Children’s Experience of Activities and Participation and their Subjective Well-Being in Norwegian Early Childhood Education and Care Institutions
- 557 Downloads
Considering how much time most children spend in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) institutions, the psychosocial dimensions of ECEC institutions and children’s well-being represent a growing research area within the ECEC field. This paper presents results from a study where children’s experiences of subjective well-being and opportunities for participation in ECEC institutions were explored. Research on children’s own perspectives about their well-being has mainly been conducted among children older than those of preschool age, and therefore this study aimed at highlighting the voices of 4-6-year-old children regarding how they experience their lives in ECEC institutions. Quantitative data was collected through conversations with 171 Norwegian 4–6-year-old children based on an electronic questionnaire. The results indicate that even though many children experience a high degree of well-being in Norwegian ECEC institutions, approximately one-third of them experience a medium level of well-being and close to one out of ten experience a low degree of well-being. The results show that the physical environment, the toys/equipment, the common activities and the opportunity to have an influence on where to move, what to do and with whom are of crucial importance for children’s well-being in ECEC institutions. This also includes children’s opportunity to oppose the staff and negotiate and choose activities that differ from those that the staff select.
KeywordsSubjective well-being Early childhood Children Activities Participation
The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research funded this project. A special acknowledgement goes to the project manager, Åse Bratterud, at the Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Norway.
- Clark, A., Kjørholt, A. T., & Moss, P. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond Listening. Children’s perspectives on early childhood services. Bristol: University Press.Google Scholar
- Dolk, K. (2013). Bångstyriga barn. Makt, normer och delaktighet i förskolan. Stockholm: Ordfront.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Hagen, T. L. (2015). Hvilken innvirkning har barnehagens fysiske utemiljø på barns lek og de ansattes pedagogiske praksis i uterommet. Nordic Early Childhood Education Research, 10, 1–16.Google Scholar
- Huntsman, L. (2008). Determinants of quality in child care: A review of research evidence. Ashfield NSW: Centre for Parenting and Research.Google Scholar
- James, A., & Christensen, P. (2007). Research with children perspectives and practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kallestad, J. H., & Ødegaard, E. E. (2014). Children’s activities in Norwegian kindergartens. Part 2: focus on variations. Cultural Historical Psychology, 10(2), 86–94.Google Scholar
- Kjørholt, A. T. (2004). Childhood as a social and symbolic space: Discourses on children as social participants in society. Trondheim: NTNU.Google Scholar
- Koch, A. B. (2012). Når børn trives i børnehaven. Århus: Syddansk Universitet, PhD thesis.Google Scholar
- Løvlie, L. (2013). Kampen om barndommen. In A. Greve, S. Mørreaunet, & N. Winger (Eds.), Ytringer om likeverd, demokrati og relasjonsbygging i barnehagen (pp. 15–26). Fagbokforlaget: Bergen.Google Scholar
- NMER. (2005). Act no. 64 of June 2005 relating to kindergartens (the kindergarten act). Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.Google Scholar
- NMER (2006/2011). Framework Plan for the Content and Tasks of Kindergartens, issued 1. March. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.Google Scholar
- NMER. (2010). NOU 2010:8 Med forskertrang og lekelyst. Systematisk pedagogisk tilbud til alle førskolebarn. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.Google Scholar
- Nordin-Hultman, E. (2004). Pedagogiske miljøer og barns subjektskaping. Oslo: Pedagogisk forum.Google Scholar
- Østrem, S., Bjar, H., Føsker, L. R., Hogsnes, H. D., Jansen, T. T., Nørdtomme, S., et al. (2009). Alle teller mer. En evaluering av hvordan Rammeplan for barnehagens innhold og oppgaver blir innført, brukt og erfart. Tønsberg: Høgskolen i Vestfold, Barnehagesenteret.Google Scholar
- Roberts, H. (2008). Listening to children: and hearing them. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children. Perspectives and practices (pp. 260–275). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Seland, M. (2009). Det moderne barn og den fleksible barnehagen. En etnografisk studie av barnehagens hverdagsliv i lys av nyere diskurser og kommunal virkelighet. Trondheim: NTNU.Google Scholar
- Seland, M., Sandseter, E. B. H., & Bratterud, Å. (2015). One- to three-year-old children’s experience of subjective wellbeing in day care. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 16(1), 70–83. doi: 10.1177/1463949114567272.
- StatisticsNorway (2014). Kindergartens, 2013, final statistics. https://ssb.no/en/utdanning/statistikker/barnehager. Accessed 28 Nov 2014.
- Storli, R., & Sandseter, E. B. H. (2015). Preschool teachers’ perceptions of children’s rough-and-tumble play (R&T) in indoor and outdoor environments. Early Child Development and Care, 1–15, doi: 10.1080/03004430.2015.1028394.
- Sylva, K., Melhuish, E. C., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., & Elliot, K. (2003). The effective provision of pre-school education (EPPE) project: Findings from the pre-school period. London: University of London.Google Scholar
- U.dir. (2015a). Barn og ansatte i barnehager i 2014. Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training.Google Scholar
- U.dir. (2015b). Barnehagespeilet. Tall og analyse av barnehager i Norge. Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training.Google Scholar
- UN (1989). The convention on the rights of the child. In U. Nations (Ed.).Google Scholar
- Vassenden, A., Thygesen, J., Bayer, S. B., Alvestad, M., & Abrahamsen, G. (2011). Barnehagenes organisering og strukturelle faktorers betydning for kvalitet (Rapport 2011/029). Stavanger: International Research Institute of Stavanger.Google Scholar