Abstract
Herbicide resistance is a growing threat to agriculture and has parallels to resistances to fungicides and insecticides. However, there are many reasons to treat the resistance to herbicides differently. To highlight these similarities and differences, three pests, a weed, an insect, and a disease that have shown the ability to rapidly develop resistance to a variety of products and product classes were used as illustrations. The situation in herbicide resistance is approaching a point already experienced by the other pest control disciplines, and thus, it is worthwhile to revisit their experiences.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Opinion
The recent Symposium—Biological and Chemical Approaches towards Combating Resistance in Agriculture, sponsored by RSC BMCS and AgriNet Agriscience, gave me a renewed opportunity to view presentations from colleagues working on insecticide and fungicide resistance, areas somewhat tangential but complementary to the field of herbicide resistance in which I work. I was struck by how familiar the problems were to what we face with herbicide resistant weeds, yet I also realized that some problems and issues were completely and fundamentally different. I presented a talk entitled “Herbicide Resistance and its Consequences for Agriculture and the Agrochemical Industry” that dealt in part with the impact that resistance to glyphosate in the USA by two Amaranth species, Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus Moq. J.D. Sauer, formerly known as Amaranthus rudis L.), have had on agriculture and our industry. Due to the long germination period, rapid growth, enormous seed production capability, and strong competitiveness of these two weeds with crops [1–5], some have referred to them almost facetiously as “monster weeds” [6]. However, they are not to be taken lightly. In some areas of the USA, it is astounding to observe soybean, cotton, and corn fields during late August that are thoroughly overgrown with these weeds. Some fields are completely lost and are then mowed and plowed under, although that is not a good idea because of the return of seeds to the soil will likely flourish in next year’s crop. The spread of these Amaranths has been described befittingly as threatening to modern agriculture [7] and even as potentially resulting in near zero yield for corn and soybean [8]. The reasons for this development have been extensively reviewed [9–11], and will not be discussed herein. Why revisit now this comparison of resistance problems between the insect, disease, and weed control disciplines? It has been addressed before [12–14], but the time is right to ask some of the same questions again. What is different now is that we are currently reaching significant milestones in herbicide resistance evolution that have already been experienced before in the other disciplines, and this, coupled with the current lack of new easy fixes (i.e., herbicides with novel modes of action), is creating a sense of urgency and despair in some markets. Almost two decades ago, it was acknowledged that resistance could develop to almost any fungicide, insecticide, or acaricide and “even [a] weed” [15]. Resistance had become an everyday management problem in the management of diseases, insect pests, and nematodes, but this was not really true for weeds. Resistance by weeds to almost any herbicide was considered by some in the recent past as more of a theoretical possibility than as a real threat. This is no longer the case. The desire to learn from “their” experience is predicated partly upon the need to see if we have missed anything. While doing so, the analogy of this situation with weeds to other major resistance problems (for insects and diseases) came to mind. I wondered if a more attenuated comparison of the Amaranth resistance situation with the resistance situation of the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) and potato late blight (Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary), two pests that have had significant impacts on agriculture and food production, could not provide a practical opportunity to highlight some of the key similarities and differences at a more comprehensible level.
Certainly, we in herbicide resistance research have learned much about management practices for diseases such as potato late blight that have developed resistance rapidly to many classes of compounds. Mixtures of different modes of action may have been the most used strategy to manage resistance 20 years ago [13], but now is regularly supplemented by using complementary cultural practices, spray schedules of alternating chemistries, and “adequate” (or close to full) rates and timings as recommended on labels to lower disease pressure, and in an era of prevalent resistance, understanding and using the positive attributes of each mode of action [16, 17]. The prominent role of the industry-sponsored Resistance Action Committees (RACs), namely FRAC and IRAC, in developing coordinated, sound management practices has been instrumental in slowing resistance development in diseases and insects [18–20]. Strategies advanced by the Weed Science Society of America, HRAC, and the Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative all agree that several concurrent steps are necessary to manage resistance, should include education about best practices and the economic benefits of proactive management [21–23], and also calls for the inclusion of disruptive practices such as harvest weed seed control [22]. We don’t necessarily know exactly how long these combinations of practices will keep herbicides working, but we do know that they need to be implemented to keep current agricultural production systems sustainable. All disciplines also agree on the need for more detailed information on pest biology, life cycles, and reproduction strategies.
