Skip to main content
Log in

Perceived intergroup competition and adolescents’ behavioural intentions toward minorities: the role of threat, stereotypes and emotions

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to analyse the effect of perceived intergroup competition on majority adolescents’ behavioural intentions toward two relevant immigrant groups in the Spanish context, Ecuadorians and Moroccans. We proposed an integrative path model in which perceived intergroup competition led to perception of outgroup threat, which in turn affected warmth stereotypes (morality and sociability). Perceived warmth further fostered positive and negative emotions, which in turn predicted facilitative and harmful interpersonal behavioural tendencies. Following a between subject design, participants (N = 231, Mage = 15.39, SD = 1.09) evaluated Moroccans (n = 114) or Ecuadorians (n = 117) on the examined variables. Results indicate that Ecuadorians were perceived as more moral and sociable and elicited less negative emotions than Moroccans. The model had a good fit for both groups. Perceived intergroup competition predicted perceived outgroup threat which, in turn, fostered perceived morality and sociability. Only perceived morality predicted both positive and negative emotions, whereas sociability elicited only positive emotions. Finally, facilitation intentions were predicted by both positive and negative emotions, while harm intentions were triggered only by negative ones. Results highlight the distinctive role of morality for intergroup relations during adolescence and extend previous literature regarding perceived intergroup competition, stereotype content, emotions and perceived outgroup threat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Throughout the manuscript both terms, perceived intergroup competition and intergroup competition will be used interchangeably as referring to perceived intergroup competition construct.

  2. Mardia’s normalized coefficient revealed that our data presented multivariate kurtosis as for both groups and in all cases its value exceeded 5.00 (Bentler 2005). In this case, both robust CFI and Satorra–Bentler scaled χ2 statistic are preferred to ML estimates (Curran et al. 1996).

  3. The results of the CFA analysis for the two dimensional model of outgroup threat had a bad fit in both groups: ET, S-Bχ2(64, 115) = 207.71, p < .01, RCFI = .79, RMSEA = .14 (.12, .16), SRMR = .09; MT, SBχ2(64, 113) = 155.38, p < .01, RCFI = .87, RMSEA = .11 (.09, .13), SRMR = .08. Given the high correlation between realistic and symbolic threat (see Table 1), both observed variables were allowed to load on this latent factor in order to account for the shared variance.

  4. The LM test revealed that the equality constraint imposed for the path between intergroup competition and morality was significant (p < .05). This result indicates that this path parameter may have different magnitude for each sample. Thus, we performed a multiple sample analysis in which no equality constraints were imposed for this path. This model also generated good fit indices: S-Bχ2(54, 231) = 68.40, p > .05, RCFI = .97, RMSEA = .05 (.00, .08), SRMR = .08.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by FPU Program of Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (Grant number: FPU15/03555) and by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Grant number: PSI2011-22731).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreea A. Constantin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants (and their parents for minors) included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Constantin, A.A., Cuadrado, I. Perceived intergroup competition and adolescents’ behavioural intentions toward minorities: the role of threat, stereotypes and emotions. Curr Psychol 40, 3488–3498 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00297-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00297-8

Keywords

Navigation