Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of loss on ignition values of the magnesite minerals using robust multiple regression

  • Methodology
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Magnesite is an ore used in the production of a wide variety of industrial minerals and compounds and magnesium metal, as well as its alloys. The main components of magnesite are MgO and CO2. However, magnesite, which is not generally observed in nature as pure, contains certain amounts of SiO2, CaO, and Fe2O3. The loss on ignition (LOI) value in magnesite minerals largely depends on the CO2 content. This study aims to develop a model that estimates the LOI values of magnesite minerals by using SiO2, MgO, CaO, and Fe2O3tot data obtained from the geochemical analysis. Measurement of the LOI can provide important information not only for calculating the amount of volatiles in magnesite, but also about the acquisition of the element magnesium. With the estimation of LOI values, samples will not need to be subjected to LOI analysis. The data used in this study were compiled from the literature and information about the study areas, deposit types, analysis methods and the laboratory/device names was presented as supplementary material. The multivariate linear regression model was applied to represent the relationship between the LOI and these major oxides. A global independent data set comprising 170 observations was used to validate the proposed model. The preliminary analysis of the data is discussed in detail to improve the quality of the analysis. In the first step, the OLS estimation method is implemented to estimate the unknown parameters. Then, model assumptions are tested. Due to the existence of outliers, violation of the assumptions can lead to the misuse of the OLS method. In such cases, obtaining reliable estimates depends on strong estimators such as robust estimators, which are resistant to the outliers. Robust M-estimation methods can be used as effective tools for this purpose. For this reason, in the final step, we consider a robust M-estimation method based on Huber, Tukey, and Hampel objective functions. The results of OLS and robust regression methods, including parameter estimates, standard errors, residual standard error, and weighted R2 are presented as a comparison. The validity of the models and the importance of each explanatory variable to the relationship are also investigated. According to the residual standard error (RSE) which is a way to measure the standard deviation of the residuals in a regression model, and \({R}_W^2\) values, a robust M- estimation method based on all three considered objective functions produces more accurate results in comparison with the outcomes of the conventional OLS method. In particular, the robust estimation method based on the Tukey objective function has the smallest RSE and largest \({R}_W^2\) among the others. It is observed that deleting a few outlying points has a big impact on the regression results. In this study, a multi-linear relationship between the main oxide values and LOI was determined. As a result, an estimation model with 91% accuracy and an RSE value of 0.283 was proposed. In addition, some relationships were established between the outliers and the determination of the ranges of major oxide values in the magnesite mineral. Our results suggest that robust M-estimation can provide efficient and stable estimates when analyzing geochemical data that may contain outliers. The application of the multivariate regression analysis has been confirmed to estimate LOI by using SiO2, MgO, CaO, and Fe2O3tot as a new approach. This additional field investigation has shown promising results. Also, we recommend that this study can be improved by using more data and considering different magnesite deposit types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No code or software has been developed for this research. The data using in the manuscript has been provided as supplementary material.

References

  • Aghion E, Golub G (2006) Production technologies of magnesium. In: Friedrich HE, Mordike BL (eds) Magnesium technology: metallurgy, design, applications. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 29–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aras Ç, Demirata Öztürk B, Sözgen Başkan K (2022) Enrichment of magnesite and usage to obtain magnesium fluoride. JOTCSA 9(2):621–630. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.1070017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azim Zadeh AM, Ebner F, Jiang SY (2015) Mineralogical, geochemical, fluid inclusion and isotope study of Hohentauern/sunk sparry magnesite deposit (eastern Alps/Austria): implications for a metasomatic genetic model. Mineral Petrol 109:555–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaton AE, Tukey JW (1974) The fitting of power series, meaning polynomials, illustrated on band-spectroscopic data. Technometrics 16(2):147–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1979) A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica: J Econometric Soc:1287–1294

  • Cook RD (1977) Detection of influential observation in linear regression. Technometrics 19(1):15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean WE (1974) Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: comparison with other methods. J Sediment Petrol 44:242–248