One instructive excercise is to compare the biology of the Amaranths with the biology of the Colorado potato beetle. The life history of this insect has been described as being complicated and diverse and thus requiring the same kind of measures to control it, with dispersal and feeding behavior, diapause, and overwintering in soil, reproduction strategies including random mating to maximize genetic diversity, and high fecundity linked with survival of potentially devastating climate conditions or insecticide applications in a particular field [24]. It has successfully adapted itself to different habitats around the globe. The Amaranths can also be described as having a complicated and diverse life history and are also very adaptable to habitats. One major obvious difference with an insect is the sedentary nature of terrestrial plants. Insects are very mobile, plants are much less so. Palmer amaranth pollen can disperse up to 300 m in the air [25], highlighting the potential ability to disperse locally. Palmer amaranth has been found in Michigan, far outside of its normal range in the southern USA [5] likely due to long-distance seed transmission. However, pollen and occasional seed transmission are much more limited transportation vectors resulting in a restricted number of transferred resistant organisms than having practically all individuals in a Colorado potato beetle population with the ability to move easily by walking between fields for hundreds of meters or even flying up to 100 km [24]. Because of the relatively reduced mobility of weeds versus insects, it has been stated that a farmer is more in control of the weed problem that develops in his field versus being more susceptible to invasion by resistant populations of insects and diseases from neighboring fields [14]. A phylogenetic study of seven Palmer amaranth populations from North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, and Arkansas, resulted in some of them clustering based more upon resistance status than geography, but results were based on a low number of sampled individuals per population and could not be called conclusive [26]. Recent in-depth studies at a local landscape level of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. resistant to ACCase- and ALS-inhibiting herbicides show that neighboring fields can have quite different resistance profiles, even between relatively small fields, and suggest that resistance evolved independently in the fields [27, 28]. These examples are, of course, dependent upon the particular weed species and cropping system and cannot be applied to all weeds, but it illustrates a major difference in assumptions about how resistance develops and spreads in insects and weeds. It is assumed that transport can play an important role, but relative to independent evolution, it is likely to be less important for weeds. Genetic diversity plays a role in beetle survival, as it does for the Amaranths. Both Palmer amaranth and common waterhemp are dioecious and thus obligate outcrossing species [29]. High fecundity is also a characteristic of these weeds, with reports of up to a million seeds produced per plant [30, 31]. Amaranths are C4 plants, making them efficient under high light and hot conditions, with Palmer amaranth being adapted to desert conditions and particularly suited for competition in dry situations [32]. The Colorado potato beetle has developed resistance to almost every insecticide used to control it [33]. The Amaranths are following in its footsteps, with resistance developed by each to up to six different modes of action [34]. Resistance factors (RF), generally the ratio of the ED50 or LD50 values between resistant and appropriate sensitive populations, are generally much higher in insects. For the Colorado potato beetle, a RF of 30 is not considered to be high and can reach up to 2,000 [24], whereas resistance factors for Palmer amaranth are generally below 10 [35–37]. One major difference between the Amaranthus weeds and the insect is in the fitness of resistant individuals. There seems to be a fitness penalty for resistant Colorado potato beetles [24] but not for Palmer amaranth [38]. Although not studied in detail, it is assumed that because of the competitiveness of resistant common waterhemp individuals growing in glyphosate-treated soybean and corn fields (personal observation), this species also does not likely possess major fitness costs associated with resistance.
We are dealing, in the USA, with two formidable weeds, Palmer amaranth and common waterhemp. Their evolutionary path has endowed them with the ability to compete effectively with crops in current agricultural production systems. They have proven to be daunting foes to agriculture, as has the Colorado potato beetle, which has been credited with helping to shape the modern pesticide industry [24]. This distinction may perhaps soon be shared with the Amaranths.
References
Anderson DD, Higley LG, Martin AR, Roeth FW (1996) Competition between triazine-resistant and -susceptible common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis). Weed Sci 44:853–859
Wright SR, Coble HD, Raper CD Jr, Rufty TW Jr (1999) Comparative responses of soybean (Glycine max), sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia), and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to root zone and aerial temperatures. Weed Sci 47:167–174
Massinga RA, Currie RS, Horak MJ, Boyer J (2001) Interference of Palmer amaranth in corn. Weed Sci 49:202–208
Bensch CN, Horak MJ, Peterson D (2003) Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A.palmeri), and common waterhemp (A.rudis) in soybean. Weed Sci 51:37–43
