Skip to main content
Log in

Ending COVID-19 vaccine apartheid through vaccine donations: the influence of supply chains

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study determinants of COVID-19 vaccine donations from recipients’ perspective, especially considering supply chain and institutional weakness (corruption) aspects. Results, based on data from more than 130 nations, show that strengthened supply chains reduced donations. The impacts of corruption and logistics performance likely persisted from pre-COVID times. More corrupt nations received fewer donations per capita, ceteris paribus. The results with respect to economic prosperity support efforts to end vaccine apartheid, and island nations received more donations, as did nations with more bilateral vaccine deals. Finally, donations received through COVAX were driven by qualitatively similar factors, except corruption did not matter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Some of the vaccine disparities might be due to vaccine hesitancy across certain population groups (Goel et al. (2023)).

  2. See https://www.paho.org/en/covax-americas.

  3. COVAX stands for COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access.

  4. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-22/pfizer-us-revise-vaccine-contract-as-world-demand-plummets#xj4y7vzkg

    https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/issue-brief/u-s-international-covid-19-vaccine-donations-tracker/

    https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covax-donations

    https://www.unicef.org/coronavirus/covid-19-vaccines-why-dose-donations-are-essential

    https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-cutting-global-donations-pfizer-covid-shots-demand-slows-2022-09-22/

  5. Goel et al. (2021b) examine a different effect of logistics by considering their effects on economic growth.

  6. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2021). COVID-19 vaccines and corruption risks: Preventing corruption in the manufacture, allocation and distribution of vaccines. https://www.unodc.org/documents/corruption/COVID-19/Policy_paper_on_COVID-19_vaccines_and_corruption_risks.pdf.

  7. In some cases, the single dose Johnson & Johnson vaccines were donated – see https://www.unicef.org/cambodia/press-releases/united-states-donates-more-1-million-johnson-johnson-single-dose-vaccines-cambodias

  8. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covax-donations

  9. https://www.voanews.com/a/logistics-of-covid-vaccine-donations-to-africa-must-improve-say-distribution-coordinators/6331883.html

  10. These supply chain aspects mainly relate to transportation bottlenecks. There may be other issues like greater absenteeism that can affect supply chain aspects. Absenteeism would partly be captured in the timeliness of deliveries.

  11. Dohse et al. (2023) and Goel et al. (2020) have considered different logistics aspects in other contexts, unrelated to the pandemic (also see Goel et al. (2021b)).

  12. See https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecasts-and-indicators/indicators/kof-globalisation-index.html for details.

  13. Island nations pose somewhat different supply chain issues than other nations and that is discussed below (also see Arvis et al. (2007)).

  14. We are aware that there are many dimensions of institutional quality, and that there are other measures (e.g., government effectiveness, rule of law, etc.). We are using corruption due to its multidimensional nature and the underlying measure of corruption is comparable across nations. Plus, the main focus of this work is not on this aspect.

  15. Given its multidimensional character, corruption can possibly impact logistics performance as well (Goel et al. (2020)). Such issues are less of a concern in a cross-sectional analysis.

  16. Of course, this cannot fully address how well equity considerations were met in achieving equal vaccine access. A poor nation may have received a relatively large allocation of vaccines, but due to graft, political favoritism, and other considerations, the vaccines were not equitably distributed within the receiving country.

  17. For further details on the methodology used to track vaccine supply, see https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/-/media/Files/Topics/COVID/IMF-WHO/imf-who-covid-19-vaccine-supply-tracker-methodology.ashx.

  18. For further details on the methodology used to construct the Index, see https://lpi.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/Methodology_LPI_survey.pdf.

  19. For further details, see https://lpi.worldbank.org/international/aggregated-ranking. The LPI is produced every two years.

  20. https://covid19.who.int/info

  21. Not surprisingly, the pairwise correlations between all four dates reflecting COVID-19-related deaths were quite high, in all cases they exceed 0.96.

  22. For further information on the methodology used to construct the index, see https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/CPI_2022_Methodology.zip.

  23. Not all nations received vaccine donations. In our dataset, 40 countries (out of 131 total) received zero donations during the period analyzed, and 43 countries had zero COVAX distributions. Furthermore, information on the source of donations received by each country does not seem to be publicly available. See Goel and Nelson (2021) for a study of vaccination information in the United States.

  24. Note that the economic significance of the coefficient on the GDPpc variable should keep in mind that it is in logs (Table 1).