    Google Scholar 

  • del Valle-Zermeño R, Giro-Paloma J, Formosa J, Chimenos JM (2015) Low-grade magnesium oxide by-products for environmental solutions: characterization and geochemical performance. J Geochem Explor 152:134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2015.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du C (2005) A review of magnesium oxide in concrete. Concr Int 27:45–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Durbin J, Watson GS (1950) Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression: I. Biometrika 37(3/4):409–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdoğan N, Yıldız R (1995) Magnesite and basic refractory material technology, Lale Publication, Kütahya (in Turkish)

  • Eren Köroğlu H, Akıska E, Karakaş Z, Akıska S (2023) Formation and origin of magnesite veins in Yakacık area (NW-Ankara). Geol Bull Turk https://doi.org/10.25288/tjb.1242468

  • Fletcher WK (1983) Analytical methods in geochemical prospecting. In: Govett GJS (ed) Handbook of exploration geochemistry, 1st edn. Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam, p 255

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox J, Weisberg S (2019) An R companion to applied regression, Third. edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA. (https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdy MM (2007) Stable isotope and trace element characteristics of some serpentinite-hosted vein magnesite deposits from the Eastern Desert of Egypt: arguments for magmatism and metamorphism-related mineralising fluids. R.C. Ain Shams Univ Earth Sci Ser 21:29–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampel FR (1974) The influence curve and its role in robust estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 69(346):383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho K, Naugher J (2000) Outliers lie: an illustrative example of identifying outliers and applying robust models. Mult Linear Regression Viewpoints 26(2):2–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland PW, Welsch RE (1977) Robust regression using iteratively reweighted least-squares. Commun Stat Theory Methods 6(9):813–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber PH (1964) Robust estimation of a location parameter. Ann Math Stat 35(1):73–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadir S, Kolaylı H, Eren M (2013) Genesis of sedimentary- and vein-type magnesite deposits at Kop Mountain. NE Turkey, Turk J Earth Sci 22:98–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya M (1993) Magnesite and basic refractories technology. Anadolu University Publishing No: 450, Eskişehir (in Turkish)

  • Kepekli TA (2015) Formation mechanisms of Eskişehir – Erenköy region magnesites: a geochemical and petrographical investigation. Ph.D. Dissertation, İstanbul Technical University Graduate School, İstanbul/Türkiye

  • Kiesl W, Koeberl C, Körner W (1990) Geochemistry of magnesites and dolomites at the Oberdorf/laming (Austria) deposit and implications for their origin. Geol Rundsch 79:327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klute A (1986) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1: physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd edition, American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, USA

  • Kuşcu M, Cengiz O, Kahya A (2017) Trace element contents and C-O isotope geochemistry of the different originated magnesite deposits in Lake District (southwestern Anatolia). Turkey. Arab J Geosci 10:339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee G, Shin D, Lee S, Koh S-M, Lee BH, You B-W, Yoo BC (2021) Ore genesis and tectonic implication of the Daeheung-Ryongyang magnesite deposits in the east Jiao-Liao-Ji Belt. North Korea Lithos 106402:400–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein TK, Hardie LA, Timofeeff MN, Demicco RV (2003) Secular variation in seawater chemistry and the origin of calcium chloride basinal brines. Geol 31:857–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstern JB (2001) Carbon dioxide in magmas and implications for hydrothermal systems. Mineral Deposita 36:490–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maronna R, Martin R, Yohai V (2006) Robust statistics: theory and methods (Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd). https://doi.org/10.1002/0470010940

  • Mehta P (1977) Cement Standards-Evolution and Trends, ASTM STP663-EB. American Society for Testing and Materials; Philadelphia, PA, USA: History and status of performance tests for evaluation of soundness of cements

  • Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG (2021) Introduction to linear regression analysis, 6th Edition. John Wiley & Sons, USA

