Skip to main content
Log in

Certification criteria in type I ecolabelling related to metals for sustainable materials management

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 29 July 2012

Abstract

A sustainable materials management for metals should be achieved to conserve resources of metal minerals. For the sustainable materials management, material flows through the whole life cycle of materials have been recognized by material flow analysis (MFA) studies. Former MFA studies pointed out that cyclic use of metals could be enhanced not only by increasing quantity of recovered scrap but also by upgrading quality of the scrap. In general, the quality is degraded by contaminants which commingle at disassembling processes. The mixture of contaminants depends on usage of materials in products. Here, Type I ecolabelling has a potential to convey messages for avoiding mixture of contaminants to the producers of finished products. In this study, on the basis of a survey on existing certification criteria related to metals in the world, a general concept of certification criteria on sustainable materials management for metals in Type I ecolabelling system is proposed. Finally, we propose six criteria in the form of certification criteria in Type I ecolabelling system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daigo I, Hashimoto S, Matsuno Y, et al. Material stocks and flows accounting for copper and copper-based alloys in Japan [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2009, 53(4):208–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Igarashi Y, Daigo I, Matsuno Y, et al. Estimation of quality change in domestic steel production affected by steel scrap exports [J]. ISIJ International, 2007, 47(5):753–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daigo I, Sasaki M, Fujisaki K, et al. Method to estimate potential environmental burden reductions by introducing design for disassembly [J]. Journal of the Japan Society of Waste Management Experts, 2010, 21(5):178–191 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atherton J. Declaration by the metals industry on recycling principles [J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2007, 12(1):59–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Reuter M A, Heiskanen K, Boin U, et al. The metrics of material and metal ecology [M]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nakajima K, Takeda O, Miki T, et al. Thermodynamic analysis for the controllability of elements in the recycling process of metals [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2011, 45(11):4929–4936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daigo Ichiro.

Additional information

Foundation item: the Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) KAKENHI 22686084

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ichiro, D., Kenichi, N. & Takashi, F. Certification criteria in type I ecolabelling related to metals for sustainable materials management. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 17, 377–379 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-012-1291-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-012-1291-z

Key words

CLC number

Navigation