Abstract
The Coatomer protein complex subunit beta 2 (COPB2) is involved in the formation of the COPI coatomer protein complex and is responsible for the transport of vesicles between the Golgi apparatus and the endoplasmic reticulum. It plays an important role in maintaining the integrity of these cellular organelles, as well as in maintaining cell homeostasis. More importantly, COPB2 plays key roles in embryonic development and tumor progression. COPB2 is regarded as a vital oncogene in several cancer types and has been implicated in tumor cell proliferation, survival, invasion, and metastasis. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on the roles of COPB2 in cancer development and progression in the context of the hallmarks of cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cancer remains a huge global health problem. Based on data from the International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1,898,160 new cancer cases and 608,570 cancer deaths were reported worldwide in 2021 [1], and the global cancer burden is expected to reach 28.4 million cases by 2040 [2]. The situation in China is particularly severe, with both the number of new cases and deaths ranking first in the world, which highlights the need to develop therapy for all types of cancer [3].
Due to the variety of cancer research, we decide to discuss from a different perspective at the cellular level. In eukaryotic cells, a large number of proteins and lipids are transported through transport vesicles to various organelles and the cell surface, so they can perform their physiological functions. Despite their pathogenic properties, cancer cells have the same intracellular machinery as normal cells, at least for a certain period of time, which suggests the importance of coat proteins (COPs) in cancer cells, as well as in normal cells. COPs play an important role in vesicular transport, and they can be classified into three types: clathrin, COPI, and COPII [4]. COPI consists of seven subunits: α-COP, β-COP, β’-COP, γ-COP, δ-COP, ε-COP, and z-COP. It carries cargo molecules, such as proteins and lipids, from the Golgi to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mediates the reverse and forward transport of materials between the Golgi membrane and vesicles, thereby maintaining the polarity of the Golgi structure and the maturity of membrane vesicles [5,6,7,8].
Of the seven subunits that form COPI, COPB2 (also known as COPI coat complex subunit beta 2, β’-COP, P102 or coatomer protein complex subunit beta prime) [6], in particular, has been shown to have a high correlation with tumors. COPB2, which is located on chromosome 3q23, encodes a protein with 906 amino acids (102.5 kDa) [9, 10]. It is mainly distributed in the ER, the Golgi stack membrane, and COPI membrane vesicles, and it is involved in intracellular protein transport, ER-to-Golgi vesicle-mediated transport, regressed membrane vesicle-mediated transport, Golgi-to-ER transport, inner Golgi-to-ER vesicle-mediated transport, and so on [6, 7, 11].
As a coatomer protein, COPB2 plays a major role in embryonic development and tumor progression and is associated with multiple pathological processes. Current studies have demonstrated that COPB2 is a vital oncogene in many cancer types due to its ability to regulate the proliferation, survival, tumorigenesis, invasion, and metastasis of cancer cells. In this paper, we focus on the emerging roles of COPB2 in cancer development and progression in the context of the hallmarks of cancer. Through this comprehensive review, we discuss the accumulating evidence for the future clinical utilization of COPB2 as a therapeutic target and a biomarker. We also provide insights that can open new avenues for studying the role of COPB2 in cancer.
Functions associated with COPB2
Several studies have reported direct and indirect associations between COPB2 and cancer. COPB2 overexpression has been reported in various kinds of cancers (Table 1). Generally, the involvement of COPB2 in tumor progression has been found to be related to the regulation of upstream genes, such as the Sensitive to apoptosis gene (SAG or RNF7) [12] and Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) [13]; the activation of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) [14] and c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)/c-Jun signaling pathways [15]; and the targeting of microRNAs [16,17,18] (Fig. 1).
SAG is an oncoprotein that targets several tumor suppressors for degradation [19,20,21] and is positively correlated with COPB2 expression, which suggests the potential oncogenic effects of COPB2 [12]. Similarly, Pu et al. [13] reported that COPB2 can promote the proliferation of lung cancer cells by upregulating the expression of YAP1, another oncoprotein that contributes to tumorigenesis as a downstream effector in the tumor-suppressive Hippo pathway [22, 23].
