Abstract
A considerable amount of research was conducted to develop and validate instruments for measuring ethical behavior concerning using information and communication technologies (ICTs). However, there is a lack of measurement scales that measure the ICT unethical behavior among undergraduate students. Therefore, this study develops and validates a new research instrument called the ICT unethical behavior scale. This research examines the configural, metric, scalar, factorial, and error invariance across gender based on two surveys collected by 1827 (study 1) and 1821 (study 2) undergraduate students at six universities in Oman. The structural equation modeling (SEM) and the independent samples t-test were employed. The results indicate that the 18-item developed scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing ICT unethical behavior among undergraduate students. The scale depicts good configural, metric, and scalar invariances across gender groups. Although the practical strength of the gender difference is minor, female undergraduates reported significantly higher ethical behavior than males. The implications of the study posit a postmodern approach to scrutinizing gender differences in ICT unethical behavior. By substantiating the measurement invariance of an ICT unethical behavior across gender groups, the findings refute the conventional biased view that one gender is more or less ethical than the other.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be available upon request.
References
Abou Naaj, M., & Nachouki, M. (2021). Evaluating students’ Cyber Ethics Awareness in a gender-segregated Environment under the impact of COVID-19 pandemic. Tem Journal-Technology Education Management Informatics, 3, 1248–1256.
Abu-Hilal, M. M., Abdelfattah, F. A., Alshumrani, S. A., Abduljabbar, A. S., & Marsh, H. W. (2013). Construct validity of self-concept in TIMSS’s student background questionnaire: A test of separation and conflation of cognitive and affective dimensions of self-concept among saudi eighth graders. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(4), 1201–1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0162-1.
Akbulut, Y., Şendağ, S., Birinci, G., Kılıçer, K., Şahin, M. C., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2008a). Exploring the types and reasons of internet-triggered academic dishonesty among turkish undergraduate students: Development of internet-triggered academic dishonesty scale (ITADS). Computers & Education, 51(1), 463–473. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.003.
Akbulut, Y., Uysal, Ö., Odabasi, H. F., & Kuzu, A. (2008b). Influence of gender, program of study and PC experience on unethical computer using behaviors of turkish undergraduate students. Computers and Education, 51(2), 485–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.004.
Al-Rafee, S., & Cronan, T. P. (2006). Digital piracy: Factors that influence attitude toward behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(3), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-1902-9.
Andreana, M., & Putri, I. (2020). The effect of intellectual intelligence, emotional intelligence, spiritual intelligence and gender on ethical behavior. Accounting, 6(7), 1411–1418.
Arpaci, I. (2020). Gender differences in the relationship between problematic internet use and nomophobia. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01160-x.
Arpaci, I., & Aslan, O. (2023). Development of a scale to measure Cybercrime-Awareness on Social Media. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 63(3), 695–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2022.2101160.
Arpaci, I., & Sevinc, K. (2021). Development of the cybersecurity scale (CS-S): Evidence of validity and reliability. Information Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666921997512.
Bateman, C. R., & Valentine, S. R. (2010). Investigating the effects of gender on consumers’ moral philosophies and ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0386-4.
Bearden, S. M. (2016). Digital Citizenship: A Community-Based Approach. Corwin Press.
Borsa, J. C., Damásio, B. F., Bandeira, D. R., & Gremigni, P. (2013). The peer aggressive and reactive behavior questionnaire (PARB-Q): Measurement invariance across italian and brazilian children, gender and age. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 44(6), 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-013-0368-8.
Buelga, S., Postigo, J., Martínez-Ferrer, B., Cava, M. J., & Ortega-Barón, J. (2020). Cyberbullying among adolescents: Psychometric Properties of the CYB-AGS Cyber-Aggressor Scale. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3090), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093090.
Cardoso, J., Ramos, C., & Almeida, T. (2019). Portuguese version of the Cyber Pornography Use Inventory-9: Psychometric Properties and gender invariance. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 45(7), 594–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2019.1594477.
Carling, K. (2000). Resistant outlier rules and the non-gaussian case. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 33(3), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(99)00057-2.
Carlo, G., McGinley, M., Roesch, S. C., & Kaminski, J. W. (2008). Measurement invariance in a measure of prosocial moral reasoning to use with adolescents from the USA and Brazil. Journal of Moral Education, 37(4), 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240802399368.
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2007). Outlier detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 14, 1–83.
Chen, Y. J., & Tang, T. L. P. (2006). Attitude toward and propensity to engage in unethical behavior: Measurement invariance across major among University students. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9069-6.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
Chiang, E. P., & Assane, D. (2008). Music piracy among students on the University campus: Do males and females react differently? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(4), 1371–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.08.011.
Chiang, L., & Lee, B. (2011). Ethical attitude and behaviors regarding computer use. Ethics and Behavior, 21(6), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2011.622181.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. In NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Hilsdale. https://doi.org/10.1234/12345678.
