Skip to main content
Log in

The Peer Aggressive and Reactive Behavior Questionnaire (Parb-Q): Measurement Invariance Across Italian and Brazilian Children, Gender and Age

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Child Psychiatry & Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines measurement invariance, reliability and scores differences of the Peer Aggressive and Reactive Behaviors Questionnaire (PARB-Q) across Italian and Brazilian children, gender and age. Participants were 587 Italian and 727 Brazilian children, aged 7–13 years from 12 elementary schools. The PARB-Q is a brief self-report instrument composed by two scales that assess aggressive behavior and reactions to peer aggression. Multigroup confirmatory factor analyses indicated full measurement invariance of the PARB-Q across groups based on country, gender and age, providing support for the unidimensionality of the first scale (direct peer aggression, PA) and a 3-factor model of the second scale (reactive aggression, RA; seeking teacher support, STS; internalizing reaction, IR). Reliability indices were good for all factors. Italian children reported a higher frequency of PA and a lower frequency of IR than the Brazilian children. Boys scored higher than girls on PA and RA, while girls scored higher than boys on STS and IR. Younger children reported a lower frequency of PA and a higher frequency of STS than older children. Results provide support for structure validity and reliability of the PARB-Q in two countries and information on differences related to gender, age and culture in peer relationships in elementary school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nansel TR, Craig W, Overpeck MD, Saluja G, Ruan WJ, The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Bullying Analyses Working Group (2004) Cross-national consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment. Arch Pediat Adol Med 158:730–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Black S, Weinles D, Washington E (2010) Victim strategies to stop bullying. Youth Violence Juv Justice 8:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Currie C, Roberts C, Morgan A, Smith R, Settertobulte W, Samdal O et al. (2004) Young people’s health in context. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2001/2002 survey. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen

  4. Taverna L, Bornstein MH, Putnick DL, Axia G (2011) Adaptive behaviors in young children: a unique cultural comparison in Italy. J Cross Cult Psychol 42:445–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu AD, Li Z, Zumbo BD (2007) Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: a demonstration with TIMSS data. PARE 12: retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v12n3.pdf

  6. Bollen KA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coie JD, Dodge KA (1998) Aggression and antisocial behavior. In: Damon W, Eisenberg N (eds) Handbook of child psychology: social, emotional, and personality development. Wiley, Toronto, pp 779–862

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baron RA, Richardson DR (2004) Human aggression, 2nd edn. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas DE, Bierman KL, The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (2006) The impact of classroom aggression on the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. Dev Psychopathol 18:471–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Connor DF (2004) Aggression and antisocial behavior in children and adolescent: rearearch and treatment. Guilfor, New York, p 10

    Google Scholar 

  11. Björkqvist K (2001) Different names, same issue. Social Dev 10:272–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Björkqvist K, Österman K, Kaukiainen A (1992) The development of direct and indirect aggressive strategies in males and females. In: Björkqvist K, Niemelä P (eds) Of mice and women. Aspects of female aggression. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 51–64

    Google Scholar 

  13. Archer J, Côté S (2005) Sex differences in aggressive behavior: a developmental and evolutionary perspective. In: Tremblay R, Hartup WW, Archer J (eds) Developmental origins of aggression. Guilford, New York, pp 425–443

    Google Scholar 

  14. LaFontana K, Cillessen A (2002) Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment. Dev Psychol 38:635–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Graham S, Juvonen J (2002) Ethnicity, peer harassment, and adjustment in middle school: an exploratory study. J Early Adolesc 22:173–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee BR, Thompson R (2009) Examining externalizing behavior trajectories of youth in group homes: Is there evidence for peer contagion? J Abnorm Child Psychol 37:31–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bagwell CL, Coie JD, Terry RA, Lochman JE (2000) Peer clique participation and social status in preadolescence. Merrill Palmer Q 46:280–305