Because COPB2 is overexpressed in several types of malignant tumors, COPB2 knockdown or silencing would help determine its role in cancer. An et al. [14] tried to determine the significance and function of COPB2 in gastric cancer using a COPB2 knockdown model, which revealed an association with the RTK signaling pathway and downstream signaling cascade molecules. RTKs are type I transmembrane proteins that can modulate fundamental cellular functions, including cell division, growth, metabolism, differentiation, migration, and survival by activating a wide range of downstream signaling cascades [24]. RTKs participation has also been reported in the development and progression of human cancer via gain-of-function mutations, genomic amplification, chromosomal rearrangements, and autocrine activation [25]. The knockdown of COPB2 in gastric cancer cell lines suppressed colony formation and promoted apoptosis via the inhibition of RTK signaling and downstream signaling cascade molecules, which suggests that COPB2 is a potential target for gene silencing for the treatment of gastric cancer [14]. The JNK/c-Jun signaling pathway was also activated by COPB2 silencing in colorectal cancer (CRC) [15]. JNK proteins are a subgroup of MAPK with conservative evolution in higher animals. They promote tumor cell apoptosis and inhibit tumor formation by promoting the transcription of apoptotic target genes and the expression of apoptotic proteins [26, 27]. Thus, COPB2 silencing inhibited CRC cell proliferation and induced apoptosis via the JNK/c-Jun signaling pathway.
As knowledge regarding the functions of exosomes grew, the understanding of their roles in cancer has likewise deepened. When investigating the function of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell (BMSC)-derived exosome miR-4461 in CRC, Chen et al. [16] found that COPB2 mRNA levels negatively correlated with the levels of miR-4461. Further studies revealed that the BMSC-derived exosome miR-4461 downregulated COPB2 and inhibited cell migration and invasion. Similar to the observations on miR-4461 in CRC, miR-335-3p and miR-216a-3p have been found to target the 3′UTR of COPB2, which led to the inhibition of COPB2 in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) [18] and lung cancer [17] cell lines, respectively.
COPB2 and cancer cells
Cancer is caused by genetic mutations in cancer cells [28]. Cancer progression is highly complex and is characterized by several hallmarks, including uncontrolled proliferation, insensitivity to growth-inhibitory (antigrowth) signals, evasion of apoptosis, limitless replicative potential, sustained angiogenesis, tissue invasion, and metastasis [29]. COPB2 involvement has been reported as an oncogene in some of these mechanisms, especially in proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, migration, cell cycle, and tumorigenesis. In the following sections, we describe the roles of COPB2 in each of these processes.
COPB2 and the proliferation of cancer cells
Telomeres become shorter with each round of cell division (mitosis) [30]. When the telomeres have been reduced to a certain length, cells can no longer maintain chromosomal stability and cellular activity, and they eventually die [31]. With the activation of telomerase, the length of the telomere is maintained, which promotes the immortalization of cells. Subsequently, the cells gain the ability to proliferate without limit and transform into cancer cells.
Two main types of genes regulate cell growth. Proto-oncogenes are involved in promoting cell growth and mitosis, whereas tumor-suppressive genes are responsible for inhibiting cell growth or regulating cell division. COPB2 is involved in tumorigenic processes as a proto-oncogene that has been implicated in the proliferation of cancer cells. Mi et al. [32] first demonstrated the effect of COPB2 on the proliferative ability of prostate cancer cell lines by showing that the downregulation of COPB2 inhibited cell proliferation. The research of Wang et al., Li et al., and Bhandari et al. [4, 33, 34] also showed similar involvement of COPB2 in colon cancer, cholangiocellular carcinoma, and breast cancer.
Other studies have indicated that COPB2 is involved in the proliferation of cancer cells by disrupting relevant signaling pathways. For instance, An et al. [14] showed that COPB2 was involved in the pro-proliferative effects of the RTK signaling pathway in gastric cancer. Similarly, Liu et al. [12] demonstrated that COPB2-related signaling was involved in the pro-proliferative effects of SAG in breast cancer.
The first human disease known to be associated with miRNA dysregulation was chronic lymphoblastic leukemia; a number of other miRNAs have since been associated with cancer [35, 36]. Chen et al. and Wang et al. [16, 17] demonstrated that the proliferation of CRC cells results from the interaction between miR-4461/miR-216a-3p and the proto-oncogene COPB2. In addition, the effects of COPB2 and miR-335-3p were observed in lung cancer, where miR-335-3p mimics significantly increased the proliferation of lung cancer cells following COPB2 knockdown [18]. Because malignant proliferation of cancer cells is the most important mechanism underlying tumor formation, controlling the proliferation of cancer cells by regulating COPB2 would be a major step in the treatment of cancer.
COPB2 and cancer cell apoptosis
There are two main types of cell death: necrosis and apoptosis. The main goal of traditional tumor therapy is to use cytotoxic drugs or radiation to cause necrosis. Apoptosis, or programmed death, is a gene-mediated process of suicide. Not only is it the opposite of cell proliferation and mitosis as in terms of function, but it is also a mechanism for removing excessively damaged and precancerous cells. Genes that have been associated with apoptosis include TP53 (encodes p53) [37], MYC (encodes c-Myc) [38], BCL2 (encodes B-cell lymphoma 2, Bcl-2) [39], COPB2, and others [32, 40,41,42,43]. Silencing COPB2 greatly affects the apoptotic ability of cancer cells. Mi et al. [44] suggested that COPB2-targeted siRNA (siCOBP2) promoted cancer cell apoptosis. Li et al. [33] have also shown that knocking down COPB2 promotes apoptosis in human RBE cholangiocellular carcinoma cells. Similarly, Wang et al.’s [15] study showed that knocking down COPB2 promoted apoptosis in human colon cancer cells.
COPB2 silencing also promotes the activation of the RTK [14] and JNK/c-Jun [15] signaling pathways in gastric cancer and CRC. COPB2 is also involved in cancer cell apoptosis by targeting downstream microRNAs. The rate of apoptosis in LUAD cell lines significantly increased after COPB2 knockdown via RNA silencing, and miR-335-3p [18] and miR-216a-3p [17] significantly increased the effects of siCOPB2. Understanding the relationship between COPB2 and cancer cell apoptosis provides new strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and highlights the potential of COPB2 as a new biomarker for the progression of cancer and monitoring treatment effects.
COPB2 and the invasion and migration of cancer cells
Invasion and migration of cancer cells result from the deterioration of tumor lesions and the accumulation of malignant properties, which are signs of late stages in the progression of malignant tumors [45]. During this process, malignant cells dissociate from the original tumor mass, reorganize their attachment to the tumor extracellular matrix (ECM) though alterations in cell–ECM adhesion dynamics, and start degrading the surrounding ECM to eventually invade through adjacent tissues and/or intravasate into blood vessels and travel through the circulation to distant sites in the body [46]. COPB2 also plays an important role in controlling the invasive ability of cancer cells. For instance, Bandari et al. [34] showed that downregulating COPB2 significantly inhibited the migratory and invasive capacities of breast cancer cells. Based on the study by Liu et al. [12], knocking down either SAG or COPB2 significantly inhibited breast cancer cell migration and invasion. The migratory and invasive capacities of CRC and lung cancer cells decreased upon treatment with siCOPB2 or with siCOPB2 plus miR-4461 [16] and miR-216a-3p [17] mimics, respectively.
