Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Significance of Gender in Predicting the Cognitive Moral Development of Business Practitioners Using the Sociomoral Reflection Objective Measure

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study constitutes a contribution to the discussion about moral reasoning in business. Kohlberg’s (1971, in Cognitive Development and Epistemology (Academic Press, New York), 1976, in Moral Development and Behavior: Theory and Research and Social Issues (Holt, Rienhart and Winston, New York)) cognitive moral development (CMD) theory is one explanation of moral reasoning. One unresolved debate on the topic of CMD is the charge that Kohlbergian-type CMD theory is gender biased. This research puts forth the proposal that the issue may be elucidated by exposing an ambiguity in “gender” (Borna and White: 2003, Journal of Business Ethics 47, 89–99; Gentile: 1993, Psychological Science 4(2), 120–122; Unger: 1979, American Psychologist 34(11), 1085–1094). We use the Sociomoral Reflective Objective Measure (SROM) to measure CMD and the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI) to measure gender as a psychosocial concept, rather than as a biological classification. The results of our study indicate that high femininity, measured as a psychosocial attribute, is associated with significantly lower Kohlbergian-type CMD scores among business practitioners. Sex moderates the effect of gender on CMD, but only indirectly. Our research also reveals that education plays a significant moderating role in the relationship between gender and moral reasoning. In addition, age has a significant direct effect on CMD scores of business practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BSRI:

Bem’s Sex Role Inventory

SROM:

Sociomoral Reflection Objective Measure

CMD:

Cognitive Moral Development

MJI:

Moral Judgment Interview

MES:

Multidimensional Ethics Scale

DIT:

Defining Issues Test

PAQ:

Personal Attributes Questionnaire

References

  • Appleson, G. and P. Thomasch: 2004, “Martha Stewart Gets Five Months Jail”, Boston.com. July 16, 2004. Available on the World Wide Web at http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2004/07/16/Martha stewart gets 5 months in prison. Accessed May 4, 2005

  • Arbuthnot J. (1975) Level of Moral Judgment as a Function of Sex and Sex Role Identity. Journal of Social Psychology 97:297–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold H. J. (1982) Moderator Variables: A Classification of Conceptual, Analytic, and Psychometric Issues. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 29:143–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auster C. J., Ohm S. C. (2000) Masculinity and Femininity in Contemporary American Society: A Reevaluation Using the Bem Sex-role Inventory. Sex Roles 43(7/8):499–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck K., Heinrichs K., Minnameier G., Parche-Kawik K. (1999) Homogeneity of Moral Judgment? – Apprentices Solving Business Conflicts. Journal of Moral Education 28(4):429–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem S. L. (1974) The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42(2):155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem S. L. (1981) Bem Sex-role Inventory: Sampler Set Manual, Test Booklet (short and original), Scoring Key (short and original). Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., Redwood City, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigel K. S. (2002) The Impact of a Business Ethics Course on the Moral Development of Undergraduate and Graduate Business Students. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal 44(2):125–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Borna S., White G. (2003) ”Sex” and “Gender”: Two Confused and Confusing Concepts in the “Women in Corporate Management” Literature. Journal of Business Ethics 47:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis R. E., Stubbs E. C., Taylor S. N. (2002) Learning Cognitive and Emotional Intelligence Competencies through Graduate Management Education. Academy of Management Learning and Education 1(2):150–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess Z., Tharenou P. (2002) Women Board Directors: Characteristics of the Few. Journal of Business Ethics 37:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bussey K., Maughan B. (1982) Gender Differences in Moral Reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42(4): 701–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow N. (1978) The Reproduction of Mothering. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie P. M. J., Kwon I. W., Stoeberl P. A., Baumhart R. (2003) A Cross-cultural Comparison of Ethical Attitudes of Business Managers: India, Korea, and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 46:263–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer P., Westergren H. (1999) Gender Identity: Affected by Social Change? Journal of Personality Assessment 73(1):19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow S. M., Fok L. Y., Hartman S. J., Payne D. M. (1991) Gender and Values: What is the Impact on Decision Making? Sex Roles 25(3/4):255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, L. M.: 1995, ‚Women and Men, Morality and Ethics’, Business Horizon July/August, 61–68

