Skip to main content
Log in

When Children are Asked About Their Well-being: Towards a Framework for Guiding Policy

  • Published:
Child Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research which focuses on children’s perspectives of their well-being complements and challenges existing research and policy on children. The study reported on here explored children’s views of what constitutes well-being, what meaning children and young people ascribe to the concept and whether distinct dimensions or characteristics of well-being can be identified. The project was initiated by the New South Wales Commission for Children and Young People as a basis for developing an authoritative child-informed framework for monitoring of well-being of children in New South Wales, Australia. In this paper, we outline the rationale for and details of qualitative research methods employed in the project, along with details of the major findings from the research. These include, the overarching importance of relationships with others and, more specifically, the importance of agency and control in the various domains identified as relevant to their wellbeing, the importance of safety and security and the way these factors contribute to sense of self. More minor but significant domains identified were: dealing with adversity, material and economic resources, physical environments, physical health and social and moral responsibility. The significance of the findings for policy development and the particular challenge of developing indicators from the research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The definition of child used in this article is that used by the United Nations, being persons from birth to 18 years of age.

  2. In total, 178 interviews were conducted, totalling approximately 150 hours of transcript.

  3. The specific characteristics of relationships, which can be described along a number of different lines, including the degree of love, affection, communication, interaction, time together, attachment, identification and commitment and, alternatively, the amount of conflict, violence, disagreement and abuse (Thornton 2001), are touched upon in specific well-being themes discussed below.

  4. Here Giddens draws upon the work of R. D. Laing. See Laing 1960.

References

  • Alanen, L. (2005). Women’s studies/childhood studies: parallels, links and perspectives. In J. Mason & T. Fattore (Eds).Children taken seriously: In theory, policy and practice. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1997). Democratization of the family. Childhood, 4(2), 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., & Beck, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J. (1993). Etiology of child maltreatment: a developmental-ecological analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 413–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A., & Goerge, R. M. (Eds.), (2006). Indicators of childrens well-being: Understanding their role, usage and policy influence. Social Indicators Research Series Volume 27. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Ben-Arieh, A., Kaufman, N. H., Bowers Andrews, A., Goerge, R. M., Lee, J. B., & Aber, L. J. (2001). Measuring and monitoring children’s well-being. Social Indicator Research Series, Volume 7. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindis, C. D., Oliva, G., & Cagampang, H. (2001). Bridging the gap: Next steps in developing and using indicators to improve adolescent health. San Francisco, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, L. (Ed.), (2002). Growing up in an urbanising world. London: UNESCO and Earthscan.

  • Cunningham, H. (1995). Children and childhood in Western Society since 1500. London and New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, S. (2004). Situating empirical research. In S. Fraser, V. Lewis, S. Ding, M. Kellett, & C. Robinson (Eds.), Doing research with children and young people. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frønes, I. (2007). Theorizing indicators: on indicators, signs and trends. Social Indicators Research, 83, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, M. (2003). Childrens rights and power: Charging up for a new century. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjørholt, A. (2002). Small is powerful: discourses on children and participation in Norway. Childhood, 9(1), 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laing, R. D. (1960). The divided self: A study of sanity and madness. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manderson, L. (2005). Introduction: The social context of wellbeing. In L. Manderson (Ed.), Rethinking Wellbeing. Perth: API Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., & Gibson, C. (2004). The Needs of Children in Care. A report on a research project: Developing a model of out-of-home care to meet the needs of individual children, through participatory research which includes children and young people. Sydney: Social Justice and Social Change Research Centre, University of Western Sydney and Uniting Care Burnside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., & Urquhart, R. (2001). Developing a model for participation by children in research on decision making. Children Australia, 26(4), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, B. (Ed.), (1994). Childrens childhoods: Observed and experienced. London: Falmer.

  • Mayall, B. (2002). Towards a sociology for childhood: Thinking from childrens lives. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. A., Evans, V. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Roth, J. (2001). What are good child outcomes? In A. Thornton (Ed.), The well-being of children and families: research and data needs. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I., Peirson, L., & Nelson, G. (2001). Mapping the terrain: Framework for promoting family wellness and preventing child maltreatment. In I. Prilleltensky, L. Peirson, & G. Nelson (Eds.), Promoting family wellness and preventing child maltreatment: Fundamentals for thinking and action. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, J. (2005). Varieties of childhood. In J. Qvortrup (Ed.), Studies in modern childhood: Society, agency, culture. London: Macmillan, Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridge, T. (2002). Childhood Poverty and Social Exclusion: From a Childs Perspective. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmela, M. (2005). What is emotional authenticity? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35(3), 209–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P., Naidoo, Y., & Griffiths, M. (2007). Towards new indicators of Disadvantage: Deprivation and social exclusion in Australia. Social Policy Research Centre, Sydney: University of New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, S. (1995). Children and the Politics of Culture: Rights, Risks and Reconstructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A. (2001). Introduction. In A. Thornton (Ed.), The Well-Being of Children and Families. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprichard, E. (2008). Children as being and becomings: children, childhood and temporality. Children and Society, 22(4), 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uszyńska-Jarmoc, J. (2004). The conception of self in children’s narratives. Early Child Development and Care, 174(1), 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbroeck, M., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2006). Children’s agency and educational norms: a tensed negotiation. Childhood, 13(1), 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M. (1999). Reconstructing developmental psychology, some first steps. Children and Society, 13(1), 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyness, M. (1996). Policy, protectionism and the competent child. Childhood, 3(4), 431–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the children who contributed from their knowledge to this project and to the research team who contributed in very significant ways to the project: Cath Brennan, Jan Falloon, Penny Irvine, Ros Leahy, Rachel Scott and Ainslie Yardley. We would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions.

Funding for this research was provided by the New South Wales Commission for Children and Young People and a University of Western Sydney partnership grant with the New South Wales Commission for Children and Young People.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Mason.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fattore, T., Mason, J. & Watson, E. When Children are Asked About Their Well-being: Towards a Framework for Guiding Policy. Child Ind Res 2, 57–77 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-008-9025-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-008-9025-3

Keywords

Navigation