Abstract
Despite the growing importance of understanding student well-being for students’ holistic development, it is still a relatively neglected concept in low and middle-income countries such as Bangladesh. Quantitative metrics such as students’ enrolment rate and academic grades have been prioritised at school and considered as the proxy of well-being at school. In contrast, students’ quality of school experience and well-being remain neglected. This qualitative study explores the conceptualisation of well-being experiences perceived by secondary school students in Bangladesh. Online focus groups and one-on-one interviews in conjunction with arts-based methods (i.e., drawings) were employed to elicit the views of 40 Grades 7–10 students (aged 13–16 years) about their well-being. Grounded theory approaches were used to analyse the data. Findings revealed that the students conceptualise well-being at school as a multidimensional but relational concept. Six interrelated and constitutive dimensions were identified including a positive sense of self and the future, sense of school resource sufficiency, a sense of relatedness, a sense of school engagement, a sense of accomplishment at school, and a sense of purpose in attending the school. The findings have implications for informing future research and enhancing understanding of student well-being from students’ standpoint within the context of a country from the global south.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data for this review may be accessed by contacting the corresponding author.
References
Abeyasekera, A. L. (2014). A social justice approach to wellbeing: the PADHI psychosocial framework. In S. C. White & A. Abeyasekera (Eds.), Wellbeing and quality of life assessment: A practical guide (pp. 25–33). Practical Action Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780448411.003.
Ahmadi, S., Hassani, M., & Ahmadi, F. (2020). Student-and school-level factors related to school belongingness among high school students. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 741–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2020.1730200.
Atkinson, S., Bagnall, A. M., Corcoran, R., South, J., & Curtis, S. (2020). Being well together: Individual subjective and community wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(5), 1903–1921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00146-2.
Bergmark, U., & Kostenius, C. (2009). Listen to me when I have something to say: Students’ participation in research for sustainable school improvement. Improving Schools, 12(3), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480209342665.
Bundick, M. J., Quaglia, R. J., Corso, M. J., & Haywood, D. E. (2014). Promoting student engagement in the classroom. Teachers College Record, 116(4), 1–18.
Butler, J., & Kern, M. L. (2016). The PERMA-Profiler: A brief multidimensional measure of flourishing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v6i3.526.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Chowdhury, S. K., & Ahmed, S. S. (2013). Exploring the side effects of assessment in secondary schools and its impact on students: Perspective from Bangladesh. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(9), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-1-9-6
Coad, J., & Evans, R. (2008). Reflections on practical approaches to involving children and young people in the data analysis process. Children and Society, 22(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2006.00062.x
Collins, T. M., Jamieson, L., Wright, L. H. V., Rizzini, I., Mayhew, A., Narang, J., Kay, E., Tisdall, M., & Ruiz-Casares, M. (2019). Involving child and youth advisors in academic research about child participation: The Child and Youth Advisory Committees of the International and Canadian Child Rights Partnership. Children and Youth Services Review, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104569.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Cuevas-Parra, P. (2020). Co-researching with children in the Time of COVID-19: Shifting the narrative on methodologies to Generate Knowledge. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920982135.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1.
Delle Fave, A., Massimini, F., & Bassi, M. (2011). Hedonism and eudaimonism in positive psychology. In A. Delle-Fave (Ed.), Psychological selection and optimal experience across cultures: Social empowerment through personal growth. Springer.
Demirci, İ. (2020). School Engagement and Well-Being in Adolescents: Mediating Roles of Hope and Social Competence Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved. Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved. Child Indicators Research, 13, 1573–1595.
Diener, E. (2009). Subjective well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), Subjective well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (Vol. 37, pp. 11–58). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6.
Diener, E., Heintzelman, S., Tay, L., Wirtz, D., Lutes, L., & Oishi, S. (2017). Findings all psychologists should know from the New Science on Subjective Well-Being University of Virginia. Canadian Psychology, 58(June), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000063.
Dunn, J. (2015). Insiders’ perspectives: A children’s rights approach to involving children in advising on adult-initiated research. International Journal of Early Years Education, 23(4), 394–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2015.1074558.
Fattore, T., & Mason, J. (2018). Constructing indicators of child well-being from a child standpoint. Developing Practice: The Child Youth and Family Work, 50, 34–49.
Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2009). When children are asked about their well-being: Towards a framework for guiding policy. Child Indicators Research, 2(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-008-9025-3.
Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2016). Children and well-being: Towards a child standpoint. Springer.