Crown, D. F., & Spiller, M. S. (1998). Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: A review of empirical research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6), 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017903001888.
Dalton, D., & Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender differences in Ethics Research: The Importance of Controlling for the Social Desirability Response Bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0843-8.
Dimitrov, D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(2), 121–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175610373459.
Erreygers, S., Vandebosch, H., Vranjes, I., Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. (2018). Development of a measure of adolescents’ online prosocial behavior. Journal of Children and Media, 12(4), 448–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2018.1431558.
Ess, C. (2014). Digital Media Ethics (2nd ed.).). Malden: Polity Press.
Fernández-Prados, J. S., Lozano-Díaz, A., & Ainz-Galende, A. (2021). Measuring Digital Citizenship: A comparative analysis. Informatics, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8010018.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. In Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.1234/12345678.
Floridi, L. (2008). Foundations of information ethics. In The handbook of information and computer ethics.
Gillam, A. R., & Waite, A. M. (2021). Gender differences in predictors of technology threat avoidance. Information and Computer Security, 29(3), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-01-2020-0008.
Gilligan, C. (2003). In a different Voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.
Gómez-Rey, P., Barbera, E., Fernández-Navarro, F., Zhang, J., & Teixeira, A. M. (2021). Development and validation of a life skills evaluation tool for online learning based on the framework of the capability approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11423-021-10054-Z.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Hoaglin, D. C., Iglewicz, B., & Tukey, J. W. (1986). Performance of some resistant rules for outlier labeling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 991–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478363.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Huck, S. W. (2012). Reading Statistics and Research. Pearson Education, Inc.
Ives, B., & Giukin, L. (2020). Patterns and predictors of academic dishonesty in moldovan University students. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09347-z.
James, C., Davis, K., Flores, A., Francis, J., Pettingill, L., & Rundle, M. (2009). Young people, ethics, and the new digital media: A synthesis from the GoodPlay project.
Johnson, D. G. (2009). Computer Ethics (4th ed.).). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Khalil, O. E., & Seleim, A. A. (2012). s. Attitudes towards information ethics: A view from Egypt. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 10(4), 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/14779961211285872.
Khang, H., Ki, E. J., Park, I. K., & Baek, S. G. (2012). Exploring antecedents of attitude and intention toward internet piracy among college students in South Korea. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 1(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-012-0017-5.
Kim, H. S., Kim, J. M., & Lee, W. G. (2014). IE Behavior intent: A study on ICT Ethics of College students in Korea. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(2), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0100-2.
Kisamore, J. L., Stone, T. H., & Jawahar, I. M. (2007). Academic integrity: The relationship between individual and situational factors on misconduct contemplations. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9260-9.
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of Structutral equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
Kracher, B., & Marble, R. P. (2008). The significance of gender in predicting the cognitive moral development of business practitioners using the sociomoral reflection objective measure. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(4), 503–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9365-9.
Lau, W. W. F., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2013). Adolescents’ risky online behaviours: The influence of gender, religion, and parenting style. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2690–2696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.005.
Lau, W. W. F., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2014). Internet ethics of adolescents: Understanding demographic differences. Computers and Education, 72, 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.006.
Lee, B. H. (2018). Explaining Cyber Deviance among School-Aged youth. Child Indicators Research, 11(2), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9450-2.
Lee, B., Paek, S. Y., & Fenoff, R. (2018). Factors associated with digital piracy among early adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 86, 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.02.002.
Lei, P. W., & Wu, Q. (2007). Introduction to structural equation modeling: Issues and practical considerations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(3), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00099.x.
Lipschultz, J. H. (2017). Social media communication: Concepts, practices, data, law and ethics. Routledge.
Maner, W. (1996). Unique ethical problems in information technology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02583549.
Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 810–819. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.810.
Martin, J. L., Zamboanga, B. L., Haase, R. F., & Buckner, L. C. (2019). Measurement invariance of the protective behavioral strategies scale across racial groups. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 53(1), 17–33.
Meriac, J. P., Woehr, D. J., & Banister, C. (2010). Generational differences in work ethic: An examination of measurement equivalence across three cohorts. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9164-7.
Milenkova, V., & Lendzhova, V. (2021). Digital Citizenship and Digital literacy in the Conditions of Social Crisis. Computers, 10(4), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10040040.
Miller, M. J., Woehr, D. J., & Hudspeth, N. (2002). The meaning and measurement of work ethic: Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(3), 451–489. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1838.
Moor, J. H. (1985). What is Computer Ethics? Metaphilosophy, 16(4), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00173.x.
Moore, A. D. (2013). Information Ethics: Privacy, property, and power. Washington D.C.: University of Washington Press.