  • Négrel P, Ladenberger A, Reimann C, Birke M, Demetriades A, Sadeghi M, the GEMAS Project Team (2021) GEMAS: geochemical distribution of mg in agricultural soil of Europe. J Geochem Explor 221:106706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2020.106706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oskierski HC, Bailey JG, Kennedy EM, Jacobsen G, Ashley PM, Dlugogorski BZ (2013) Formation of weathering-derived magnesite deposits in the New England Orogen, New South Wales, Australia: Implications from mineralogy, geochemistry and genesis of the Attunga magnesite deposit. Miner Deposita 48(4):525–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-012-0440-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pluch H (2013) Geological characterization and genetic aspects of the Mafengzhen magnesite deposit (Haicheng, Liaoning Province, NE China). M.Sc. Thesis, University of Leoben, Austria

  • Pohl W (1990) Genesis of magnesite deposits – models and trends. Geol Rundsch 79(2):291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl W (2011) Economic geology: principles and practice: Wiley-Blackwell, p 678. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444394870

  • Pohl W, Siegl W (1986) Sediment-hosted magnesite deposits. In: Wolf KH (ed) Handbook of strata-bound and Stratiform ore deposits 14. Elsevier, pp 223–310

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2022) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Toros T (2019) Mineralogy, geochemistry and genesis of magnesite deposits of Gocekler Village (Mut-Mersin). M.Sc. Thesis. University of Mersin, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Mersin/Türkiye

  • Toulkeridis T, Peucker-Ehrenbrink B, Clauer N, Kröner A, Schidlowski M, Todt W (2010) Pb–Pb age, stable isotope and chemical composition of Archaean magnesite, Barberton Greenstone Belt, South Africa. J Geol Soc Lond 167:943–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Geological Survey (2012) Mineral commodity summaries – magnesium. USGS, Virginia, pp 96–99

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Geological Survey (2022) Mineral commodity summaries 2022: U.S. Geol Surv, 202 pp. https://doi.org/10.3133/mcs2022

  • Uslu İ (2007) Investigations of chromite and magnesite deposits – enrichments by using Landsat 7 ETM+ and Aster data in Mıhalıççık (Eskişehir). M.Sc. Thesis. Ankara University Institute of Science and Technology Geological Engineering, Ankara/Türkiye

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, Fourth edition. Springer, New York. ISBN 0–387–95457-0. https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/

  • Warren J (2000) Dolomite: occurrence, evolution and economically important associations. Earth Sci Rev 52:1–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan S, Yan Q, Shi X, Yuan L, Liu Y, Yang G, Ye X (2022) The dynamics of the Sorol trough magmatic system: insights from bulk-rock chemistry and mineral geochemistry of basaltic rocks. Geol J 10(57):4074–4089. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.4529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz A (2008) Investigation geology, geochemistry and origin of Margı-Taycılar-Sepetçi, Süleymaniye ve Tutluca (Eskişehir) magnesite occurrences. Ph.D. Dissertation. Süleyman Demirel University Graduate School of Applied and Natural Sciences, Isparta/Türkiye

  • Yılmaz A, Kuşcu M (2007) Geology and geochemistry of Süleymaniye (Mihallıcçık-Eskişehir) area magnesite. Geol Bull Turk 50(2):95–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan M, Tang M (1984) Study on the mechanism of autogenous expansion of concrete used in Baishan dam. J Nanjing Inst Chem Technol 2:15–18 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeileis A, Hothorn T (2002) Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. R News 2(3):7–10. https://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/Rnews/

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Editor-in-Chief, and the anonymous referees for their thorough reading of the former version of the paper. Their helpful comments and numerous suggestions led to a considerable improvement of the manuscript.

Funding

No funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Sinan Akıska: conceived the ideas and acquired data, provided basic geological-mineralogical knowledge, and wrote the manuscript. Elif Akıska: conceived the ideas and acquired data, provided basic geological-mineralogical knowledge, and wrote the manuscript. Yeşim Güney: developed the methodology and designed the robust multiple linear analyses, and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sinan Akıska.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Communicated by: H. Babaie

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(XLSX 20 kb)

ESM 2

(XLSX 10 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akıska, S., Akıska, E. & Güney, Y. Estimation of loss on ignition values of the magnesite minerals using robust multiple regression. Earth Sci Inform 16, 4243–4255 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01076-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01076-7

Keywords

Navigation