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barke ED, Vitaro F, Lacourse E, Fontaine NMG, Carbonneau R, Tremblay RE (2010) Testing the developmental distinctiveness of male proactive and reactive aggression with a nested longitudinal experimental intervention. Aggress Behav 36:127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Emond A, Ormel J, Veenstra R, Oldehinkel AJ (2007) Preschool behavioral and social-cognitive problems as predictors of (pre)adolescent disruptive behavior. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 38:221–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Farrell AD, Sullivan TN, Esposito LE, Meyer AL, Valois RF (2005) A latent growth curve analysis of the structure of aggression, drug use, and delinquent behaviors and their interrelations over time in urban and rural adolescents. J Res Adolesc 15:179–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pepler DJ, Craig WM (2005) Aggressive girls on troubled trajectories: a developmental perspective. In: Pepler DJ, Madsen KC, Webster C, Levene KS (eds) The development and treatment of girlhood aggression. Lawrence Earlbaum, Mahwah, pp 3–28

    Google Scholar 

  22. Arseneault L, Bowes L, Shakoor S (2010) Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: ‘much ado about nothing’? Psychol Med 40:717–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hanish LD, Guerra NG (2002) A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization. Dev Psychopathol 14:69–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kochenderfer BJ, Ladd GW (1996) Peer victimization: cause or consequences of school maladjustment? Child Dev 67:1305–1317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kochenderfer BJ, Ladd GW (1997) Victimized children’s responses to peers’ aggression: behaviors associated with reduced versus continued victimization. Dev Psychopathol 9:59–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ladd GW, Kochenderfer-Ladd B (2002) Identifying victims of peer aggression from early to middle childhood: analysis of cross-informant data for concordance, estimation of relational adjustment, prevalence of victimization, and characteristics of identified victims. Psychol Assess 14:74–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fields L, Prinz RJ (1997) Coping and adjustment during childhood and adolescence. Clin Psychol Rev 17:937–976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Losoya S, Eisenberg N, Fabes RA (1998) Developmental issues in the study of coping. Int J Behav Dev 22:287–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tapper K, Boulton MJ (2005) Victim and peer group responses to different forms of aggression among primary school children. Aggress Behav 31:238–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dirks MA, Treat TA, Weersing VR (2011) The latent structure of youth responses to peer provocation. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 33:58–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dirks MA, Treat TA, Weersing VR (2007) The situation specificity of youth responses to peer provocation. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 36:621–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ostrov JM, Pilat MM, Crick NR (2006) Assertion strategies and aggression during early childhood: a short-term longitudinal study. Early Child Res Q 21:403–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Causey DL, Dubow EF (1992) Development of a self-report coping measure for elementary school children. J Clin Child Psychol 21:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hubbard JA, Dodge KA, Cillessen AHN, Coie JD, Schwartz D (2001) The dyadic nature of social information processing in boys’ reactive and proactive aggression. J Pers Soc Psychol 80:268–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hubbard JA, Smithmyer CM, Ramsden SR, Parker EH, Flanagan KD, Dearing KF et al (2002) Observational, physiological, and self-report measures of children’s anger: relations to reactive versus proactive aggression. Child Dev 73:1101–1118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Poulin F, Boivin M (2000) Proactive and reactive aggression: evidence of a two-factor model. Psychol Assess 12:115–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Poulin F, Boivin M (2000) The role of proactive and reactive aggression in the formation and development of friendships in boys. Dev Psychol 36:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schwartz D, Dodge KA, Coie JD, Hubbard JA, Cillessen AH, Lemerise EA et al (1998) Social cognitive and behavioral correlates of aggression and victimization in boys’ play groups. J Abnorm Child Psychol 26:431–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Raine A, Dodge K, Loeber R, Gatzke-Kopp L, Lynam D, Reynolds C et al (2006) The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggress Behav 32:159–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Davidson LM, Demaray MK (2007) Social support as a moderator between victimization and internalizing–externalizing distress from bullying. School Psychol Rev 36:383–405

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schmidt ME, Bagwell CL (2007) The protective role of friendships in overtly and relationally victimized boys and girls. Merrill Palmer Q 53:439–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Visconti KJ, Troop-Gordon W (2010) Prospective relations between children’s responses to peer victimization and their socioemotional adjustment. J Appl Dev Psychol 31:261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Eisenberg N, Shepard SA, Fabes RA, Murphy BC, Guthrie IK (1998) Shyness and children’s emotionality, regulation, and coping: contemporaneous, longitudinal, and across context relations. Child Dev 69:767–790

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Eisenberg N, Cumberland A, Spinrad TL, Fabes RA, Shepard SA, Reiser M et al (2001) The relations of regulation and emotionality to children’s externalizing and internalizing problem behavior. Child Dev 72:1112–1134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Card NA, Little TD (2006) Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. Int J Behav Dev 30:466–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Xu Y, Zhang Z (2008) Distinguishing proactive and reactive aggression in Chinese children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 36:539–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Fonzi A, Genta ML, Menesini E, Bacchini D, Bonino S, Costabile A (1999) The Latin countries: Italy. In: Catalano R, Junger-Tas J, Morita Y, Olweus D, Slee P, Smith PK (eds) The nature of school bullying: a cross-national perspective. Routledge, London, pp 140–156

    Google Scholar 

  48. Genta ML, Menesini E, Fonzi A, Costabile A, Smith PK (1996) Bullies and victims in schools in central and southern Italy. Eur J Psychol Educ 11:97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Francisco MV, Libório RMC (2009) Um estudo sobre bullying entre escolares do ensino fundamental. Psicol Reflex Crit 22:200–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Borsa CJ, Nunes MLT (2011) Prevalência de problemas de comportamento em uma amostra de crianças em idade escolar da cidade de Porto Alegre. Aletheia 34:32–46

    Google Scholar 

  51. Oyserman D, Coon HM, Kemmelmeier M (2002) Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychol Bul 128:3–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Gonçalves LAO, Sposito MP (2002) Public initiatives of scholar violence reduction in Brazil. Cad Pesq 115:101–138

    Google Scholar 

  53. Frizzo MN, Bisol LW, Lara DR (2012) Bullying victimization is associated with dysfunctional emotional traits and affective temperaments J Affect Disord doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.046

  54. Lopes Neto AA, Saavedra LH (2003) Diga não para o Bullying. Abrapia, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  55. de Lima Braga L, Lisboa C (2010) Estratégias de coping para lidar com o processo de bullying: um estudo qualitativo. Inter-Am J Psychol 44:321–331

    Google Scholar 

  56. Borsa JC, Bandeira DR (2011) The use of psychological measures of child aggressive behavior: analysis of Brazilian scientific production. Aval Psi 12:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  57. Gremigni P, Damásio BF, Borsa JC (2013) Development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate overt aggression and reactions to peer aggression. Psicol Reflex Crit 26: in press

  58. French BF, Finch WH (2006) Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for the determination of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling 13:378–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Card NA, Stucky BD, Sawalani GM, Little TD (2008) Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Dev 79:1467–8624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kristensen SM, Smith PK (2003) The use of coping strategies by Danish children classed as bullies, victims, bully/victims, and not involved, in 82 responses to different (hypothetical) types of bullying. Scand J Psyc 44:479–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Smith P, Shu S, Madsen K (2001) Characteristics of victims of school bullying: developmental changes in coping strategies and skills. In: Juvonen J, Graham S (eds) Peer harassment in school: the plight of the vulnerable and victimized. Guilford, New York, pp 332–351

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hyde JS (2005) The gender similarities hypothesis. Am Psychol 60:581–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Zakriski AL, Wright JC, Underwood MK (2005) Gender similarities and differences in children’s social behavior: finding personality in contextualized patterns of adaptation. J Pers Soc Psychol 88:844–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Caprara GV, Pastorelli C, Barbaranelli C, Vallone R (1992) Indicatori della capacità di adattamento sociale in età evolutiva. Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze

    Google Scholar 

  65. McGinnis E, Goldstein AP (1997) Skillstreaming the elementary school child: new strategies and perspectives for teaching prosocial skills, 2nd edn. Research Press, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  66. Bentler PM, Wu E (2005) EQS 6.1 for windows user’s guide. Multivariate Software Inc, Encino

  67. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling 9:233–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Brown TA (2006) Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  69. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  70. Bryant FB, Smith BD (2001) Refining the architecture of aggression: a measurement model for the Buss-Perry aggression questionnaire. J Res Person 35:138–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Ang RP (2007) Factor structure of the 12-item aggression questionnaire: further evidence from Asian adolescent samples. J Adolesc 30:671–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Sangwon K, Seock-Ho K, Kamphaus RW (2010) Is aggression the same for boys and girls? assessing measurement invariance with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. School Psychol Q 25:45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Kistner J, Counts-Allan C, Dunkel S, Drew CH, David-Ferdon C, Lopez C (2010) Sex differences in relational and overt aggression in the late elementary school years. Aggress Behav 36:282–291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Lim SH, Ang RP (2009) Relationship between boys’ normative beliefs about aggression and their physical, verbal, and indirect aggressive behaviors. Adolesc 44:635–650

    Google Scholar 

  75. Archer J (2004) Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: a meta-analytic review. Rev Gen Psychol 8:291–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Archer J (2009) Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behav Brain Sci 32:249–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Malta DC, de Souza ER, da Silva MMA, Silva CDS, de Andreazzi MAR, Crespo C et al (2010) Vivência de violência entre escolares brasileiros: resultados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar. Cienc Saude Colet 15:3065–3076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Monks CP, Palermiti A, Ortega R, Costabile A (2011) A cross-national comparison of aggressors, victims and defenders in preschools in England, Spain and Italy. Span J Psychol 14:133–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Chen X, De Oliveira AM, Coco AL, Zappulla C, Kaspar V, Schneider B et al (2004) Loneliness and social adaptation in Brazilian, Canadian, Chinese and Italian children: a multi-national comparative study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 45:1373–1384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Preddy TM, Fite PJ (2012) The impact of aggression subtypes and friendship quality on child symptoms of depression. Child Indic Res. doi:10.1007/s12187-012-9143-9

  81. Craig W, Pepler D, Blais J (2007) Responding to bullying: what works? School Psychol 28:465–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Hunter SC, Boyle JM (2004) Appraisal and coping strategy use in victims of school bullying. Br J Educ Psychol 74:83–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Houbre B, Tarquinio C, Lanfranchi JB (2010) Expression of self-concept and adjustment against repeated aggressions: the case of a longitudinal study on school bullying. Eur J Psychol Educ 25:105–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Shelley D, Craig WM (2010) Attributions and coping styles in reducing victimization. Can J School Psychol 25:84–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Menesini E, Eslea M, Smith PK, Genta ML, Giannetti E, Fonzi A et al (1997) Cross-national comparison of children’s attitudes towards bully/victim problems in school. Aggress Behav 23:245–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Kochenderfer-Ladd B (2004) Peer victimization: the role of emotions in adaptive and maladaptive coping. Soc Dev 13:329–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Ruble DN, Martin CL (1998) Gender development. In: Damon W (ed) Handbook of child psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 933–1016

    Google Scholar 

  88. Larson RW (1999) The uses of loneliness in adolescence. In: Rotenberg KJ, Hymel S (eds) Loneliness in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 244–262

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  89. Nicole S, Caprara GV (2005) Assessing aggressive behavior in children. Eur J Psychol Assess 21:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Gremigni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borsa, J.C., Damásio, B.F., Bandeira, D.R. et al. The Peer Aggressive and Reactive Behavior Questionnaire (Parb-Q): Measurement Invariance Across Italian and Brazilian Children, Gender and Age. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 44, 766–776 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-013-0368-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-013-0368-8

Keywords

Navigation