Skip to main content
Log in

Getting the Measure of Child Health and Development Outcomes (1): A Method for Use in Children’s Services Settings

  • Published:
Child Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measuring child well-being is an important basis for planning needs-led children’s services and charting their impact on outcomes. The quality of this work in the UK varies widely and little of it gets used in policy and practice. This article examines an attempt to develop and implement a new instrument to address these problems. The setting is an urban local authority seeking to plan and develop services in the context of a renewed focus on outcomes and multi-agency working. The article describes the development and implementation of an epidemiological survey of child health and development outcomes with a sample of children selected to be representative of all children aged 0–18 in the city. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the approach and considers future challenges as regards conceptualising child well-being, enhancing participation in such surveys and exploiting the data that emerges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See, for example: http://www.colorado.edu/cspv/blueprints/, http://www.promisingpractices.net/, http://nrepp.samhsa.gov/

  2. http://www.everychildmatters.gov.uk.

  3. www.sdqinfo.com

  4. ‘Higher-order’ categorisation means that a parent reporting the use of a physical aggression—the highest order category—does not exclude the use of lower-ordered misbehaviour response tactics (verbal reasoning and psychological aggression).

  5. www.ofsted.gov.uk

  6. Parents of children aged two and above were asked if, and how often, they had done the following: (a) smacked or slapped their child on the hands, arms or legs; (b) smacked or slapped the child on the face, head or ears; (c) grabbed, pushed or handled their child roughly; and (d) shaken their child.

References

  • Anning, A., Cottrell, D., Frost, N., Green, J., & Robinson, M. (2007). Developing multiprofessional teamwork for integrated children’s services. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axford, N. (2008). Exploring concepts of child well-being. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axford, N. (2010a). Conducting needs assessments in children’s services. British Journal of Social Work, 40(1), 4–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axford, N. (2010b). ‘What’s in a service?’, Child & Family Social Work. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00698.x.

  • Axford, N., & Berry, V. (2005). Measuring outcomes in the ‘new’ children’s services. Journal of Integrated Care, 13(4), 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axford, N., & Morpeth, L. (forthcoming). Creating a common language: From strategy development to implementation of evidence-based practice. In B. Kelly & D. Perkins (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of implementation science for educational psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Axford, N., & Whear, R. (2006). Early learning for children in North Docklands: Report of survey findings. Unpublished report for Early Learning for Children Group, National College of Ireland, Dublin.

  • Axford, N., Green, V., Kalsbeek, A., Morpeth, L., & Palmer, C. (2009). Measuring children’s needs: how are we doing? Child & Family Social Work, 14(3), 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, V. (2009a). The relative contribution of family conflict to children’s health and development. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Bath.

  • Berry, V. (2009b). Ethical considerations in conducting family violence research. Research Ethics Review, 5(3), 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. O., & Jones, W. H. (1995). The parental stress scale: initial psychometric evidence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12(3), 463–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., & Mayhew, E. (Eds.). (2005). The well-being of children in the United Kingdom. London: Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., Noble, M., Bloor, K., Huby, M., McLennan, D., Rhodes, D., et al. (2009). A child well-being index at small area level in England. Child Indicators Research, 2(2), 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdon, K. H., Goodman, R., Rae, D. S., Simpson, C., & Koretz, D. S. (2005). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: US normative data and psychometric properties. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(6), 557–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, K., & Espelage, D. (1995). Teen conflict survey. Bloomington: Centre for Adolescent Studies, Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, R. (2006). The dissemination of research findings in children’s services: issues and challenges. Adoption & Fostering, 30(1), 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, R., Gooch, D., Little, M., & Mount, K. (1998). Research in practice: Experiments in development and information design. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, E. M., Essink-Bot, M. L., Kobussen, M. P. H. M., van Suijlekom-Smit, W. A., Moll, H. A., & Raat, H. (2005). Reliability and validity of health status measurement by the TAPQOL. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 90, 351–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaskin, R. J., & Rosenfeld, J. M. (Eds.). (2007). Research for action: Cross-national perspectives on connecting knowledge, policy and practice for children. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collishaw, S., Maughan, B., Goodman, R., & Pickles, A. (2004). Time trends in adolescent mental health. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(8), 1350–1362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, E. J., Egger, H., & Angold, A. (2006a). 10-year research update review: the epidemiology of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders: I. Methods and public health burden. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(10), 972–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, E. J., Foley, D. L., & Angold, A. (2006b). 10-year research update review: the epidemiology of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders: II. developmental epidemiology. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 45(1), 8–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton, S., Ghate, D., Hazel, N., Field, J., & Finch, S. (2003). Putting the conflict tactics scale in context in violence from parent to child. In R. M. Lee & E. Stanko (Eds.), Researching violence: Essays on methodology and measurement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., & Lau, A. L. D. (2005). Personal Wellbeing Index—School Children (PWI-SC) Manual (3rd Edition). Melbourne: Deakin University.

  • Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: an integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling, N., & Toyokawa, T. (1997). Construction and validation of the parenting style inventory II (PSI-II). Department of Human Development and Family Studies: Pennsylvania State University.

  • Fagan, A. A., Hanson, K., Hawkins, D. J., & Arthur, M. W. (2008). Bridging science to practice: achieving prevention program implementation fidelity in the community youth development study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fekkes, M., Theunissen, N. C., Brugman, E., Veen, S., Verrips, E. G. H., Koopman, H. M., et al. (2000). Development and psychometric evaluation of the TAPQOL: a health related quality of life instrument for 1-5 year-old children. Quality of Life Research, 9, 961–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, T. (2008). Practitioner review: how can epidemiology help us plan and deliver effective child and adolescent mental health services? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(9), 900–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, R. D., & Schonlau, M. (2002). Advantages and disadvantages of internet research surveys: evidence from the literature. Field Methods, 14(4), 347–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghate, D., & Hazel, N. (2002). Parenting in poor environments: Stress, support and coping. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. (1999). The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 791–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R., Ford, T., Gatward, R., & Meltzer, H. (2000a). Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 534–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R., Renfrew, D., & Mullick, M. (2000b). Predicting type of psychiatric disorder from Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) scores in child mental health clinics in London and Dhaka. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 129–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., Adelman, K., Ashworth, J., Bradshaw, R., Levitas, S., Middleton, C., et al. (2000). Poverty and social exclusion in Britain. Joseph Rowntree Foundation: York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, N. (2001). Developing an approach to population needs assessment in English social services. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 9(1), 22–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government. (2008). National indicators for local authorities and local authority partnerships: Handbook of definitions. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, T. (2009). Looking for a Grand View: introducing concepts of robust sampling to policy makers and practitioners engaged in measuring the well-being of children at the local authority levels. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. First published 11th December 2009, doi:10.1080/13645570903354294.

  • Hobbs, T., Axford, N. & Jodrell, D. (2010). Getting the measure of children’s health and development outcomes (2): The picture for a local authority in England. Article submitted to Child Indicators Research.

  • Hobbs, T., & Jodrell, D. (2010). Adaptation of Kidscreen-52 for children with special educational needs. Unpublished paper, The Social Research Unit, Dartington, UK.

  • Laming, L. H. (2003). The Victoria Climbié Inquiry report. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, M., Axford, N., Morpeth, L., & Weyts, A. (2005). Evaluating children's services: recent conceptual and methodological developments. British Journal of Social Work, 35(1), 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, M., Axford, N., & Morpeth, L. (2002). Aggregating data: Better management information and planning in children's services. Dartington: Warren House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, M., Madge, J., Mount, K., Ryan, M., & Tunnard, J. (1999). Matching needs and services (2nd ed.). Dartington: Dartington Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, N. E., Yarcheski, T. J., & Yarcheski, A. (2002a). The revised personal lifestyle questionnaire for early adolescents. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 533–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, N. E., Yarcheski, A., & Yarcheski, T. J. (2002b). Psychometric evaluation of the personal lifestyle questionnaire for adolescents. Research in Nursing & Health, 25, 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, S., & Collard, S. (2004). Developing deprivation questions for the family resources survey. Working Paper 13. Bristol: Personal Finance Research Centre, University of Bristol.

  • Mellor, D. (2004). Furthering the use of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: reliability with younger child respondents. Psychological Assessment, 16(4), 396–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morpeth, L. (2004). Organisation and outcomes in children’s services. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Exeter.

  • Muris, P., Meesters, C., & van den Berg, F. (2003). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents. European Journal of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 12, 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., Meesters, C., Eijkelenboon, A., & Vinken, M. (2004). The self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: its psychometric properties in 8- to 13-year-old non-clinical children. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 436–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicklas, T. (2004). Assessing diet quality in children and adolescents. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 104(9), 1383–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol: Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister). (2004). The impact of overcrowding on health and education: A review of evidence and literature. Wetherby: ODPM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percy-Smith, J. (2000). Introduction: the contours of social exclusion. In J. Percy-Smith (Ed.), Policy responses to social exclusion: Towards inclusion? Buckingham: Open University Press.

  • Percy-Smith, J. (Ed.). (1996). Needs assessments in public policy. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravens-Sieberer, U., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Erhart, M., Bruil, J., Duer, W., et al. (2005). KIDSCREEN-52 quality-of-life measure for children and adolescents. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 5(3), 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw, J. (2008). Tools for improving outcomes and performance: Comparing six different approaches. London: IdEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richters, J., & Martinez, P. (1992). Things I have seen and heard: A structured interview for assessing young children’s violence exposure. Rockville: National Institute of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (2007). Sure Start local programmes: An outsider’s perspective. In J. Belsky, J. Barnes, & E. Melhuish (Eds.), The national evaluation of Sure Start: Does area-based early intervention work? Bristol: Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., & Stevenson, K. (2008). Using epidemiology to plan services: A conceptual approach. In M. Rutter, D. Bishop, D. Pine, S. Scott, J. Stevenson, E. Taylor, & A. Thapar (Eds.), Rutter’s child and adolescent psychiatry (5th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Exclusion Taskforce. (2007). Reaching out: Think family. Analysis and themes from the families at risk review. London: Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedje, H., Broman, J.-E., Hetta, J., & von Knorring, A.-L. (1999). Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 8, 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R. L., & Greenberg, M. T. (2005). Toward a comprehensive strategy for effective practitioner-scientist partnerships and larger-scale community health and well-being. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35(3–4), 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the conflict tactics scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. Garden City: Anchor/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2004). Effective Provision of Pre-school Education (EPPE) Project: Final report. London: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Kidscreen Group Europe. (2006). The Kidscreen questionnaires: Quality of life questionnaires for children and adolescents. Lengerich: Pabst Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman, J., Robinson, K., Evans, A. L., Smith, D., Cunningham, L., Millward, R., et al. (2003). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a pilot study of a new computer version of the self-report scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 12, 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries. UNICEF Innocenti Report Card 7. Florence: UNICEF IRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utting, D. (2009). Assessing and meeting the need for parenting support services: A literature review. London: National Academy for Parenting Practitioners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, I., Nutley, S., Percy-Smith, J., McNeish, D., & Frost, S. (2004). Improving the use of research in social care. Knowledge Review 7. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence and the Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissberg, R. P., & Greenberg, M. T. (1998). Prevention science and collaborative community action research: combining the best from both perspectives. Journal of Mental Health, 7(5), 479–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge funding for this work from the local authority concerned. We would also like to thank all colleagues past and present who have been involved in the surveys, in particular Vashti Berry, Nick Gornall, Helen Harris, David Jodrell, Annemieke Kalsbeek, Dwan Kaoukji, Michael Little, Louise Morpeth and Rebecca Whear.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Axford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Axford, N., Hobbs, T. Getting the Measure of Child Health and Development Outcomes (1): A Method for Use in Children’s Services Settings. Child Ind Res 4, 59–80 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-010-9074-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-010-9074-2

Keywords

Navigation