  • Deaux K. (1993) Commentary: Sorry, Wrong Number – A Reply to Gentile’s Call. Psychological Science 4(2):125–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derry R. (1989) An Empirical Study of Moral Reasoning Among Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 8:855–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elm D. R., Kennedy E. J., Lawton L. (2001) Determinants of Moral Reasoning: Sex Role Orientation, Gender and Academic Factors. Business & Society 40(3):241–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elm D. R., Nichols M. L. (1993) An Investigation of the Moral Reasoning of Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 12:817–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elm D. R., Weber J. (1994) Measuring Moral Judgment: The Moral Judgment Interview or the Defining Issues Test? Journal of Business Ethics 13:341–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “Enron’s Lay Indicted”: July 7, 2004, CNNMoney, retrieved January 6, 2006 from http://www.money. cnn.com/2004/07/07/news/newsmakers/lay/?cnn=yes

  • Everett L., Thorne D., Danehower C. (1996) Cognitive Moral Development and Attitudes toward Women Executives. Journal of Business Ethics 15:1227–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “Ex-Tyco Executives Get Up to 25 Years in Prison”: September 20, 2005, MSNBC.com, retrieved January 8, 2006 from http://www.msnbc.com/id/9399803

  • Eynon G., Hill N. T., Stevens K. T. (1997) Factors that Influence the Moral Reasoning Abilities of Accountants: Implications for Universities and the Profession. Journal of Business Ethics 16:1297–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell O. C., Skinner S. J. (1998) Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations. Journal of Marketing Research 25:103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford R. C., Richardson W. D. (1994) Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Journal of Business Ethics 13:205–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte A. (2004) Antecedents of Managers Moral Reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics 51:315–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraedrich J., Thorne D. M., Ferrell O. C. (1994) Assessing the Application of Cognitive Moral Development Theory to Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 13:829–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche D. J. (2000) Ethical Climates and the Ethical Dimension of Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 24:125–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garmon L. C., Basinger K. S., Gregg V. R., Gibbs J. C. (1996) Gender Differences in Stage and Expression of Moral Judgment. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 42(3):418–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile D. (1993) Just What are Sex and Gender, Anyway? A Call for a New Terminological Standard. Psychological Science 4(2):120–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gianakos I. (2002) Predictors of Coping with Work Stress: The Influences of Sex, Gender Role, Social Desirability, and Locus of Control. Sex Roles 46(5/6):149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs J. C. (2003) Moral Development and Reality: Beyond the Theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs J. C., Arnold K. D., Morgan R. L., Schwartz E. S., Gavaghan M. P., Tappan M. B. (1984) Construction and Validation of a Multiple-choice Measure of Moral Reasoning. Child Development 55: 527–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs J. C., Basinger K. S., Fuller D. (1992) Moral Maturity: Measuring the Development of Sociomoral Reflection. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs J. C., Widaman K. F., Colby A. (1982) Construction and Validation of a Simplified, Group-administerable Equivalent to the Moral Judgment Interview. Child Development 53:895–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C. (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover S. H., Bumpus M. A., Logan J. E., Ciesla J. R. (1997) Re-examining the Influence of Individual Values on Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 16:1319–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goolsby J. R., Hunt S. D. (1992) A Cognitive Moral Development and Marketing. Journal of Marketing 56:55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haan N., Langer J., Kohlberg L. (1976) Family Patters of Moral Reasoning. Child Development 47:1204–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson K. (2005) Making Those Choices About Right and Wrong. U.S. News & World Report 138(7):60–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstein C. B. (1976) Irreversible, Stepwise Sequence in the Development of Moral Judgment: A Longitudinal Study of Males and Females. Child Development 47:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt C. L., Ellis J. B. (1998) Assessing the Current Validity of the Bem Sex-role Inventory. Sex Roles 39(11/12):929–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. M. (1991) Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-contingent Model. Academy of Management Review 16(2):366–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidder D. L. (2002) The Influence of Gender on the Performance of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Management 28(5):629–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. (1969) Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive Development Approach to Socialization. In: Goslin D. A. (ed), Handbook of Socialization Theory. Rand McNally, Chicago, pp 347–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. (1971) From Is to Ought: How to Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy and Get Away with it in the Study of Moral Development. In: Mischel T. (ed), Cognitive Development and Epistemology. Academic Press, New York, pp 151–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. (1976) Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-development Approach. In: Lickona T. (ed), Moral Development and Behavior: Theory and Research and Social Issues. Holt, Rienhart and Winston, New York, pp 31–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. (1984) Essays on Moral Development: Volume II. The Psychology of Moral Development. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L, Boyd D., Levine C. (1990) The Return of Stage 6: Its Principle and Moral Point of View. In: Wren T. (ed), The Moral Domain: In the Ongoing Discussion Between Philosophy and the Social Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 151–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Korabik K. (1999) Sex and Gender in the New Millennium. In: Powell G. N. (ed) Handbook of Gender & Work. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kracher B., Chatterjee A., Lundquist A. R. (2002) Factors Related to the Cognitive Moral Development of Business Students and Business Professionals in India and the United States: Nationality, Education, Sex and Gender. Journal of Business Ethics 35:255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs D. L., Denton K., Wark G., Couch R., Racine T., Krebs D. L. (2002) Interpersonal Moral Conflicts Between Couples: Effects of Type of Dilemma, Role, and Partner’s Judgments on Level of Moral Reasoning and Probability of Resolution. Journal of Adult Development 9(4):307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacayo R., Ripley A. (2002) The Whistleblowers. Persons of the Year, Times Magazine 160(27):30–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton P. D. (1985) Individual Differences in Moral Development: The Relation of Sex, Gender, and Personality to Morality. Journal of Personality 53:306–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loe T. W., Weeks W. A. (2000) An Experimental Investigation of Efforts to Improve Sales Students’ Moral Reasoning. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 20(4):243–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Marnburg E. (2003) Educational Impacts on Academic Business Practitioner’s Moral Reasoning and Behaviour: Effects of Short Courses in Ethics or Philosophy. Business Ethics: A European Review 12(4):403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris J. J., Sherman J. D., Mansfield E. R. (1986) Failures to Detect Moderating Effects With Ordinary Least Squares-moderated Multiple Regression: Some Reasons and a Remedy. Psychological Bulletin 99(2):282–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D., M. Bebeau, S. Thoma and M. Pritchard: 1997, A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach to Moral Judgment, a symposium presented at the Association of Moral Education Annual Conference in Atlanta, GA, November, 22

