Child Indicators Research

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 913–932 | Cite as

Children’s Experience of Activities and Participation and their Subjective Well-Being in Norwegian Early Childhood Education and Care Institutions

  • Ellen Beate Hansen SandseterEmail author
  • Monica Seland


Considering how much time most children spend in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) institutions, the psychosocial dimensions of ECEC institutions and children’s well-being represent a growing research area within the ECEC field. This paper presents results from a study where children’s experiences of subjective well-being and opportunities for participation in ECEC institutions were explored. Research on children’s own perspectives about their well-being has mainly been conducted among children older than those of preschool age, and therefore this study aimed at highlighting the voices of 4-6-year-old children regarding how they experience their lives in ECEC institutions. Quantitative data was collected through conversations with 171 Norwegian 4–6-year-old children based on an electronic questionnaire. The results indicate that even though many children experience a high degree of well-being in Norwegian ECEC institutions, approximately one-third of them experience a medium level of well-being and close to one out of ten experience a low degree of well-being. The results show that the physical environment, the toys/equipment, the common activities and the opportunity to have an influence on where to move, what to do and with whom are of crucial importance for children’s well-being in ECEC institutions. This also includes children’s opportunity to oppose the staff and negotiate and choose activities that differ from those that the staff select.


Subjective well-being Early childhood Children Activities Participation 



The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research funded this project. A special acknowledgement goes to the project manager, Åse Bratterud, at the Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Norway.


