Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of enhanced recovery program for patients undergoing partial laparoscopic hepatectomy of liver cancer

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To analyze the results after the introduction of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, a randomized study was performed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy under ERAS or traditional care.

Methods

Patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy from April 2014 to October 2014 were included and randomly divided into Control group (CG) and ERAS. Primary outcome was quality of life (QoL) and length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary endpoints were percentage readmission, mortality, duration to first flatus, complications, hospital costs, conversions and blood loss.

Results

Thirteen patients withdrew after randomization. Eighty-six patients completed the study, 48 ERAS and 38 CG. Postoperative LOS was significantly reduced in ERAS [6 (4–8) versus 10 (7–15) days, P = 0.04]. First flatus occurred earlier in ERAS than CG [2(1–4) versus 3(2–5) days, P = 0.02]. The average perioperative charges were 9470 ± 1540 in CG and only 7742 ± 1200 in ERAS (P = 0.03), with no differences in readmission rate, blood loss, conversions to open surgery, mortality or surgical complications. The median AUC (area under a curve) of QoL was considerably improved in ERAS (P = 0.04).

Conclusions

This study suggests that ERAS is feasible and safe for laparoscopic hepatectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(5):606–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fayezizadeh M, Petro CC, Rosen MJ, Novitsky YW. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for abdominal wall reconstruction: pilot study and preliminary outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(4 Suppl 2):151S–9S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lyon A, Payne CJ, Mackay GJ. Enhanced recovery programme in colorectal surgery: does one size fit all? World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(40):5661–3.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aarts MA, Okrainec A, Glicksman A, Pearsall E, Victor JC, McLeod RS. Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length of hospital stay. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(2):442–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim JW, Kim WS, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Safety and efficacy of fast-track surgery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg. 2012;36(12):2879–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang G, Jiang ZW, Xu J, Gong JF, Bao Y, Xie LF, et al. Fast-track rehabilitation program vs conventional care after colorectal resection: a randomized clinical trial. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(5):671–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang D, He W, Zhang S, Chen H, Zhang C, He Y. Fast-track surgery improves postoperative clinical recovery and immunity after elective surgery for colorectal carcinoma: randomized controlled clinical trial. World J Surg. 2012;36(8):1874–80.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cuesta MA, Meijer S, Paul MA, de Brauw LM. Limited laparoscopic liver resection of benign tumors guided by laparoscopic ultrasonography: report of two cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1995;5(5):396–401.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shibata J, Ishihara S, Nishikawa T, Tanaka T, Tanaka J, Kiyomatsu T, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2014;111(11):2105–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Gulik T. Open versus laparoscopic resection for liver tumours. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11(6):465–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rockall TA, Demartines N. Laparoscopy in the era of enhanced recovery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;28(1):133–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abu Hilal M, Pearce NW. Laparoscopic left lateral liver sectionectomy: a safe, efficient, reproducible technique. Dig Surg. 2008;25(4):305–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Dam RM, Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Breukelen GJ, Stoot JH, van der Vorst JR, Bemelmans MH, et al. Open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery ERAS(R) programme (ORANGE II-trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2012;13:54.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dagher I, O’Rourke N, Geller DA, Cherqui D, Belli G, Gamblin TC, et al. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):856–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin DX, Li X, Ye QW, Lin F, Li LL, Zhang QY. Implementation of a fast-track clinical pathway decreases postoperative length of stay and hospital charges for liver resection. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2011;61(2):413–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. MacKay G, O’Dwyer PJ. Early discharge following liver resection for colorectal metastases. Scott Med J. 2008;53(2):22–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanchez-Perez B, Aranda-Narvaez JM, Suarez-Munoz MA, Eladel-Delfresno M, Fernandez-Aguilar JL, Perez-Daga JA, et al. Fast-track program in laparoscopic liver surgery: theory or fact? World J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;4(11):246–50.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schultz NA, Larsen PN, Klarskov B, Plum LM, Frederiksen HJ, Christensen BM, et al. Evaluation of a fast-track programme for patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg. 2013;100(1):138–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones C, Kelliher L, Dickinson M, Riga A, Worthington T, Scott MJ, et al. Randomized clinical trial on enhanced recovery versus standard care following open liver resection. Br J Surg. 2013;100(8):1015–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Langenhoff BS, Krabbe PF, Peerenboom L, Wobbes T, Ruers TJ. Quality of life after surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2006;93(8):1007–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shao Y, Zou LL, Zhou QH, Zhong DS, Guo FJ, Ma L. Fast-track surgery for gastroenteric neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Tumori. 2014;100(5):197e–203e.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):825–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection 2804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):831–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Philp S, Carter J, Pather S, Barnett C, D’Abrew N, White K. Patients’ satisfaction with fast-track surgery in gynaecological oncology. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2014. doi:10.1111/ecc.12254.

  25. Khan S, Gatt M, MacFie J. Enhanced recovery programmes and colorectal surgery: does the laparoscope confer additional advantages? Colorectal Dis. 2009;11(9):902–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Holte K, Sharrock NE, Kehlet H. Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89(4):622–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Nygren J, et al. Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg. 2011;146(5):571–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wakeling HG, McFall MR, Jenkins CS, Woods WG, Miles WF, Barclay GR, et al. Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(5):634–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Koea JB, Young Y, Gunn K. Fast track liver resection: the effect of a comprehensive care package and analgesia with single dose intrathecal morphine with gabapentin or continuous epidural analgesia. HPB Surg. 2009;2009:271986.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bagry HS, Raghavendran S, Carli F. Metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance: perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(3):506–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Soop M, Carlson GL, Hopkinson J, Clarke S, Thorell A, Nygren J, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the effects of immediate enteral nutrition on metabolic responses to major colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery protocol. Br J Surg. 2004;91(9):1138–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stevens MF, de Nes L, Hollmann MW. Randomized clinical trial of epidural, spinal or patient-controlled analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery (Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1068–1078). Br J Surg. 2011;98(12):1805 author reply 6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, Rhodes A, Grounds RM, Bennett ED. Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]. Crit Care. 2005;9(6):R687–93.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rahbari NN, Zimmermann JB, Schmidt T, Koch M, Weigand MA, Weitz J. Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2009;96(4):331–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Itou K, Fukuyama T, Sasabuchi Y, Yasuda H, Suzuki N, Hinenoya H, et al. Safety and efficacy of oral rehydration therapy until 2 h before surgery: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Anesth. 2012;26(1):20–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Camera L, Calabrese M, Sarnelli G, Longobardi M, Rocco A, Cuomo R, et al. Pseudopneumoperitoneum in chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction: a case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(24):2972–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Alkari B, Owera A, Ammori BJ. Laparoscopic liver resection: preliminary results from a UK centre. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(10):2201–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Khan S, Wilson T, Ahmed J, Owais A, MacFie J. Quality of life and patient satisfaction with enhanced recovery protocols. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(12):1175–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;2:CD007635.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the patients who agreed to participate in the study and the surgeons, anesthetists, statistician and nurses who helped to implement the protocol.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, F., Lin, X., Xie, F. et al. The effect of enhanced recovery program for patients undergoing partial laparoscopic hepatectomy of liver cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 17, 694–701 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-015-1296-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-015-1296-9

Keywords

Navigation