Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of cutting parameters on cutting forces and surface roughness in dry turning of Al using PCD and different coated tools

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aluminium (Al) is the suitable material for aerospace and automotive industries due its light weight, corrosion resistance, weldability, non-magnetic and mechanical properties. But, machining of Al and its alloy and finding the suitable tool is really a big challenge because of its formation of BUE (Built-up Edge) and BUL (Built-up Layer). This paper presents the influence of cutting parameters (speed, feed and depth of cut) and its effect on the cutting force and the surface finish. Five different advanced cutting tool inserts (SPUN WC, SPGN WC, PCD, WC + TiN and WC + Ti(C, N) TiN + Al2O3) at different cutting speed (Vc) ranging between 300 m/min and 700 m/min and feed rate (f) of 0.045, 0.06, 0.09 and 0.125 mm/rev at a depth of cut of 0.2 mm (constant throughout the experiment) were taken for the experiment. Tool inserts were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. The cutting forces were measured using Kistler force dynamometer. Amongst all tools, PCD provided a better result in all aspects but surprisingly WC tool provided a better surface finish with lesser tool wear. For all cutting conditions, high speed (670 m/min) and low feed rate (0.045 mm/rev) were recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roy P, Sarangi S K, Ghosh A and Chattopadhyay A K 2009 Machinability study of pure aluminium and Al-12% Si alloy against uncoated and coated carbide inserts. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 27: 535–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zedan Y and Alkahtani S 2013 Influence of the microstructure on the machinability of heat-treated Al–10.8% Si cast alloys: role of copper-rich intermetallic. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 213: 167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stephenson D A and Agapiou J S 2006 Metal cutting theory and practice, Second Edition. Florida: CRC Press 17–20: 371–416, 459–478, 551–697

  4. Oliaei S N B and Karpat Y 2017 Investigating the influence of friction conditions on finite element simulation of microscale machining with the presence of a built-up edge. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 90: 819–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fang N, Srinivasa P and Mosquea S 2010 The effect of built-up edge on the cutting vibrations in machining 2024-T351 aluminum alloy. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 49: 63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanchez J M, Rubio E, Alvarez M, Sebastian M A and Marcos M 2005 Microstructural characterisation of material adhered over cutting tool in the dry machining of aerospace aluminium alloys. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 164–165: 911–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mário C S, Alisson R M, Wisley F S, Marcos A S B and Emmanuel O E 2016 Machining of aluminum alloys, a review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 86: 3067–3080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Senthil P, Selvaraj T and Sivaprasad K 2013 Influence of turning parameters on the machinability of homogenized Al–Cu/TiB2 in situ metal matrix composites. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 67: 1589–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tash M, Samuel F H, Mucciardi Doty H W and Valtierra S 2006 Effect of metallurgical parameters on the machinability of heat-treated 356 and 319 aluminium alloys. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 434: 207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liang Q, Vohra Y K and Thompson R 2008 High speed continuous and interrupted dry turning of A390 aluminium/silicon alloy using nanostructured diamond coated WC-6 wt. % Cobalt tool inserts by MPCVD. Diam. Relat. Mater. 17: 2041–2047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalyan C and Samuel G L 2015 Cutting mode analysis in high speed finish turning of AlMgSi alloy using edge chamfered PCD tools. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 216: 146–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gangopadhyay S, Acharya R, Chattopadhyay A K and Sargade V G 2010 Effect of cutting speed and surface chemistry of cutting tools on the formation of BUL or BUE and surface quality of generated surface in dry turning of AA6005 aluminium alloy. Mach. Sci. Technol. 14: 208–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. List G, Nouari M, Géhin D, Gomez S, Manaud J P, Petitcorps Y L and Girot F 2005 Wear behaviour of cemented carbide tools in dry machining of aluminium alloy. Wear 259: 1177–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim C Y H, Lau P P T and Lin S C 2001 The effect of work material on tool wear. Wear 250: 344–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Davim J P 2002 Diamond tool performance in machining metal-matrix composites. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 128: 100–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Suresh R, Baravarajappa S, Gaitonde V N and Samuel G L 2012 Machinability investigation on hardened steel AISI 4340 steel using coated carbide inserts. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 33: 75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Astakhov V P and Xiao X 2008 A methodology for practical cutting force evaluation based on the energy spent in the cutting system. Mach. Sci. Technol. 12: 325–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Giasin K, Hodzic A and Phadnis V and Ayvar-Soberanis S 2016 Assessment of cutting forces and hole quality in drilling Al2024 aluminium alloy: experimental and finite element study. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 87: 2041–2061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Basavakumar K G, Mukunda P G and Chakraborty M 2007 Influence of melt treatments and polished CVD diamond coated insert on cutting force and surface integrity in turning of Al–7Si and Al–7Si–2.5Cu cast alloys. Bull. Mater. Sci. 30: 427–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Manna A and Bhattacharaya B 2005 Influence of machining parameters on the machinability of particulate reinforced Al/SiC–MMC. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 25: 850–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Agustina B D, Bernal C, Camacho A M and Rubio E M 2013 Experimental analysis of the cutting forces obtained in dry turning processes of UNS A97075 aluminium alloys. Procedia Eng. 63: 694–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Davim J P, Maranhao C, Jackson M J, Cabral G and Grácio J 2008 FEM analysis in high speed machining of aluminium alloy (Al7075-0) using polycrystalline diamond (PCD) and cemented carbide (K10) cutting tools. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 39: 1093–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pattnaik S K, Bhoi N K, Padhi S and Sarangi S K 2018 Dry machining of aluminum for proper selection of cutting tool: tool performance and tool wear. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 98:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cakır A, Yagmur S, Kavak N, Kucukturk G and Seker U 2016 The effect of minimum quantity lubrication under different parameters in the turning of AA7075 and AA2024 aluminium alloys. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 84: 2515–2521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Feng S and Hattori M 2000 Cost and process information modelling for dry machining. In: International Workshop for Environment Conscious Manufacturing, pp. 1–8

  26. Chattopadhyay A K, Roy P and Sarangi S K 2009 Study of wettability test of pure aluminium against uncoated and coated carbide inserts. Surf. Coat. Technol. 204: 410–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar R, Minz J K, Sahu D P and Bishoyi S S 2018 Comparative study of measured cutting force and surface roughness for machining of pure aluminium using uncoated and coated carbide inserts. Int. J. Adv. Mech. Eng. 8: 181–190

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tounsi N and Otho A 2000 Dynamic cutting force measuring. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 40: 1157–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Totis G and Sortino M 2011 Development of a modular dynamometer for triaxial cutting force measurement in turning. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 51: 34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lei X, Shen B and Sun F 2015 Optimization of diamond coated micro drills in aluminium alloy 7075 machining: a case study. Diam. Relat. Mater.. 54: 79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Su Y, Li Z, Li L, Wang J, Gao H and Wang G 2017 Cutting performance of micro-textured polycrystalline diamond tool in dry cutting. J. Manuf. Process. 27: 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yuan Z J, Zhou M and Dong S 1996 Effect of diamond tool sharpness on minimum cutting thickness and cutting surface integrity in ultraprecision machining. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 62: 327–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pan W, Ding S and Mo J 2014 Thermal characteristics in milling Ti6Al4V with polycrystalline diamond tools. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 75: 1077–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gomez-Parra A, Alvarez-Alco M, Silguero J and Batista M, Marcos M 2013 Analysis of the evolution of the Built-Up Edge and Built-Up Layer formation mechanisms in the dry turning of aeronautical aluminum alloys. Wear 302: 1209–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chattopadhyay A B, FNA (E) 2011 Machining and Machine Tools. Wiley - India Publication

  36. Chattopadhyay A K, Roy P, Ghosh A and Sarangi S K 2009 Wettability and machinability study of pure aluminium towards uncoated and coated carbide cutting tool inserts. Surf. Coat. Technol. 203: 941–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chakravarthy G V, Chandran M, Bhattacharya S S, Rao M S R and Kamaraj M 2012 A comparative study on wear behaviour of TiN and diamond coated WC-Co substrates against hypereutectic Al-Si alloys. Appl. Surf. Sci. 261: 520–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xiao X, Lev L C and Lukitsch M J 2009 Material transfer during machining of aluminum alloys with polycrystalline diamond cutting tools. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209: 5760–5765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang B and Liu Z 2016 Investigations on deformation and fracture behaviour of workpiece material during high speed machining of 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 14: 43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India (CSIR-22/(0628)/13/EMR-II). The authors would like to thank all the laboratory staff of VSSUT, Burla for their kind support to carry out this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S K Sarangi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, R., Pattnaik, S.K., Minz, J.K. et al. Influence of cutting parameters on cutting forces and surface roughness in dry turning of Al using PCD and different coated tools. Sādhanā 44, 186 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-019-1155-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-019-1155-4

Keywords

Navigation