  • Nunnally J. C. (1978) Psychometric Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald P. A. (2004) An Examination of the Current Usefulness of the Bem Sex-role Inventory. Psychological Reports 94:1331–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parikh B. (1980) Development of Moral Judgment and Its Relation to Family Environmental Factors in Indian and American Families. Child Development 51:1030–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson D., Rhoads A., Vaught B. C. (2001) Ethical Beliefs of Business Professionals: A Study of Gender, Age and External Factors. Journal of Business Ethics 31:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell G. N., Butterfield D. A. (1981) A Note on Sex-role Identity Effects on Managerial Aspirations. Journal of Occupational Psychology 54:299–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell G. N., Butterfield D. A. (1989) The “Good Manager”: Did Androgyny Fare Better in the 1980s? Group & Organization Studies 14(2):216–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell G. N., Butterfield D. A., Parent J. D. (2002) Gender and Managerial Stereotypes: Have the Times Changed? Journal of Management 28(2):177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryzgoda J., Chrisler J. C. (2000) Definitions of Gender and Sex: The Subtleties of Meaning. Sex Roles 43(7/8):553–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radtke R. R. (2000) The Effects of Gender and Setting on Accountants’ Ethically Sensitive Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics 24:299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach R. E., Robin D. P. (1990) Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 9:639–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. R. (1975) Longitudinal Study of the Defining Issues Test of Moral Judgment: A Strategy for Analyzing Developmental Change. Developmental Psychology 11:738–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. R. (1986) Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. Praeger Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. R. (1994) Background: Theory and Research. In: Rest J. R., Narvaez D. (eds), Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest J., Narváez D., Bebeau M. J., Thoma S. J. (1999) Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin D. P., Babin L. (1997) Making Sense of the Research on Gender and Ethics in Business: A Critical Analysis and Extension. Business Ethics Quarterly 7(4):61–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin D. P., Gordon G., Jordan C., Reidenbach R. E. (1996) The Empirical Performance of Cognitive Moral Development in Predicting Behavioral Intent. Business Ethics Quarterly 6(4):493–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosener, J. B.: 1990, ‹Ways Women Lead’, Harvard Business Review November–December, 119–125