  25. It could be the case that the form of the government of the vaccine donor nations might be relevant. However, given the relatively few donor nations and the opaqueness of the supply-side data, we are unable to focus on the behavior of donor nations.

  26. Incidentally, the elasticity of DONATIONSpc with respect to INTLship from Model 2.2 (= −5.66) is almost identical to that with respect to LogisticPERF from Model 1.1 (= −5.64).

  27. Corruption/bribery might also be at play in the formation and execution of bilateral deals (Goel et al. (2021a)). We control for corruption perceptions in Table 4.

    Table 4 COVID-19 vaccine apartheid and donations: the role of government
  28. Various scholars have noted the role of corruption in charitable contributions in a broader context (Goel (2020), McDonnell and Rutherford (2018)).

  29. See Dragomirescu-Gaina (2021), Goel and Haruna (2021), and Goel and Jones (2022) for discussions of other policy responses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

References

  • Afonso Ó (2023) Inter- and intracountry effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on wages and economic growth. Bull Econ Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12412. (forthcoming)

  • Arvis J-F Ojala L, Shepherd B, Ulybina D, Wiederer C (2023) Trade logistics in the global economy. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. https://lpi.worldbank.org/international/aggregated-ranking

  • Arvis J-F, Ojala L, Wiederer C, Shepherd B, Raj A, Dairabayeva K et al (2018) Connecting to compete 2018: trade logistics in the global economy. The World Bank, Washington. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29971

  • Arvis J-F, Raballand G, Marteau J-F (2007) The cost of being landlocked: logistics costs and supply chain reliability. In: Policy Research Working Paper; No. 4258. The World Bank, Washington. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/7420

  • Baldwin R, Weder di Mauro B (eds) (2020) Economics in the time of COVID-19. Centre for economic policy research. CEPR Press, London. http://acdc2007.free.fr/ceprcorona.pdf

  • Bajaj SS, Maki L, Stanford FC (2022) Vaccine apartheid: global cooperation and equity. Lancet 399(10334):1452–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barceló J, Chih-Hsin Sheen G, Tung HH, Wu W-C (2022) Vaccine nationalism among the public: a cross-country experimental evidence of own-country bias towards COVID-19 vaccination. Soc Sci Med 310:115278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ (2022) Vaccination rates and COVID outcomes across U.S. states. Econ Hum Biol 47:101201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bengy Puyvallée A, Storeng KT (2022) COVAX, vaccine donations and the politics of global vaccine inequity. Glob Health 18:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00801-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch J (2021) EU and AstraZeneca settle court case over vaccine supply. POLITICO, September 3. https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-and-astrazeneca-settle-court-case-over-vaccine-supply/. Accessed 27 May 2023

  • Dimant E, Tosato G (2018) Causes and effects of corruption: what has past decade’s empirical research taught us? A survey. J Econ Surv 32(2):335–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donchev D, Ujhelyi G (2014) What do corruption indices measure? Econ Polit 26(2):309–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohse D, Goel RK, Saunoris JW (2023) Supply chain constraints and research spending: an international investigation. J Technol Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10044-8. (in press)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragomirescu-Gaina C (2021) Facing an unfortunate trade-off: policy responses, lessons and spillovers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Econ Hum Biol 43:101052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elekdag S, Muir D, Wu Y (2015) Trade linkages, balance sheets, and spillovers: the Germany-Central European supply chain. J Policy Model 37(2):374–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes N (2020) Economic effects of coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) on the world economy. Spain: IESE Business School. Preliminary version

  • Gibson J, Sun X (2023) A synthetic control analysis of U.S. state level COVID-19 stay-at-home orders on new jobless claims. J Econ Financ 47:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel RK (1990) The substitutability of capital, labor, and R&D in U.S. manufacturing. Bull Econ Res 42(3):211–227

