Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Advances in Patellofemoral Arthroplasty

  • Advances in Patellofemoral Surgery (L Redler, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

To describe current indications, implants, economic benefits, comparison to TKA, and functional and patient-reported outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty.

Recent Findings

Modern onlay implants and improved patient selection have allowed for recent improvements in short- and long-term outcomes after patellofemoral joint replacement surgery.

Summary

Patellofemoral arthroplasty has become an increasingly utilized technique for the successful treatment of isolated patellofemoral arthritis. Advances in patient selection, implant design, and surgical technique have resulted in improved performance and longevity of these implants. Although short- and mid-term data for modern patellofemoral arthroplasties appear promising, further long-term clinical studies are needed to evaluate how new designs and technologies will affect patient outcomes and long-term implant performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Davies AP, Vince AS, Shepstone L, Donell ST, Glasgow MM. The radiologic prevalence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;402:206–12. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12218486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McAlindon TE, Snow S, Cooper C, Dieppe PA. Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992;51(7):844–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.51.7.844.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Walker T, Perkinson B, Mihalko WM. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the other unicompartmental knee replacement. Instr Course Lect. 2013;62:363–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McKeever DC, Sherk HH. THE CLASSIC: patellar prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000187334.15841.05.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blazina ME, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Broukhim B, Ivey FM. Patellofemoral replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;144:98–102. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000172301.66790.62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Cloedt P, Legaye J, Lokietek W. Femoro-patellar prosthesis. A retrospective study of 45 consecutive cases with a follow-up of 3–12 years. Acta Orthop Belg. 1999;65(2):170–5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10427798.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Argenson J-NA, Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac J-M. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: an update. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440(440):50–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000187061.27573.70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Charalambous CP, Abiddin Z, Mills SP, Rogers S, Sutton P, Parkinson R. The low contact stress patellofemoral replacement: high early failure rate. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(4):484–9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.25899.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yadav B, Shaw D, Radcliffe G, Dachepalli S, Kluge W. Mobile-bearing, congruent patellofemoral prosthesis: short-term results. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2012;20(3):348–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Winter WE, Feith R, van Loon CJ. The Richards type II patellofemoral arthroplasty: 26 cases followed for 1–20 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72(5):487–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164701753532826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kooijman HJ, Driessen AP, van Horn JR. Long-term results of patellofemoral arthroplasty. A report of 56 arthroplasties with 17 years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(6):836–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Khefacha A. Long-term results with the first patellofemoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436(436):47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jørgensen PS, Konradsen LA, Mati WB, Tørholm C. Treatment of patellofemoral arthritis with patello-femoral arthroplasties. Ugeskr Laeger. 2007;169(23):2201–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. van Jonbergen HP, Werkman DM, Barnaart LF, van Kampen A. Long-term outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2010;25(7):1066–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.08.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoogervorst P, de Jong RJ, Hannink G, van Kampen A. A 21% conversion rate to total knee arthroplasty of a first-generation patellofemoral prosthesis at a mean follow-up of 9.7 years. Int Orthop. 2015;39:1857–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2941-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tauro B, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Shah NA. The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty. A five- to ten-year prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(5):696–701.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith AM, Peckett WRC, Butler-Manuel PA, Venu KM, D’Arcy JC. Treatment of patello-femoral arthritis using the Lubinus patello-femoral arthroplasty: a retrospective review. Knee. 2002;9(1):27–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(01)00127-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Board TN, Mahmood A, Ryan WG, Banks AJ. The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty: a series of 17 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(5):285–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0645-x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hendrix MR, Ackroyd CE, Lonner JH. Revision patellofemoral arthroplasty: three- to seven-year follow-up. J Arthroplast. 2008;23(7):977–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Arciero RA, Toomey HE. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. A three- to nine-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;236:60–71. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3180587.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gadeyne S, Besse JL, Galand-Desme S, Lerat JL, Moyen B. Results of self-centering patellofemoral prosthesis: a retrospective study of 57 implants. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008;94(3):228–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rco.2007.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. van Wagenberg JM, Speigner B, Gosens T, de Waal Malefijt J. Midterm clinical results of the Autocentric II patellofemoral prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2009;33(6):1603–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0719-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lonner JH, Mehta S, Booth RE. Ipsilateral patellofemoral arthroplasty and autogenous osteochondral femoral condylar transplantation. J Arthroplast. 2007;22(8):1130–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2005.08.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Akhbari P, Malak T, Dawson-Bowling S, East D, Miles K, Butler-Manuel PA. The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: mid-term prospective results from an independent Centre. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015;7(2):171–6. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2015.7.2.171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Ackroyd CE, Chir B. Development and early results of a new patellofemoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436(436):7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nicol SG, Loveridge JM, Weale AE, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH. Arthritis progression after patellofemoral joint replacement. Knee. 2006;13(4):290–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2006.04.