Fraillon, J. (2004). Measuring student well-being in the context of Australian schooling: discussion paper. In The Australian Council for Educational Research (Issue December). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Measuring-Student-Well-Being-in-the-Context-of-Fraillon/5d9efa67110a525b84ad4e376eba594dd8b20448%0Ahttp://www.mceetya.edu.au/verve/_resources/Measuring_Student_Well-Being_in_the_Context_of_Australian_Schooling.pdf%0Ah.
Habib, M. A. (2015). Exploring young Bangladeshi students’ sense of belonging to school: A phenomenological study [Dosctoral dissertation, Monash University] (Issue March). Monash University.
Hascher, T. (2007). Exploring students’ well-being by taking a variety of looks into the classroom. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 4(3), 331–349.
Hascher, T. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research approaches to assess student well-being. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2007.11.016.
Hascher, T., & Hagenauer, G. (2020). Swiss adolescents’ well-being in school. Swiss Journal of Educational Research, 42(2), 367–390. https://doi.org/10.24452/sjer.42.2.5.
Haybron, D. M. (2016). The philosophical basis of eudaimonic psychology. In V. Joar (Ed.), Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 27–53). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3.
Henderson, L., & Knight, T. (2012). Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways to wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(3), 196–221. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v2i3.3.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014.
Holfve-Sabel, M. A. (2014). Learning, interaction and relationships as components of student well-being: Differences between classes from student and teacher perspective. Social Indicators Research, 119(3), 1535–1555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0557-7.
Horgan, D. (2017). Child participatory research methods: Attempts to go deeper. Childhood, 24(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568216647787.
Horgan, D., Forde, C., Martin, S., & Parkes, A. (2017). Children’s participation: Moving from the performative to the social. Children’s Geographies, 15(3), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2016.1219022.
Hossain, S., O’Neill, S. C., & Strnadová, I. (2019). What really matters for students’ school satisfaction in Bangladesh? Psychology in the Schools, 56(5), 670–689. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22226.
Jha, S. (2018). ‘Somehow I Will Learn To Do All This Work’ A Relational View of Women ’s Everyday Negotiations of Agency in Surguja, India [Doctoral dissertation, University of Bath]. University of Bath.
Kern, M. L., Waters, L. E., Adler, A., & White, M. A. (2015). A multidimensional approach to measuring well-being in students: Application of the PERMA framework. Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(3), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.936962.
Khan, H., & Williams, J. B. (2006). Poverty alleviation through access to education: Can e-learning deliver? In U21 Global Working Paper (002/2006). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1606102.
Kiefer, S. M., Alley, K. M., & Ellerbrock, C. R. (2015). Teacher and peer support for young adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and school belonging. RMLE Online, 38(8), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2015.11641184.
Krys, K., Capaldi, C. A., Zelenski, J. M., Park, J., Nader, M., Kocimska-Zych, A., Kwiatkowska, A., Michalski, P., & Uchida, Y. (2019). Family well-being is valued more than personal well-being: A four-country study. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00249-2.
Kumalasari, D. (2020). Teacher versus classmate support: Which one is more important to school well-being of senior high-school students? Advances in Social Science Education and Humanities Research, 399, 61–64. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200130.081.
Literat, I. (2013). A pencil for your thoughts: Participatory drawing as a visual research method with children and youth. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200143.
Liu, W., Mei, J., Tian, L., & Huebner, E. S. (2016). Age and gender differences in the relation between school-related social support and subjective well-being in school among students. Social Indicators Research, 125(3), 1065–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0873-1.
López-Pérez, B., & Fernández-Castilla, B. (2018). Children’s and adolescents’ conceptions of happiness at school and its relation with their own happiness and their academic performance. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(6), 1811–1830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9895-5.
López-Pérez, B., Sánchez, J., & Gummerum, M. (2015). Children’s and adolescents’ conceptions of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 2431–2455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9701-1.
Losada-Puente, L., Mendiri, P., & Rebollo-Quintela, N. (2022). From general well-being to school well-being: A systematic review. RELIEVE, 28(1), 1–27.
Mahali, A., Lynch, I., Fadiji, A. W., Tolla, T., Khumalo, S., & Naicker, S. (2018). Networks of well-being in the Global South: A critical review of current scholarship. Journal of Developing Societies, 34(4), 373–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X18786137.
McGregor, J. A. (2007). Researching well-being from concepts to Methodology. In I. Gough & J. A. McGregor (Eds.), Wellbeing in developing countries: From theory to research (1st ed., pp. 316–350). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488986.