Ward SM, Webster TM, Steckel LE (2013) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri): a review. Weed Technol 27:12–27
Hampton N (2009) Cotton versus the monster weed. North Carolina State Univ CALS online magazine available http://www.cals.ncsu.edu/agcomm/magazine/winter09/cotton.html. Accessed 09 Jul 2014
Price AJ, Balkcom KS, Culpepper SA, Kelton JA, Nichols RL, Schomberg H (2011) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth: a threat to conservation tillage. J Soil Water Conserv 66:265–275
CropLife (2014) Understanding the threat of Palmer amaranth: management recommendations for the 2014 season. Available http://www.croplife.com/crop-inputs/herbicides/understanding-the-threat-of-palmer-amaranth-management-recommendations-for-the-2014-season. Accessed 07 Jul 2014
Shaner DL (1995) Herbicide resistance: where are we? How did we get here? Where are we going? Weed Technol 9:850–856
Powles SB (2008) Evolved glyphosate-resistant weeds around the world: lessons to be learnt. Pest Manag Sci 64:360–365
Duke SO, Powles SB (2009) Glyphosate-resistant crops and weeds; now and in the future. AgBioforum 12:346–357
Gould F (1995) Comparisons between resistance management strategies for insects and weeds. Weed Technol 9:830–839
Peever TL, Milgroom MG (1995) Fungicide resistance—lessons for herbicide resistance management. Weed Technol 9:840–849
Clarke JH, Clark WS, Hancock M (1997) Strategies for the prevention of development of pesticide resistance in the UK—lessons for and from the use of herbicides, fungicides and insecticides. Pestic Sci 51:391–397
Urech PA, Staub T, Voss G (2013) Resistance as a concomitant of modern crop protection. Pestic Sci 51:227–234
Anon (2004) Potato late blight: Guidelines for managing fungicides resistance. Bulletin FRAG-UK
Damicone J (2009) Fungicide resistance management. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Fact Sheet F-7663
Staub T (1991) Fungicide resistance—practical experience with antiresistance strategies and the role of integrated use. Annu Rev Phytopathol 29:421–42
Russell PE (2005) A century of fungicide evolution. J Agric Sci 143:11–25
Leonard PK (1997) There has never been a better time or a greater need for resistance management. Pestic Sci 51:387–390
Norsworthy JK, Ward SM, Shaw DR, Llewellyn RS, Robert L. Nichols RL, Webster TM, Bradley KW, Frisvold G, Powles SB, Burgos NR, Witt WW, Michael Barrett M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci Sp Iss:31–62
Walsh M, Powles S (2013) Management of herbicide resistance in wheat cropping systems: learning from the Australian experience. Pest Manag Sci. doi:10.1002/ps.3704
Soteres J, Glasgow L, Peterson M, Obrigawitch T, Evans R, Strek H, Pawlak J, Wilson S (2013) Herbicide resistance management and sustainable ag: an industry perspective. Outlook Pest Manag 24:230–232
Alyokhin A, Baker M, Mota-Sanchez D, Dively G, Grafius E (2008) Colorado potato beetle resistant to insecticides. Am J Pot Res 85:395–413
Sosnoskie LM, Webster TM, Kichler JM, MacRae AW, Grey TL, Culpepper AS (2012) Pollen-mediated dispersal of glyphosate-resistance in Palmer amaranth under field conditions. Weed Sci 60:366–373
Lorentz L (2012) Molecular and physiological characterization of the glyphosate resistant weeds Amaranthus spp. and Sorghum spp. Dissertation Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Hess M, Beffa R, Kaiser J, Laber B, Menne H, Strek H (2012) Status and development of ACCase and ALS inhibitor resistant black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.) in neighboring fields in Germany. ulius-Kühn-Archiv 434:163–170
Hermann J, Hess M, Schubel T, Strek H, Richter O, Beffa R (2014) Spatial and temporal development of ACCase and ALS resistant black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.) populations in neighboring fields in Germany. Julius-Kühn-Archiv 443:273–279
Tranel PJ, Wassom JJ, Jeschke MR, Rayburn AL (2002) Transmission of herbicide resistance from a monoecious to a dioecious weedy Amaranthus species. Theor Appl Genet 105:674–679
Hager AG (2014) Management of Palmer amaranth in Illinois. Univ Illinois Ext Bull April 2014
Nordby D, Hartzler B, Bradley K (2013) Biology and management of waterhemp. Purdue Exten Bull GWC-13
Pearcy RW, Ehleringer J (1984) Comparative ecophysiology of C3 and C4 plants. Plant Cell Environ 7:1–13
Naun R, Denholm I (2005) Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 58:200–215
Heap I (2014) The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Available www.weedscience.org. Accessed 08 Jul 2014
Culpepper AS, Grey TL, Vencill WK, Kichler JM, Webster TM, Brown SM, York AC, Davis JW, Hanna WW (2006) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci 54:620–626
Steckel LE, Main CL, Ellis AT, Mueller TC (2008) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Tennessee has low level glyphosate resistance. Weed Technol 22:119–123
Gaines TA, Zhang W, Wang D, Bukun B, Chisholm ST, Shaner DL, Nissen SJ, Patzold WL, Tranel PJ, Culpepper AS, Grey TL, Webster TM, Vencill WK, Sammons RD, Jiang J, Preston C, Leach JE, Westra P (2010) Gene amplification confers glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri. PNAS 107:1029–1034
Giacomini D, Westra P, Ward SM (2014) Impact of genetic background in fitness cost studies: an example from glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth. Weed Sci 62:29–37
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Strek, H.J. Herbicide resistance—what have we learned from other disciplines?. J Chem Biol 7, 129–132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12154-014-0119-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12154-014-0119-8