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leadbetter WB, Kolisek FR, Levitt RL, Brooker AF, Zietz P, Marker DR, et al. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: a multi-centre study with minimum 2-year follow-up. Int Orthop. 2009;33(6):1597–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0692-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Starks I, Roberts S, White SH. The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: independent assessment of early functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(12):1579–82. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B12.23018.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sarda PK, Shetty A, Maheswaran SS. Medium term results of Avon patellofemoral joint replacement. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45(5):439–44. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.83761.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mont MA, Johnson AJ, Naziri Q, Kolisek FR, Leadbetter WB. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: 7-year mean follow-up. J Arthroplast. 2012;27(3):358–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.07.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Farr J, Arendt E, Dahm D, Daynes J. Patellofemoral arthroplasty in the athlete. Clin Sports Med. 2014;33(3):547–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2014.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Odumenya M, Costa ML, Parsons N, Achten J, Dhillon M, Krikler SJ. The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: five-year results from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(1):56–60. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.23135.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Al-Hadithy N, Patel R, Navadgi B, Deo S, Hollinghurst D, Satish V. Mid-term results of the FPV patellofemoral joint replacement. Knee. 2014;21(1):138–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Davies AP. High early revision rate with the FPV patello-femoral unicompartmental arthroplasty. Knee. 2013;20(6):482–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2013.07.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Williams DP, Pandit HG, Athanasou NA, Murray DW, Gibbons CL. Early revisions of the Femoro-Patella Vialla joint replacement. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(6):793–7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B6.31355.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Halai M, Ker A, Anthony I, Holt G, Jones B, Blyth M. Femoro Patella Vialla patellofemoral arthroplasty: an independent assessment of outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up. World J Orthop. 2016;7(8):487–93. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i8.487.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Goh GS, Liow MH, Tay DK, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. Four-year follow up outcome study of patellofemoral arthroplasty at a single institution. J Arthroplast. 2015;30(6):959–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liow MH, Goh GS, Tay DK, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. Obesity and the absence of trochlear dysplasia increase the risk of revision in patellofemoral arthroplasty. Knee. 2016;23(2):331–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2015.05.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hofmann AA, McCandless JB, Shaeffer JF, Magee TH. Patellofemoral replacement: the third compartment. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(11 Suppl A):124–8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lustig S. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(1 Suppl):S35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.06.013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Beitzel K, Schottle PB, Cotic M, et al. Prospective clinical and radiological two-year results after patellofemoral arthroplasty using an implant with an asymmetric trochlea design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(2):332–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2022-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fink B, Schwenninger C. Arthroplasty of the Femoropatellar joint—what data are available? Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie Unfallchirurgie. 2014;152(2):182–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1360353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Philippe H, Caton J. Design, operative technique and ten-year results of the Hermes™ patellofemoral arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2014;38(2):437–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2158-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the impact of design on outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am. 2008;39(3):347–54, vi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2008.02.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Guy SP, Farndon MA, Conroy JL, Bennett C, Grainger AJ, London NJ. A prospective randomised study of minimally invasive midvastus total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2012;19(6):866–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.04.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. • Osarumwense D, Syed F, Nzeako O, Akilapa S, Zubair O, Waite J. Patellofemoral joint arthroplasty: early results and functional outcome of the Zimmer gender solutions patello-femoral joint system. Clin Orthop Surg. 2017;9(3):295–302. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2017.9.3.295. Describes outcomes of one of the newest, gender-specific implant designs.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Sisto DJ, Sarin VK. Custom patellofemoral arthroplasty of the knee: surgical technique. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2007;os-89(2_suppl_2):214–25. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sisto DJ, Henry J, Sisto M, Sarin VK. Patient-specific patellofemoral arthroplasty. Tech Knee Surg. 2010;9(3):188–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/BTK.0b013e3181e0e3ef.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: an evolving science. Instr Course Lect. 2017;66:211–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Borus T, Brilhault J, Confalonieri N, Johnson D, Thienpont E. Patellofemoral joint replacement, an evolving concept. Knee. 2014;21(Suppl 1):S47–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(14)50010-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. van der List JP, Chawla H, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD. Survivorship and functional outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;25:2622–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3878-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. • Kazarian GS, Tarity TD, Hansen EN, Cai J, Lonner JH. Significant functional improvement at 2 years after isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty with an onlay trochlear implant, but low mental health scores predispose to dissatisfaction. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(2):389–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.033. Addresses the psychosocial component of patient outcomes after arthroplasty. Mental health may influence perceptions of satisfaction.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lonner JH. 101. Patellofemoral Arthroplasty. Vol 33.; 2010. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20100722-39.

  54. Leadbetter WB, Seyler TM, Ragland PS, Mont MA. Indications, contraindications, and pitfalls of patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 4):122–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Dejour D, Ferrua P, Ntagiopoulos PG, et al. The introduction of a new MRI index to evaluate sagittal patellofemoral engagement. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(8 S). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.10.008.