  • Goel RK (2009) Technological complementarities, demand, and market power. NETNOMICS 10(2):161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel RK (2020) Uncharitable acts in charity: socioeconomic drivers of charity-related fraud. Soc Sci Q 101(4):1397–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel RK, Haruna S (2021) Unmasking the demand for masks: analytics of mandating coronavirus masks. Metroeconomica 72(3):580–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel RK, Jones JR (2022) Managing the risk of COVID-19 via vaccine passports: modeling economic and policy implications. Manag Decis Econ 43(6):2578–2586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel RK, Jones JR, Saunoris JW (2023) Explaining vaccine hesitancy: a COVID-19 study of the United States. Manag Decis Econ 44(2):1073–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel RK, Mazhar U, Saunoris JW (2020) Identifying the corrupt cog in the wheel: dimensions of supply chain logistics and cross-country corruption. Aust Econ Pap. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel RK, Nelson MA (2021) COVID-19 internet vaccination information and vaccine administration: evidence from the United States. J Econ Financ 45:716–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel RK, Nelson MA (2023) Give me your best shot! Diffusion of complete versus booster Covid-19 vaccines across US counties. CESifo Working Paper #10559

  • Goel RK, Nelson MA, Goel VY (2021a) COVID-19 vaccine rollout—scale and speed carry different implications for corruption. J Policy Model 43(3):503–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel RK, Saunoris JW, Goel SS (2021b) Supply chain performance and economic growth: the impact of COVID-19 disruptions. J Policy Model 43(2):298–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haffajee RL, Mello MM (2020) Thinking globally, acting locally—the US response to COVID-19. N Engl J Med 382:e75. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2006740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris E, Petrovits C, Yetman MH (2017) Why bad things happen to good organizations: the link between governance and asset diversions in public charities. J Bus Ethics 146(1):149–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao Y, Lin F-Y, Sheen GC-H, Wang C-H (2023) Politics matters for individual attitudes toward vaccine donation: cross-national evidence from the United States and Taiwan. Glob Health 19:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-00940-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov D (2020) Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: a simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2) case. Transp Res E-Log 136:101922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickbusch I (2021) Can geopolitics derail the pandemic treaty? BMJ 2021:375. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-069129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Priya B, Srivastava SK (2021) Response to the COVID-19: understanding implications of government lockdown policies. J Policy Model 43(1):76–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo S, Tsang KP (2020) China and world output impact of the Hubei lockdown during the Coronavirus outbreak. Contemp Econ Policy 38(4):583–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell D, Rutherford AC (2018) The determinants of charity misconduct. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 47(1):107–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morelli P, Seghezza E (2021) Why was the ECB’S reaction to Covid-19 crisis faster than after the 2008 financial crash? J Policy Model 43(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordås HK, Pinali E, Grosso MG (2006) Logistics and time as a trade barrier. In: OECD trade policy papers, No. 35. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/664220308873

  • Ranney ML, Griffeth V, Jha AK (2020) Critical supply shortages — the need for ventilators and personal protective equipment during the Covid-19 pandemic. N Engl J Med 382:e41. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2006141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter O, Stehrer R (2023) Assessing the importance of risky products in international trade and global value chains. Empirica 50:7–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan NJ, Laffey JG (2020) Challenges and solutions for addressing critical shortage of supply chain for personal and protective equipment (PPE) arising from Coronavirus disease (COVID19) pandemic – case study from the Republic of Ireland. Sci Total Environ 725:Article 138532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobo EJ, Cervantes G, Ceballos DA, McDaniels-Davidson C (2022) Addressing COVID-19 vaccination equity for Hispanic/Latino communities by attending to aguantarismo: a Californian US–Mexico border perspective. Soc Sci Med 305:115096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storeng KT, de Bengy Puyvallée A, Stein F (2021a) COVAX and the rise of the ‘super public private partnership’ for global health. Glob Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2021.1987502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storeng KT, Stein F, de Bengy Puyvallée A (2021b) COVAX and the many meanings of sharing. BMJ Glob Health 6(11). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007763

  • Sun S (2022) The demand for a COVID-19 vaccine. Econ Hum Biol 46:101135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York G (2021) Canada donates soon-to-expire COVID-19 vaccines to Africa as global shortage worsens. The Globe and Mail, September 9. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-canada-donates-soon-to-expire-vaccines-to-africa-as-global-shortage/. Accessed 27 May 2023

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank two referees and the editor for useful comments. An earlier version of this paper was circulated as a CESifo working paper # 10723.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajeev K. Goel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Tables 6 and 7

Table 6 Countries in the dataset
Table 7 COVID-19 vaccine apartheid and donations: drivers of COVAX donations

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goel, R.K., Nelson, M.A. Ending COVID-19 vaccine apartheid through vaccine donations: the influence of supply chains. J Econ Finan (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-024-09662-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-024-09662-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation