Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating the influence of friction conditions on finite element simulation of microscale machining with the presence of built-up edge

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In micromachining, the uncut chip thickness is less than the cutting tool edge radius, which results in a large negative effective rake angle. Depending on the material properties, this large negative rake angle promotes built-up edge (BUE) formation. A stable BUE acts like a cutting edge and affects the mechanics of the process. The size of the BUE increases with increasing uncut chip thickness and cutting speed. It also creates a positive rake angle, but it decreases the clearance angle of the tool. A method of including BUE formation in finite element simulations is to use sticking friction conditions at the tip of the tool. However, this approach is shown to be insufficient to simulate BUE formation in microscale machining. Therefore, the cutting edge is modified with the experimental BUE size in the finite element simulations based on experimental measurements. The influence of friction models between BUE and the work material has been investigated, and the study identifies friction coefficients that yield good agreements with experimental results. The finite element model is shown to be capable of simulating process forces and chip shapes for uncut chip thickness values larger than minimum uncut chip thickness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nano and micromachining, J. Paulo Davim (Editor), Mark J. Jackson (Editor) ISBN: 978–1–84821-103-2, December 2008, Wiley-ISTE

  2. Câmara MA, Campos Rubio JC, Abrão AM, Davim JP (2012) State of the art on micromilling of materials, a review. Journal of Materials Science & Technology 28(8):673–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cardoso P, Davim JP (2012) A brief review on micromachining of materials. RevAdv Mater Sci 30:98–102

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lucca DA, Seo YW (1993) Effect of tool edge geometry on energy dissipation in ultraprecision machining. Ann CIRP 42(1):83–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lamikiz A, López de Lacalle LN, Sanchez JA, Bravo U (2005) Calculation of the specific cutting coefficients and geometrical aspects in sculptured surface machining. Mach Sci Technol 9(3):411–436. doi:10.1080/15321790500226614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Uriarte L, Azcárate S, Herrero A, Lopez de Lacalle LN, Lamikiz A (2008) Mechanistic modelling of the micro end milling operation. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 222:23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang X, Ehmann KF, Yu T, Wang W (2016) Cutting forces in micro-end-milling processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 107:21–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Srinivasa YV, Shunmugam MS (2013) Mechanistic model for prediction of cutting forces in micro end-milling and experimental comparison. International Journal of Machine Tools Manufacture 67:18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Malekian M, Park SS, Jun MBG (2009) Modeling of dynamic micro-milling cutting forces. International Journal of Machine Tools Manufacture 49:586–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gonzalo O, Jauregi H, Uriarte LG, López de Lacalle LN (2009) Prediction of specific force coefficients from a FEM cutting model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:348. doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1717-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Afazov SM, Ratchev SM, Segal J (2010) Modelling and simulation of micro-milling cutting forces. J Mater Process Technol 210:2154–2162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jin X, Altintas Y (2012) Prediction of micro-milling forces with finite element method. J Mater Process Technol 212:542–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lazoglu I, Mamedov A (2016) Deformation of thin parts in micromilling. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 65:117–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hartung PD, Kramer BM (1982) Tool wear in titanium machining. Annals of CIRP 32:75–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kümmel J, Gibmeier J, Müller E, Schneider R, Schulze V, Wanner A (2014) Detailed analysis of microstructure of intentionally formed built-up edges for improving wear behaviour in dry metal cutting process of steel. Wear 311:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kümmel J, Braun D, Gibmeier J, Schneider J, Greiner C, Schulze V, Wanner A (2015) Study on micro texturing of uncoated cemented carbide cutting tools for wear improvement and built-up edge stabilisation. J Mater Process Technol 215:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oliaei SNB, Karpat Y (2016) Investigating the influence of built-up edge on forces and surface roughness in micro scale orthogonal machining of titanium alloyTi6Al4V. J Mater Process Technol 235:28–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gomez-Parra A, Alvarez-Alcon M, Salguero J, Batista M, Marcos M (2013) Analysis of the evolution of the built-up edge and built-up layer formation mechanisms in the dry turning of aeronautical aluminium alloys. Wear 302:1209–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Desaigues JE, Lescalier C, Bomont-Arzur A, Dudzinski D, Bomont O (2016) Experimental study of built-up layer formation during machining of high strength free-cutting steel. J Mater Process Technol 236:204–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Waldorf DJ, DeVor RE, Kapoor SG (1999) An evaluation of ploughing models for orthogonal machining. J Manuf Sci Eng 121:550–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fang N, Dewhurst P (2005) Slip-line modeling of built-up edge formation in machining. Int J Mech Sci 47:1079–1098

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Karpat Y (2009) Investigation of the effect of cutting tool edge radius on material separation due to ductile fracture in machining. Int J Mech Sci 51(7):541–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim J, Marinov VR, Kim D (1997) Built up edge analysis of orthogonal cutting by the visco plastic finite element method. J Mater Process Technol 71:367–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Childs THC (2013) Ductile shear failure damage modelling and predicting built-up edge in steel machining. J Mater Process Technol 213:1954–1969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Atlati S, Haddag B, Nouari M, Moufki A (2015) Effect of the local friction and contact nature on the built-up edge formation process in machining ductile metals. Tribol Int 90:217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Özel T (2006) The influence of friction models on finite element simulations of machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(5):518–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Arrazola PJ, Ugarte D, Domínguez X (2012) A new approach for the friction identification during machining through the use of finite element modeling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(2):173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Arrazola PJ, Özel T, Umbrello D, Davies M, Jawahir IS (2013) Recent advances in modelling of metal machining processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62:695–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Thepsonthi T, Özel T (2013) Experimental and finite element simulation based investigations on micro-milling Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy: effects of cBN coating on tool wear. J Mater Process Technol 213:532–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Thepsonthi T, Özel T (2015) 3-D finite element process simulation of micro-end milling Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy: experimental validations on chip flow and tool wear. J Mater Process Technol 221:128–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Calamaz M, Coupard D, Girot F (2008) A new material model for 2D numerical simulation of serrated chip formation when machining titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:275–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sima M, Özel T (2010) Modified material constitutive models for serrated chip formation simulations and experimental validation in machining of titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50:943–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu R, Melkote S, Pucha R, Morehouse J, Man X, Marusich T (2013) An enhanced constitutive material model for machining of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. J Mater Process Technol 213:2238–2246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang XP, Shivpuri R, Srivastava AK (2014) Role of phase transformation in chip segmentation during high speed machining of dual phase titanium alloys. J Mater Process Technol 214:3048–3066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Karpat Y (2011) Temperature dependent flow softening of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V: an investigation using finite element simulation of machining. J Mater Process Technol 211:737–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Budinski KG (1991) Tribological properties of titanium alloys. Wear 151:203–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang L, Tanaka H (1997) Towards a deeper understanding of wear and friction on the atomic scale: a molecular dynamics analysis. Wear 211:44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Venkatachalam S, Liang SY (2007) Effects of ploughing forces and friction coefficient in microscale machining. J Manuf Sci Eng 129:274–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiğit Karpat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oliaei, S.N.B., Karpat, Y. Investigating the influence of friction conditions on finite element simulation of microscale machining with the presence of built-up edge. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90, 819–829 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9456-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9456-9

Keywords

Navigation