  56. Dahm DL, Kalisvaart MM, Stuart MJ, Slettedahl SW. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: outcomes and factors associated with early progression of tibiofemoral arthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(10):2554–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3202-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. • Carroll KM, Mayman DJ. Robotic patellofemoral replacement. Oper Tech Orthop. 2015;25(2):120–6. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.oto.2015.02.001. Discusses the role and technological improvements that robotics can have in patellofemoral arthroplasty.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Tamam C, Plate JF, Augart M, Poehling GG, Jinnah RH. Retrospective clinical and radiological outcomes after robotic assisted bicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Adv Orthop. 2015;2015:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/747309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Watanabe T, Abbasi AZ, Conditt MA, Christopher J, Kreuzer S, Otto JK, et al. In vivo kinematics of a robot-assisted uni- and multi-compartmental knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19(4):552–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0578-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lonner JH. Indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and rationale for robotic arm-assisted technology. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009;38(2 Suppl):3–6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19340375.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kamara E, Berliner ZP, Hepinstall MS, Cooper HJ. Pin site complications associated with computer-assisted navigation in hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(9):2842–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. van der List JP, Chawla H, Joskowicz L, Pearle AD. Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(11):3482–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4305-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Dahm DL, Al-Rayashi W, Dajani K, Shah JP, Levy BA, Stuart MJ. Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010;39(10):487–91.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Dy CJ, Franco N, Ma Y, Mazumdar M, McCarthy MM, Gonzalez Della Valle A. Complications after patello-femoral versus total knee replacement in the treatment of isolated patello-femoral osteoarthritis. A meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(11):2174–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1677-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. • Vasta S, Papalia R, Zampogna B, Espregueira-Mendes J, Amendola A. Current design (onlay) PFA implants have similar complication and reoperation rates compared to those of TKA for isolated PF osteoarthritis: a systematic review with quantitative analysis. J ISAKOS Jt Disord Orthop Sport Med. 2016;1(5):257–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2015-000044. Reviews the types of complications, as well as the causes and rates of reoperation and revision for PFA or TKA.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. • Odgaard A, Madsen F, Kristensen PW, Kappel A, Fabrin J. Double-blinded randomized controlled trial of patellofemoral vs. total knee arthroplasty for patellofemoral osteoarthritis: two-year results. 2014. This is the first blinded randomized trial that compares clinical and patient-reported outcomes of PFA versus TKA. The PFA group had superior outcomes to TKA in recovery time, range of motion, and function, contradictory to registry-based results .

  67. Hollinghurst D, Stoney J, Ward T, Pandit H, Beard D, Murray DW. In vivo sagittal plane kinematics of the Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2007;22(1):117–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. • van der List JP, Chawla H, Villa JC, Pearle AD. Why do patellofemoral arthroplasties fail today? A systematic review. Knee. 2017;24(1):2–8. Analyzes the causes of PFA failure according to prosthesis design, follow-up period, and cohort studies versus registries over a long-follow up period .

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Christ AB, Baral E, Koch C, Shubin Stein BE, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Strickland SM. Patellofemoral arthroplasty conversion to total knee arthroplasty: retrieval analysis and clinical correlation. Knee. 2017.

  70. Lonner JH, Jasko JG, Booth RE Jr. Revision of a failed patellofemoral arthroplasty to a total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(11):2337–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. • Parratte S, Lunebourg A, Ollivier M, Abdel MP, Argenson JN. Are revisions of patellofemoral arthroplasties more like primary or revision TKAs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(1):213–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3756-x. Determined that PFA to TKA conversion surgery shares similar surgical characteristics and postoperative outcomes as primary TKA.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. van Jonbergen HP, Werkman DM, van Kampen A. Conversion of patellofemoral arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: a matched case-control study of 13 patients. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(1):62–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670902805031.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Hutt J, Dodd M, Bourke H, Bell J. Outcomes of total knee replacement after patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2013;26(4):219–23. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1329233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. • Chawla H, Nwachukwu BU, Van Der List JP, Eggman AA, Pearle AD, Ghomrawi HM. Cost effectiveness of patellofemoral versus total knee arthroplasty in younger patients. Bone Joint J. 2017;99B(8) https://doi.org/10.1302/0301620X.99B8.BJJ20161032.R1. Describes the economical and lifetime benefits of PFA versus TKA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Patellofemoral Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA

    Sabrina M. Strickland

  2. Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70122, USA

    Mackenzie L. Bird

  3. Division of Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 10021, USA

    Alexander B. Christ

Authors
  1. Sabrina M. Strickland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mackenzie L. Bird
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander B. Christ
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabrina M. Strickland.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

No human or animal studies were performed by the authors. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Advances in Patellofemoral Surgery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strickland, S.M., Bird, M.L. & Christ, A.B. Advances in Patellofemoral Arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 11, 221–230 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-018-9477-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-018-9477-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation