibit food intake and increase circulating cholecystokinin levels by a trypsin-dependent mechanism. Intl. J. Obesity. 35: 236–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Machado, R.M.D., M.C. Toledo, and L.C. Garcia. 2007. Effect of light and temperature on formation of glycoalkaloids in potato. Food Control. 18: 503–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, T.H., and S. Bi. 2006. Hyperphagia and obesity in OLETF rats lacking CCK-1 receptors. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 361: 1211–1218.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, T.H., and K.P. Kinzig. 2004. Gastrointestinal satiety signals. II. Cholecystokinin. American Journal of Physiology - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 286: G183–G188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noda, T.S., M. Tsuda, S. Mori, C. Takigawa, K. Matsuura-Endo, K. Saito, and W.H.A. Mangalika. 2004. The effects of harvest dates on the starch properties of various potato cultivars. Food Chemistry 86: 119–125.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papathanasiou, F., S.H. Mitchell, and B.M.R. Harvey. 1988. Glycoalkaloid accumulation during potato tuber development of early potato cultivars. Potato Res. 41: 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peksa, A., G. Golubowska, E. Rytel, K. Lisinska, and K. Aniolowski. 2002. Influence of harvest date on glycoalkaloid content of three potato cultivars. Food Chemistry 78: 313–317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radosevich, J., and B. Lewis. 2007. Safety of Slendesta® potato extract 5% powder. Kemin Technical literature. Kemin Heatlh Black Book KHBB-017-049

  • Ryan, C.A., T. Kuo, G. Pearce, and R. Kunkel. 1976. Variability in the concentration of three heat stable proteinase inhibitor proteins in potato tubers. A. Potato J. 53: 443–445.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C.A., and G. Pierce. 1978. Proteinase inhibitor proteins as genetic markers for identifying high protein potato clones. A. J of Potato Res 55: 351–358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinden, S.L., L.L. Sanford, and R.E. Webb. 1984. Genetic and environmental control of potato glycoalkaloids. A. Potato J. 61: 141–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.P., and J. Gibbs. 1992. The development and proof of the CCK hypothesis of satiety. In multiple Cholecystokinin Receptors in the CNS, 162–182. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P.K., R.I. Krohn, G.H. Hermanson, A.K. Mallia, F.H. Gartner, M.D. Provenzano, E.K. Fujimoto, N.M. Goike, B.J. Olson, and D.K. Klenk. 1985. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Analytical Biochemistry 150: 76–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Speijers, G.J.A. 1998. Risk assessment of potato-glycoalkaloids. AIR NETTOX Project Seminar Report 7, 43–47. Denmark: Danish Veterinary and Food Administration.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Narasimhamoorthy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Narasimhamoorthy, B., Zhao, L.Q., Liu, X. et al. Effect of Harvest Date on PI2, Total Protein, TGA Content and Tuber Performance in Potato. Am. J. Potato Res. 90, 561–569 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-013-9329-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-013-9329-9

Keywords

Navigation