Moore, T., Noble-Carr, D., & Mcarthur, M. (2015). Changing things for the better: The use of children and young people’s reference groups in social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.989640.
Newland, L. A., Mourlam, D., Strouse, G., DeCino, D., & Hanson, C. (2019). A phenomenological exploration of children’s school life and well-being. Learning Environments Research, 22(3), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09285-y.
Noble, T., McGrath, H., Wyatt, T., Carbines, R., & Robb, L. (2008). Scoping study into approaches to student wellbeing. https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/scoping_study_into_approaches_to_student_wellbeing_final_report.pdf.
Oishi, S., & Gilbert, E. A. (2016). Current and future directions in culture and happiness research. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8(May 2016), 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.005.
Oishi, S., Graham, J., Kesebir, S., & Galinha, I. C. (2013). Concepts of happiness across time and cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(5), 559–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213480042.
Opre, D., Pintea, S., Opre, A., & Bertea, M. (2018). Measuring adolescents’ subjective well-being in educational context: Development and validation of a multidimensional instrument. Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies, 18(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.24193/jebp.2018.2.20.
Phiri, D. T., & Abebe, T. (2016). Suffering and thriving: Children’s perspectives and interpretations of poverty and well-being in rural Zambia. Childhood, 23(3), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568216637654.
Renshaw, T. L., Long, A. C. J., & Cook, C. R. (2015). Assessing adolescents’ positive psychological functioning at school: Development and validation of the student subjective wellbeing questionnaire. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(4), 534–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000088.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/034645.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Simon and Schuster.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2018). PERMA and the building blocks of well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 333–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1437466.
Shamrova, D. P., & Cummings, C. E. (2017). Participatory action research (PAR) with children and youth: An integrative review of methodology and PAR outcomes for participants, organizations, and communities. Children and Youth Services Review, 81(February), 400–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.08.022.
Shin, J., Suh, E. M., Eom, K., & Kim, H. S. (2018). What does happiness prompt in your mind? Culture, word choice, and experienced happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(3), 649–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9836-8.
Svane, D., Evans, N., Snowy, & Carter, M. A. (2019). Wicked wellbeing: Examining the disconnect between the rhetoric and reality of wellbeing interventions in schools. Australian Journal of Education, 63(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944119843144.
Teuscher, S., & Makarova, E. (2018). Students’ school engagement and their truant behavior: Do relationships with classmates and teachers matter? Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n6p124.
Thorsteinsen, K., & Vittersø, J. (2018). Striving for wellbeing: The different roles of hedonia and eudaimonia in goal pursuit and goal achievement. International Journal of Wellbeing, 8(2), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v8i2.733.
Truscott, J., Powell, M. A., & Graham, A. (2019). Ethical considerations in participatory research with young children. In A. Eckhoff (Ed.), Participatory research with young children (pp. 21–36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19365-2
White, S. C. (2015a). Introducing relational well-being (Issue 19).
White, S. C. (2015b). Relational wellbeing: A theoretical and operational approach (No. 43; Bath Papers in International Development and Wellbeing).
White, S. C. (2017). Relational wellbeing: Re-centring the politics of happiness, policy and the self. Policy & Politics •, 45, 121–157. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317X14866576265970.
White, S. C., & Jha, S. (2014). Inner wellbeing. The wellbeing and poverty pathways approach. In S. C. White, & A. Abeyasekera (Eds.), Wellbeing and quality of Life Assessment: A practical guide (pp. 55–76). Practical Action Publishing.
White, S. C., & Jha, S. (2018). Towards an interdisciplinary approach to wellbeing: Life histories and self-determination theory in rural Zambia. Social Science and Medicine, 212(July), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.026.
White, S. C., & Ramirez, V. (2015). Economics and subjectivities of wellbeing in Rural Zambia. In S. C. White, & C. Blackmore (Eds.), Cultures of wellbeing: Method, place, policy (pp. 118–143). Palgrave Macmillan.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the participating students. This research is funded by the University International Postgraduate Award (UIPA),
UNSW Sydney.
Funding
There are no funding sources to disclose for this review. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
This work was approved and supported by the UNSW Human Research Ethics Committee, ethics approval number HC200003.
Informed Consent
Applicable.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hossain, S., Strnadová, I., Danker, J. et al. How Do Bangladeshi Secondary School Students Conceptualise Well-Being in School. Child Ind Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-024-10132-7
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-024-10132-7