Morris, R. G., Johnson, M. C., & Higgins, G. E. (2009). The role of gender in predicting the willingness to engage in digital piracy among college students. Criminal Justice Studies, 22(4), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786010903358117.
Morton, N. A., & Koufteros, X. (2008). Intention to commit Online Music Piracy and its antecedents: An empirical investigation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510802154331.
Namlu, A. G., & Odabasi, H. F. (2007). Unethical computer using behavior scale: A study of reliability and validity on turkish university students. Computers and Education, 48(2), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.006.
Nguyen, N. T., Basuray, M. T., Smith, W. P., Kopka, D., & McCulloh, D. (2008). Moral issues and gender differences in ethical judgment using Reidenbach and Robin’s (1990) multidimensional ethics scale: Implications in teaching of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9357-9.
Quinn, M. J. (2015). Ethics for the information age (6th ed.).). New Jersey Pearson Education, Inc.
Rabi, S. M., Patton, L. R., Fjortoft, N., & Zgarrick, D. P. (2006). Characteristics, prevalence, attitudes, and perceptions of academic dishonesty among pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj700473.
Raju, N. S., Van Der Linden, W. J., & Fleer, P. F. (1995). An IRT-based internal measure of test bias with applications for differential item functioning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(4), 353–368.
Rauch, W. A., Schweizer, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2008). An IRT analysis of the personal optimism scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.1.49.
Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/bile-2015-0008.
Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. Praeger Press.
Sasson, H., & Mesch, G. (2016). Gender differences in the factors explaining Risky Behavior Online. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(5), 973–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0465-7.
Şendaǧ, S., Duran, M., & Fraser, M. (2012). Surveying the extent of involvement in online academic dishonesty (e-dishonesty) related practices among university students and the rationale students provide: One university’s experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.004.
Shahbaznezhad, H., Kolini, F., & Rashidirad, M. (2020). Employees’ behavior in phishing attacks: What Individual, Organizational, and Technological factors Matter? Journal of Computer Information Systems, 00(00), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2020.1812134.
Sliter, K. A., & Zickar, M. J. (2013). An IRT examination of the psychometric functioning of negatively worded personality items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413504584.
Stahl, B. C. (2010). Social Issues in Computer Ethics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics (pp. 101–115).
Stahl, B. C. (2021). From computer ethics and the ethics of AI towards an ethics of digital ecosystems. Information Tecnology and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00080-1.
Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/209528.
Sudbury-Riley, L., & Kohlbacher, F. (2016). Ethically minded consumer behavior: Scale review, development, and validation. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2697–2710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.005.
Susan, M. F., Tilley, E., & Pauknerová, D. (2014). Limited gender differences in ethical decision making between demographics in the USA and New Zealand. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 29(3), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-08-2012-0069.
Tanrikulu, I., & Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2021). Psychometric properties of a cyberbullying inventory for university students. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 49(3), 494–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2020.1775174.
Tavani, H. T. (2012). Computer Ethics as a field of Applied Ethics: Core questions and future directions. Journal of Information Ethics, 21(2), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.21.2.52.
Tjiptono, F., & Elfitasari, T. (2018). Consumer ethics among youths in Indonesia: Do gender and religiosity matter? Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 7(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-017-0081-y.
Tjiptono, F., Arli, D., & Winit, W. (2017). Gender and young consumer ethics: An examination in two southeast asian countries. Young Consumers, 18(1), 94–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-10-2016-00641.
Wang, L. C., & Calvano, L. (2015). Is Business Ethics Education Effective? An analysis of gender, personal ethical perspectives, and Moral Judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(4), 591–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1973-y.
Weems, G. H., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. T. (2006). The role of reading comprehension in responses to positively and negatively worded items on rating scales. Evaluation & Research in Education, 19(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790608668322.
Wilkinson, J. (2009). Staff and student perceptions of Plagiarism and Cheating. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 98–105.
Woehr, D. J., Arciniega, L. M., & Lim, D. H. (2007). Examining work ethic across populations: A comparison of the multidimensional work ethic profile across three diverse cultures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406292036.
Wools, S., Eggen, T. J. H. M., & Béguin, A. A. (2016). Constructing validity arguments for test combinations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 48, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STUEDUC.2015.11.001.
Yen, C. H., Tsaur, S. H., & Tsai, C. H. (2023). Service redundancy: Scale development and validation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 110, 103430. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHM.2023.103430.
Zainuddin, Z., & Attaran, M. (2016). Malaysian students’ perceptions of flipped classroom: A case study flipped classroom background of flipped learning in the University of Malaya. InnovatIons In EducatIon and TEachIng IntErnatIonal, 53(6), 660–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1102079.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Nuaimi, M.N., Al-Emran, M. Development and validation of ICT unethical behavior scale among undergraduate students. Curr Psychol 43, 8760–8776 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05038-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05038-6