Skip to main content
Log in

Classroom norms of bullying and group school bullying: a mediated moderation model

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have primarily concentrated on the factors influencing bullying at the individual level; few studies have explored it at the collective level. To fill this research gap, this research explored the relationship between classroom norms of bullying and group school bullying, the moderating role of group identity, and the mediating role of collective moral disengagement and collective guilt at the class level. This is a cross-sectional study, a total of 1025 middle school students in 29 classes in China were surveyed in the fall semester of 2020 (Mage = 14.82 years; 49% female). The results confirmed that: (1) classroom norms of bullying were positively correlated with group school bullying; (2) group identity moderated the relationship between classroom norms of bullying and group school bullying; (3) this moderating effect is owing to the mediating effect of collective moral disengagement and collective guilt. Hence, the role of classroom norms, as well as students’ moral cognition and emotion, should be considered in the prevention and intervention of group school bullying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Authors can confirm that all relevant data are included in the article and/or its supplementary information files and data can be made available upon request from the authors.

References

  • Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and pro-social behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12(5), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1986, 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2017). Mechanisms of moral disengagement. Insurgent terrorism (pp. 85–115). Routledge.

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2017). Moral disengagement. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongiorno, R., McGarty, C., Kurz, T., Haslam, S. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2016). Mobilizing cause supporters through group-based interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(4), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branscombe, N. R., Slugoski, B., & Kappen, D. M. (2004). The measurement of collective guilt: What it is and what it is not. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives(pp. 16–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Brenick, A., & Romano, K. (2016). Perceived peer and parent out-group norms, cultural identity, and adolescents’ reasoning about peer intergroup exclusion. Child Development, 87(5), 1392–1408. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Zhao, Q., Dishion, T., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2018). The association between peer network centrality and aggression is moderated by moral disengagement. Aggressive Behavior, 44(6), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costabile, K. A., & Austin, A. B. (2018). A riot on campus: The effects of social identity complexity on emotions and reparative attitudes after ingroup-perpetrated violence. Aggressive Behavior, 44(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Bussey, K. (2014). Collective moral disengagement: Initial validation of a scale for adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(3), 386–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2013.851024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. E., Manstead, A. S., & Livingstone, A. (2011). Birds of a feather bully together: Group processes and children’s responses to bullying. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 853–873. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151008X390267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killer, B., Bussey, K., Hawes, D. J., & Hunt, C. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth. Aggressive Behavior, 45(4), 450–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laninga-Wijnen, L., Harakeh, Z., Dijkstra, J. K., Veenstra, R., & Vollebergh, W. (2018). Aggressive and prosocial peer norms: Change, stability, and associations with adolescent aggressive and prosocial behavior development. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(2), 178–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616665211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyla, B. R., Slugoski, B., & Kappen, M. D. (2004). The Measurement of Collective Quilt: What It Is and What It Is Not. Branscombe, RN, Doosje, B. Collective Guilt: International Perspectives

  • Olweus, D. (1996). The revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire for students. University of Bergen.

  • Perkins, H. W., Craig, D. W., & Perk]ins, J. M. (2011). Using social norms to reduce bullying: A research intervention among adolescents in five middle schools. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 703–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210398004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. (1991). Normative theory in intergroup relations: Explaining both harmony and conflict. Psychology and Developing Societies, 3, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/097133369100300102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renström, E. A., Bäck, H., & Knapton, H. M. (2018). Conforming to collective action: The impact of rejection, personality, and norms on participation in protest activity. Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.v13i4.26427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharvit, K., Brambilla, M., Babush, M., & Colucci, F. P. (2015). To feel or not to feel when my group harms others? The regulation of collective guilt as motivated reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1223–1235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215592843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H. (2022). The role of perceived bullying norms in friendship dynamics: An examination of friendship selection and influence on bullying and victimization. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(5), 432–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419868533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2012). On conviction’s collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02000.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., & Song, Y. R. (2021). The impact of school tight-loose culture on bullying in middle school: The mediating effect of collective moral disengagement and collective efficacy. Educational Research and Experiment, 40(1), 93–96. [In Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W. J., & Yang, C. L. (2019). Criminal incentives of group school bullying atmosphere and preventive measures. Journal of Guizhou Police College, 31(6), 70–78. [In Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, B. J., & Wen, Z. L. (2013). A discussion on testing methods for mediated moderation models: Discrimination and integration. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45(9), 1050–1060. [In Chinese].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R., & Zhang, F. F. (2015). The mechanism of group identity in collective action. Advances in Psychological Science, 23(9), 1637–1646. [In Chinese].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R., Zhang, F. F., Wang, Y. Y., & Xu, Z. H. (2017). Collective guilt: Definition, psychological mechanisms, action tendency, and interventions. Advances in Psychological Science, 25(6), 1058–1068. [In Chinese].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younan, B. (2019). How does guilt, influence, and attitudes effect the role we play in bullying? The self-perception measure. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 12(4), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-019-0246-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, X. R., Wang, Y., Ding, J. H., & Zhou, H. (2019). Classroom bullying norms and bullying behavior: The mediating role of fear induced by group identity and peer pressure. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(8), 935–944. [In Chinese].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W. X., Wu, J. F., & Kevin, J. (1999). Revision of chinese version of the Olweus child bullying questionnaire. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 15(2), 7–11. [In Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the students who participated in the survey, as well as the reviewers and editors who provided valuable suggestions during the revision stage.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Education Science Planning project “Mechanism and Intervention Countermeasures of bullying behavior in primary and secondary schools” (BHA190150), and the General scientific research project of Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education “The influence of classroom norms of bullying on group school bullying” (Y202148277).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yanling Chen and Siyao Wang performed the study and wrote the paper. Lan Jiao and Lin Zhang revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lan Jiao or Lin Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical Statement

The present study was approved by the Ningbo University Ethics Committee. Our survey’s introductory page stated explicitly that proceeding to the questionnaire would signify consent to participate.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Wang, S., Jiao, L. et al. Classroom norms of bullying and group school bullying: a mediated moderation model. Curr Psychol 43, 9899–9908 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05125-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05125-8

Keywords

Navigation