  1. Bae, B. (2009). Children’s right to participate–challenges in everyday interactions. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 17(3), 391–406. doi: 10.1080/13502930903101594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Arieh, A. (2008). The child indicators movement: past, present, and future. Child Indicators Research, 1(1), 3–16. doi: 10.1007/s12187-007-9003-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, A., Kjørholt, A. T., & Moss, P. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond Listening. Children’s perspectives on early childhood services. Bristol: University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dolk, K. (2013). Bångstyriga barn. Makt, normer och delaktighet i förskolan. Stockholm: Ordfront.Google Scholar
  5. Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2007). Children’s conceptualization(s) of their well-being. Social Indicators Research, 80(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2009). When children are asked about their well-being: towards a framework for guiding policy. Child Indicators Research, 2(1), 57–77. doi: 10.1007/s12187-008-9025-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fine, G. A., & Sandstrom, K. L. (1988). Knowing children: Participant observation with minors (Qualitative research methods 15th ed.). Beverly Hills, California: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foley, K. R., Blackmore, A. M., Girdler, S., O’Donnell, M., Glauert, R., Llewellyn, G., et al. (2012). To feel belonged: the voices of children and youth with disabilities on the meaning of wellbeing. Child Indicators Research, 5(2), 375–391. doi: 10.1007/s12187-011-9134-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  10. Grieg, A., Taylor, J., & MacKay, T. (2007). Doing research with children (Vol. 2). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hagen, T. L. (2015). Hvilken innvirkning har barnehagens fysiske utemiljø på barns lek og de ansattes pedagogiske praksis i uterommet. Nordic Early Childhood Education Research, 10, 1–16.Google Scholar
  12. Harter, S., & Pike, R. (1984). The pictorial scale of perceived competence and social acceptance for young children. Child Development, 55(6), 1969–1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huntsman, L. (2008). Determinants of quality in child care: A review of research evidence. Ashfield NSW: Centre for Parenting and Research.Google Scholar
  14. Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. C. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: application of a New conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 837–861. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. James, A., & Christensen, P. (2007). Research with children perspectives and practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Kallestad, J. H., & Ødegaard, E. E. (2014). Children’s activities in Norwegian kindergartens. Part 2: focus on variations. Cultural Historical Psychology, 10(2), 86–94.Google Scholar
  17. Kjørholt, A. T. (2004). Childhood as a social and symbolic space: Discourses on children as social participants in society. Trondheim: NTNU.Google Scholar
  18. Kjørholt, A. T., & Seland, M. (2012). Kindergarten as a Bazar. Freedom of choice and new forms of regulation. In A. T. Kjørholt & J. Qvortrup (Eds.), The modern child and the flexible labour market. Exploring early childhood education and care. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koch, A. B. (2012). Når børn trives i børnehaven. Århus: Syddansk Universitet, PhD thesis.Google Scholar
  20. Kyttä, M. (2004). The extent of children’s independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria for child-friendly environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Løvlie, L. (2013). Kampen om barndommen. In A. Greve, S. Mørreaunet, & N. Winger (Eds.), Ytringer om likeverd, demokrati og relasjonsbygging i barnehagen (pp. 15–26). Fagbokforlaget: Bergen.Google Scholar
  22. Mashford-Scott, A., Church, A., & Tayler, C. (2012). Seeking children’s perspectives on their wellbeing in early childhood settings. International Journal of Early Childhood, 44, 231–247. doi: 10.1007/s13158-012-0069-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neill, S. R. S. J. (1982). Preschool design and child behaviour. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 23(3), 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. NMER. (2005). Act no. 64 of June 2005 relating to kindergartens (the kindergarten act). Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.Google Scholar
  25. NMER (2006/2011). Framework Plan for the Content and Tasks of Kindergartens, issued 1. March. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.Google Scholar
  26. NMER. (2010). NOU 2010:8 Med forskertrang og lekelyst. Systematisk pedagogisk tilbud til alle førskolebarn. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.Google Scholar
  27. Nordin-Hultman, E. (2004). Pedagogiske miljøer og barns subjektskaping. Oslo: Pedagogisk forum.Google Scholar
  28. Østrem, S., Bjar, H., Føsker, L. R., Hogsnes, H. D., Jansen, T. T., Nørdtomme, S., et al. (2009). Alle teller mer. En evaluering av hvordan Rammeplan for barnehagens innhold og oppgaver blir innført, brukt og erfart. Tønsberg: Høgskolen i Vestfold, Barnehagesenteret.Google Scholar
  29. Roberts, H. (2008). Listening to children: and hearing them. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children. Perspectives and practices (pp. 260–275). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Sandberg, A., & Eriksson, A. (2008). Children’s participation in preschool—on the conditions of the adults? Preschool staff’s concepts of children’s participation in preschool everyday life. Early Child Development and Care, 180(5), 619–631. doi: 10.1080/03004430802181759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sandseter, E. B. H. (2009a). Affordances for risky play in preschool—the importance of features in the play environment. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 439–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sandseter, E. B. H. (2009b). Characteristics of risky play. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 9(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Seland, M. (2009). Det moderne barn og den fleksible barnehagen. En etnografisk studie av barnehagens hverdagsliv i lys av nyere diskurser og kommunal virkelighet. Trondheim: NTNU.Google Scholar
  34. Seland, M., Sandseter, E. B. H., & Bratterud, Å. (2015). One- to three-year-old children’s experience of subjective wellbeing in day care. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 16(1), 70–83. doi: 10.1177/1463949114567272.
  35. StatisticsNorway (2014). Kindergartens, 2013, final statistics. Accessed 28 Nov 2014.
  36. Storli, R., & Sandseter, E. B. H. (2015). Preschool teachers’ perceptions of children’s rough-and-tumble play (R&T) in indoor and outdoor environments. Early Child Development and Care, 1–15, doi: 10.1080/03004430.2015.1028394.
  37. Sylva, K., Melhuish, E. C., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., & Elliot, K. (2003). The effective provision of pre-school education (EPPE) project: Findings from the pre-school period. London: University of London.Google Scholar
  38. Thoilliez, B. (2011). How to grow up happy: an exploratory study on the meaning of happiness from children’s voices. Child Indicators Research, 4(2), 323–351. doi: 10.1007/s12187-011-9107-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. U.dir. (2015a). Barn og ansatte i barnehager i 2014. Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training.Google Scholar
  40. U.dir. (2015b). Barnehagespeilet. Tall og analyse av barnehager i Norge. Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training.Google Scholar
  41. UN (1989). The convention on the rights of the child. In U. Nations (Ed.).Google Scholar
  42. Vassenden, A., Thygesen, J., Bayer, S. B., Alvestad, M., & Abrahamsen, G. (2011). Barnehagenes organisering og strukturelle faktorers betydning for kvalitet (Rapport 2011/029). Stavanger: International Research Institute of Stavanger.Google Scholar
  43. Waller, T., & Bitou, A. (2011). Research with children: three challenges for participatory re-search in early childhood. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queen Maud University College of Early Childhood EducationTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations