Abstract
In this essay, the authors present data collected in mixed-method and multi-phased projects that reveal some troubling contradictions within the discipline of Sociology. From a range of respondents, students through college presidents, several themes emerge that may not bode well for Sociology if left unchecked. Most important are the conflicting demands to provide large General Education classes while maintaining a robust, rigorous curriculum for Sociology majors; to meet university standards for scholarly production while allowing for work that is not within the traditional definitions of research; and to increase interdisciplinary collaboration without diluting the discipline.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As part of the activities surrounding SDSU’s WASC review, in August of 2004, a survey was sent to all department chairs and school directors across the campus. The survey “....sought to gather general information on the level and variety of undergraduate RSCA that was taking place and to identify academic units that placed a high priority on these activities. The survey asked chairs to list their advanced RSCA courses, estimate the percent of their undergraduate majors who were required or voluntarily chose to complete a RSCA course, and to rate the value of offering RSCA in allowing undergraduate students to acquire the skills needed to succeed in graduate school or in a professional position. Chairs were also asked to report on the frequency of their undergraduates engaging in work leading to publications and conference presentations” (San Diego State University 2005, p. 27–28). The authors of the report (SDSU 2005, p. 29) conclude that the survey “...findings indicate that undergraduate students are engaged in RSCA activities to a great extent and that involvement in RSCA is highly valued by the faculty.”
References
American Sociological Association (ASA) (2004). Are Sociology departments downsizing? Data Brief (March). http://www.asanet.org/research/downsizing.html
American Sociological Association (ASA) (2007). Sociology and General Education. Report of the Task Force on General Education. ASA: Washington, DC.
Becker, H. S., & Geer, B. (1960). Participant observation: The analysis of qualitative field data. In R. N. Adams, & J. J. Preiss (Eds.) Human organization research (pp. 267–288). Homewood: Dorsey.
Berheide, C. W. (2005). Searching for structure: Creating coherence in the Sociology curriculum. Teaching Sociology, 33, 1–15.
Brint, S., Riddle, M., Turk-Bicakci, L., & Levy, C. S. (2005). From the Liberal to the Practical Arts in American colleges and universities: Organizational analysis and curricular Change. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 151–180.
Hohm, C. F. (2008). Sociology in the academy: How the discipline is viewed by Deans (Pacific Sociological Association 2007 Presidential Address) Sociological Perspectives, (in press)
San Diego State University (2005). Educational Effectiveness Report: Submitted to the Western Association of Schools and Colleges. (http://wasc.sdsu.edu/ed_effect/Ed_Effect_Report.pdf)
Turner, J. H. (2006). American Sociology in chaos: Differentiation without integration. The American Sociologist, 37(1), 15–29 Summer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The second author was at San Diego State from 1973 to 2004 and then left for California State University, Dominguez Hills to become the Founding Dean of the College of Natural and Behavioral Studies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sargent, P., Hohm, C.F. Sociology in the Academy: A Study in Contradictions?. Am Soc 39, 181–192 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-008-9038-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-008-9038-x