COPB2 and the cancer cell cycle
The cell cycle is a series of physiological processes that lead to cell division [47]. Cell cycle regulation has two main mechanisms, namely, cell cycle-driven mechanisms and regulatory mechanisms. When the cell cycle regulatory mechanism is disrupted, normal cell growth becomes uncontrollable, and normal cells are transformed into tumor cells. The cell cycle is divided into four consecutive periods: G1, S, G2, and M [48, 49]. The G1 phase of the cell cycle is controlled by an event known as a restriction point; when the restriction point control becomes non-functional for any reason, uncontrolled proliferation occurs in cancerous cells [50]. Regulating gene expression to control the cell cycle is instructive and meaningful for the treatment of tumors. Mi et al. [32] have demonstrated that prostate cancer cell lines were arrested in the G1 phase after COPB2 knockdown, which, in turn, promoted tumorigenesis. Li et al. [33] found that downregulation of COPB2 arrested the cell cycle in the G1 phase in human cholangiocellular carcinoma cells. Furthermore, in a study by Wang et al. [4], silencing COPB2 induced G1 phase arrest and inhibited cell cycle progression in RKO CRC cells; in contrast, HCT116 human CRC cells were arrested at the S phase following COPB2 silencing.
COPB2 and tumorigenesis
COPB2 has been found to be upregulated in all kinds of cancer tissue. A study has demonstrated that COPB2 promoted tumorigenesis through the downregulation of YAP1 [33]. Additionally, knockdown of COPB2 significantly downregulated the expression (in varying degrees) of phosphorylated target factors in the RTK signaling pathway [14].
COPB2 protein interactions
The Golgi coatomer complex (MIM 601,924) constitutes the coat of non-clathrin coated vesicles and is essential for Golgi budding and vesicular trafficking. To predict the genes that interact with COPB2 and to better understand the biological role of COPB2, we used the STRING database to search for the functional partners of COPB2. The search yielded coatomer subunit beta (COPB), coatomer subunit epsilon (COPE), coatomer subunit delta (ARCN1), coatomer subunit gamma-1 (COPG1), coatomer subunit alpha (COPA), coatomer subunit gamma-2 (COPG2), coatomer subunit zeta-1 (COPZ1), coatomer subunit zeta-2 (COPZ2), cell division cycle 5-like protein (CDC5L), and protein SEC13 homolog (SEC13) (Fig. 2). Although the level of COPB2 in cancer tissues is lower than in normal tissues in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), kidney chromophobe (KICH), kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC), and acute myeloid leukemia (LAML), the level of COPB2 expression in most other cancer tissue types is higher than in normal tissues (Fig. 3), according to the GEPIA database.
Future perspectives
COPB2 and autophagy
Autophagy, which delivers cellular materials to lysosomes for degradation, leading to the basal turnover of cell components and providing energy and macromolecular precursors to cells, is another major mechanism in the progression of cancer [51]. Yamamoto et al. [52] pointed out that autophagy promoted immune evasion of pancreatic cancer by degrading the major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I). Furthermore, HPV16 drive cancer immune escape via NLRX1-mediated degradation of STING [53]. Thus, autophagy is an effective escape mechanism in cancer; in addition, it has already been implicated in the development of drug resistance in multiple cancer types [54, 55]. Evidence shows that autophagy caused by chemotherapeutics may boost the resistance of cancer cells to paclitaxel, tamoxifen, epirubicin, or trastuzumab [55]. However, the connection between COPB2 and autophagy has not yet been described. Therefore, we suggest that the regulatory role of COPB2 in autophagy should be considered in future studies.
COPB2 and other diseases
COPB2 is also involved in other diseases. Based on a genome-wide association study, COPB2 is a susceptibility gene for Kawasaki disease [56], and COPB2 homozygous mutations have been associated with microcephaly [57, 58]. COPB2 has also been identified as a vitamin D-regulated gene, along with other new candidate vitamin D response elements that have demonstrated importance for transcriptional regulation, immune function, stress response, and DNA repair [59]. Notably, knockdown of COPB2 is detrimental to parasitic infection, thereby inhibiting malaria [60]. Meanwhile, as one of the candidate genes for neuronal function and mu opioid receptor expression, as revealed by whole-genome expression profiling, COPB2 is implicated in modified neuronal development, central nervous system patterning processes, differentiation and dopaminergic neurotransmission, the serotonergic signaling pathway, and glutamatergic neurotransmission [61]. In addition to its benefits to human health, targeting COPB2 can be beneficial to certain aspects of breeding and animal husbandry. Knocking down COPB2 had been shown to destroy the integrity of the epithelial cell membrane and contribute to increased mortality of Tetranychus urticae [62], Aedes aegypti [63], Lepeophtheirus salmonis [64]. It has therefore been recognized as a target candidate for new pest control methods.
COPB2 and animal models
Based on the currently available literature, we found that studies on COPB2 were mostly limited to the cellular level. The only research we found in vivo was the one conducted by An et al. [14], which demonstrated the function of COPB2 silencing in the xenograft nude mouse model. They proposed that silencing COPB2 using the Lv‑shCOPB2 vector significantly inhibited the tumorigenicity of gastric cancer cells, and the total radiant efficiency of mice in the Lv‑shCOPB2‑infected group was markedly reduced compared with that in the Lv‑shCtrl‑infected group. To the best of our knowledge, more in vivo studies must be carried out before COPB2 targeting can be fully applied in the clinical stage. COPB2 has been implicated in different aspects of tumorigenesis in in vitro studies. It is therefore considered as a potential biomarker for cancer progression and cancer treatment. Hence, studies in animal models must be performed to support the use of COPB2 in cancer therapy, diagnosis and follow up.
COPB2 and new technologies
In recent years, researchers have devoted more energy to understanding the underlying mechanisms of cancer etiology to identify new drug targets. It has long been recognized that cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and genome changes play a crucial role in the occurrence of this disease. In the past few years, many new technologies have been used in cancer identification and treatment. For example, with the development of technologies such as single cell sequencing, microarray chips, and big data, other regulatory factors upstream of COPB2 can also be identified. Furthermore, single cell sequencing can accurately determine the number of gene copies in a single nucleus and can therefore be an accurate test to estimate COPB2 copy numbers to reduce false positive results and resolve issues on heterogeneity in future studies.
Conclusion
Here, we summarize the emerging roles of coatomer protein COPB2 in cancer development and progression in light of the hallmarks of cancer. COPB2 is viewed as a vital oncogene in many cancer types that regulates multiple biological behaviors of tumor cells, including proliferation, survival, tumorigenesis, invasion, and metastasis. However, current research on the role of COPB2 is still lacking, and many details will be worth exploring in the future.
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Global Cancer Statistics, et al. GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.
Sun D, Li H, Cao M, He S, Lei L, Peng J, et al. Cancer burden in China: trends, risk factors and prevention. Cancer Biol Med. 2020;17(4):879–95.
Wang Y, Chai Z, Wang M, Jin Y, Yang A, Li M. COPB2 suppresses cell proliferation and induces cell cycle arrest in human colon cancer by regulating cell cycle-related proteins. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15(1):777–84. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2019.4717.
Arakel EC, Schwappach B. Formation of COPI-coated vesicles at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.209890.
Béthune J, Wieland FT. Assembly of COPI and COPII vesicular coat proteins on membranes. Annu Rev Biophys. 2018;47:63–83. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-070317-033259.
Bykov YS, Schaffer M, Dodonova SO, Albert S, Plitzko JM, Baumeister W, et al. The structure of the COPI coat determined within the cell. Elife. 2017;6:e32493.
Adolf F, Rhiel M, Hessling B, Gao Q, Hellwig A, Béthune J, et al. Proteomic Profiling of Mammalian COPII and COPI Vesicles. Cell Rep. 2019;26(1):250–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.041.
De Baere E, Speleman F, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Messiaen L. Assignment of the cellular retinol-binding protein 1 gene (RBP1) and of the coatomer beta subunit gene (COPB2) to human chromosome band 3q23 by in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1998;82(3–4):226–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000015107.
Tarsounas M, Heng HH, Ye CJ, Pearlman RE, Moens PB. Identification of the mouse beta’-COP Golgi component as a spermatocyte autoantigen in scleroderma and mapping of its gene Copb2 to mouse chromosome 9. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1999;87(3–4):201–4. https://doi.org/10.1159/000015467.
Dodonova SO, Diestelkoetter-Bachert P, von Appen A, Hagen WJ, Beck R, Beck M, et al. Vesicular transport. A structure of the COPI coat and the role of coat proteins in membrane vesicle assembly. Science. 2015;349(6244):195–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab1121.
Liu A, Zhang S, Li W, Xu B, Lei R, Zhu S. SAG expression associates with COPB2-related signaling and a poorer prognosis in breast cancer. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(1):902–11.
Pu X, Wang J, Li W, Fan W, Wang L, Mao Y, et al. COPB2 promotes cell proliferation and tumorigenesis through up-regulating YAP1 expression in lung adenocarcinoma cells. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;103:373–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.04.006.
An C, Li H, Zhang X, Wang J, Qiang Y, Ye X, et al. Silencing of COPB2 inhibits the proliferation of gastric cancer cells and induces apoptosis via suppression of the RTK signaling pathway. Int J Oncol. 2019;54(4):1195–208.
Wang Y, Xie G, Li M, Du J, Wang M. COPB2 gene silencing inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation and induces apoptosis via the JNK/c-Jun signaling pathway. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(11):e0240106. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240106.
Chen HL, Li JJ, Jiang F, Shi WJ, Chang GY, Zhou Y, et al. MicroRNA-4461 derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell exosomes inhibits tumorigenesis by downregulating COPB2 expression in colorectal cancer. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2020;84(2):338–46. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2017.5506.
Wang X, Shi J, Niu Z, Wang J, Zhang W. MiR-216a-3p regulates the proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion of lung cancer cells via targeting COPB2. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2020;84(10):2014–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09168451.2020.1783197.
Pu X, Jiang H, Li W, Xu L, Wang L, Shu Y. Upregulation of the coatomer protein complex subunit beta 2 (COPB2) gene targets microRNA-335-3p in NCI-H1975 lung adenocarcinoma cells to promote cell proliferation and migration. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e918382. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.102663.
Duan H, Wang Y, Aviram M, Swaroop M, Loo JA, Bian J, et al. SAG, a novel zinc RING finger protein that protects cells from apoptosis induced by redox agents. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19(4):3145–55.
Sun Y. Alterations of SAG mRNA in human cancer cell lines: requirement for the RING finger domain for apoptosis protection. Carcinogenesis. 1999;20(10):1899–903. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/20.10.1899.
Sun Y, Li H. Functional characterization of SAG/RBX2/ROC2/RNF7, an antioxidant protein and an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Protein Cell. 2013;4(2):103–16.
Chen HY, Yu SL, Ho BC, Su KY, Hsu YC, Chang CS, et al. R331W missense mutation of oncogene YAP1 is a germline risk allele for lung adenocarcinoma with medical actionability. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(20):2303–10. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.59.3590.
Raj N, Bam R. Reciprocal crosstalk between YAP1/Hippo pathway and the p53 family proteins: mechanisms and outcomes in cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:159.
Song S, Rosen KM, Corfas G. Biological function of nuclear receptor tyrosine kinase action. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5(7):a009001.
Du Z, Lovly CM. Mechanisms of receptor tyrosine kinase activation in cancer. Mol Cancer. 2018;17(1):58.
Owen GR, Achilonu I, Dirr HW. High yield purification of JNK1β1 and activation by in vitro reconstitution of the MEKK1→MKK4→JNK MAPK phosphorylation cascade. Protein Expr Purif. 2013;87(2):87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2012.10.010.
Hou B, Feng L. Role of JNK signaling pathway-mediated apoptosis in diseases. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi. 2011;19(17):1819–25.
Graham TA, Sottoriva A. Measuring cancer evolution from the genome. J Pathol. 2017;241(2):183–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4821.
Darwiche N. Epigenetic mechanisms and the hallmarks of cancer: an intimate affair. Am J Cancer Res. 2020;10(7):1954–78.
McIntosh JR. Mitosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016;8(9):a023218.
Mitchison TJ, Salmon ED. Mitosis: a history of division. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(1):E17-21. https://doi.org/10.1038/35050656.
Mi Y, Yu M, Zhang L, Sun C, Wei B, Ding W, et al. COPB2 Is upregulated in prostate cancer and regulates PC-3 cell proliferation, cell cycle, and apoptosis. Arch Med Res. 2016;47(6):411–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2016.09.005.
Li ZS, Liu CH, Liu Z, Zhu CL, Huang Q. Downregulation of COPB2 by RNAi inhibits growth of human cholangiocellular carcinoma cells. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22(4):985–92. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_201802_14380.
Bhandari A, Zheng C, Sindan N, Sindan N, Quan R, Xia E, et al. COPB2 is up-regulated in breast cancer and plays a vital role in the metastasis via N-cadherin and Vimentin. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23(8):5235–45. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.918382.
Balatti V, Pekarky Y, Croce CM. Role of microRNA in chronic lymphocytic leukemia onset and progression. J Hematol Oncol. 2015;8:12.
Javandoost E, Firoozi-Majd E, Rostamian H, Khakpoor-Koosheh M, Mirzaei HR. Role of microRNAs in chronic lymphocytic leukemia pathogenesis. Curr Med Chem. 2020;27(2):282–97. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867326666190911114842.
Mantovani F, Collavin L, Del Sal G. Mutant p53 as a guardian of the cancer cell. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26(2):199–212.
Stine ZE, Walton ZE, Altman BJ, Hsieh AL, Dang CV. MYC, metabolism, and cancer. Cancer Discov. 2015;5(10):1024–39.
Delbridge AR, Grabow S, Strasser A, Vaux DL. Thirty years of BCL-2: translating cell death discoveries into novel cancer therapies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16(2):99–109. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2015.17.
Yue X, Zhao Y, Xu Y, Zheng M, Feng Z, Hu W. Mutant p53 in cancer: accumulation, gain-of-function, and therapy. J Mol Biol. 2017;429(11):1595–606.
Duffy MJ, Synnott NC, Crown J. Mutant p53 as a target for cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer. 2017;83:258–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.023.
Hsieh AL, Walton ZE, Altman BJ, Stine ZE, Dang CV. MYC and metabolism on the path to cancer. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015;43:11–21.
Opferman JT. Attacking cancer’s Achilles heel: antagonism of anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members. FEBS J. 2016;283(14):2661–75.
Mi Y, Sun C, Wei B, Sun F, Guo Y, Hu Q, et al. Coatomer subunit beta 2 (COPB2), identified by label-free quantitative proteomics, regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis in human prostate carcinoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;495(1):473–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.11.040.
Trepat X, Chen Z, Jacobson K. Cell migration. Compr Physiol. 2012;2(4):2369–92.
Wei SC, Yang J. Forcing through tumor metastasis: the interplay between tissue rigidity and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26(2):111–20.
Roy D, Sheng GY, Herve S, Carvalho E, Mahanty A, Yuan S, et al. Interplay between cancer cell cycle and metabolism: challenges, targets and therapeutic opportunities. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;89:288–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.01.019.
Icard P, Fournel L, Wu Z, Alifano M, Lincet H. Interconnection between metabolism and cell cycle in cancer. Trends Biochem Sci. 2019;44(6):490–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2018.12.007.
Hartwell LH, Weinert TA. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science. 1989;246(4930):629–34. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2683079.
Kar S. Unraveling cell-cycle dynamics in cancer. Cell Syst. 2016;2(1):8–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2016.01.007.
Levy JMM, Towers CG, Thorburn A. Targeting autophagy in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17(9):528–42.