  • Roxas M. L., Stoneback J. Y. (2004) The Importance of Gender Across Cultures in Ethical Decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics 50:149–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt B., Millard R. T. (1988) Construct Validity of the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI): Does the SBRI Distinguish Between Gender-schematic and Gender-aschematic Individuals? Sex Roles 19(9/10):581–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S., Durand R. M., Gur-arie O. (1981) Identification and Analysis of Moderator Variables. Journal of Marketing Research 71(2):291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikula Sr. A., Costa A. D. (1994) Are Women More Ethical than Men?. Journal of Business Ethics 13:859–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P. L., Oakley E. F. III (1997) Gender-related Differences in Ethical and Social Values of Business Students: Implications for Management. Journal of Business Ethics 16:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snarey J. (1985) The Cross-cultural Universality of Social-moral Development. Psychological Bulletin 97(2):202–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence J. T., Helmreich R. L. (1978) Masculinity and Femininity: Their Psychological Dimensions, Correlates, and Antecedents. University of Texas Press, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • “Status of High-Profile Corporate Scandals”: December 28, 2005, HoustonChronicle.com, retrieved January 8, 2006 from http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/business/3552612.html

  • Street M. D. (1995) Cognitive Moral Development and Organizational Commitment: Two Potential Predicators of Whistle-blowing. Journal of Applied Business Research 11(4):104–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Street S., Kimmel E. B., Kromrey J. D. (1995) Revisiting University Student Gender Role Perceptions. Sex Roles 33(3/4): 183–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoma S. J. (1986) Estimating Gender Differences in the Comprehension and Preference of Moral Issues. Developmental Review 6:165–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K. (1986) Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review 11(3):601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K. (1992) Moral Reasoning and Business Ethics: Implications for Research, Education and Management. Journal of Business Ethics 11:445–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K., McCabe D. (1994) Meta-learning About Business Ethics: Building Honorable Business School Communities. Journal of Business Ethics 13:405–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K., Youngblood S. A. (1990) Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-making Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 75(4):378–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger R. K. (1979) Toward a Redefinition of Sex and Gender. American Psychologist 34(11):1085–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger R. K., Crawford M. (1993) The Troubled Relationship Between Terms and Concepts. Psychological Science 4(2):122–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker L. J. (1984) Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning: A Critical Review. Child Development 55:677–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker L. J. (2004) Progress and Prospects in the Psychology of Moral Development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 50(4):546–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber J. (1990) Managers’ Moral Reasoning: Assessing Their Responses to Three Moral Dilemmas. Human Relations 43(7): 687–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber J. (1991) Adapting Kohlberg to Enhance the Assessment of Managers’ Moral Reasoning. Business Ethics Quarterly 1(3): 293–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber J. (1996) Welcoming Another CMD Instrument – The MES: But Don’t Throw Out the MJI or DIT Just Yet! Business Ethics Quarterly 6(4):517–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber J., Gillespie J. (1998) Differences in Ethical Beliefs, Intentions, and Behaviors: The Role of Beliefs and Intentions in Ethical Research Revisited. Business & Society 34(4):447–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber J., Wasieleski D. (2001) Investigating Influences on Managers’ Moral Reasoning: The Impact of Context and Personal and Organizational Factors. Business & Society 40(1):79–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams J. E., Best B. (1994) Cross-cultural Views of Women and Men. In: Lonner W. J., Malpass R. (eds), Psychology and Culture. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA, pp 191–196

    Google Scholar 

  • “WorldCom ex-CFO Surrenders”: August 2, 2002, CNNMoney, retrieved May 4, 2005 from http://www.money.cnn.com/2002/08/01/news/worldcom

  • Zigmund W. G. (1991) Exploring Marketing Research, Fourth Edition. Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Creighton University, Omaha, NE, 68178, U.S.A.

    Beverly Kracher & Robert P. Marble

Authors
  1. Beverly Kracher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert P. Marble
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beverly Kracher.

Additional information

Beverly Kracher is an Associate Professor of Business Ethics & Society in the College of Business Administration at Creighton University. Her research areas include moral reasoning in business, e-commerece ethics & online trust, business ethics pedagogy, and business & the environment. Her research appears in Journal of Business Ethics, Business Ethics Quarterly, Business & Society, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Teaching Business Ethics, Interdisciplinary Environmental Review and more.

Robert P. Marble is an Associate Professor of Decision Sciences in the College of Business Administration at Creighton University. His research is in the areas of information systems implementation, artificial intelligence, and statistical modeling of business processes. He has published in such journals as the European Journal of Information Systems and Information & Management.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kracher, B., Marble, R.P. The Significance of Gender in Predicting the Cognitive Moral Development of Business Practitioners Using the Sociomoral Reflection Objective Measure. J Bus Ethics 78, 503–526 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9365-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9365-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation