Skip to main content
Log in

The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty: a series of 17 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty was introduced in our institution in 1994. The first 17 patients were followed-up in order to identify the short-term outcome for this prosthesis.

Materials and methods

The average age at surgery was 66 years (range 37–82 years). The mean follow-up was 19 months. The indications for surgery were strictly limited to radiographically proven primary osteoarthritis affecting only the patellofemoral joint (13) and secondary arthritis due to maltracking, subluxation (3) or trauma to the patella (1). At review, the range of movement and Lysholm and Tegner scores were recorded and radiographs obtained. Patients were also asked if their outcome was satisfactory or unsatisfactory.

Results

At review, only 9 (53%) knees were classified as satisfactory by the patients. Further surgery had been carried out in 6 cases (35%) including revision to total knee arthroplasty in 4 (24%). Other complications included clicking and subluxation in 3 cases (18%), extension block in 3 (18%) and infection in 1 (6%). Progression of osteoarthritis to involve other compartments occurred in 2 cases (12%).

Conclusions

Many of these early problems are related to the unforgiving nature of the prosthesis on insertion. These poor early results have led us to stop using the prosthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackroyd CE, Polzoides AJ (1978) Patellectomy for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 60:353

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arciero RA, Major MC, Toomey HE (1988) Patellofemoral arthroplasty. A three to nine year follow up study. Clin Orthop 107:175–187

    Google Scholar 

  3. Argenson JA, Guillaume JM, Aubaniac JM (1996) Is there a place for patellofemoral arthroplasty? Clin Orthop 321:162–167

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Greslsamer R (1990) Patellofemoral arthroplasty: 2–12 year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 5:49–55

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ficat RP, Ficat C, Gedeon P, Toussaint JB (1979) Spongialisation: a new treatment for diseased patellae. Clin Orthop 144:74–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krajca-Radcliffe JB, Coker TP (1996) Patellofemoral arthroplasty. A 2 to 18 year follow up study. Clin Orthop 330:143–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lubinus HH (1979) Patella glide bearing total replacement. Orthopaedics 2:119–127

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maquet P (1963) Considerations biomeqanicues sur l’arthose du genou. Un treatment biomeqanicue de l’arthrose femoro-patellaire. L’avancement du tendon rotulein. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartritic 30:779

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith AM, Peckett WRC, Butler-Manuel PA, Venu KM, d’Arcy JC (2002) Treatment of patello-femoral arthritis using the Lubinus patello-femoral arthroplasty: a retrospective review. The Knee 9:27–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tauro B, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Shah NA (2001) The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty. A five to ten year prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:696–701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. N. Board.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Board, T.N., Mahmood, A., Ryan, W.G. et al. The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty: a series of 17 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124, 285–287 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0645-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0645-x

Keywords

Navigation