Yamamoto K, Venida A, Yano J, Biancur DE, Kakiuchi M, Gupta S, et al. Autophagy promotes immune evasion of pancreatic cancer by degrading MHC-I. Nature. 2020;581(7806):100–5.
Luo X, Donnelly CR, Gong W, Heath BR, Hao Y, Donnelly LA, et al. HPV16 drives cancer immune escape via NLRX1-mediated degradation of STING. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(4):1635–52.
Smith AG, Macleod KF. Autophagy, cancer stem cells and drug resistance. J Pathol. 2019;247(5):708–18.
Li YJ, Lei YH, Yao N, Wang CR, Hu N, Ye WC, et al. Autophagy and multidrug resistance in cancer. Chin J Cancer. 2017;36(1):52.
Tsai FJ, Lee YC, Chang JS, Huang LM, Huang FY, Chiu NC, et al. Identification of novel susceptibility Loci for kawasaki disease in a Han chinese population by a genome-wide association study. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(2):e16853. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058725.
Bertini V, Valetto A, Baldinotti F, Azzarà A, Cambi F, Toschi B, et al. Blepharophimosis, ptosis, epicanthus inversus syndrome: new report with a 197-kb deletion upstream of FOXL2 and review of the literature. Mol Syndromol. 2019;10(3):147–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.05.011.
DiStasio A, Driver A, Sund K, Donlin M, Muraleedharan RM, Pooya S, et al. Copb2 is essential for embryogenesis and hypomorphic mutations cause human microcephaly. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(24):4836–48.
Hossein-nezhad A, Spira A, Holick MF. Influence of vitamin D status and vitamin D3 supplementation on genome wide expression of white blood cells: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3):e58725.
Raphemot R, Toro-Moreno M, Lu KY, Posfai D, Derbyshire ER. Discovery of Druggable Host Factors Critical to Plasmodium Liver-Stage Infection. Cell Chem Biol. 2019;26(9):1253–62.
Herrero-Turrión MJ, Rodríguez-Martín I, López-Bellido R, Rodríguez RE. Whole-genome expression profile in zebrafish embryos after chronic exposure to morphine: identification of new genes associated with neuronal function and mu opioid receptor expression. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:874.
Kwon DH, Park JH, Ashok PA, Lee U, Lee SH. Screening of target genes for RNAi in Tetranychus urticae and RNAi toxicity enhancement by chimeric genes. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2016;130:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2015.11.005.
Isoe J, Collins J, Badgandi H, Day WA, Miesfeld RL. Defects in coatomer protein I (COPI) transport cause blood feeding-induced mortality in Yellow Fever mosquitoes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(24):E211–7.
Tröße C, Nilsen F, Dalvin S. RNA interference mediated knockdown of the KDEL receptor and COPB2 inhibits digestion and reproduction in the parasitic copepod Lepeophtheirus salmonis. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;170:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2013.12.006.
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation (Number: 81802576, 81902565, 81372316), Jiangsu Provincial Central Administration Bureau (Number: YB201827), Wuxi Commission of Health and Family Planning (Number: T202024, J202012, Z202011, ZM001, J201802, J201810), The Science and Technology Development Fund of Wuxi (Number: WX18IIAN024, N20202021), Jiangnan University Wuxi School of Medicine (No. 1286010242190070), Wuxi Taihu Lake Talent Plan, Supports for Leading Talents in Medical and Health Profession, and Top Talent Support Program for Young and Middle-aged People of Wuxi Health Committee (Number: BJ2020061).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YYF, XL, LFZ, and HYW were major contributors in writing the manuscript. JJW and MLZ created all the figures. HYP performed the literature search. LJZ and YYM made substantial contributions to the design of the manuscript and revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.
Informed consent
Informed consent is not required for this type of study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, Y., Lei, X., Zhang, L. et al. COPB2: a transport protein with multifaceted roles in cancer development and progression. Clin Transl Oncol 23, 2195–2205 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-021-02630-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-021-02630-9